Mobilnostni načrt za Ministrstvo za promet Republike Slovenije, Ljubljana, 3. marec 2010 SUPPORTING SUSTAINABLE MOBILITY WITH REDESIGNING PUBLIC SPACE.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

Ljubljana – a World City…?. Ljubljana – a World City The first FCG played in Slovenia. Connected to the Royal Visit as a part of its programme.

Advertisements

Slide 1 ECOMM 2009 San Sebastián 13-15th May 2009 The planning simulation workshop in Slovenia: process and results Aljaž Plevnik, Urban Planning Institute,

Mobility for all generations - Social and health issues Tatjana Buzeti Ana Šabjan Centre for Health adn Development M. Sobota.

How to get started in SUMP – the case of Ljubljana Aljaž Plevnik Urban Planning Institute of the Republic of Slovenia.

11-12 February 2014 Issues in planning for future transport systems in Middle East Cities Jubail City Planning Forum, Saudi Arabia Omar Al Battaineh, Arup.

Statutory city of Jihlava. City location History.

Experiences from the QUEST project in Koprivnica, Croatia QUEST workshop in Gavle, 12 March 2013.

1/??. 2/?? A few words about FEMA 23 members 17 countries Representing all PTW users.

Looking forward Innovative ideas and how to take advantage of them 12 November 2013, Stuttgart, Germany Siegfried Rupprecht, Rupprecht Consult.

Parking management and incentives as successful and proven strategies for energy-efficient urban transport Coordinated by FGM-AMOR Pressl, Robert.

Workshop 2 – Integrated development in cities, rural and specific regions Observations from TANGO Lisa Van Well and Peter Schmitt, Nordregio ESPON Internal.

Markham Centre TDM and Land Development Case Study ACT Canada – TDM Summit October 21, 2008.

Ljubljana Urban Region Development Agency meeting with Delegation of Germany - Berlin 31 May 2005 Ljubljana Mr. Miloš Bajt Adviser, City of Ljubljana,

From traffic noise to children's voice Traffic calming measures in the city of Graz CIVINET Magyar pedestrian mobility 16 September 2014, Székesfehérvár.

Urban Systems Collaborative #urbansystems April 19, 2012.

St. Polten, of March 2011 SpiCycles in PLOIESTI city.

City of Zurich - Catch the big players to be partners ECOMM Florence 2014, 7th to 9th May 2014, Page 1 Zurich‘s big employers’ forum Catch the big players.

Arch. Giovanna Rossi Direzione Generale per lo Sviluppo sostenibile, il Clima e l’Energia EUROPEAN MOBILITY WEEK 2012 Coordination meeting Ministero dell’Ambiente.

Car sharing in European CIVITAS cities lessons learned and evaluation May 21th, 2015 Utrecht, The Netherlands Janiek de Kruijff, CIVITAS & TNO.

N° 1 Directorate General for Energy and Transport How can the European Commission enhance the acceptability and success of local transport policies? Seville,

The Bicycle Policy of Copenhagen Clean Air Conference Turin, 25 and 26 Octobre 2002 Thomas Krag Mobility and bicycle planning advice.

WEBINAR Provisions for cyclists 06/06/2012 Fermín Echarte Peña Ayuntamiento Donostia - San Sebastian.

Auditing and Certification Scheme to increase the quality of Sustainable Urban Mobility Plans in Cities Organisation Surname, Name Meeting / Conference.

EMW 2012 Coordination Meeting June 2012 Bologna, Italy.

SUMP development:a challenge of our capacity City of Koprivnica, Croatia 3 June Szentendre, Hungary Helena Hecimovic, DAN.

| The Planning and roll-out of accessible and human-centred public transport services in Europe The cities’ perspective Karen Vancluysen, Polis.

Master Class Almada - March 2009 City of Graz – change of mobility Gerhard Ablasser.

ECOMM 2014 HOW MM POLICY HAS BEEN INTEGRATED IN SUMP IN ILE-DE-France REGION Région Ile-de-France Direction des Transports Nathalie GRANES.

WEBINAR Public participation and public involvement in mobility policies 22/02/ Alessandro Meggiato, Reggio Emilia Municipality.

Slide 1 Our habitat – a small and beautiful spaceship! Fast, rich, vulnerable, with limited ressources!

This project is part-financed by the European Union (European Regional Development Fund), the Finnish Ministry of Environment and the partners. Pilot action.

Bicycle transport developments How to become a bicycle friendly settlement? György Kukely PhD. business director Terra Studio Ltd

1 Regional Development Plan for the Ljubljana Urban Region Ljubljana,

The municipality of Tønsberg: Plans for sustainable transportation systems & mobility management Birgitte Søderstrøm – MECINE coordinator.

1. Variety of modes (types) of transport (public and private) 2. Density of transport networks more nodes and.

Tallinn Tallinn on the way for becoming European Green Capital Relo Ligi, Environmental Department of Tallinn.

1 Stockholm – European Green Capital County Governor of Stockholm, Per Unckel St. Petersburg September

SUMP works well on different scales – experiences from Slovenia ECOMM 2014, Florence Aljaž Plevnik, Mojca Balant, Luka Mladenovič Urban Planning Institute,

Move Together Share it with us ! Move Together Day Conference Brussels, Monday 7 December 2009 European Economic and Social Committee Carlo Sessa – ISIS.

Ljubljana Project idea: Recreational and Long Distance Tourist Bicycle Lanes along Sava River, Connecting Capital Cities Ljubljana, Zagreb and.

Utrecht Attractive and Accessible A new approach for sustainable urban mobility in Utrecht Paul Kouijzer, Manager Environment and Mobility.

Planning for People – an overview of the SUMP concept and its benefits UBC Joint Commission meeting in the City of Tallinn10-12 April 2013 Maija Rusanen.

Measure 60 Cycle Transport Improvements Katerina Oktabcova Usti nad Labem Municipality.

Centre City Planning & Design, Land use Planning & Policy, City of Calgary HERITAGE CANADA FOUNDATION

The sole responsibility for the content of this presentation lies with the authors. It does not necessarily reflect the opinion of the European Communities.

This project is part-financed by the European Union (European Regional Development Fund), the Finnish Ministry of Environment and the partners. NEW BRIDGES.

Starting the SUMP process in Slovenia based on the experience from Ljubljana Aljaž Plevnik, Urban Planning Institute, Ljubljana.

Addressing the conflict between cyclists and pedestrians in Ljubljana draft Luka Mladenovic, Urban Planning Institute of the Republic of Slovenia, Slovenia.

Meeting of CIVITAS PAC 12 March 2014 Graz, Austria Helena Hecimovic, Development agency North-DAN.

Road user charge, City of Zagreb Marko Slavulj Effective solutions for green urban transport – Learning from CIVITAS cities, Athens, 24 April 2012.

Working with stakeholders 1 Simon Koblar – Ljubljana, UIRS.

Effective solutions for green urban transport – Learning from CIVITAS cities 13 September 2011 Brussels, Belgium Michael Glotz-Richter, City of Bremen.

VicRoads – Movement & Place

Mobility in Hasselt. Content of this presentation Short introduction of Hasselt Mobility plan Campaigns City projects.

Tallinn Free public transport impacts on the city environment Relo Ligi, Environmental Department of Tallinn.

SUSTAINABLE URBAN MOBILITY PLANNING IN EMERGING CITIES: THE EXAMPLE OF GDYNIA dr Marcin Wolek Department of Transportation Market University of Gdansk.

Capital of Free Public Transport - Tallinn 2013 Taavi Aas deputy mayor of Tallinn.

Free Public Transport in Tallinn – financial, environmental and social aspects April 11, 2013 Taavi Aas Deputy Mayor of Tallinn

Tackling urban road congestion with CREATE project Paul Curtis CREATE partner, Vectos ECOMM 1-3 June 2016.

Basic figures Population of Tallinn (as )

ECF Kevin Mayne Brussels, 20 February 2017.

European Regional Development Fund

PLANNED ACTIONS – UPCOMING DUTIES

PREVENTING/ TACKLING HOMELESSNESS IN THE CITY OF LJUBLJANA

The PUMAS project.

7th SUMP platform coordination group meeting Brussels, 8 June 2017

SUMP Monitoring & Evaluation: the case of Metropolitan Thessaloniki Thessaloniki Public Transport Authority (ThePTA) Dr. Maria Spandou Chrysa Vizmpa Sam.

SUMPs for functional regions in Slovenia

Project WCYCLE Model of Urban Circular Economy for Municipality of Maribor, Slovenia Brussels, October 2018 Igor Kos, WCYCLE Institute Maribor

The walkability improvements within the city centre – Krakow’s way

Presentation transcript:

Mobilnostni načrt za Ministrstvo za promet Republike Slovenije, Ljubljana, 3. marec 2010 SUPPORTING SUSTAINABLE MOBILITY WITH REDESIGNING PUBLIC SPACE Examples from Slovenia Mojca Balant, Urban Planning Institute of the Republic of Slovenia ECOMM 2015, Utrecht, B5 – Designing public space and buildings for optimal mobility

CONTENT Background Ljubljana Ljutomer

BACKGROUND SUMPs - cca 10 years in Slovenia Active involvement of UIRS Size extremes Big differences in short time

LJUBLJANA inhabitants More than students High number of daily migrations from the region Active in SM in last 10 years Ambitious SUMP Changes strongly connected to the Mayor

LJUBLJANA inhabitants More than students High number of daily migrations from the region Active in sustainable mobility in last 10 years Ambitious SUMP Changes strongly connected to the Mayor FOCUS = Changes in the city centre

Successfull pedestrianization

7 new pedestrian bridges 5 existing pedestrian bridges car + pedestrian bridges

Improvements for cyclists

Restrictive parking policy

Improving reliability of PT

September 2013 EMW 2013 February 2015 April 2015 May 2015

EVIDENCE OF SUCCESS - Tourists thousands of tourists visitorsovernight stays

EVIDENCE OF SUCCESS - Awards -EMW award (2003, 2013) -European Prize for Urban Public Space (2012) -Planet Earth-friendly Municipality (2012, 2013, 2014) -Eurocities »Smart living« award (2013) -Access City Award (2015, honorary mention in 2012) -European Green Capital 2016

Coexistence between cyclists and pedestrians Lack of effective interchange point for PT New underground parking planned for the city centre Lack of monitoring and evaluation activities CHALLENGES

LJUTOMER inhabitants ( in municipality) Centre of municipality Active in sustainable mobility from 2011 Successfull SUMP

Improving school environment Primary school Secondary school

Residential area refurbishment

Cycling infrastructure guidelines

AWARDS European SUMP award (2012 finalist) national Golden stone award (2015 regional winner)

ADVANTAGES Smaller number of decision makers and practitioners -  easier consensus Flexibility  quicker decisions and visible results Measures (even smaller) have a bigger effect Strong community spirit  strong public support

Money for implementation CHALLENGES Traditional way of transport planning and design on national roads

Come to Slovenia in autumn and experience it yourself: Questions? Comments? Suggestions? Thank you!