Off the Pyramid Intensive Behavior Programming for K-8 Students.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Response to Intervention (RtI) & The IST Process
Advertisements

Consensus Building Infrastructure Developing Implementation Doing & Refining Guiding Principles of RtI Provide working knowledge & understanding of: -
The NDPC-SD Intervention Framework National Dropout Prevention Center for Students with Disabilities Clemson University © 2007 NDPC-SD – All rights reserved.
A Problem-Solving Approach to Student Success.  Review of RTI  Definitions  The Problem-Solving Approach  Role of the Three Tiered Intervention System.
JOHN LARSON DIRECTOR OF STUDENT SUPPORT SERVICES 10/7/2014 EXHIBITION HALL Student Support Services.
Edward S. Shapiro Director, Center for Promoting Research to Practice Lehigh University, Bethlehem, PA Planning for the Implementation of RTI: Lessons.
School-wide Positive Behavioral Interventions and Supports & Students with Autism Jointly developed by the above organizations with funding from the U.S.
Albany Unified School District Strategic Plan Board Study Session June 21, 2011.
Optional PBIS Coaches Meeting November 15, 2010 Tier 2 and Tier 3 Interventions and Supports.
Response to Intervention (RtI) Aldine ISD District Staff Development October 9, 2009.
Self Assessment and Implementation Tool for Multi- Tiered Systems of Support (RtI)
Hudson RTI Response to Intervention. Understanding the Process This presentation is a general guide to understanding the RTI process.
1 Visions of Community 2011 March 12, 2011 The Massachusetts Tiered System of Support Madeline Levine - Shawn Connelly.
The general structure of the facilitation notes will be:
As Services and Not a Place Quality IEPs + Tiered Interventions and Supports.
RTI Response to Intervention. What are RTI systems? Definition (NCRTI, 2010) RTI programs integrate assessment systems and student interventions Are multi-tiered.
Power Pack Click to begin. Click to advance Congratulations! The RtI process has just become much easier. This team member notebook contains all the information.
2011 Phase 3 ILCD Review. Cody-Kilgore Unified Schools C – Committed K – Knowledgeable U – Unified S - Successful.
Maine’s Response to Intervention Implementation: Moving Forward Presented by: Barbara Moody Title II Coordinator Maine Department of Education.
Response to Intervention
V 2.1 Tier II Critical Features Building the Infrastructure to Support Tier 2.
Building A Tier Two System In An Elementary School: Lessons Learned Tina Windett & Julie Arment Columbia Public Schools, Missouri Tim Lewis & Linda Bradley.
RtI in Georgia: Student Achievement Pyramid of Intervention
REDIRECTION PROGRAM Portland Public Schools. MISSION STATEMENT At Redirection, we strive to: Utilize ISD to support all students Utilize ISD to support.
New Eligibility Requirements for Special Education Karen Johnson Leigh Ann Roderick August 1, 2012.
Response to Instruction Training Wednesday, October 30, 2013.
1 The Special Education Assessment and IEP Process EDPOWER Teacher Institute 2013.
Response to Intervention (RtI) & The IST Process Jennifer Maichin Patricia Molloy Special Education Teacher Principal IST Chairperson Meadow Drive Elementary.
Response to Intervention (RtI) Secondary Model for Intervention.
The Role of the Teacher. Basically, the state believes that teachers, along with the school district, are responsible for students that fail. If a student.
Preparing for Advanced Tiers using CICO Calvert County Returning Team Summer Institute Cathy Shwaery, PBIS Maryland Overview.
Formative Assessments and the Challenges of a Small District McKenzie School District Sally Storm Lane Tompkins Kevin Moore.
Brief Overview of Response to Intervention within Glenbrook South Andy Piper & Lindsay Schrand NSSED Problem-Solving Coaches.
Introduction to School-wide Positive Behavior Support.
CHAPTER 4: MEETING THE NEEDS OF ALL STUDENTS Response to Intervention by Nathan Bryant, Samantha Hayden, James Hayden, and Eric Williams EDU 310 – Teaching.
Sustaining Change: RtI & SWPBS George Sugai OSEP Center on PBIS Center for Behavioral Education and Research University of Connecticut May 9,
Response To Intervention “Collaborative Data Driven Instruction at Lewis & Clark Elementary” Owen Stockdill.
Severe Discrepancy vs. Response to Intervention. Severe Discrepancy Model of Eligibility Determination (1974 – present) This method is used for students.
Using the Pyramid of Intervention for Special Education Referrals.
Winter  The RTI.2 framework integrates Common Core State Standards, assessment, early intervention, and accountability for at-risk students in.
EDF 593: Tier 3 RTI Instruction Rachel Brown-Chidsey, Ph.D
Chapter 7 Children with Attention Deficit/Hyperactive Disorders (ADHD) © Cengage Learning. All rights reserved.
Positive Attitude with Supports (PAWS) Program. Staff Travis Hounshell-3-5 PAWS teacher Alisa Pitman-K-2 PAWS teacher Aida Williams-Behavior Specialist.
Clayton R. Cook Diana Browning Wright. Purposes of Assessment Screening Who needs help? Diagnosis Why is the problem occurring? Progress Monitoring Is.
RTI Response to Intervention Connecting the Pieces.
Response to Invention (RTI) A Practical Approach 2016 Mid-Level Conference.
School-Based Problem-Solving for Individuals (SBIT)
The Facts About Failing To Intervene… highly likely to continue Students who are poor readers early on are highly likely to continue to be poor readers.
The Continuum of Interventions in a 3 Tier Model Oakland Schools 3 Tier Literacy Leadership Team Training November
Incrementally Improving Implementation of Tier 1 Diana Browning Wright, MS, LEP.
Moving from Reactive to Proactive:
Identifying and Serving Students with Behavior Problems
RSU #38 Response to Intervention
Summer Leadership August 7-9, 2017
Behavioral Health: Social, Emotional, & Academic Learning Program
The Continuum of Interventions in a 3 Tier Model
Tiered Instruction and Interventions
Week 3 The IEP Process.
Identifying and Serving Students with Behavior Problems
The ABCs of Student Support Services
Response to Instruction and Intervention
Data-Based Decision Making
RESPONSE TO INTERVENTION
Response to Intervention Implementation
Tiered Instruction and Interventions
Mexico High School –RTI Plan
SWPB Action Planning for District Leadership
Liberty Elementary staff training
Intensive Intervention – Tier 3
Special Education Review
Presentation transcript:

Off the Pyramid Intensive Behavior Programming for K-8 Students

SELF S tudents E ngaged in L earning for their F uture

Based on the works by Diana Browning Wright and Dr. Clayton Cook

Rationale ● FAPE

Rationale ● FAPE ● Continuum of Services

Rationale ● FAPE ● Continuum of Services ● Wanted to Decrease o Dropout o Unemployment o Substance Abuse o Adult Mental Health Problems o Involvement in the Legal System

Goals of SELF Program 1.Reintegrate to Gen Ed 2.Improve Social, Behavior, Academics 3.Improve General Ed Environment 4.Increase Staff Satisfaction 5.Low Class Ratio - Strive for 3:1

Why a Regional Program? **Proven model--SUCCESS and TYKE **Allows small schools access to specialized services **ESU fiscal agent and hires staff

Original RTI Pyramid ACADEMIC RTIBEHAVIORAL RTI Overview of Academic Interventions and Supports TIER % Whole Classroom Universal Screening Quality core instruction provided to ALL students TIER 2 TIER 3 Diagnostic Assessment Targeted interventions to small groups Progress Monitoring Diagnostic Assessment Intensive 1:1 Tutoring Progress Monitoring 10-15% 5-10%

Tier 1 Support Core Services for ALL students Preventative Proactive

Tier 2 Interventions Targeted GROUP Interventions Moderate intensity Short term

Tier 3 Programming Intensive INDIVIDUAL Interventions High intensity Long duration

Off the Pyramid Pyramid ACADEMIC RTIBEHAVIORAL RTI Overview of Academic Interventions and Supports TIER 1 Intensified Supports for ALL Students TIER 2 TIER 3 Intensified Supports for SOME Students Intensified Supports for FEW Students

Key RTI in Restrictive Settings Concepts ●Relationships - Establish, Maintain, Restore ●Physiology to Learn and Behave Well ●Positive Behavior Supports ●Specially Designed Curriculum ●Proactive Classroom Management ●Good Behavior Game ●Points and Levels System ●Progressive Method of Responding to Problem Behavior

Key RTI in Restrictive Settings Concepts ●Effective Academic Instruction ●Honors Time/Outings & Reflective Time/Boring Room ●Thinking Functionally About Behavior ●Relentless Parent Outreach ●Daily De-Briefs/Communication ●Self-Governance Meetings

Handbook ESU 6 document Based on “RTI in Restrictive Settings” Sign up for document to be ed

Entrance Criteria a. Entrance Criteria #1 i.Evidence that prior attempts of evidence based interventions have been attempted with fidelity in a less restrictive environment, and these attempts have occurred over a period of time (4-6 weeks for first level attempt and 4-6 weeks for second level attempt). 1. Examples of behavioral interventions for Tier II: a. behavioral contract b. school-home note system c. self-monitoring protocol d. mentor based program/check in check out e. point sheet to keep track of students behaviors f. use of honors room/reward system

Entrance Criteria a. Entry Criteria #1 1. Examples of behavioral interventions for Tier III: a.formalized behavior support plan based on a functional behavior assessment b.progress monitoring data c.intervention fidelity data d.student receives social skills instruction i. Override to entry criteria #1-- determined by the leadership team ii.If a student engages in serious, violent behavior that endangers the less restrictive environment, or significant mental health needs that suggest a more restrictive environment would be the least restrictive environment placement

Entrance Criteria b. Entry Criteria #2 i. Data collected by a school psychologist via a standardized behavior rating scale (BASC, Social Skills Improvement System) ii. The student’s T score should be one standard deviation below the mean c. Entry Criteria #3 i. Unanimous Team Confirmation the Leadership team followed by the IEP Team

Intensive Tier 1 ● Proactive Classroom Management ● Integrated Academic and Behavior Supports ● Good Behavior Game ● Token Economy with Points and Levels ● Honors/Boring Room ● Social Skills, Social Emotional, Stress Reduction ● School/Home Communication ● Time Away/Crisis Management

Intensive Tier 2 ● Behavior Contract ● Check In/Check Out Mentor Based Support ● Self Monitoring ● Daily School-Home Note System ● Small Group Social Skills Training

Intensive Tier 3 ● Individual Cognitive Behavior Therapy ● Functional Behavior Assessment and Behavior Intervention Plan

Beyond Tier 3 Diana Browning Wright: Not everyone can be served in Tiers model (Boys Town, BEST, Epworth, Etc.)

Data Collection Review Pearson Data Collection Newsletter-- Valuable!

Levels of Program ● Daily (17/20 - last 5 days in a row) ● Weekly (15 days in a row) ● Natural

Exit Criteria Each student will be enrolled in the SELF program for a minimum of 45 days Progress monitoring indicates that students are being successful at their current levels

Exit Criteria The student spends at least 90% of their day in the general classroom The SELF Classroom is no longer the student’s least restrictive environment A transition plan is developed for the student with input from local district and leadership team.

Program Costs and Funding Annual Per Pupil Costs: $18, $20,024 Reimbursed through NDE SPED financials

Results *Student 1 B *Student 2 Br *Student 3 - H *Student 4 - M

Student 1 - 6th - Rule 18 - Daily Tier I

Student 2 - 6th - Non-Comp - Natural

Student 3 - Primary - Autism - Weekly

Student 4 - Out of District - Natural

Questions?

Contact Information Nancy Meyer, Director of Student Services ESU 6 Beth Ericson, District Administrator York Public