How to Involve Families in the Child Outcome Summary (COS) Process Debi Donelan, MSSA Early Support for Infants and Toddlers Katrina Martin, Ph.D. SRI.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Ideas from the Outcomes Think Tank. Gather family’s concerns and general information about child following program procedures Use 3 global outcomes as.
Advertisements

Module 2 Learning More about the Summary of Functional Performance Every day, we are honored to take action that inspires the world to discover, love and.
Early Childhood Outcomes Center1 Refresher: Child Outcome Summary Form Child Outcome Summary Form.
Early On® Michigan Child Outcomes
Tying it All Together Understanding and Utilizing the Seven Key Principles and the Agreed Upon Practices to Provide Early Intervention Services.
Self Determination in the IEP
The Web of Writing USING REFLECTIVE WRITING AS A LITERACY STRATEGY.
Building Team Facilitation Skills Presented by: Mary Jo Meyers M.S.
July 2013 IFSP and Practice Manual Revisions April 29, 2013 May 3, 2013 Infant & Toddler Connection of Virginia Practice Manual Infant & Toddler Connection.
Implementing the Child Outcomes Summary Process: Challenges, strategies, and benefits July, 2011.
By Paula Jacobsen Chapter 12
1 Assuring the Quality of your COSF Data. 2 What factors work to improve the quality of your data? What factors work to lessen the quality of your data?
Teaching children social skills through stories..
During the intake process, information is collected about families’ concerns through interviewing. Additionally, this method of information gathering.
Early Childhood Outcomes Center 1 Christina Kasprzak Robin Rooney March 2008 The Early Childhood Outcomes (ECO) Center National Early Childhood Technical.
Therapeutic Communication
Pacific TA Meeting: Quality Practices in Early Intervention and Preschool Programs.
Diane Paul, PhD, CCC-SLP Director, Clinical Issues In Speech-Language Pathology American Speech-Language-Hearing Association
Working with Families Chapter 2. Background In 1997, the amendments to the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) strengthened the role of.
Interstate New Teacher Assessment and Support Consortium (INTASC)
1 Enhancing Services in Natural Environments Presenter: Mary Beth Bruder March 3, :00- 2:30 EST Part of a Web-based Conference Call Series Sponsored.
Corey Herd Cassidy, Ph.D., CCC-SLP Radford University Corey Herd Cassidy, Ph.D., CCC-SLP Radford University Coaching in Natural Environments: Beyond the.
INDIVIDUALIZED FAMILY SERVICE PLAN-IFSP. IFSP The Individualized Family Service Plan (IFSP) is a process of looking at the strengths of the Part C eligible.
Preparing the Next Generation of Professionals to Use Child Outcomes Data to Improve Early Intervention and Preschool Special Education Lynne Kahn Kathy.
Families, Professionals, & Exceptionality: Positive Outcomes Through Partnerships & Trust, 6e Turnbull / Turnbull / Erwin / Soodak / Shogren ISBN:
Teamwork! Creating a Positive Partnership with Parents Janet K Peterson
Human Growth and Development HPD 4C Working with School Age Children and Adolescents - Mrs. Filinov.
The Creative Curriculum for Infants, Toddlers, & Twos
Inquiring Families Want to Know: Engaging Families in the Outcome Rating Process Hearing Family Stories Gaining Family Insight Involving Families Adapted.
The Relationship of Quality Practices to Child and Family Outcomes A Focus on Functional Child Outcomes Kathi Gillaspy, NECTAC Maryland State Department.
Session 9 Communicating with Parents: Parent-Teacher Conferencing.
AN OVERVIEW OF THE CHILD OUTCOMES SUMMARY RATING PROCESS 1 Maryland State Department of Education - Division of Special Education/Early Intervention Services.
Arizona Early Intervention Program -Assessment Part II-
Individualized Education Program (IEP) Parent Information L. Deardorff West Bladen High School.
Clinton County RESA Early On ® Training & Technical Assistance Higher Education Introduction to: Developing Functional IFSP Outcomes to Meet the Unique.
Early Childhood Outcomes Center Orientation for New Outcomes Conference Participants Kathy Hebbeler Lynne Kahn The Early Childhood Outcomes (ECO) Center.
CHAPTER 3 Strategy Cards for: Communication with Colleagues, Students, & Families.
COACHING. Coaching focuses on partnering with families. This is a shift from the expert telling parents what to do in a top down fashion to a coach who.
Guidance for Leading Focused Conversations with Families to Help Complete the DRDP (2015) For Home Visitors, Teachers, and other Service Providers 1 3/25/16.
Oregon Department of Human Services Senior and People with Disabilities State Unit on Aging-ADRC In partnership with  Portland State University School.
Children’s Policy Conference Austin, TX February 24, ECI as best practice model for children 0-3 years with developmental delays / chronic identified.
Section 6 The Three Global Outcomes. Key Principles for Early Intervention Service Provision 1.Infants and toddlers learn best through every day experiences.
Section 4 Family Assessment for a Child Determined Eligible.
1 Child and Family Teaming Module 2 The Child and Family Team Meeting: Preparation, Facilitation, and Follow-up.
Universal GO 4 IT Training. Welcome and Introductions.
Section 7 Plan of Action and Developing Functional, Measurable IFSP Outcomes.
1 Oregon Department of Human Services Senior and People with Disabilities State Unit on Aging-ADRC In partnership with  Portland State University School.
PARENTS AS PARTNERS (AKA “FAMILIES AS PARTNERS”) O’BRIEN-CHAPTER 3.
Coaching in Early Intervention Provider Onboarding Series 3
Moving Maryland Forward: Service Coordinator Resource Group
Child Outcomes Summary (COS) Process Training Module
Universal GO 4 IT Training
Child Outcomes Summary (COS) Process Module
Session 6: Good Teaming, Good Decisions
K-3 Student Reflection and Self-Assessment
How to Talk to Families about the 3 Global Outcomes and the EI Program
Section 3 Evaluation and Assessment Documentation that Informs the 3 Global Outcomes and Eligibility Determination Facilitator’s Notes: Handouts used in.
Session 6: Good Teaming, Good Decisions
Session 6: Good Teaming, Good Decisions
A non-profit organization providing support to North Carolina parents and professionals for more than 25 years.
Lynne Kahn Kathy Hebbeler The Early Childhood Outcomes (ECO) Center
Building Capacity to Use Child Outcomes Data to Improve Systems and Practices 2018 DEC Conference.
How to Talk to Families about the 3 Global Outcomes and the EI Program
Child Outcome Summary Form
Implementing the Child Outcomes Summary Process: Challenges, strategies, and benefits July, 2011 Welcome to a presentation on implementation issues.
Child Outcomes Summary (COS) Process Module
Child Outcomes Summary (COS) Process Training Module
Involving Families Early Childhood Outcomes Center.
Involving Families in the COS Process
Implementing the Child Outcomes Summary Process: Challenges, strategies, and benefits July, 2011 Welcome to a presentation on implementation issues.
Presentation transcript:

How to Involve Families in the Child Outcome Summary (COS) Process Debi Donelan, MSSA Early Support for Infants and Toddlers Katrina Martin, Ph.D. SRI International/DaSy/ECTA Center May 6, 2016

Objectives Objectives: Discuss why family involvement throughout the COS process is important. Explore ways to engage families as partners in assessment. Learn about resources that promote collaboration with families.

Supporting Multiple Needs

Why team for the COS process? Obtaining a complete picture of the child’s functioning requires people who: Spend time with the child in different settings, situations, and everyday routines, and Have different perspectives about the child’s functioning based on their particular expertise in observing skills and behaviors.

Who should be on the team? Family Resources Coordinator Child’s family Early Intervention Specialist Other therapists or related service providers Other caregivers (child care, extended family, etc.)

Preparing the Family Before the meeting: Explain the COS process to the family. Share written materials describing the process. Review what the family can expect. Check for understanding and answer questions.

Washington Resource- COS Brochure

National Resource- PACER Family Guide PACER Center/ECTA Center (2013):

National Resource- Maryland Family Worksheet Family Worksheet, page 13 of “A Family Guide to Understanding the Individualized Family Service Plan (IFSP)” /earlyinterv/infant_toddlers/resources.ht ml

Effective Teaming Practices All members participate. It is not necessary that all team members be knowledgeable in all 5 areas There is no expectation that families understand the rating scale of typical child development Diverse perspectives and different opinions are encouraged. Acronyms and jargon are minimized. Professional terms are explained.

Effective Teaming Practices Use appropriate eye contact. Listen empathically with responsive body language and appropriate facial expressions. Allow speakers to reflect on and finish their thoughts before moving on. Summarize, paraphrase, or ask for descriptive examples to check understanding. Ask follow-up questions to get additional information, as needed.

Quality COS Teaming Practices (1) 1.Plan ahead to have the information needed for the discussion.

Quality COS Teaming Practices (2) 1.Plan ahead to have information needed for the discussion. 2.Discuss the child’s functioning on each outcome, across settings, and relative to what is age expected.

Involving families in a conversation about their child’s functioning Ask questions that allow parents to tell you what they have seen. “Tell me how Anthony eats” Avoid questions that can be answered with a yes or no. “Does Anthony finger feed himself?” “Is that what you see at home?”

Rich Discussion: Example Questions to Ask What skills and behaviors does the child use? In what settings and situations? How often is the child using those skills and behaviors? What supports are needed for the child to use them? Are these skills and behaviors that we expect of a child this age? Are there skills or behaviors that we would expect a child this age to use that this child is not yet using?

Rich Discussion: Addressing the Full Content of Each Outcome For example, for Positive Social Relationships: How does the child interact with familiar adults? With unfamiliar adults? How does the child interact with peers? How well does the child follow rules and routines when at child care? How does the child express himself when he is frustrated? Excited? (other emotions) How does the child handle transitions between activities?

Rich Discussion: Considering Age Expectations Discuss how the child’s functioning relates to age expectations. Draw on child development resources to age-anchor skills. Consider such factors as What is expected in the child’s culture, and Availability and use of assistive technology devices.

Quality COS Teaming Practices (3) 1.Plan ahead to have information needed for the discussion. 2.Discuss the child’s functioning on each outcome, across settings, and relative to what is age expected. 3.Consider as a team what you have learned about the child in relation to the criteria on the 7-point scale and use the decision tree to help apply the criteria.

Summary of Functional Performance Descriptor statements rather than numbers There is no reason to mention the numbers on the scale during the discussion or ask families to come up with a number IFSP Process and Resource Guide:

Culture and Summary of Functional Performance The age appropriateness of some behaviors varies across cultures, especially those related to independence and self care. It is important for working with the child and for completing the Summary of Functional Performance to understand expectations within the child’s culture.

Summary of Functional Performance Example Example: With regard to positive social relationships, Bella interacts in age-expected ways with adults but is not yet interacting with peers. We are seeing a mix of age-expected and not age- expected skills. Does everyone agree?

Discussion Questions How are you currently engaging families in the COS process? What obstacles have you encountered with regard to involving families in the COS decision-making processes?

Video Engaging Families in the COS Process Video

Discussion Questions What steps did the providers take to help prepare for the IFSP meeting, including the actions they took to prepare the family? What unique perspective did each team member bring to the discussion?

Video Engaging Families in the COS Process Video

Discussion Questions How did the Special Educator transition the discussion of the child’s strengths and needs into the COS rating discussion? How will you apply what you saw in the video to your current practice to better engage families in the COS process? How would you adjust your questioning strategies in situations where a parent is not as easily able to describe his/her child’s strengths and needs? How did the professionals demonstrate that they valued the parent’s contributions to the team discussion?

Remote Participation Face-to-face interactions are preferable, but getting all team members together can be difficult Team discussions can be held with one or more members present remotely (phone or web)

When Teams Struggle with Consensus Make sure team members… Share the same understanding of the three outcomes. Have the opportunity to thoroughly describe the child’s functioning. Agree on the age-anchoring of skills. Revisit/review the definitions or criteria for the ratings being considered.

Is the COS Rating Subjective? What does “subjective” mean? “Relating to the way a person experiences things in his or her own mind based on feelings or opinions rather than facts.” – Merriam-Webster Dictionary Research shows that consistent application of rating criteria, like those in the COS process, produces valid information.

Final Thoughts

Evaluations Please take a few moments to complete an evaluation. Thank you!

Resources ESIT COS brochure: PACER brochure: Maryland form: oddlers/resources.html oddlers/resources.html ENHANCE study: Videos: