Utilitarianism PSIR308. Two distinctive features 1) Promoting the happiness, or welfare, or well-being of human beings 2) It is a consequentialist moral.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Justice & Economic Distribution (2)
Advertisements

Hedonism & Utilitarianism
Non-Consequentialism
Introduction to Ethics Lecture 19 Regan & The Case for Animal Rights
A Place for Cost-Benefit Analysis
Why Ethics? Should I bring my personal beliefs into my organisation? Should not an employer determine standards of behaviour for all employees? Should.
What is a normative theory?
Section 5.2 The End Justifies the Means
RECAP – TASK 1 What is utilitarianism? Who is Jeremy Bentham?
Utilitarianism.
Utilitarian ethical theory
Phil 160 Kant.
Chapter Seven: Utilitarianism
Utilitarianism the Good, the Bad, the Ugly. Utilitarianism Utilitarianism: the idea that the moral worth of an action is determined solely by its usefulness.
Normative Ethical Theory Jim Okapal Asst. Professor of Philosophy Missouri Western State University.
UTILITARIANISM: A comparison of Bentham and Mill’s versions
Ethical Theories: Deontology and Teleology
Virtue Theory Rels 300 / Nurs Sep What is a virtue? Virtue = a strength of character that promotes human well-being (self and others) often.
© Michael Lacewing Three theories of ethics Michael Lacewing
Introduction to Ethics Lecture 19 Regan & The Case for Animal Rights By David Kelsey.
Chapter One: Moral Reasons
What is the right thing to do?
Introduction to Ethics in Health Sector. 2 Why Is Ethical Analysis Needed? Problems are not just technical How do we know which problems are important?
Ethical Issues in Health Research in Developing Countries Rio de Janeiro November 19, 2009 Daniel Wikler, Ph.D. Harvard School of Public Health The Global.
“A man without ethics is a wild beast loosed upon this world.”
Introduction to Utlilitarianism What do we already know about Utilitarianism? It’s a Consequentialist Theory: focuses on outcomes. It’s a Teleological.
Questioning Natural Rights: Utilitarianism ER 11, Spring 2012.
 The benefits of embryo research come mainly from stem cell usage  it is hoped that stem cells can be stimulated to develop any tissue or organ of the.
Utilitarianism. Nature has placed mankind under the governance of two sovereign masters; pain and pleasure. It is for them alone to point out what we.
Utilitarianism or Consequentialism Good actions are those that result in good consequences. The moral value of an action is extrinsic to the action itself.
What is Utilitarianism?
READING #1: “What This Book is About” Chapter One from The Ethics of Teaching.
Ethical Theories Unit 9 Ethical Awareness. What Are Ethical Theories? - Explain what makes an action right or wrong - Have an overview of major ethical.
Nicole Pongratz Allisen Jacques Shannon Griese Amber Teichmiller 4/13/2010.
Setting the state for Kant --Are there any acts that are wrong, regardless of the consequences? (Are consequences all that matter?) --Case: Bombing Hiroshima.
Traditional Ethical Theories. Reminder Optional Tutorial Monday, February 25, 1-1:50 Room M122.
Utilitarianism is a kind of consequentialism
AREA 1 GUIDING PRINCIPLES SECTION 3 Consequences (Utilitarian Ethics) Duty and Reason (Kantian Ethics)
The Moral Philosophy of Immanuel Kant The Ethics of Duty and Reason
Utilitariansim  Why did the theory come up?  Why there is a need for utilitarian idea? Or is there a real need for it?  Ideas of anarchism, social contract.
Ethics Overview: Deontological and Teleological ( Consequentalist) Systems.
Building an ethical toolbox. Engineering 10 Spring 2008.
Utilitarian Ethics Act and Rule Utilitarianism Principle of the greatest good.
‘The New Testament principle of Agape is a better guide to ethical decision making than the Utilitarian principle of happiness.’ Discuss. Robert Brown.
Preference Utilitarianism. Learning Objectives By the end of this lesson, we will have... Consolidated our knowledge of Act and Rule Utilitarianism by.
Utilitarianism. Learning Objectives:- (long term) 1. To understand the ‘greatest happiness principle’. 2. To understand the similarities and differences.
An act is moral if it brings more good consequences than bad ones. What is the action to be evaluated? What would be the good consequences? How certain.
Basic Framework of Normative Ethics. Normative Ethics ‘Normative’ means something that ‘guides’ or ‘controls’ ‘Normative’ means something that ‘guides’
Utilitarianism.
Utilitarianism: objections Michael Lacewing
Moral Reasoning and Ethical Theories “Good engineering, good business, and good ethics work together in the long run.
Jan 29, 10 Ashley Tao. Tues 8-10pm Dundas Town Hall
AS Ethics Utilitarianism Title: - Preference Utilitarianism To begin… What is meant by preference? L/O: To understand Preference Utilitarianism.
Copyright © 2010 South-Western Legal Studies in Business, a part of South-Western Cengage Learning. and the Legal Environment, 10 th edition by Richard.
THE RULES OF THE ULTIMATUM GAME 1. The Referee gives some money, say $10, to the Proposer. 2. The Proposer may offer any amount $X, between $1 and $10,
LO: I will explain Peter Singer’s approach to Utilitarianism H/W: Remember, assessment next lesson 10 th.
The Ethics of Care According to this method, we have an obligation to exercise special care toward the people with whom we have valuable, close relationships.
Ethics Topic 3.
Utilitarianism PSIR308.
What is the difference between these two situations?
By Richard A. Mann & Barry S. Roberts
Introduction to Philosophy Lecture 15 Ethics #1: Utilitarianism
Act utilitarianism, partiality and integrity
Moral Reasoning  Ethical dilemmas in management are not simple choices between “right” and “wrong”.They are complex judgments on the balance between economic.
Moral Reasoning  Ethical dilemmas in management are not simple choices between “right” and “wrong”.They are complex judgments on the balance between economic.
Moral Reasoning  Ethical dilemmas in management are not simple choices between “right” and “wrong”.They are complex judgments on the balance between economic.
Moral Theories: Utilitarianism
Moral Reasoning  Ethical dilemmas in management are not simple choices between “right” and “wrong”.They are complex judgments on the balance between economic.
By Richard A. Mann & Barry S. Roberts
Utilitarianism.
Presentation transcript:

Utilitarianism PSIR308

Two distinctive features 1) Promoting the happiness, or welfare, or well-being of human beings 2) It is a consequentialist moral theory

Two building blocs of utilitarianism 1. an account of human welfare, or utility, and 2. a instruction to maximize utility by means of giving equal weight to each person’s utility

Defining Utility: greatest happiness for the greatest number A) welfare hedonism: experience of sensation of pleasure is the central human good Criticism: Nozick’s machine, injecting drugs into us in order maintain constant pleasure. This would be waisted life. B) non-hedonistic mental state utility: Non happiness, we should include other mental states (e.g. having pleasure of reading and reading) Criticism: we want to write, not just the experience of writing

Definition continues C) Preference Satisfaction: Utility is increased by satisfying people’s preferences. Criticism: Preferences do not define our good. 1) mistaken preferences: by mistake studying Pols. And IR - Things worth having to do versus current preferences 2) Adaptive preferences: If you cannot achieve something, it loses its import: ‘soar grapes’. A repressive system may better provide the preferences of its citizens, as they would be socialized in such way not desire certain things

Definition continues Informed preferences: Criticism: what is an informed criticism? What is the time aspect, e.g. should we be more concerned about today or tomorrow? - Clash of preferences: career paths and romantic love - Uninformed preferences can be satisfied: cheated husband case? Should he better of not knowing the truth, or live a lie? - rational preferences of dead people: my reputation shall proceed - interpersonal comparability: family, neighbours, friends - we should give appropriate background conditions of our preferences - we can satisfy all-purpose goods:

Maximising utility What to do in case of conflicting preferences? -satisfy as many informed preferences as possible -Unsatisfied preferences -Equal amount utility matters equally Acting according to utilitarian principles: 1)Direct utilitarianism: agents calculate the consequences of his actions to maximize his utility 2)Indirect utilitarianism: the idea of maximizing utility is not necessary during the decision-making: Agents should follow non-utilitarian principles to maximize utulity

Two main objections to utilitarian decision-making 1) special relationships: U-agents ground their actions on utilitarian calculations in assuming that each agent stands in the same moral relationship to them. Criticism: what about moral relationships to family, friends, lenders, etc. There are obligations I have to follow, even if other who I have no obligation would benefit more E.g. loan: should I pay my debt, or donate the money to UNICEF? Should we still pat the loan even such act would be the cause of a war? Utilitarian says: I should pay, because it maximises utility. Common sense: pay the loan regardless of whether it maximizes utility Utilitarianism may be alienating, e.g. detach ourselves from our commitments

Illegitimate preferences: -The case of not building a health centre because of racial discrimination in a mainly white society. Or, should we kill alcoholics staying on parks because they disturb the public. So, some preferences are illegitimate. -Unfair preferences: e.g. not selling houses to immigrants, even though the owner does hold any prejudice, as this may decrease the value of the property -Take away! Kymlicka p. 27, parag. 4, last sentence: we cannot consider each source of utility and each kind of preference of equal importance or even legimate

From act utilitarianism to rule utilitarianism Not act but which rules maximise utility -Criticism: The problem is there: aiming to maximise utility but illegitimate preferences and special obligations cannot be a concern of utility maximization game -The problem is the process of decision-making: -From decision-making to a standard of rightness: right act maximises utility versus deliberately acting to maximise utility

Two arguments for Utility maximization A) equal consideration of interests: Aggregating individual interests and desires Treating people with equal consideration Maximization of utility is a by-product B) Teleological utilitarianism: Maximising utility is the goal. Interest of individuals are considered equally because this is the only way to maximize utility Eg. 18 units of utility for 5 billion versus 1 unit of utility for 100 billion Rawls sees utilitarianism from this point of view. That is, if the problem is respecting the people versus respecting the good, it is positioned within the second view

Inadequate conception of equality Does utilitarianism allow some people to be treated as less than equals, as means to other people’s ends? Criticism: source of happiness and kinds of preference a)External preferences: Goods, resources, and opportunities available to others. On this account, can people want minorities to have less resources? b)Selfish preferences: desire for more than one’s own share of resources

People who lack of resources benefit more if well-off give some of their share. No problem with this. But, are resources really mine. Some say, people could demand benefiting from personal property if they could make better use from it and more will benefit at the end. E.g. using one’s garden for public purposes