US-169 / I-70 “North Loop” Planning Environmental Linkages Study Pre-Proposal Workshop.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
TITLE OF PROJECT PROPOSAL NUMBER Principal Investigator PI’s Organization ESTCP Selection Meeting DATE.
Advertisements

New I-65 Interchange at Worthsville Road Welcome!.
Route 17 Corridor Study Public Workshop II – November 29, 2012 Orange / Sullivan County 1.
Joe Olson SW Region Director December 8,  History/Background  Next Steps (Planning & Environmental Linkages (PEL)  PEL Process  Schedule  Questions.
KC REGIONAL TRAFFIC SIGNAL COORDINATION. Agenda  National Perspective  OGL Video Overview  Mid – America Regional Council  Program Elements  What.
Environmental Justice (EJ) & Community-Based Transportation Planning (CBTP) Grant Programs California Department of Transportation District 3 January 25,
NEW YORK STATE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Route 110 over Route 27 Design-Build Project (PIN , D900027) Town of Babylon, Suffolk County Request.
Austin Strategic Mobility Plan Apr 19, 2010 Program Overview.
Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority Pre-Proposal Conference Sourcing and Contracts Management System (CMS) Solution Request for Proposal FQ
King County Metro Long Range Public Transportation Plan Kirkland Transportation Commission_ April 10, 2015.
Anaheim Regional Transportation Intermodal Center Project Update.
Program Update Baltimore MPO November 25, Internal Draft AGENDA  Program Overview  Alternatives Development  Stakeholder and Public Outreach.
History of US Bicycle Routes In 1970’s interest in long distance bicycle travel proliferates.
Improving Your World. RS&H tradition began in 1941 Employee-owned company Six programs of client-focused services Multi-disciplined team of planners,
Anacostia Streetcar Phase 2 Environmental Assessment & Section 106 Evaluation: Community Workshop January 12, 2011.
Steven C. Braun, P.E. Senior Project Manager. A Master Plan identified a Locally Preferred Alternative (LPA) for the corridor … This LPA was adopted by.
Oversight Team Meeting December 11, INTRODUCTIONS (15 MINUTES) Name and affiliation Purpose of meeting/ review agenda Edits to September’s Oversight.
Community Development & Planning Grant Pre-Application Meeting April 17,
Wyoming Infrastructure Authority Developing Electric Infrastructure for the Future of the West Energy Gateway Update Presented by Darrell T. Gerrard Vice.
© 2014 HDR, Inc., all rights reserved. COUNCIL BLUFFS INTERSTATE SYSTEM MODEL Jon Markt Source: FHWA.
MnDOT-ACEC Annual Conference March 5,  Capital planning and programming at MnDOT  Major considerations  A more transparent and collaborative.
Regional Transportation Investments: Alaskan Way Viaduct / Seawall Port of Seattle Commission Meeting March 28, 2006 Item No. xx Supp. Meeting.
Congressional District Projects New CD-7 North I-25 Record of Decision (ROD): — Recently signed the Environmental Impact Statement (EIS), for the corridor.
CCJPA Sacramento to Roseville 3 rd Track Project Sacramento Stakeholder Advisory Committee (SAC) Meeting #1 HDR Office Tuesday, May 20, :00 - 9:00.
CHAPTER 3 SCOPING AND AGENCY COORDINATION. Scoping - the procedure for determining the appropriate level of study of a proposed project/activity - process.
Public-Private Partnership Program 2015 Update 2015 American Council of Engineering Companies ACEC – Los Angeles Chapter Luncheon, July 8, 2015.
ADOT Multimodal Planning Division Planning Assistance for Rural Areas (PARA) Program Overview December 4, 2013.
Citizens Advisory Committee Quarterly Update Bill Van Meter, Assistant General Manager, Planning September 19, 2012.
AGENDA OPEN HOUSE 6:00 – 8:00 PM  Review materials  Ask questions  Provide feedback on purpose, needs, and alternatives  Sign up for list  Fill.
NEW YORK STATE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Superstructure and Bridge Replacements in Region 9 Design-Build Project (PIN , D900020) Broome, Delaware,
OPEN HOUSE #4 JUNE AGENDA OPEN HOUSE 6:00 PM  Review materials  Ask questions  Provide feedback  Sign up for list  Fill out comment.
NEW YORK STATE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Superstructure and Bridge Replacements in Regions 2 & 9 Design-Build Project (PIN , D900022) Herkimer,
WELCOME! July 31, 2012 ODOT District July 31, 2012 PURPOSE OF TONIGHT’S MEETING Introduce the project –Reconstruct I-75.
Creating the 2040 Regional Transportation Plan. Today’s Presentation Now Developing the Next RTP  Very Early Stages of Development  Website: 2040Plan.org.
Andrew Winga, P.E. – WisDOT Project Manager.  Background on numerous Transportation Studies  What is a Planning & Environment Linkage Study  Problem.
METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION Key Steps to Delivering Project 1.Lead agency submits final project scope, budget and schedule to MTC 2.MTC.
Regional Transportation Investments: Alaskan Way Viaduct / Seawall Port of Seattle Commission Policy and Staff Briefing March 14, 2006 Item No. xx Supp.
Request For Qualifications (RFQ) Missouri Local Programs How to Complete the RFQ & Get it Advertised.
Texas Department of Transportation Corpus Christi District Harbor Bridge Project U.S. 181 (Harbor Bridge)/SH 286 (Crosstown Expressway) Citizens Advisory.
Phase I Engineering and Environmental Studies Project Development Flowchart US Route 45; IL Route 132 to IL Route 173 and Millburn Bypass CSS
The Fargo/Moorhead Area Interstate Operations Study Opportunities and Planned Activities Presentation for the Mn/DOT Travel Demand Modeling Coordinating.
TEAM Presentation January 21, Overview Top MoDOT Priority Top MoDOT Priority A Funding challenge A Funding challenge Desperately needed Desperately.
Regional Transportation Investments: Alaskan Way Viaduct / Seawall Port of Seattle Commission Meeting November 8, 2005?? Item No. xx Supp. Meeting Date:
Bicycle Advisory Board September 2, 2015 Freight Master Plan.
August 19, 2015 Port Bienville Rail EIS Scoping Meeting Presented by: Rhea Vincent Mike McGuire.
I-66 Corridor Improvements Morteza Farajian Interstate 66 Corridor Improvements From US Route 15 in Prince William County To Interstate 495 in Fairfax.
The Kern Regional Transportation Plan A Vision and Guidebook for Kern County in 2025.
Preparation Plan. Objectives Describe the role and importance of a preparation plan. Describe the key contents of a preparation plan. Identify and discuss.
1 © 2013 Protiviti Inc. All Rights Reserved. This document has been prepared for use by OOCEA’s management, audit committee, and board of directors. This.
Prioritizing Transportation Projects National League of Cities July 14, 2011 Alan Clark Director of Transportation Planning.
Kansas City Regional ITS Architecture Ron Achelpohl, PE Assistant Director of Transportation Mid-America Regional Council September 29, 2005.
Planning Commission Study Session: Preferred Plan July 23, 2015.
Waterdown Road Corridor Class Environmental Assessment (Phase 3 & 4) Community Services Committee May 9, 2012.
Planning and Environmental Linkages MPO/COG Conference February 24, 2016.
GOODS MOVEMENT COLLABORATIVE AND GOODS MOVEMENT PLAN 1 Goods Movement Collaborative and Goods Movement Plan Final Plan Alameda County Transportation Commission.
1. 2 February Alliance Workshop St. Louis Regonal Freightway Alliance Needs Analysis and Freight Development Committee Terminal Rail Association.
2035 General Plan Update Planning Commission Study Session on Draft Circulation Element February 2, 2016.
Alternative Alignments Public Meeting
Principal Investigator ESTCP Selection Meeting
Chelan County Transportation Element Update
Project Overview – Phase 1
NGTA Halton Planning and Public Works Committee
Principal Investigator ESTCP Selection Meeting
N.C. Strategic Transportation Corridors Master Plans
N.C. Strategic Transportation Corridors Master Plans
Update on Route 1 Efforts Transportation Advisory Committee October 20, 2015 Leonard Wolfenstein, FCDOT Jane Rosenbaum, FCDOT Doug Miller, FCDOT Department.
Principal Investigator ESTCP Selection Meeting
Chicago to Council Bluffs-Omaha
Principal Investigator ESTCP Selection Meeting
Presentation transcript:

US-169 / I-70 “North Loop” Planning Environmental Linkages Study Pre-Proposal Workshop

Pre-Proposal Workshop US-169 / I-70 PEL Study ___________________________________ Welcome & Introductions RFP General Overview RFP Specifics Overview Questions

Pre-Proposal Workshop US-169 / I-70 PEL Study ___________________________________ MARC Ron Achelpohl, Darryl Fields, Charles Gorugantula, Martin Rivarola, City of Kansas City, MO Wes Minder, Sheri McIntyre MoDOT Dan Niec, Susan Barry

Planning and Environmental Linkages (PEL) Study Provides more efficient process of evaluating full range of transportation concepts and identifying preferred improvements. Allows early, planning-level decisions to be carried forward to accelerate future National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) activities. What are benefits of PEL process? Provides opportunity for early coordination with the public. Added early coordination with local, state and federal agencies. Transparent and collaborative environment. Alternatives and avoidance measures can be developed at a local level.

Study Location PEL study limits From 5 th and 6 th Street interchange to the US- 169/MO Route-9 interchange in Missouri. 4 miles From the I-70/I-670 interchange in Kansas to US- 71/I-670 interchange in Missouri. 6 miles I-70 parallel corridor of influence (I-670). 4 miles

PEL study background This PEL study area includes critical access corridors into the region’s core. US-169 in Clay County, along with the Broadway Extension Bridge over the Missouri River. “Downtown north loop” along the I-70 corridor is substandard for current interstate facilities. Why a PEL study? Transportation infrastructure provides safe and reliable access to the region’s core, across rivers, county and state boundaries. Benefits of past investments are numerous and significant. Transport of goods and services contributes to commercial activity and supports the regional economy. Lifespan of these facilities is limited, and conditions around them change over time. Due to the large investment needed to rehabilitate/replace infrastructure, we must take a long-term look at future needs.

Study purpose Overall objective: Develop a purpose and need statement, reasonable alternatives and a phased implementation plan for multi-modal transportation investments for subsequent analysis under NEPA. General scope of proposed improvement is replacement or reuse of the US- 169 bridge along with I-70 corridor improvements These improvements could include: Strategies to improve traffic flow at north and south ends of Broadway Extension Bridge. Strategies to better connect street grid between River Market and downtown Kansas City for future redevelopment. According to NEPA regulations, PEL study will focus on issues such as general location, mode choice, transportation performance factors, known environmental and cultural resource constraints, area-wide air quality and land use implications. Other improvements to be considered: access to Port of Kansas City. airspace around Charles B. Wheeler Downtown Airport. Missouri River navigation. bicycle/pedestrian accommodations. impacts to transit and railroads. KDOT plans for Lewis and Clark Viaduct.

What will we be looking for? What will we not accomplish as part of this study? Study will not produce a single preferred/recommended alternative. Study will produce a set of reasonable improvement alternatives which could be implemented over time according to a phasing strategy. It will set foundation for future NEPA work for segments of study area. Study purpose

MARC will provide project management Project partners include MARC/MODOT/KCMO/KDOT/UG. $3 million from STP funds. Local match 750,000 (City of KCMO) Study lead/partners/funding

SolicitationFebruary 26, 2016 Pre-Proposal Workshop February 29, 2016 (3:00pm) Responses due March 18, 2016 – 3:00pm Notice to proceed Estimated May 2016 Draft PELAugust 2017 Final PELNovember 2017 Procurement of consultant teams for project assistance. Next steps

Request for Proposals ___________________________________ Sections 1 and 2: Program Introduction and Background Response Submission and Due Date Response Contents Sections 3, 4, 5 and 6: Project Specifics Title VI, DBE Goals General Scope of Work Proposal Evaluation Criteria Selection Process Appendix Key Partners, Prior Planning Work Available Analytic Tools and Data

Request for Proposals ___________________________________ Sections 1 and 2: Program Introduction and Background Response Submission and Due Date Friday, March 18 th – 3:00pm. 1 digital + 5 hard copies Response Contents ItemPage Requirements Letter of Transmittal 2 max single sided. Not included in proposal page count Table of ContentsNot included in proposal page count Management Summary/Conceptual Work Plan Not to exceed 10 pages Qualifications and Experience Project Schedules Milestones and Timelines Appendix: Org Chart. Key Staff and resumes Not included in proposal page count

Request for Proposals ___________________________________ Sections 3, 4, 5 and 6: Project Specifics Title VI, DBE Goals of 20%, certified by Missouri Regional Certification Committee (MRCC) General Scope of Work Study Goals, Outreach & Engagement, Traffic Modeling And Analysis, Data Collection, Statement of Purpose and Need, Evaluation Criteria, Initial Alternatives, Refinement of Alternatives, Documentation Proposal Evaluation Criteria Project Concept and Understanding (30 points) General Experience of Planning Study Firm(s) (30 points) General Experience of Traffic Modeling Firm(s) (30 points) Past Performance (10 points) Selection Process Selection and Proposed Schedule

Traffic Modeling and Analysis Understand, quantify traffic impacts of alternatives Regional Travel Impacts – Dynamic Traffic Assignment (DTA) Models Operational Impacts – Traffic Microsimulation Models Support evaluation of alternatives Support public outreach/stakeholder engagement

Request for Proposals ___________________________________ Appendix Key Partners, Prior Planning Work Available Analytic Tools and Data

US-169 / I-70 PEL Study ___________________________________ More information available online: If you have any questions please contact: Martin Rivarola Mid-America Regional Council