Dave McGrath ACM Chief Engineer February 18, 2010

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Space Camp/Academy Huntsville, AL S.T.S. – The Space Shuttle –Orbiters –Space Shuttle Main Engines –External Tank –Solid Rocket Boosters.
Advertisements

Blue Origin AIAA Civil Space Symposium Huntsville, Alabama
Ares V RFI Point of Departure Information Package
Exploration Launch Office Scope
AGC and Manual Control of the Saturn V Booster Infoage Science/History Learning Center AGC and Manual Control of the Saturn V Booster Frank O’Brien Infoage.
Launch Vehicles. LAUNCH SYSTEM CONCEPTS SHROUD PROTECTS THE SPACECRAFT SHROUD PROTECTS THE SPACECRAFT MAIN VEHICLE PRIMARY LIQUID OR SOLID ROCKET PROPELLANT.
Launch Propulsion: SMC/LR Perspectives Presented to
MAE 4262: ROCKETS AND MISSION ANALYSIS Single and Multi-Stage Rockets September 9, 2014 Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering Department Florida Institute.
Lessons from Apollo * Data from NASA Apollo 11 Press Kit Shows spacecraft weight delivered to LEO (Low Earth Orbit) Shows weights for each portion of Apollo.
Design Goals Saturn V Ariane 4 Pegasus Vanguard Bellerophon ? ? ?
The Lander is at a 25 km Lunar altitude and an orbital period of approximately 110 minutes. After separation occurs the Lander is completely self sufficient.
Project X pedition Spacecraft Senior Design – Spring 2009
Spacecraft Propulsion Dr Andrew Ketsdever Lesson 13 MAE 5595.
MAE 5495: Launch Vehicle Analysis LECTURE 1 Dr. Andrew Ketsdever Spring 2008.
THE FUTURE PLANS OF NASA FOR HUMAN SPACE FLIGHT; MISSIONS, LAUNCH VEHICLES.
Rocket Power Introduction to Rockets and Missiles Scott Schoneman.
AAE450 Senior Spacecraft Design Catherine Frey Week 4: February 8 th, 2007 Propulsion Group, Transfer Vehicle Group Transfer Vehicle Combustion Chamber.
Rockets 101 AIAA – March 2009 Theory of Rockets Dr. Eric Besnard California State University, Long Beach Project Director, California Launch Vehicle Education.
Rocket Power – Part 2 Introduction to Rockets and Missiles Scott Schoneman 4 Nov 03.
Propulsion Engineering Research Center NASA Technology Roadmap: Launch Propulsion Systems Robert J. Santoro The Propulsion Engineering Research Center.
By: James Phommaxay, Andrew Fazekas, and Nick Chase.
Launch System Launch Vehicle Launch Complex Orbit Insertion Orbit Maneuvers.
“Fly me to the Moon”. Few can argue there is a more exciting vehicle than the Saturn V One of the most successful craft ever built by NASA, no payload.
Rocket Engine Physics and Design
CAV 100 History of Rocketry Chinese Invent gunpowder Emperor Kia-fung Tu-1286 Emperor Kia-fung Tu-1286 First recorded use of rockets as a weapon First.
The Return to Space Exploration Constellation. NASA Authorization Act of 2005 The Administrator shall establish a program to develop a sustained human.
November 30, 2006 Space Telescope Science Institute Conference Scott “Doc” Horowitz Associate Administrator NASA Exploration Systems Mission Directorate.
Space Exploration Timeline
Chapter 24 Space Vehicular Systems. Objectives After reading the chapter and reviewing the materials presented the students will be able to: Identify.
A3 Altitude Test Facility
Thortek Expander Cycle Engine Presentation - 15 Slides 1 Design of an Expander Cycle Engine with J-2 Equivalent Thrust AIAA th AIAA/ASME/SAE/ASEE.
Satellites and Launch Vehicles. “Gee Whiz” Facts Number of satellites currently in orbit is over 900 Satellites orbit at altitudes from 100 miles (Low.
Oh, Thank Heaven for 7-Eleven: Fueling Up in Space with In-Situ Resource Utilization ASTE-527 Final Presentation Riley Garrett.
Space Exploration Timeline
Dynamic Design: Launch and Propulsion Genesis Launch Vehicle: The Delta Rocket Student Text Supplement.
Physics 112 Star Systems Lecture 6 To The Moon Kevin H Knuth University at Albany Fall 2013.
Constellation Program Overview Mark Geyer Constellation Program Office October 2006.
Space Exploration Timeline
Space Exploration Timeline
NASA’s Apollo Program.
What to do with Space Station Poo 1. 2 David Heck Advanced Manufacturing Research & Development Boeing – Phantom Works, St. Louis, Mo SEND IT TO THE MOON.
PROGRAM UPDATE March 2012.
AAE 450- Propulsion LV Stephen Hanna Critical Design Review 02/27/01.
LAUNCH VEHICLE DOWNSELECT A Wide Variety of Launch Systems Are Available Today Initial Downselect Constraint Based Upon UMRM Requirements Primary Payload.
Introduction to the Altair Project
APOLLO SPACECRAFT Daniel McCaffery Jeff Robinson Kyle Smith Jason Tang Brad Thompson.
The Shuttle Transportation System Produced by Loren Fletcher (click picture)
Structural Practices Principles of Space Systems Design U N I V E R S I T Y O F MARYLAND Structural Design Practices Payload interfaces to launch vehicles.
Unit 6 Lesson 1 Explanation. In 2004, President Bush set the following goal for the NASA constellation program, “this vision… is a sustainable and affordable.
SP 210 NASA’s Space Transportation System Development Dr. Lance Erickson.
Apollo Program By: Courtney McGrath why did we want to reach the moon?  Compete with the Soviet Union  Space Race vs.
What Makes Up the Space Shuttle? The space shuttle is the most complex machine ever created by human beings. The first shuttle was launched on April 12,
TESLA Rocket Project Lecture #3 10/28/15
US Lunar Exploration. Ranger Missions first close-up look at the lunar surface first six of 9 missions failed transmitted television pictures.
Uncontrolled copy not subject to amendment Rocketry Revision 1.00.
Launch Structure Challenge - Background Humans landed on the moon in 1969 – Apollo 11 space flight. In 2003, NASA started a new program (Ares) to send.
Space Exploration Timeline Amy Oliver Russia- a scientist named Tsiolkovsky started testing rockets. Konstantin Tsiolkovsky developed.
Flight Hardware. Flight Profile - STS Flight Profile - SLS Earth Mars 34,600,000 mi International Space Station 220 mi Near-Earth Asteroid ~3,100,000.
NAME-RAJIB KUMAR BEHERA REGD. NO SEMESTER,BRANCH:-- 7 TH SEM,MECHANICAL ENGG.
How Astronauts Got Launched to the Moon Created by: Luke Sharman.
An Insiders View of the US Space Programs Dennis O’Connor, PE.
The Vehicle Assembly Building (VAB) construction in early 1965
Development and Principles of Rocketry
Space journey —launching
Space Travel Present & Future
Physics 112 Star Systems Lecture 6 To The Moon Kevin H Knuth
Section 5: Lecture 3 The Optimum Rocket Nozzle
Video ULA.
Team A Propulsion 1/16/01.
Section 5: Lecture 3 The Optimum Rocket Nozzle
Presentation transcript:

Dave McGrath ACM Chief Engineer February 18, 2010 Saturn V Propulsion Dave McGrath ACM Chief Engineer February 18, 2010

Presentation Outline The Saturn V Vehicle Stage 1 Propulsion Abort Propulsion Stage 3 Propulsion Lunar Module Propulsion Command Module Propulsion Saturn V in Comparison with Shuttle, Ares I and Ares V Future Directions in Exploration

The Saturn V Vehicle Formally approved as a project in 1961 (studies for certain parts as early as 1957) First flight in 1967 – Apollo 4 - unmanned Last all-up flight 1972 for Apollo 17 14 total missions (3 unmanned, plus Skylab launch) 79 total rocket propulsion engines/motors Some references indicate additional attitude control engines on S-IVB stage (up to 8) – NASA manual does not list 10.1 M total pounds of thrust for all systems 1.072 M total pounds of thrust for all solids (21 motors total – “ATK” 19 motors)

Stage 1 – S1C - Boeing Prime contractor – Boeing Primary Propulsion – 5 F-1 engines from Rocketdyne LOX – RP-1 (kerosene) ~1.5M lbf thrust each 33 feet diameter by 138 feet long Staging propulsion – 8 TE-M-424-6 retro from Thiokol Elkton

S1C Technical Details Dry weight: 288,650 lbm Loaded weight: 5,022,262 lbm Operating Time: 2 min 42 seconds Separation conditions: 38 miles altitude, 6,000 mph

The F-1 Engine - Rocketdyne Manufacturer: Rocketdyne Largest LOX/RP-1 single chamber engine ever made – 1.5M lbf thrust First full-up development test in 1959 Development started in 1957 for the Air Force Significant instability issues overcome in injector design

Additional F1 Photos F-1 testing at AFRL Dr. Von Braun in Front of SI stage on display in Huntsville F-1 Engines at Rocketdyne

S1C Retro – Thiokol Elkton TE-M-424-6 15.2 inch diameter X 84.3 inches long ~82,000 lb of thrust for 0.67 seconds 278 lbm of propellant (78% solids, 2% aluminum, polysulfide binder) 12 point star grain 506 lbm total motor weight Fully submerged steel nozzle Nozzle extensions put on by Boeing at installation Mounted in pairs under each outboard F-1 engine fairing Eight total used per flight 21 motor qualification program completed in 1965

Position of Stage 1 Retro Motors

Stage 2 – SII – North American Rockwell Prime contractor – North American Rockwell (started as North American Aviation) Primary Propulsion – 5 J-2 engines from Rocketdyne LOX – LH2 230,000 lbf thrust each 33 feet diameter by 81 feet long Staging propulsion – 4 TE-M-29-X retro from Thiokol Elkton Ullage propulsion – 4 RS-U-601 from Rocketdyne MacGregor, TX, later Hercules, then ATK

SII Technical Details Dry weight: 80,220 lbm Loaded weight: 1,060,415 lbm Operating Time: 6 min 30 seconds Separation conditions: 117 miles altitude, 15,300 mph

The J-2 Engine - Rocketdyne Manufacturer: Rocketdyne Largest LOX/LH2 space-restartable engine Isp = 421 sec, 230,000 lb thrust Development started in 1960 Design updated by the Ares program as the J-2X

Additional J-2 Engine Pictures

SII Retro – Thiokol Elkton TE-M-29-4 9 inch diameter X 107 inches long 36,250 lb of thrust for 1.52 seconds 270 lbm of propellant (76% solids, 0% aluminum, polysufide binder) 5 point star grain 380 lbm total motor weight Mounted at the base of the stage Steel nozzle Four total used per flight Nozzle canted 9.2 degrees versus straight baseline Recruit design 11 motor qualification program completed in 1965

SII Ullage – Rocketdyne MacGregor RS-U-601 12.6 inch diameter X 89 inches long 23,000 lb of thrust for 3.75 seconds 337 lbm of CTPB propellant 4 point star grain 488.4 lbm total motor weight Phenolic exit cone with metal shell Four total used per flight

Launch Abort Propulsion

Main Abort Propulsion Contractor: Lockheed Propulsion in San Bernardino, CA Abort motor: 26 in dia, 186 in long 3,162 lb prop, 4,794 lb total 138,300 lb thrust, 3.3 sec 76% TS, 2% Al, polysulfide Pitch Motor: 8.75 in dia, 22 in long 8.9 lb prop, 49 lb total 2,420 lb thrust, 0.62 sec

Tower Jettison Propulsion TE-M-380 26 inch diameter X 55.6 inches long 31,500 lb of thrust for 1.1 seconds 205 lbm of propellant (78% solids, 2% aluminum, polysulfide binder) 10 point star grain 528 lbm total motor weight Dual steel canted, scarfed nozzle One total used per flight – normal operation or abort 21 motor qualification program completed in 1965

Stage 3 – SIVB – McDonnell Douglas Prime contractor – McDonnell Douglas (started as Douglas Aircraft) Primary Propulsion – 1 J-2 engine from Rocketdyne LOX – LH2 230,000 lbf thrust each 22 feet diameter by 59 feet long Ullage propulsion – 2 TX-280 from Thiokol Huntsville Used for LEO insertion burn and translunar injection burn

SIVB Ullage Motor – Thiokol Huntsville TX-280-10 8.3 inch diameter X 36.3 inches long 3,420 lb of thrust for 3.81 seconds 58.7 lbm of propellant (81% solids, 2% aluminum, polysulfide binder) 5 point star grain 88.4 lbm total motor weight Steel nozzle Two total used per flight 13 motor qualification program completed in 1965

Lunar Module Propulsion Prime contractor – Grumman Primary Propulsion : 1 descent engine from TRW NTO/AZ50 10,500 lbf thrust Isp 305 sec 1 ascent engine from Rocketdyne 3,500 lbf thrust Isp 311 sec 16 RCS engines (4 pods of 4) Marquardt 100 lb thrust Isp 290 sec Height ~21 feet, width ~14 feet, 31 feet diagonal on pads Weight 33,000 lb

Pictures of Lunar Module Propulsion TRW Descent Engine 10,500 lbf thrust , 10:1 throttle 6 degree gimbal Ablative nozzle to 16:1, radiative to 48:1 Isp = 305 Propellant: NTO/AZ50 Rocketdyne RS-18 Ascent Engine 3,500 lbf thrust Ablative nozzle Isp = 311 sec Propellant NTO/AZ50 Marquardt R4D RCS Engine 100 lbf thrust 16 on Lunar Module 16 on Service Module Propellants: NTO/AZ50 Isp = 290 sec

Command Module Propulsion Prime Contractor: North American Aviation (later Rockwell, now Boeing) Propulsion: Rocketdyne Canoga Park, CA 12 thrusters for pitch, roll, and yaw control of the capsule during re-entry Rocketdyne SE-8 Command Module Thruster 93 lb thrust Propellants: NTO/MMH, Isp ~230 sec

Service Module Propulsion Prime Contractor: North American Aviation Primary Propulsion : 1 primary engine from Aerojet AJ10-137 NTO/AZ50 21,900 lbf thrust Isp 312 sec 16 RCS engines (4 pods of 4) Marquardt 100 lb thrust Isp 290 sec Height 22.5 feet, width ~13 feet Weight 50,000 lb

Payload to LEO Comparison of the Saturn V with Shuttle and Ares I and Ares V

Future Directions in Exploration Back to the Moon? Initial target of the Constellation program Competition from China and India – both of which have stated manned mission goals to the moon Water found Helium 3 for fusion energy (~$1B per pound) Other resources Asteroids? Potentially easier to get to Potential resources for water and minerals Mars? Part of the new NASA/administration long term goals Congress will have a say Strong bi-partisan support for Constellation

References AIAA 96-3151 Thiokol Solid Rocket Motors on the Saturn V Launch Vehicle, McGrath Wikipedia Various NASA websites NASA Apollo manuals – vehicle, spacecraft, Lunar Module, etc Rocketdyne web site Rocket Propulsion Elements, Sutton and Ross, 4th ed. Boeing web site Aerojet web site National Air and Space Museum web site CPIAC – Rocket Motor Electronic Data (RMED) Base

Skylab Launch

Apollo 15 Photo

Apollo 17 – The last mission to the Moon – December 1972

Little Joe II – Altitude Abort Testing Little Joe II flown at White Sands One mission was a real abort Cluster of Algol motors provided main thrust