Mike Dinneen, MD, PhD Strategic Planning and Business Development Office of the Assistant Secretary of Defense for Health Affairs Why MEPRS Matters More.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
CDCs 21 Goals. CDC Strategic Imperatives 1. Health impact focus: Align CDCs people, strategies, goals, investments & performance to maximize our impact.
Advertisements

National Public Health Performance Standards Program Orientation to the Essential Public Health Services.
Strategic Value of the HR Function Presentation by
Care Coordination in the Patient-Centered Medical Home New York Academy of Medicine May 24, 2011.
Page 1 Service Organization Overview October, 2006 Oakland Unified School District Redesign Oakland Unified School District.
A relentless commitment to academic achievement and personal growth for every student. Redmond School District Graduates are fully prepared for the demands.
US Business Leadership Network Conference Orlando, Florida October 2012 Karen Stang Placement Manager.
Facilities Management 2013 Manager Enrichment Program U.Va.’s Strategic Planning Initiatives Colette Sheehy Vice President for Management and Budget December.
National Health Policy Forum William Winkenwerder, Jr., M.D. Assistant Secretary of Defense (Health Affairs) January 28, 2004.
1 World-Class Care…Anytime, Anywhere Navy Medicine Strategic Plan FY15 U.S. Navy Bureau of Medicine & Surgery.
Strategic Management & Strategic Competitiveness
What is Strategy? (Part Two). Key Concepts Managerial Cognition Business Model Stakeholders The Balanced Scorecard.
3 Internal Analysis: Distinctive Competencies, Competitive Advantage, and Profitability.
Status of Army’s Civilian Human Capital Strategic Plan (HCSP)
Click to edit Master title style Click to edit Master text styles Second level Third level Fourth level Fifth level 1 1 DoD VA Joint Business Case Analysis(BCA)/Planning.
Capacity Task Force Virginia Health Reform Initiative January 14, 2011
Medicaid Information Technology Architecture (MITA) Where Louisiana Medicaid is Today and Where it Will To Be in the Future April 17, 2012.
Company LOGO Leading, Connecting, Transforming UNC… …Through Its People Human Capital Management.
The Library Balanced Scorecard: The Results Please! Joe Matthews American Library Association June 2007.
MHS Business Planning Update “Translating Strategy into Action” Tri Service Symposium 13 July 2006 MHS Business Planning Workgroup.
Experience ideas // CPAs & ADVISORS FINANCE CONSIDERATIONS WITH RURAL HOSPITAL AND PHYSICIAN RELATIONSHIPS Randy Biernat, CPA/ABV Mark Blessing, CPA/FHFMA.
American Association of Colleges of Pharmacy
Success Principles in Integrated Delivery System.
HealthBridge is one of the nation’s largest and most successful health information exchange organizations. Quality Improvement and Medical Home Models:
Attracting appropriate user funding in the context of declining public funding.
Continuity of Operations (COOP) Awareness Training.
MHS IM/IT Program The Military Electronic Health Record (EHR) AHLTA Briefing for the TRICARE Data Quality Training Course June 2006.
1 DoD-VA Partnership Status 22 February DoD/VA Partnership DoD/VA Mission, Vision, Authority DoD/VA Council Structure Joint Strategic Plan Current.
Duke Medicine IT Strategy Jeffrey Ferranti, MD Chief Information Officer / VP Medical Informatics Duke Medicine April 17, 2015.
Internal Management Controls Tri-SERVICE MEPRS CONFERENCE 28 August 2007.
3 Internal Analysis: Distinctive Competencies, Competitive Advantage, and Profitability.
1 “The Integrator” Accountable Care Across the Continuum BRENDA BRUNS, MD EXECUTIVE MEDICAL DIRECTOR, HEALTH PLAN ACHP Medical Directors, March 2, 2011.
Practice Management: Tips for a Successful GI Practice James J. Weber, MD President & CEO of Texas Digestive Disease Consultants.
CHILDREN, YOUTH AND WOMEN’S HEALTH SERVICE New Executive Leadership Team 15 December 2004 Ms Heather Gray Chief Executive.
CSI - Introduction General Understanding. What is ITSM and what is its Value? ITSM is a set of specialized organizational capabilities for providing value.
Methodist Healthcare HCAD 5390.
2010 UBO/UBU Conference Health Budgets & Financial Policy Briefing: Strategic Plans for UBO Date: 24 March 2010 Time: 0800–0850.
Delivery System Reform Incentive Payment Program (DSRIP), Transforming the Medicaid Health Care System.
Imran Ghaznavi Course Code: MGT557 COMSATS Strategic Human Resource Management.
Mike Dinneen, MD, PhD Director, Office of Strategy Managment Office of the Assistant Secretary of Defense for Health Affairs Why MEPRS Matters More Than.
Peter B. Bloland, DVM, MPVM Director Division of Public Health Systems and Workforce Development Global Health Leadership Forum November 10, 2011 National.
Strategic Framework C-1. Strategic Plan Our Mission: “Improving the health of our community in all we do.” C-2 Our Core Values: The organization’s core.
Catawba County Board of Commissioners Retreat June 11, 2007 It is a great time to be an innovator 2007 Technology Strategic Plan *
Evaluating Ongoing Programs: A Chronological Perspective to Include Performance Measurement Summarized from Berk & Rossi’s Thinking About Program Evaluation,
This document contains information exempt from mandatory disclosure under the Freedom of Information Act. Exemption 5 Applies. 0 Military Health System.
Improving Patient-Centered Care in Maryland—Hospital Global Budgets
2010 UBO/UBU Conference Title: MEPRS and the Performance Based Assessment Model (PBAM) Session: W UNCLASSIFIED.
NHS Education & Training Operating Model from April 2013 Liberating the NHS: Developing the Healthcare Workforce From Design to Delivery.
Personnel and Readiness Personnel and Readiness Current Issues Dr. David S. C. Chu Under Secretary of Defense (Personnel and Readiness) September 8, 2008.
AACN – Manatt Study In February 2015, the AACN Board of Directors commissioned Manatt Health to conduct a study on how to position academic nursing to.
Military Health System, PPS, Benchmarking, Anesthesia Information Management Systems and YOU ?
The Workforce, Education Commissioning and Education and Learning Strategy Enabling world class healthcare services within the North West.
Determining the Added-Value of Partnerships
1 FY2005 MMIG Strategic Plan Session Mr. Eric Meadows TMA – OCFO/MEPRS.
“Medically Ready Force…Ready Medical Force” 1. DHA Vision “A joint, integrated, premier system of health, supporting those who serve in the defense of.
2010 UBO/UBU Conference Title: MEPRS and the Performance Based Assessment Model (PBAM) Speaker: Richard Meyer Session: W UNCLASSIFIED.
Personnel: Internal Management Control. Executing with Precision Timely, Complete, & Accurate Submission of EAS IV Data System Access Source Data EAS.
Health Management Information Systems Unit 3 Electronic Health Records Component 6/Unit31 Health IT Workforce Curriculum Version 1.0/Fall 2010.
Presentation to the Health Portfolio Committee Presentation to Health Portfolio Committee Free State Department of Health 15 APRIL 2003.
Budgeting and financial management
Stanford University School of Medicine
Health Education England
Compensation Committee 2017 Goals – Updated
Centralization and Standardization Listening Session
Translating Strategy into Action to Manage the Business
Navy Medicine Strategic Plan FY15
Strategic Planning 3/31/2016.
GMHC Board of Directors November 14, 2016
Improve Heart Health Reduce the global burden of cardiovascular disease Achieve goals of the Triple Aim Improve Cardiovascular Competency.
Johns Hopkins Medicine Innovation 2023 Strategic Plan
Presentation transcript:

Mike Dinneen, MD, PhD Strategic Planning and Business Development Office of the Assistant Secretary of Defense for Health Affairs Why MEPRS Matters More Than Ever

Objectives Understand Department of Defense Strategic Direction and how expense reporting fits in. Understand the MHS Strategic Plan and how MEPRS fits in. Understand the critical importance of MEPRS Time allocation in achieving performance based management. Understand how MEPRS accounting will be modified to enable collection of cost and workload data in a manner that resembles best civilian practices.

The DoD BSC Strategic Framework for Change Historical World ViewFuture Objectives Central PlanningToAdaptive and Dynamic Planning Fixed, Predictable ThreatToCapabilities Against Shifting Threats Mature Business and OrganizationToMix of New and Mature Organizations Inputs Based Management – Focus on Programs ToOutput Based Management – Focus on Results Appropriated Funds – “Cost is Free”ToMore Market-like and price based Segmented Information – Closed Architecture ToNetworked Information – Open Architectures Stovepiped and Competitive Organizations – “Zero sum Enterprise” ToAligned Organizations with common and shared objectives

Historical World ViewFuture ObjectivesMHS Initiatives Central PlanningAdaptive and Dynamic PlanningMHS Business Planning Process Fixed, Predictable ThreatCapabilities Against Shifting Threats Medical Readiness Review Mature Business and Organization Mix of New and Mature Organizations BRAC Inputs Based Management – Focus on Programs Output Based Management Focus on Results MHS Office of Transformation – LAWG Appropriated Funds – “Cost is Free” More Market-like and price based Prospective Payment System Segmented Information Closed Architecture Networked Information – Open Architectures CHCS II, IM/IT in support of business operations Stovepiped and Competitive Organizations – “Zero sum Enterprise” Aligned Organizations with common and shared objectives BRAC, Joint Operations MHS Alignment with DoD Strategic Initiatives

The Mission and the Transformation: Medical QDR To continue to provide the Joint Force with best-in-the world Operational Medicine/Force Health Protection (FHP) and high-quality health care for beneficiaries, four things must be done—  Transform the medical force so that future medical support—  Is fully aligned with joint force concepts and provides optimum combat service support to the joint force  More rapidly responds to the needs of the changing national security environment  Transform the infrastructure of the Military Health System—  Implement BRAC recommendations to reduce excess capacity/infrastructure and operate jointly in Multi-Service Markets  Transform the business operating model to —  A fully customer-focused and performance-based organization, with--  Effective processes that anticipate and respond to the changing nature of health care  Transform the TRICARE benefit—  To reinforce appropriate use of resources and demand for services  To engage the individual to actively manage his/her health

Patient Care, Sustain Skills and Training Promote & Protect Health of the Force Deploy to Support the Combatant Commanders to Military Health System Mission and In Peace & War 9 Manage Beneficiary Care Deploy Healthy Force Manage Beneficiary Care Deploy Healthy Force Deploy Medical Force Manage Beneficiary Care

The MTFs Support all 3 Mission Elements * Disease and Non-Battle Injury Force Health Protection (FHP)Beneficiary Health Care Both FHP and Beneficiary Health Care Clinical care not associated with FHP training Individual Medical Readiness DNBI* Prevention Other health care services not associated with FHP training Military-Unique Training for the Medical Force Health Care that Supports FHP Training Personnel Deployment Homeland Defense

The “Fog” in MTF Performance The system cannot accurately define, measure and value the FHP and mission essential services performed by MTFs Individual Medical Readiness Military-Unique Training for the Medical Force Health Care that Supports FHP Training Clinical care not associated with FHP training Other health care services not associated with FHP training Being defined and measured Primary basis for MTF funding Issues exist in coding and accounting Performance and costs not well defined or measured DNBI Prevention Deployment

$1 for inpatient care buys* 59 cents of inpatient care, at the CMAC reimbursement rate 41 cents of an unknown combination of-- - Force Health Protection capability - Non-CMAC reimbursable health care - Inefficiency $1 for outpatient care buys* 42 cents of outpatient care, at the CMAC reimbursement rate 58 cents of an unknown combination of-- - Force Health Protection capability - Non-CMAC reimbursable health care - Inefficiency The Price of the “Fog” System cannot separate legitimate FHP efforts, non- reimbursed/able healthcare, and inefficiency * Based on ASD(HA) Study, Perspectives on Efficiency in the Direct Care System

Some of the Keys to Transforming the Business Model and “seeing through the fog” Standard Application of MEPRS across all Services Standard triservice business processes for the collection of labor expenses Full transparency of performance data, including MEPRS labor cost allocation Why? –Because we need to know where we are investing our most valuable assets –Because we want each MTF commander to have the tools to maximize effectiveness and return on investment

Level of Effort Full Time Equivalents and funds by project (initiative) Capital Investments Level of Effort Full Time Equivalents and funds by project (initiative) Capital Investments Joint, interoperable deployable medical capabilities BRAC – Joint MTFs and joint training Performance based management Reshaped benefit Joint, interoperable deployable medical capabilities BRAC – Joint MTFs and joint training Performance based management Reshaped benefit Fit and Protected Force Improved Satisfaction Reduced Growth in Health Care Costs for DoD Healthy Communities Fit and Protected Force Improved Satisfaction Reduced Growth in Health Care Costs for DoD Healthy Communities  Value Creation  Relevant Organization  Viable Enterprise/Entity Measures Critical Few Inputs Outputs Outcomes Level of Effort Full Time Equivalents and funds by functional activity or program element Level of Effort Full Time Equivalents and funds by functional activity or program element Trained deployable medical units IMR RVUs / RWPs Trained medical staff Trained deployable medical units IMR RVUs / RWPs Trained medical staff Medical units deployed Healthy Communities Beneficiary Satisfaction Reduced cost per enrolled beneficiary Committed workforce Infrastructure Maintained Medical units deployed Healthy Communities Beneficiary Satisfaction Reduced cost per enrolled beneficiary Committed workforce Infrastructure Maintained Measures Many InputsOutputs Outcomes Strategic Transformation Business Planning/ Operations Long-term Outcomes Resources Integrating MHS Strategic Transformation and Business Planning/Operations

Stakeholder Perspective Customer Perspective Internal Perspective Learning & Growth Perspective Medically Ready and Protected Force and Homeland Defense for Communities Sustain the Benefit by Managing DoD Health Care Costs (ROI) Mission Centered Care Continuous, efficient health status monitoring focuses health improvement activities Reduce death, injuries and diseases, and restore function during and after military operations Improve satisfaction with health care Resources are predictably available Patient Centered Care “It feels like the Military Health System was designed just for me.” “I am a partner with my healthcare team. They know me and care about improving my health.” Create healthy communities DoD BeneficiariesCommanders and Service Members Resource Perspective “I have responsive, capable & coordinated medical services anywhere, anytime.” “One Stop Shopping” for IMR activities that improves health and enhance performance “The MHS supports me in achieving individual medical readiness and enhancing performance.” Forces are medically ready to deploy, their performance is enhanced through medical interventions, and both the force and communities are protected from medical threats Improved Homeland Defense “Total Customer Solution”“Product Leadership” Manage and Deliver the Health Benefit Evidence based medicine is used to improve quality and manage demand Our health care processes are patient centered, effective and efficient Knowledge about beneficiary health and their customer requirements is readily accessible Beneficiaries partner with us to improve health outcomes Deployable Medical Capability New products, processes and services are rapidly deployed to support the mission – “Bench to Battlefield” The electronic medical record supports continuous tracking and medical surveillance Joint, interoperable processes efficiently move patients and staff and deliver care anytime, anywhere Responsibility and accountability are aligned throughout MHS Personnel are recruited, trained, and retained to meet requirements DoD Biomedical R&D is coordinated and focused on militarily relevant issues IM/IT is leveraged to enhance capabilities Culture of jointness and interagency cooperation The MHS embodies performance based management and a culture of innovation focused on results Employee s create success for customers Infrastructure is maintained and improved to optimize performance Information CapitalHuman CapitalOrganization & Culture MHS Mission: To enhance DoD and our Nation’s security by providing health support for the full range of military operations and sustaining the health of all those entrusted to our care. Financial Perspective

Stakeholder Perspective Customer Perspective Internal Perspective Learning & Growth Perspective Medically Ready and Protected Force and Homeland Defense for Communities Sustain the Benefit by Managing DoD Health Care Costs (ROI) Mission Centered Care Continuous, efficient health status monitoring focuses health improvement activities Reduce death, injuries and diseases, and restore function during and after military operations Improve satisfaction with health care Resources are predictably available Patient Centered Care “It feels like the Military Health System was designed just for me.” “I am a partner with my healthcare team. They know me and care about improving my health.” Create healthy communities DoD BeneficiariesCommanders and Service Members Resource Perspective “I have responsive, capable & coordinated medical services anywhere, anytime.” “One Stop Shopping” for IMR activities that improves health and enhance performance “The MHS supports me in achieving individual medical readiness and enhancing performance.” Forces are medically ready to deploy, their performance is enhanced through medical interventions, and both the force and communities are protected from medical threats Improved Homeland Defense “Total Customer Solution”“Product Leadership” Manage and Deliver the Health Benefit Evidence based medicine is used to improve quality and manage demand Our health care processes are patient centered, effective and efficient Knowledge about beneficiary health and their customer requirements is readily accessible Beneficiaries partner with us to improve health outcomes Deployable Medical Capability New products, processes and services are rapidly deployed to support the mission – “Bench to Battlefield” The electronic medical record supports continuous tracking and medical surveillance Joint, interoperable processes efficiently move patients and staff and deliver care anytime, anywhere Responsibility and accountability are aligned throughout MHS Personnel are recruited, trained, and retained to meet requirements DoD Biomedical R&D is coordinated and focused on militarily relevant issues IM/IT is leveraged to enhance capabilities Culture of jointness and interagency cooperation The MHS embodies performance based management and a culture of innovation focused on results Employee s create success for customers Infrastructure is maintained and improved to optimize performance Information CapitalHuman CapitalOrganization & Culture MHS Mission: To enhance DoD and our Nation’s security by providing health support for the full range of military operations and sustaining the health of all those entrusted to our care. Financial Perspective What parts of the Strategic Plan Rely on Accurate MEPRS Data?

MEPRS Process Improvements Simplify data capture for individuals –Lump, don’t split work centers –Standard naming of work centers –Standard time allocation rules –Simplified data entry –Show people their data –Align accountability with authority

Why invest the time and effort to improve MEPRS Processes We must MANAGE: –Provider availability for clinical care ? 36H –Provider productivity RVU per month (MGMA or other standard) –Clinic level “profitability” Total “revenue” minus total expenses We will be showing this data to EVERYONE. It will make the transition to DMHRSi much easier.

The Civilian Model of Institutional vs. Professional Charges Institutional Charges –Pays for hospital and some clinic expenses –Linked to DRG/RWP for IP care –Pays for ER and APV facility expenses Professional Charges –Pays for group practice expenses –Linked to RVUs earned by providers in all clinical settings (IP, OP and APV)

Why does this matter We are planning on fully implementing (over 3-5 years) a system of professional and institutional accounting. (QDR) How will this affect MEPRS? –Separate providers from other staff in order to create “group practices”. (Skill type 1 and 2) –Ensure that all support staff attribute time accurately to clinical work areas in order to account for institutional expenses.

Monthly Group Practice Profit and Loss Statement (Professional) Total "Revenue" 3000RVU*$40/RVU =$120,000 Support Staff Salary Expense (MEPRS )($45,000) Supply Expense($5,000) Travel Expense($4,000) Overhead Expense (E Stepdown)($20,000) Net Earnings$46,000 Provider Salaries($56,000) Profit (or loss)($10,000) Monthly Hospital Ward Profit and Loss (Institutional) Total "Revenue" 150RVU*$6000/RWP =$900,000 Support Staff Salary Expense (MEPRS )($325,000) Supply Expense($145,000) Travel Expense($10,000) Overhead Expense (E Stepdown)($300,000) Profit (or loss)$120,000 Hypothetical Examples of Professional and Institutional Monthly Financial Statements Note: Q: Where does the group practice “revenue” come from? A: All of the work done by the providers in the group practice regardless of where it is done! Note: Q: Where does the ward “revenue” come from? A: All of the work done by the ward only, (not the work that the physicians receive RVU value for).

What do you think?

Synopsis I will show how success in strategic transformation in the Department of Defense and the Military Health System depends on accurate and reliable expense data. I will then explain how minor changes and improvements in the methods for capturing and displaying MEPRS data will allow us to compare performance across MTFs and benchmark with civilian healthcare facilities. This section of the brief will include an overview of the concept of professional and institutional charges. Finally, I will try to show how success in simplifying and standardizing MEPRS 3 rd and 4 th level names and definitions will make the transition to DMHRSi much easier.