Increment 13 Payload Operations and Integration Working Group (POIWG) ESA Long Duration Mission (LDM) Payloads February 1, 2006 George Norris Increment.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Student Astronaut Challenge. Description of Student Astronaut Challenge 8 teams of students from all over Florida will compete in four rounds of a five-person.
Advertisements

Software Quality Assurance Plan
Chapter 7: Key Process Areas for Level 2: Repeatable - Arvind Kabir Yateesh.
The Vision for Space Exploration – Challenge & Opportunity ISS Panel Report Robert D. Cabana ISS Panel Chair March 30, 2005.
AMS-02 Rebaselining Outbrief ISS PIA/ICD & SSP MIP/ICD ISS Payload Mission Integration & Planning/OZ2 Space Shuttle Mission & Cargo Integration Office/MO3.
Amateur Radio on the International Space Station (ARISS)
(Project) SIGN OFF PROCESS June 21, 2010
MISSION OPERATIONS DIRECTORATE CARGO INTEGRATION AND OPERATIONS BRANCH Brion J. Au Johnson Space Center/DO55.
Navigating SSEP Experiments from Selection to Flight SSEP National Conference 2012 July 2, 2012 Dr. Harri Vanhala National Center for Earth and Space Science.
DoD Information Technology Security Certification and Accreditation Process (DITSCAP) Phase III – Validation Thomas Howard Chris Pierce.
Managing the Information Technology Resource Jerry N. Luftman
Lecture Nine Database Planning, Design, and Administration
INFORMATION SYSTEMS AND THE INTERNATIONAL SPACE STATION -Colby Nortz.
Release & Deployment ITIL Version 3
PMSS Final SOW May 22 nd, Statement of Work 2 GLENN RESEARCH CENTER PROJECT MANAGEMENT SUPPORT SERVICES (PMSS) The Contractor shall provide expert.
LSU 07/07/2004Communication1 Communication & Documentation Project Management Unit – Lecture 8.
General Program Briefing Dr. Jeff Goldstein Center Director, National Center for Earth and Space Science Education (USA) Institute Director,
OSIAM4HE Proposed org structure Authored by the strategy and organization team.
Database System Development Lifecycle © Pearson Education Limited 1995, 2005.
Overview of the Database Development Process
Commissioning of Fire Protection and Life Safety Systems Presented by: Charles Kilfoil Bechtel National Waste Treatment Plant Richland WA.
ISS-HAM Slow Scan Television (SSTV) Project A joint AMSAT-NA And MAREX-NA Project.
1 Head of Russian Federal Space Agency ISS Program International Cooperation Paris, June 17, 2009.
Project ManagementDay 1 in the pm Project Management (PM) Structures.
Project Tracking. Questions... Why should we track a project that is underway? What aspects of a project need tracking?
Certification and Accreditation CS Phase-1: Definition Atif Sultanuddin Raja Chawat Raja Chawat.
Transition to 6-person crew ASE conference, Praha Oct 8, 2009 Andreas Schön, ESA All dates used in this presentation are examples only, they do not necessarily.
SPS policy – Information Presentation Presentation to ROS June 16, 2004.
Disaster Recovery and Business Continuity Planning.
PLANNING ENGINEERING AND PROJECT MANAGEMENT By Lec. Junaid Arshad 1 Lecture#03 DEPARTMENT OF ENGINEERING MANAGEMENT.
NASA MSFC Mission Operations Laboratory MSFC NASA MSFC Mission Operations Laboratory Ku - Band, DTN, and enhanced payload utilization.
National Aeronautics and Space Administration Space Launch System Phase I Safety Review Preparation for GT #2 Topic: Phase I Safety Review.
State of Georgia Release Management Training
Page No. 1 FDOC/MOD Observation Groundrules & Communication information.
1 Procurement Operations Division (POD) Guidance for Telework and Work Schedules February 2016.
Alpha Magnetic Spectrometer NASA / DOE National Aeronautics and Space Administration AMS-02 ROAD TO COFR Mike Fohey July 15, 2004.
1 MINUS EIGHTY DEGREE LABORATORY FREEZER FOR ISS (MELFI) MSFC Briefing February 2005 John Cornwell
MSFC Payload Training bs/kh/ExpPldsTST#1/ 3/18/2016 Page 1 Astroculture-8 (ADVASC) TST #1 April 27, 1998 DTM/Beth Skidmore NASA/MSFC Training Branch Voice.
1 Columbus Control Center - Teams and Responsibilities - Roland Luettgens ESA Columbus Lead Flight Director Tel:
Note: Glacier is launched unpowered and hardmounted in EXPRESS Rack 6 on Flight ULF2. For the following three weeks after activation or transfer, two 2-hour.
A. Maillet, POIWG#25, Feb 3-5, Inc Experiments supported by CADMOS and using the EPM Alain MAILLET CADMOS
1 Increment 1 Lessons Learned Many things are not happening as predicted. Major differences are: –Scheduling and stowage –Turnaround times for troubleshooting.
Urine Monitoring System (UMS) ISS UMS is a redesigned version of the Shuttle UMS.
E-USOC operations in Increments José Miguel Ezquerro Navarro E-USOC/UPM Jul 2010POIWG#28 - Huntsville, AL.
ESA UNCLASSIFIED – For Official Use Experiment Development and Integration Process Philippe Schoonejans, Head of Robotics and Future Projects Office ESA.
Lyndon B. Johnson Space Center Human Research Facility (HRF) HRF WORKSTATION 2 Brian Barras 1 HRF WORKSTATION 2 OVERVIEW/NOMINAL OPERATIONS Trainer: Brian.
Payloads Operations Integration Working Group (POIWG) #19 Increment 12 Payloads Programmatic Status August 10, 2005 Kevin M. Meehan Increment 12 Payload.
NASA MSFC Engineering Directorate Mission Operations Laboratory MSFC NASA MSFC Engineering Directorate Mission Operations Laboratory Increment 19/18 Soyuz.
Lisa Prendergast EO20/ Operations Lead January
MOL The Mission Operations Laboratory MOL The Mission Operations Laboratory NASA MSFC Engineering Directorate Huntsville, Alabama OCR Etiquette Jimmy Whitaker.
Avatar Explore PROPOSAL NUMBERS Not available SCIENCE TEAM Erick Dupuis, Canadian Space Agency RESEARCH OBJECTIVES Demonstrate an operational and technical.
Microgravity User Support Center (MUSC) Payload Overview POIWG, July Chart 1> MUSC Payload Overview > Patrick Hambloch POIWG > July 2013.
MOL The Mission Operations Laboratory MOL The Mission Operations Laboratory NASA MSFC Huntsville, Alabama Date: March 3, 2011 Originator: Tricia Pittman/EO20.
NASA – MSFC, Huntsville, Alabama Muscle Atrophy Research and Exercise System (MARES) Operations Summary Part I/II Karen Somers EO20/ Operations Lead
Holter Monitor 2 Bioastronautics Flight Research Program Johnson Space Center, Houston, TX 1 Holter Monitor 2 Training Presentation Alonso Fuentes Hardware.
National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) Glenn Research Center SAMS KU Forward Lessons Learned 1 Kevin McPherson NASA GRC Payload Operation.
Inventory and Stowage Overview Kay Standridge February 26, 2004 MSFC/ESA TIM #2.
Damec Research Aps POIWG July 2008 CARD Long-term microgravity: A model for investigating mechanisms of heart disease and sympatho adrenal activity during.
Page No. 1 ISS_CM_019 (Rev 09/2011) Pre-decisional, For Internal Use Only Payload Safety Review Panel (PSRP) Process Updates/Status International Space.
NASA MSFC Mission Operations Laboratory MSFC NASA MSFC Mission Operations Laboratory POIWG 23 Increment 17 Payload Operations Status Patricia Patterson.
NASA MSFC Mission Operations Laboratory MSFC NASA MSFC Mission Operations Laboratory Radiation Environment Monitor Kevin Hargrave EO
Page No. 1 ISS_CM_019 (Rev 09/2011) Sponsoring Org/Office Code: OD Name of Forum: Date: July 2015 Dan Duncavage OD/Computer Resources iPad on ISS General.
Payload Inventory Management & Stowage Operations Processes 10/19/99 Point of Contact Gordon Boswell MSFC/POIF/OI (256)
MOL The Mission Operations Laboratory MOL The Mission Operations Laboratory NASA MSFC Engineering Directorate Huntsville, Alabama Training Strategy Team.
Enter Participant Organization here Enter System / Activity Name here
Health Ingenuity Exchange - HingX
1 Stadium Company Network. The Stadium Company Project Is a sports facility management company that manages a stadium. Stadium Company needs to upgrade.
CDS-EL IRR Closeout 28 March 2019 J.G. Weisend II, Chairman.
(Project) SIGN OFF PROCESS MONTH DAY, YEAR
Presentation transcript:

Increment 13 Payload Operations and Integration Working Group (POIWG) ESA Long Duration Mission (LDM) Payloads February 1, 2006 George Norris Increment 13 Payload Manager ISS Payloads Office (281) Niki Werkheiser Increment 13 Payload Engineer ISS Payloads Office (281)

Page No. 2 ESA Long Duration Mission (LDM) Payloads l The ESA Long Duration Mission (LDM) payloads are a suite of payloads that ESA is flying under Russian contract. ‒ All LDM payloads will be launched on Russian Vehicles ‒ Some LDM payloads require NASA interaction and support. Details of this support are defined in the LDM MOA (addressed below) ‒ There is the potential of an ESA LDM payload being returned via Shuttle and/or using Cold Stowage resources in the US Lab. This would go out on CEF for community review and comment. l The ESA LDM Memorandum of Agreement has been signed and is posted at xxxxxxxxxxxxx. The signed LDM MOA is limited to addressing the following ESA-submitted CEF’s: ‒ CEF Accelerate PFS Upgrade for HRF Rack 2 from Increment 13 to Increment 12 ‒ CEF Request Use of HRF for CARD Experiment during Increment 12 ‒ CEF Use of NetMeeting to perform an E-LEARNING session in the LDM ‒ CEF Use of US Lab Hand Rails at different location to position ALTEA Helmet to carry out ALTEA Shield ESA experiment during LDM ‒ CEF Downlink Data as part of the ALTCRISS experiment ‒ CEF Downlinked digital video during LDM as part of the OIL EMULSION experiment ‒ CEF Use of CANON BP-930 Batteries to power Erasmus Recording Binocular - ERB experiment ‒ CEF Thomas Reiter to be filmed showing the SPHERE experiment during operation for DVD-4 experiment of the LDM ‒ CEF Filming the RWS (Robotic Workstation) of the SSRMS (Space Station Remote Manipulator System) while nominally operated, as part of the DVD-4 experiment of the LDM l Any additional support will be requested per additional CEF’s submitted by ESA. Upon approval, they will require a revision to the existing LDM MOA.

Page No. 3 ESA Long Duration Mission (LDM) Payloads l The LDM payloads are addressed in the IDRD Annex 5, Payload Tactical Plan, Rev A in Sections and 10.3 l This applicability of this agreement is based on the following constraints: ‒ STS-121 / ISS Flight ULF-1.1 continues to launch in the May-July 2006 timeframe during Increment 13 which begins with the launch of 12 Soyuz (12S). ‒ The ESA LDM Crewmember flies aboard Flight ULF-1.1 and serves as Flight Engineer Number Two (FE-2) for Expedition 13. ‒ In the event that either of the above constraints changes, which would result in the need for NASA OZ and ESA HME-EP to significantly re-plan and re-prioritize Increment 13 utilization activities, integration activities associated with the various ESA CEFs addressed by this agreement will need to be reassessed as part of the overall Increment 13 re-plan and reprioritization activities.

Page No. 4 ESA Long Duration Mission (LDM) Payloads Experiment Name Associated HardwareReseach ObjectivesNASA Roles and/or Constraints CARDEPM Holter BP Crew support Computer Urine sampling Kit Blood sampling Kit Consumables The objective of this experiment is to study adaptive changes in humans during prolonged spaceflight. This proposal addresses cardiovascular phenomena observed in cardiac patients and in astronauts alike. The equipment is also applied in the care of ailing patients. This proposal studies the mechanisms of activation of sympathoadrenal activity in humans during spaceflight. Studies of sympathoadrenal activity in plasma (acute changes in activity) and thrombocytes (long-term changes in activity) will be combined with measurements of cardiac output, arterial blood pressure and heart rate. This proposal also studies the mechanisms of activation of sympathoadrenal activity in humans during spaceflight. Studies of sympathoadrenal activity in plasma (acute changes in activity) and thrombocytes (long-term changes in activity) will be combined with measurements of cardiac output, arterial blood pressure and heart rate. CARD hardware can not be flown on ULF-1.1. All CARD hardware must be stowed within the Russian Segment under Russian allocations. Operation of the EPM Holter within the U.S. Segment is permitted only once certification is confirmed.. The CARD experiment to be performed for the LDM shall not require the use or storage of urine collection bags, kits, or other non-Holter hardware within the U.S. Segment, shall not require any cold stowage support from NASA, and shall not require the launch/return of hardware aboard the Shuttle. If such requirements are identified they will be submitted via CEF. Besides PFS data which will flow their nominal path to the involved ESA entities, the downlink of CARD data shall be requested of and coordinated by the Russian operations teams. If NASA assets are required to assist with downlink of the CARD data, then the use of such assets shall be requested of MOD by Russia and processed in accordance with existing MOD and Russian operating interface procedures. POI has no responsibility for planning or facilitating data downlink activities associated with CARD.

Page No. 5 ESA Long Duration Mission (LDM) Payloads Experiment Name Associated HardwareResearch ObjectivesNASA Roles and/or Constraints PFS UpgradePFS Accessories Pouch II (Mixing Bag System), Mass 4100 g (estimate), Dimensions: 600 x 350 x 380 mm (estimate) PFS Accessories Pouch III (consumables) Mass 3000 g (estimate), Dimensions: 400 x 320 x 180 mm (estimate) Cevis Cable Bag Mass 2000 g (estimate) Dimensions: 280 x 280 x 60 mm ( estimate) Facility Upgrade SupportPFS Upgrade hardware is planned for launch on Flight 21P. It is ESA intention to launch the BP/ECG cab le and the CEVIS/PFS data interface cable on 21P as part of the PFS Upgrade launch package. They would be stowed in the Russian segment until ULF1.1. However, the use of these cables, and any activity associated with this, is not within the scope of this agreement due to open issues regarding certification and ownership DVD-4Model of the ERMThe objective of this experiment is to have an ESA astronaut demonstrating some robotics applications in space for educational purposes Filming must be done either by the Russian Cosmonaut (FE-1) or ESA LDM crewmember (FE-2) on a non-interference basis with the execution of the RWS and SSRMS activities. This agreement does not authorize in any way the LDM crewmember to operate or participate in actual RWS or SSRMS operations. Any activities performed by the LDM crewmember shall be simulation only. Any participation by the LDM crewmember in the actual operations of SSRMS and RWS is outside the authorization authority of OZ and, should this be desired, must be coordinated with the Increment Manager and MOD.

Page No. 6 ESA Long Duration Mission (LDM) Payloads Experiment Name Associated HardwareResearch ObjectivesNASA Roles and/or Constraints ERB3D Video CameraThe objective is to bring on ground 3D images of the ISS, like the iMAX camera did in the past, to be used for communication (i.e. PR) and educational purposes. The use of the camera in weightlessness shall also provide ergonomic indications for the further development of the camera itself (i.e auto-vergence system and controls). The camera consists of a digital stereo acquisition system with a stereo viewer for the operator. It is a technological demonstrator of a miniaturized 3D camcorder using replaceable hard disks instead of tapes. The ERB camera requires 3 Canon BP-930 batteries to operate. 4 runs are expected, which will require 4 complete recharging of 3 batteries. All ERB hardware, except for the ISS- provided Canon batteries, must be maintained, stowed, and operated within the Russian Segment under Russian allocations. All ERB operations must be performed in the Russian Segment and are not authorized within the U.S. Segment. Oil EmulsionDouble contained cuboid filled with an emulsion of oil and water The objective of this experiment is to demonstrate the mixture of oil and water and following separation of the two liquids in microgravity. Target groups are secondary classes. The experiment is prepared by the pupils on ground and simultaneously accomplished by the astronaut. The visually dramatically different expected results can be discussed both regarding hydrostatic pressure and the cohesion forces between oil and water. The principle of scientific working can be already brought to the pupils in this pupil groups.. All Oil Emulsion hardware must be maintained, stowed, and operated within the Russian Segment under Russian allocations. All video taping of Oil Emulsion activities shall be performed in the Russian Segment. The video needs to be downlinked (video playback - tbc) as soon as possible after experiment execution, as it is needed on ground for educational purposes while the LDM crewmember is still on orbit (otherwise it will compromise experiment success). According to the current mission schedule, the return of the video has to be done before mid-November, 2006(tbc).

Page No. 7 ESA Long Duration Mission (LDM) Payloads Experiment Name Associated HardwareResearch ObjectivesNASA Roles and/or Constraints E-learningN/AThe objective of the experiment is to offer University level student the opportunity to perform e-learning Session in RT. On-orbit operations involving E-Learning will be done using existing NetMeeting resources in the USOS. Two-way communication with schools and universities on the ground shall be done using Microsoft NetMeeting. The universities and their locations that will be participating in the E-Learning activities are listed below: Required: Technische Universitat Munchen (D) ENSAE-SupAero Toulouse (F) Desired: University of Pisa (I) Cranfield University (UK) Universidad Politecnica de Madrid (E)

Page No. 8 NASA Responsibilities for LDM Payloads l E-learning ‒ OZ shall coordinate with MOD to resolve the outstanding security issues that currently prohibit scheduling and performance of the E-Learning activities, specifically two-way data and voice communications via an Internet connection outside of the secure ISS firewall. ‒ NASA is responsible for training the LDM crewmember in the use of and NetMeeting System (laptop, webcam and headset) as part of the standard training received by the astronauts in Houston. ‒ OZ to provide to ESA HME-EP the appropriate points of contact to interface with and ensure that all the technical issues are worked out: »Configuration and details of the NetMeeting system (laptop, webcam and headset) and how the tool is currently being used (including the ground network). »OZ will support the development of the procedures by providing a NetMeeting point of contact to assist with ensuring compabitility between NetMeeting and E- Learning session procedures. ‒ Lecture on a CD (tbc) to be open from the NetMeeting laptop during the experiment execution. ‒ The E-learning lecture and accompanying notes, in the appropriate formats, will be up-linked via NASA. ‒ NASA is responsible providing the requirements for setting up the ground communication infrastructure between NASA and the identified Universities ‒ Because there are still significant security issues that must be resolved to allow two-way communications to/from the ISS with organizations that will be outside of the controlled ISS firewall, ESA HME-EP and NASA OZ agree that pursuing E-Learning will be done on a best-effort basis. ‒ The NASA astronaut on Increment 13 is not required to be trained to perform any E-Learning activities. ‒ E-Learning activities will be viewed, from a crew time perspective, as a Russian activity performed by a cosmonaut in the US Segment. l ALTCRISS ‒ OZ shall coordinate with the appropriate Increment Management Team and appropriate MOD personnel to notify them that Russia (on behalf of ESA) will be requesting ALTCRISS data downlinks throughout the Increment. ‒ OZ shall identify and provide to ESA HME-EP the appropriate MOD point-of-contact to interface with regarding any questions or issues ESA HME-EP may have when trying to coordinate the downlink activities with Russia. ‒ OZ (including POI) has no responsibility for certifying the readiness of ALTCRISS activities as part of its overall CoFR responsibilities. ‒ ALTCRISS hardware must be maintained, stowed, and operated within the Russian Segment under Russian allocations, with the exception of the data storage media used for down-linking the experiment data. All crew time associated with ALTCRISS will be counted as if it were a Russian experiment, with no crew time counted against the U.S. crew time allocation. ‒ The NASA astronauts on Increments 12 and 13 are not required to be trained to perform any ALTCRISS activities. ‒ ALTCRISS activities, including data downlink, will be viewed, from a crew time perspective, as a Russian activity performed by a cosmonaut.

Page No. 9 NASA Responsibilities for LDM Payloads l PFS Upgrade ‒ OZ and HRF are responsible for integrating and launching the PFS Upgrade software, which also includes the CARD software, aboard Flight ULF-1.1. ‒ OZ POI is responsible for training the ESA LDM crew to perform the PFS upgrade, check-out and operations. ‒ OZ POI is responsible for developing the procedures required to support the PFS upgrade, check-out, and operations. ‒ OZ POI is responsible for scheduling the PFS upgrade, check-out, and operations ‒ OZ-3 PEI and HRF are responsible for incorporating PFS Upgrade readiness into their CoFR submittals for flight ULF1.1 and Increment 13. The inability to certify readiness prior to the OZ CoFR Review and SORR will result in the open work required to complete certification being tracked by OZ as Non-Standard Open Work. The basis for flight shall be, if still desired for launch by ESA, ESA obtaining approval from the PSRP and JARSWG to yellow-tag the hardware. See “Constraints & Remarks” for more information. ‒ POI is responsible for incorporating PFS Upgrade readiness into its CoFR submittal for Flight 12S. ‒ The NASA astronaut on Increment 13 is not required to be trained to perform the PFS Upgrade activities. ‒ PFS upgrade activities will be viewed, from a crew time perspective, as a Russian activity performed by a cosmonaut as agreed to via the ESA and Russian contract for the LDM. l CARD ‒ OZ and HRF are responsible for launching the CARD software, which is bundled with the PFS Upgrade software, aboard Flight ULF-1.1. ‒ OZ POI and HRF are responsible for training the ESA LDM crewmember in the use of the HRF racks. ‒ From an operations perspective, POI is only responsible for ensuring that PFS procedures are sufficient to support PFS activities in support of CARD, and for assisting Russia and MOD, as part of weekly planning support, in determining when PFS operations can be planned in support of CARD. POI will perform the scheduling of the PFS operations in support of CARD. ‒ HRF is responsible for reviewing and concurring with all CARD procedures that require use of the HRF racks and PFS; POI is also responsible for reviewing and concurring with these procedures ‒ OZ-3 PEI is responsible for incorporating the EPM Holter readiness and certification into its CoFR submittal for Flight ULF1.1. The EPM Holter will remain stowed in the Russian segment when not in operation. ‒ The NASA astronaut on Increment 13 is not required to be trained to perform any CARD activities. ‒ CARD activities will be viewed, from a crew time perspective, as a Russian activity performed by a cosmonaut.

Page No. 10 NASA Responsibilities for LDM Payloads l Oil Emulsion ‒ OZ shall coordinate with the affected Increment Management Teams and appropriate MOD personnel to notify them that Russia (on behalf of ESA) will be requesting Oil Emulsion video downlink. ‒ OZ shall identify and provide to ESA HME-EP the appropriate MOD point-of-contact to interface with regarding any questions or issues ESA HME-EP may have when trying to coordinate the downlink activities with Russia. ‒ OZ (including POI) has no responsibility for certifying the readiness of Oil Emulsion activities as part of its overall CoFR responsibilities. ‒ OZ to provide information about the nominal Expedition crewmember training provided by NASA regarding camera equipment and data downlink. ‒ OZ to provide to ESA HME-EP the appropriate point of contact to interface with and ensure that all the technical issues about the video downlink (video playback- tbc) are worked out. ‒ The length of the video recording to be down linked shall be less than or equal to 20 minutes. ‒ The NASA astronaut on Increment 13 is not required to be trained to perform any Oil Emulsion activities. ‒ Oil Emulsion activities, including video downlink, will be viewed, from a crew time perspective, as a Russian activity performed by a cosmonaut. l ERB ‒ OZ shall coordinate with the appropriate Increment Management Teams, appropriate MOD, and appropriate imagery/video personnel responsible for the Canon batteries to notify them that Russia (on behalf of ESA) will require use of the Canon batteries throughout the Increment to support ERB operations. ‒ OZ shall identify and provide to ESA HME-EP the appropriate MOD and hardware point-of-contact to interface with regarding any questions or issues ESA HME-EP may have when trying to certify the ERB to use the Canon BP-930 batteries. ‒ No NASA astronaut is required to be trained to perform any ERB activities, but will have general training in the use and recharging of the Canon batteries. ‒ All other ERB activities will be considered, from a crew time perspective, as a Russian activity performed by a cosmonaut.

Page No. 11 NASA Responsibilities for LDM Payloads l DVD-4 (SPHERES) ‒ OZ shall identify and provide to ESA HME- EP the appropriate SPHERES PIM point-of- contact to interface with and ensure the non- interference with the execution of the SPHERES check-out activities and operations. ‒ OZ (including POI) has no responsibility for certifying the readiness of the LDM crewmember (beyond normal Expedition Crewmember training) to perform DVD-4 filming activities, nor of the DVD-4 experiment. ‒ The NASA astronaut on Increment 13 is not required to perform any activities, other than operation of SPHERES as nominally planned, in support of the DVD-4 activities associated with video taping SPHERES activities. ‒ All camera preparation and filming activities associated with video taping the SPHERES activities in support of DVD-4 will be considered, from a crew time perspective, as a Russian activity performed by a cosmonaut. ‒. l DVD-4 (RWS) ‒ OZ shall identify a point-of-contacts within the NASA on-orbit imagery organization and appropriate MOD that ESA may contact to obtain further information regarding camera capabilities, operational scenario constraints and recommendations to ensure optimal recording of the RWS during SSRMS activities. ‒ OZ (including POI) has no responsibility for certifying the readiness of the LDM crewmember (beyond normal Expedition Crewmember training) to perform DVD-4 filming activities, nor of the DVD-4 experiment ‒ The NASA astronaut on Increment 13 is not required to perform any activities, other than operation of the RWS and SSRMS as part of nominally planned operations, in support of the DVD-4. ‒ All camera preparation and filming activities associated with video taping the RWS and SSRMS activities will be considered, from a crew time perspective, as a Russian activity performed by a cosmonaut.