Introduction to the Road to Quality Process using the Missouri Afterschool Program Self- Assessment.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
SCHOOL LEADERS: THE KEY TO SUCCESSFUL INDUCTION
Advertisements

Practice Profiles Guidance for West Virginia Schools and Districts April 2012.
(Individuals with Disabilities Education Improvement Act) and
The Core Competencies for Youth Development Professionals were developed with leadership from the OPEN Initiative, Missouri Afterschool Network (MASN),
Performance management guidance
Comprehensive Organizational Health AssessmentMay 2012Butler Institute for Families Comprehensive Organizational Health Assessment Presented by: Robin.
Preparing New A.P.S. Workers for the Field The Supervisor as Trainer.
School Based Assessment and Reporting Unit Curriculum Directorate Reporting.
Purpose of Evaluation  Make decisions concerning continuing employment, assignment and advancement  Improve services for students  Appraise the educator’s.
Educator Evaluation System Salem Public Schools. All DESE Evaluation Information and Forms are on the SPS Webpage Forms may be downloaded Hard copies.
Performance Management
700: Moving Through the Collaboration Continuum to Improve Permanency Outcomes Wednesday, March 20, 2013.
Early Childhood Professional Development in Indonesia— Steps Toward a System.
Presented at Annual Conference of the American Evaluation Association Anaheim, CA, November 2011 Lessons Learned about How to Support Outcomes Measurement.
Unit 8: Tests, Training, and Exercises Unit Introduction and Overview Unit objectives:  Define and explain the terms tests, training, and exercises. 
North Carolina Professional Teaching Standards Lee County Schools New Hire Training
1 Strengthening Child Welfare Supervision as a Key Practice Change Strategy Unit I: Helping Child Welfare Leaders Re-conceptualize Supervision.
Partnership between the NYCI, the Health Service Executive and the Department of Children and Youth Affairs National Youth Health Programme Kevin O’ Hagan.
Title I Needs Assessment/ Program Evaluation Title I Technical Assistance & Networking Session October 5, 2010.
Evaluation of Math-Science Partnership Projects (or how to find out if you’re really getting your money’s worth)
REGIONAL PEER REVIEW PANELS (PRP) August Peer Review Panel: Background  As a requirement of the ESEA waiver, ODE must establish a process to ensure.
Educator Effectiveness and The Common Core State Standards October 20, 2013 Bend Oregon.
9/2/20151 Ohio Family and Children First An overview of OFCF structure, membership, and responsibilities.
Student Learning Objectives The SLO Process Student Learning Objectives Training Series Module 3 of 3.
New England Regional Colloquium Series “Systems of State Support” B. Keith Speers January 24, 2007.
1. 2 Why is the Core important? To set high expectations –for all students –for educators To attend to the learning needs of students To break through.
TITLEIIA(3) IMPROVING TEACHER QUALITY COMPETITIVE GRANTS PROGRAM 1.
Unit 5:Elements of A Viable COOP Capability (cont.)  Define and explain the terms tests, training, and exercises (TT&E)  Explain the importance of a.
Updated Performance Management for Exempt Staff Fall 2009.
A Professional Development Model for Teachers in Child- Care Centers CEC National Conference April 2, 2009 Seattle, WA Madelyn James UIC PhD student in.
Food Safety Professional Development for Early Childhood Educators Evaluation Plan.
Healthy Schools Leadership Program Findings and Lessons Learned.
Assessing Program Quality with the Autism Program Environment Rating Scale.
+ sysSTEM Orientation AUGUST 23, 2013 Maryland Science Center.
Setting purposeful goals Douglas County Schools July 2011.
Standards, Assessment and Accountability: Administration of Environmental Rating Scales by EEC Regional Staff Board of Early Education and Care December.
National Consortium On Deaf-Blindness Families Technical Assistance Information Services and Dissemination Personnel Training State Projects.
Documents posted at QRIS 2011 Program Quality Improvement Grant RFP Bidder’s Conferences February & March 2011 Wendy Valentine Director,
Early Childhood Outcomes Center1 Using Data for Program Improvement Christina Kasprzak, NECTAC/ECO Ann Bailey, NCRRC July 2010.
1. Housekeeping Items June 8 th and 9 th put on calendar for 2 nd round of Iowa Core ***Shenandoah participants*** Module 6 training on March 24 th will.
Your Presenters Melissa Connelly, Director, Regional Training Academy Coordination Project, CalSWEC Sylvia Deporto, Deputy Director, Family & Children’s.
Introduction of the Curriculum for Prospective NHTI Faculty NHTI Coordinating Committee Association of College & University Housing Officers – International.
1 Support Provider Workshop # East Bay BTSA Induction Consortium.
1 Coordinated Program Review: School Staff Overview Sutton Public Schools Frequently Asked Questions: Faculty Information
Data Report July Collect and analyze RtI data Determine effectiveness of RtI in South Dakota in Guide.
Performance Management A briefing for new managers.
Early Childhood Transition Part C Indicator C-8 & Part B Indicator B-12 Analysis and Summary Report of All States’ Annual Performance Reports.
State Advisory Council Community Support Grant Summary Presentation for Policy Committee Meeting December 3, 2012.
Overview.  Accreditation is both a status and a process  Status:  Status: Accreditation provides public notification that standards of quality are.
Welcome to PD Forum FY 11. Professional Development Support Structure SchoolsDistrict Support Department PD Team (Administrator, PD Contact, & PD Team.
WestEd.org When It Comes to the Guidelines, We’re the Guide by the Side PITC Partners for Quality Advanced Training 2014.
Understanding Positive Behavior Support Closing the Gap Conference November 12, 2009 Pamela A. Clark, MSW.
Agent Performance Review. Goals of a Performance Review Provide opportunity for self-assessment Increase job satisfaction and understanding Recognize.
1 Community-Based Care Readiness Assessment and Peer Review Overview Department of Children and Families And Florida Mental Health Institute.
SAN FRANCISCO’S FAMILY AND CHILDREN’S SERVICES BUILDING A COMPETENCY BASED ORGANIZATION.
Goal Attainment Scales as a way to Measure Progress Amy Gaumer Erickson & Monica Ballay December 3, 2012.
Transition Improvement Plan (TIP) Introduction to the Predictor Rubric Transition Improvement.
District Implementation of PBIS C-1 Rob Horner Brian Megert University of Oregon Springfield School District.
A Professional Development Series from the CDC’s Division of Population Health School Health Branch Professional Development 101: The Basics – Part 1.
[Presentation location] [Presentation date] (Confirm ABT logo) Building Bridges and Bonds (B3): An introduction.
Improving Data, Improving Outcomes Conference Washington, DC Sept , 2013 Planful Changes: Using Self-Assessments to Improve Child and Family Outcome.
RTI/MTSS Self-Assessment. RTI Session Objectives -An increase in the understanding of the necessary components of RTI/MTSS -An awareness that each school.
Benchmarking Excellence in Restorative Conferencing
NC State Improvement Project
Phase I Strategies to Improve Social-Emotional Outcomes
Overview of MAAP Accreditation
An Overview of the Minnesota Afterschool Accreditation Program (MAAP)
Recommendation: ASD Licensed Specialist
Oh, the Places You’ll Go! Learning Session 1.
Presentation transcript:

Introduction to the Road to Quality Process using the Missouri Afterschool Program Self- Assessment

 Gain understanding of the process of the Road to Quality and why it is important  Learn the key components of Quality Programs  Introduce the Missouri Afterschool standards, MO-KS Core Competencies of Afterschool providers and Missouri Afterschool Program Self-Assessment  Learn to complete the Missouri Afterschool Program Self-Assessment

 Group A WORST YOUTH WORKER EVER! ◦ Describe a person who absolutely should not work with children ◦ What do they do? ◦ What do they say?  Group B WORST PROGRAM PLAN EVER! ◦ Describe the most inappropriate youth program ◦ What are the program’s goals for youth? ◦ What activities are available?

 How was that process for you?  Why would we start a workshop about Quality with the Worst Ever?

 SL4K Piloted the Road to Quality Process in 2003  Since that time we have used this process with hundreds of programs in our region and dozens more across the state through Missouri After School Network  Unique process that involves ALL STAFF

 Team building  Greater involvement among staff  Customized plan for your program  Site-specific support  Documented improvement  Part of a statewide movement  Making Missouri a leader in afterschool field

 Quality Standards Orientation ◦ 2 hour workshop for all new staff to introduce the Missouri Afterschool Self-Assessments ◦ Takes place at the beginning of the school year in September/October

 Self Assessment completed by all staff using MO Afterschool Program Standards  Self Assessment booklets are returned to SL4K for tabulation and use in Consensus Building  Submitted by October/November

 Consensus Building- also known as Planning with Data  Based on Assessment results  Up to a 3 hour planning session facilitated by SL4K staff to identify areas of strength and improvement  Takes place November/December

 Create Action Plan towards Quality Improvement based on areas identified in Consensus Building Conversation  Three goals are chosen to work on  Takes place November/December

Area of Concern (from the MO Assessment) Intended Outcome (what you would like to see happen) Activities or action steps to resolve concerns Person responsible and date to be completed Actual outcome (what actually happened or occurred)

 On-going Technical Assistance from United 4 Children towards achieving Action Plan goals  Follow up at 30, 60 and 90 days  Plan is revised as needed  Implementation takes place January through May

 Evaluate –discuss challenges  Celebrate successes

 Communication/training link between site and Project  Conduct Group Assessment Training and facilitate Quality Assessment Results  Assist in development of Action Plan  Keep Quality Process on timeline schedule  Work with directors and staff as a team

 Attend Assessment Orientation  Complete self-assessment process  Create Action Plan  Implement Action Plan  Follow-up with TA Coordinator at scheduled times

Program Content Program Personnel Program Management  Physical Environment, Interpersonal Relations, & Curriculum and Activities  Covered in KS and MO Core Competencies for Youth Development Professionals  Family Involvement, Human Resources, Safety and Health, & Business Administration

The research indicates the following aspects of afterschool programs that make the difference in achieving positive results for young people:  Student accessibility to programs in addition to ongoing and consistent student participation,  Quality programming involving adequate supervision and structure, well-trained staff and well-planned developmentally appropriate programming and  Strong partnerships with families, schools and other community resources.

 Review the Standards  Establish an objective mindset  Get a broad picture ◦ Other Tips:  Take your time (don’t try to do this all in one sitting)  Ratings must be your own  When you come across an area you don’t have first hand experience with, find out

 Shaded standards are basic practices that should be present in all programs. Rate as Yes (it is evident) or No (it is not evident)  Remaining standards are rated on a scale ◦ 4: Consistently Observed ◦ 3: Frequently Observed ◦ 2: Seldom Observed ◦ 1: Not Observed

 Notice that there are examples under each standard that may help to clarify it in practice and others may be added by you  Make sure you have specifics to support your ratings (quotes, procedures, practices).

Now let’s try rating a couple of standards based on our own program experiences

 In your small group review the page you’ve been assigned pick out 2 standards to share with the group ◦ Share one standard that makes a lot of sense ◦ Share one standard that is unclear

Target DateWhoAction October 12, 2012All StaffReceive orientation to standards September/October 2012 All StaffFill out Missouri Afterschool Program Self-Assessment booklet October 20, 2011All StaffFinished booklets submitted for tabulation December 6, 7, 13, &15 All StaffConsensus meeting to review ratings and identify growth areas, create Quality Action Plan December 17, 2012Site Director Final Action Plan submitted to United 4 Children January –May 2013Site Director and staff Implement Action Plan

 In your group, create a visual representation of the sights and sounds of a quality program or the characteristics of the “the best youth worker ever”

Call if you have questions! Gloria Hampton ext. 108