December 8, 2011 Chris Bodendorfer.  Regulatory Requirement ◦ 9 CFR 417 ◦ Notices (2)  Options ◦ CCP ◦ SOP  Recordkeeping.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
SANITATION THE FOUNDATION OF FOOD SAFETY
Advertisements

FSIS Directive 12,600.2 Reimbursable Overtime Inspection Services at Meat and Poultry Establishments OPPD/PDD District Correlation.
Policy Development Staff/OPPD
FSIS Notice Measures to Address E. coli O157:H7 at Establishments that Receive, Grind, or Otherwise Process Raw Beef Products FSIS Notice Measures.
HACCP Validation The FSIS Perspective Charles Gioglio FSIS/OPPD Director, Meat and Poultry Advisory Committee Staff.
Food Safety Modernization Act (FSMA) Key Themes/Concepts Jeannie Perron, JD, DVM Covington & Burling LLP.
Complying with FSMA: What a cashew exporter to the U.S. needs to do.
Current Thinking and Draft Directive on Foreign Material Contamination in HACCP, SSOP, and Prerequisite Programs Lee Puricelli Program Analyst RDDS, OPPD,
January 24, 2008 Policy Development Division 1 FSIS Notice Verification of the Annual Reassessment and Establishment Training Requirements Under.
1 Allergies, Allergens and Food Handlers Welcome.
Food Safety and Inspection Service Pathogen Reduction/HACCP.
1 William H. Sveum, Ph.D. Kraft Foods – 09/2002 Role of Prerequisite Programs in Extraneous Material Management William H. Sveum Ph.D. Associate Director.
Good hygienic practices
GOOD MANUFACTURING PRACTICES Training about our Food Safety Plan
Hazard Analysis Critical Control Point (HACCP)
Food Safety Management Systems
Role of Testing to Ensure FSMA and Global Safety Compliance for Functional Food and Dietary Ingredients Douglas L. Marshall, Ph.D., CFS Chief Scientific.
Listeria Summit - Washington, DC November RISK MANAGEMENT Current FSIS Activities Daniel Engeljohn, Ph.D. Office of Policy and Program Development.
Public Health Information System: Headquarters Session HACCP Verification.
Seafood HACCP Alliance for Training and Education Chapter 10 Principle 6: Establish Verification Procedures.
Future Editions This manual, future additions and the latest updates are available at the following website:
BRC Food Safety Quality Management System Training Guide
Ashland Specialty Ingredients IFAC’s cGMP Audit Guide How the Food Ingredient Industry has Responded to FSMA and Food Safety Audits Priscilla Zawislak.
Food Safety and Inspection Service U. S. Department of Agriculture
8-2 Food Safety Management Systems Food safety management system: Group of practices and procedures intended to prevent foodborne illness Actively controls.
Food Safety Management Systems
United States Department of Agriculture Food Safety and Inspection Service Undeclared Allergen Prevention Webinar Labeling and Program Delivery Division.
© 2011 Michigan State University and United Nations Industrial Development Organization, original at CC-BY-SA Procedures FSKN.
A Basic Overview of the US FDA’s Regulations for Regulatory Compliance
FSIS Notice Food Safety and Inspection Service (FSIS) District Correlation Meeting November 3,
Edible Extended Food Safety & Licensing Pete Haase Director, Bureau of Food Safety and Inspection WDATCP August 2015.
Proposed Regulations for Foreign Supplier Verification Programs (FSVPs)
Animal Feed Safety System P Timothy E. Costigan Manager of Quality and Analytical Services Prince Agri Products, Inc.
Donald A. Kautter, Jr. Consumer Safety Officer Division of HACCP Programs Washington, D.C. United States of America Juice HACCP Final Rule.
1 FSIS Notice Notice of Reassesment for E. Coli O157:H7 Control And Completion of Checklist for all beef operations.
Aloe Vera of America: A Quality IASC-Certified Producer of Aloe Vera Presented by Walt Jones.
Chapter 3 Prerequisite Programs and Preliminary Steps.
1. Directive Ongoing Verification of Product Formulation and Labeling Targeting the Eight Most Common (“Big 8”) Food Allergens Scott Seys Risk,
Final Rule for Preventive Controls for Human Food September 16, THE FUTURE IS NOW 1.
Proposed Rule for Preventive Controls for Animal Food.
Proposed Rule: 21 CFR 507 Proposed Rule for Preventive Controls for Animal Food 1.
WHO - PSM Materials Pharmaceutical Quality, Good manufacturing Practice & Bioequivalence Kiev, Ukraine October 2005 Maija Hietava M.Sci.Pharm Quality.
Implementation into Child Nutrition Programs
8-2 Service Objectives: Food safety management systems Active managerial control Hazard Analysis Critical Control point (HACCP)
Final Rule for Preventive Controls for Animal Food 1 THE FUTURE IS NOW.
1 Daniel Engeljohn USDA, FSIS May 9, 2001 Processed Meat and Poultry Proposed Rule _________________ Listeria monocytogenes and Listeria spp.
Risk Assessment Technical Meeting Washington, DC -- February Current Listeria Policy And Risk Management Questions Daniel Engeljohn, Ph.D. Office.
FSIS Directive Verifying an Establishment's Food Safety System - Revision 4 OPPD/PDS Thursday District Correlation.
United States Department of Agriculture Food Safety and Inspection Service Validation – In Plant Findings Kenneth Petersen, DVM, MPH Assistant Administrator.
Awareness Training: ‘HARPC’ for Food Safety Complimentary Presentation by Quality Systems Enhancement 1790 Wood Stock Road Roswell GA E. mail:
1. Allergen Control Strategies - A “How To” Guide Hormel Foods Corporation Brent Brehmer Corporate Manager of Regulatory Compliance & HACCP.
Jennifer L. Johnson, Ph.D. Director of Food Safety & Quality Salm Partners LLC.
© Food – a fact of life 2009 Hazard Analysis Critical Control Point (HACCP) HACCP is a system which looks for and prevents potential problems before they.
United States Department of Agriculture Food Safety and Inspection Service Draft Labeling Policy Guidance for N- 60 Testing Claims for Boneless Beef Manufacturing.
Author: Nurul Azyyati Sabri
The Seafood HACCP Regulation
Final Rule for Preventive Controls for Human Food
Prerequisite Programs
Chapter 4 PREREQUISITE PROGRAMS
Hazard Analysis Critical Control Point (HACCP).
Chapter 5 BUILDING HACCP PROGRAMS
Allergen Control.
Hazard Analysis Critical Control Point (HACCP)
A Road Map to Food Safety
Prerequisite Programs
Food Safety T-1150 This work has been produced by DGL (Aust) Pty Ltd
PREREQUISITE PROGRAMS
Madison chemical food division
Final Rule on Foreign Supplier Verification Programs
Hazard Analysis Critical Control Point (HACCP)
Presentation transcript:

December 8, 2011 Chris Bodendorfer

 Regulatory Requirement ◦ 9 CFR 417 ◦ Notices (2)  Options ◦ CCP ◦ SOP  Recordkeeping

417.2 Hazard Analysis and HACCP Plan. (a) Hazard analysis. (1) Every official establishment shall conduct, or have conducted for it, a hazard analysis to determine the food safety hazards reasonably likely to occur in the production process and identify the preventive measures the establishment can apply to control those hazards. The hazard analysis shall include food safety hazards that can occur before, during, and after entry into the establishment. A food safety hazard that is reasonably likely to occur is one for which a prudent establishment would establish controls because it historically has occurred, or because there is a reasonable possibility that it will occur in the particular type of product being processed, in the absence of those controls.

(i) Natural toxins; (ii) Microbiological contamination; (iii) Chemical contamination; (iv) Pesticides; (v) Drug residues; (vi) Zoonotic diseases; (vii) Decomposition; (viii) Parasites; (ix) Unapproved use of direct or indirect food or color additives; and (x) Physical hazards.

Every establishment shall reassess the adequacy of the HACCP plan at least annually and whenever any changes occur that could affect the hazard analysis or alter the HACCP plan. Such changes may include, but are not limited to, changes in: raw materials or source of raw materials; product formulation; slaughter or processing methods or systems; production volume; personnel; packaging; finished product distribution systems; or, the intended use or consumers of the finished product.

 FSIS NOTICE /7/11 ◦ “This notice instructs inspection program personnel (IPP) to make establishments aware of the need for them to have appropriate process controls for ingredients of public health concern, the need for the ingredients to be properly labeled, and the importance of taking steps to prevent the production and shipment into commerce of adulterated or misbranded meat, poultry, or egg products. “

 FSIS NOTICE /28/11 ◦ “It also instructs IPP at meat and poultry establishments to verify the control procedures an establishment uses for ingredients of public health concern and to verify that the establishment has addressed any chemical food safety hazard in its hazard analysis. “

 Chemical Hazard ◦ Where address in the process? ◦ How address?  CCP  SOP

 Reasonably likely to occur ◦ CCP  Not reasonably likely to occur because/why? ◦ Allergen control program ◦ Don’t have any allergens

 What is your critical limit?  How do you measure it?  Frequency of measuring?  How perform verification?

 Stand Alone SOP – Allergen Control Program/SOP  Address the Big “8” Allergens and ingredients of public health concern Most common allergens found in meat plants are soy, milk, egg, wheat proteins, & anchovy-containing Worcestershire sauce

 Main objective is to protect the food- allergic consumer by: ◦ Preventing cross-contamination between allergenic ingredients or allergen-containing products and ingredients or products that are not suppose to contain allergens ◦ Insuring that the label accurately describes ingredients in that product ◦ Insuring that documentation is accurate, adequate & appropriate  Secondary objective is to avoid regulatory issues

 Labeling ◦ Approval (need completed allergen survey) ◦ Receipt ◦ Processing ◦ Finished goods ◦ Obsolete (label SOP)  Specifications ◦ Highlight allergens

 Inventory/storage ◦ Allergens ◦ WIP ◦ Rework ◦ Clean up spills (GMP or other SOP)  Cross Contact Prevention ◦ Scheduling ◦ Dedicated lines ◦ Wash matrix  Rework (separate SOP) ◦ Usage Matrix ◦ Documentation

 Sanitation ◦ Operational ◦ Verification  Training ◦ New hires ◦ Annual refresher  Recordkeeping

 Allergen Questionnaire/survey  Master Allergen List  Vendor Ingredient Specifications  Product Specifications  Label Approvals  Ingredient Inventory

 Formulation Sheet  Work in process (wip)  Rework generation & usage  Change-over sanitation check lists  Allergen-control Program Self Assessment form

 Responsible Individual ◦ Could be multiple individuals  Ingredient or formulation change prompts dispatch of a new questionnaire  Include allergens important to export markets

 List approved suppliers for each ingredient  Develop a master list of products containing Major Food Allergens & other allergens or ingredients of interest ◦ Highlight “sister” codes to assist in rework control & diversion of excess production ◦ Identify unique items, the production of which must be isolated  Rework Matrix  Wash Matrix

 Ingredient listing: compare to ingredient label  Information on extent of hydrolysis on hydrolyzed protein-derived ingredients  Written notification of any changes to formulation of ingredient or sub-ingredient

 Reference label  Master formula  Sort by allergen ◦ “Sister codes”  Highlight products containing allergens ◦ Color code ◦ Universal icon ◦ List allergen(s) in header

 Accurate listing of how much was used (including ingredient supplier & lot number), when, and in what product  Formulator initials  Check formula against specification  Notification of allergen inclusion ◦ Different color paper ◦ Special Allergen entry

 When generated and from what code & batch  How much used, when, and in what code & batch  Alerts to allergens present in rework ◦ Color code system ◦ Universal icon

 Document actions taken at change over ◦ Destroy product ◦ Blow out or push through; pounds &/or time ◦ Wash down & reinspection ◦ Swapping out or replacing equipment ◦ Oil treatment (e.g. filtration, dilution)

 Document program effectiveness with regular reviews  Break down allergen control program ◦ Allergen questionnaires ◦ Specification review process ◦ Receiving process ◦ Operational procedures ◦ Label control/accuracy ◦ Sanitation process ◦ Testing results

 Are forms filled out completely & properly? ◦ If not, determine reason ◦ Revise form as needed ◦ Educate/train personnel on proper recordkeeping & form specifics  Are records accurate?

 A recall (best case) OR  One or more deaths and a recall (worst case)