2016 Draft School Facilities Needs Analysis Presentation by: Lyn Gruber & Douglas Floyd Koppel & Gruber Public Finance.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
IMPACT FEES AFFORDABLE HOUSING COMPONENT. STATUTORY REQUIREMENTS W.Va. Code § a contains the mandate for an affordable housing component and provides.
Advertisements

Past and Current Initiatives in Pinellas County to Coordinate Planning between the School Board and Local Governments 1996 – Interlocal Agreement and Comprehensive.
Smart Growth Update VCARD May 23, Growth Management & Schools during 2005 Volusia County Council adopts new school impact fee. School Board of Volusia.
Wakulla County Sewer Project Eutaw Utilities Presentation April 7, 2011.
Summary of $475 million Bond Issue and Capital Financing Options Practiced By the State System of Higher Education in Oklahoma Practiced By the State System.
Floyd County Board of Commissioners Special Town Hall Meeting Topic: Update on status of Georgetown WWTP.
PROPOSITION 218 IMPACTS ON UTILITY USER FEES Case Study City of Dixon Sewer Rate Repeal of 2007.
Water Rates Utility Rates & SDCs Presentation to the West Linn City Council October 5, 2009.
Photos by Susie Fitzhugh Building Excellence Presentation Community Engagement April 2012.
Educational Facilities Developer Fee Information October /5/2015.
1 Presented at Symposium: Infrastructure and Growth: Are We Keeping Pace? March 7, 2015.
The Chula Vista Model October 15-17, 2003 DIF Roundtable.
January 20, 2015 City Council Meeting. Purpose Council direction on moving forward with: Housing linkage fee in short term based on 2009 Study and existing.
Implementing State Density Bonus Law in Berkeley November 13, 2014 City of Berkeley Planning & Development Department.
Accounting Details We show transfers as a separate line below personnel, operating expense, and capital outlay so true cost of the department before transfer.
Master Plan Update Chapter 213 of the Local Government Code provides that Cities may engage in Comprehensive Planning which may:  include but not be limited.
Interlocal Agreement – Transportation Impact Fees City Council Workshop July 9, 2013.
State Financing Programs for Brownfield Redevelopment.
June 17, 2008 Fresno County Board of Supervisors First Public Hearing / First Reading of Ordinance Public Facilities Impact Fees and Capital Improvement.
Reduction and Deferral of Impact Fees Board of County Commissioners Discussion Item March 29, 2011.
2014 Budget Department Presentations Infrastructure Funding Options.
C ALIFORNIA’S COALITION for ADEQUATE SCHOOL HOUSING NEW CONSTRUCTION AND MODERNIZATION ELIGIBILITY AND GRANT DETERMINATION Friday, July 24, 2009 Airport.
Walton County School District 5-Year Facilities Work Plan
2015 School Impact Fees April 29, Changes since March o Updated number of square feet per elementary student to 120 sq ft / pupil o Updated the.
Revenue-Based Development Incentives Property Tax Revenues Bob Rychlicki Kane, McKenna and Associates, Inc.
CAREER TECHNICAL EDUCATION FACILITIES PROGRAM Cycle 2 Conversions.
Impact Fee Updates Board of County Commissioners Public Hearings October 30, 2012.
CITY COUNCIL WORKSHOP DECEMBER 14, Sec Review requirements. (a) The City Manager shall each fiscal year prepare a preliminary capital improvement.
Implementing SB 1525: An Update Cheyenne Walsh Squire Sanders (US) LLP Government Finance Officers Association of Arizona Winter Conference Prescott, Arizona.
Council Workshop, June 24, Image Date: 1/15/2014 Future WWTF No. 2 Capacity 2.0 MGD., Expandable to 6.0 MGD. Future WWTF No. 2 Capacity 2.0 MGD.,
City of Marshall Development Proposal to Action Manufacturing, Inc. February 11, 2014.
CITY COUNCIL WORKSHOP DECEMBER 21, Sec Review requirements. (a) The City Manager shall each fiscal year prepare a preliminary capital improvement.
Proposition 1 Workshop: the Grant Application Process July 2015.
Interlocal Agreement – Transportation Impact Fees City Council Meeting July 16, 2013.
Valuing The Site Basic Real Estate Appraisal: Principles & Procedures – 9 th Edition © 2015 OnCourse Learning Chapter 10.
Redevelopment in the Resort Housing District To the Sanibel- Captiva Chamber of Commerce Nov. 29, 2011 Prepared by: Planning Department.
Workforce Housing Pilot Program and Economic Incentive Plan Update Board of County Commissioners August 25, 2009.
Alliance Policy & Management Group TAX YEAR 2015 UPDATE SEPTEMBER 18,
ESS G RANT M ANAGEMENT IDEA Charter School Expansion Act (CSEA), Basic Entitlement and supplemental grants New Charter Operator Training 2015.
Facility Master Plan Board of Education Update April 26, 2016.
PORT OF TACOMA. Contract Increase & Award Pier 7 Structural Repairs Request authorization to expand the scope of existing A/E Contract No and.
Dublin Unified School District Presented by Davis Demographics & Planning, Inc. May 10, 2016 “Draft” 7-Year Forecast and Maturity Analysis Using Resident.
LAND Subdivie a 4.27 acres into 18 lots 17 detached single family homes One duplex Base density allows for unit Affordable housing bonus.
SMITHVILLE R-II SCHOOL DISTRICT Tradition of Excellence The Power of One … One Community … One Future! November 4, 2014 SMITHVILLE R-II SCHOOL DISTRICT.
Affordable Housing Impact Fees City Council Hearing, Redwood City October 26, 2015.
Basis of recommendation (cont.) 3.Insufficient green/open space (pgs. 3-4)  Green/open space within the site inadequate to serve estimated population.
1 Economic Development Program Agreement Sundance Square Central Plaza Robert Sturns Housing and Economic Development Department April 10, 2012.
CITY OF STOCKTON CITY COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM: DATE: PROJECT: APPLICANT: PRESENTOR: AGENDA ITEM: DATE: PROJECT: APPLICANT: PRESENTOR: a) FEIR/IS Final Environmental.
Presentation to Board of Education 1 August 2014 Facilities Capital Plan Board of Education Update August 18,
Presentation to Board of Education 1 August 2014 Facilities Capital Plan Board of Education Update August 28,
Hillsborough County Public School Siting MPO SCHOOL TRANSPORTATION WORKING GROUP
1 Villa Laguna MXD3 Site Plan Review. 2 Request: The applicant is requesting site plan review of a proposed mixed-use project pursuant to the recently.
Economic Development Subsidy Report Pursuant to Government Code Section Ground Lease Agreement by and Between City of Pasadena and KHP (Kimpton.
Jefferson County Planning Commissioners Hearing June 26, 2013
Prior Conversations with Board as We Explore Land Acquisition
Casitas Municipal Water District Community Facilities District No
Large scale development groundwater balance
Updates to the Traffic Reduction and Transportation Improvements Fee (TR/TIF) City Council July 24, 2017.
MPO School Transportation Working Group
School Concurrency Requirement that public school facilities necessary to maintain the adopted level of service are in place prior to or concurrent with.
PUBLIC HEARING Stockton City Council June 6, 2006
Presentation and Discussion of the Draft Transportation Land Use Assumptions and Infrastructure Improvement Plan Report (Impact Fee Report) Town Council.
UNDERSTANDING HOW TO MAXIMIZE YOUR FEES
Delta Water Supply Project
Funding the Town’s Transportation Infrastructure Improvement Plan (IIP) – An Initial Discussion of Impact Fees Town Council Meeting March 1, 2017.
2018 Open Space Bond August 2, 2018.
Crisis in school OVERCRowding : what should be done
Home Rule Option or Permanent Base Adjustment?
12B: Scott County CDA Comprehensive Plan Amendment, Rezoning and Zoning Code Amendment City Council June 18, 2018 Laura.
DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEES AB 1600 UPDATE
Presentation transcript:

2016 Draft School Facilities Needs Analysis Presentation by: Lyn Gruber & Douglas Floyd Koppel & Gruber Public Finance

 Alternative School Fees ◦ Level 2 – Intended to represent 50% of Facilities Costs ◦ Level 3 – Intended to represent 100% of Facilities Costs  District Must Meet at least Two out of Four Eligibility Requirements ◦ District meets Two of the Four  Must prepare and adopt School Facilities Needs Analysis (SFNA)  SFNA Final and Available 30 Days prior to Public Hearing ◦ Public Hearing Scheduled for June 14 th  Effective immediately; valid for 1 year after adoption 2

3 Draft SFNA Supports the Following Alternative Fee Amounts: A LTERNATIVE F EE P RELIMINARY A MOUNT Level II Fee$10.66 per square foot Level III Fee$21.32 per square foot

 SFNA shall be conducted to: “determine the need for new school facilities for unhoused pupils that are attributable to projected enrollment growth from the development of new residential units over the next five years.”  Projected Student Enrollment  Historical Student Yield Factors * Projected Residential Units  Permissible New Construction Costs + Site Acquisition/Development Costs Attributable Projected Student Enrollment=Permissible Costs  Permissible Costs/Square Footage from Projected Residential Units  = Per Square Foot Fee 4

5 Historical Student Yield Rates (5-year) Determined by DDP S CHOOL L EVEL S INGLE F AMILY D ETACHED (SFD) U NITS S INGLE F AMILY A TTACHED (SFA) U NITS M ULTI - F AMILY U NITS Elementary School (K-5) Middle School (6-8) High School (9-12) T OTAL

6 ◦ Collaboration with DDP ◦ Anticipated Development After October 2015 Enrollment ◦ Includes Unmitigated Projected Units Only  Major Unmitigated Projects: Jordan Ranch, Moller Ranch, Tassajara Highlands, Terrace Ridge, Heritage Park, Bay West, Eden Veterans, Dublin Station R ESIDENTIAL C ATEGORY T OTAL P ROJECTED U NITS M ITIGATED P ROJECTED U NITS U NMITIGATED P ROJECTED U NITS SFD1,9301, SFA1, MF6310 T OTAL 3,9552,2361,719

7 ◦ Student Yield Factors * Projected Unmitigated Residential Units S CHOOL L EVEL P ROJECTED S TUDENT E NROLLMENT Elementary School (K-5) 458 Middle School (6-8) 197 High School (9-12) 144 T OTAL 799

8 ◦ Seats at High School level deemed not available. Expected to be occupied due to:  Enrollment Growth from Existing Housing  Projected Student Enrollment from Projected Mitigated Units S CHOOL L EVEL E XISTING F ACILITIES C APACITY S TUDENT E NROLLMENT (O CTOBER 2015) 1 E XCESS /(D EFICIT ) C APACITY Elementary School (K-6)5,1946,141(947) Middle School (7-8)1,4501,495(45) High School (9-12)2,4992, T OTAL 9,1439,966(823) 1. The School District currently operates K-5 and 6-8 schools, the figures above have been adjusted by school level to be consistent with SAB capacity requirements.

9 ◦ Projected Unhoused Students * State per-pupil Grants ◦ State per Pupil Grants Adjusted by SAB – Feb 2016 ◦ Includes Base Grant, Automatic Fire Detection/Alarm Grant, Fire Sprinkler System Grant and General Site Development Grant S CHOOL L EVEL P ROJECTED U NHOUSED S TUDENTS T OTAL P ER P UPIL G RANT T OTAL N EW C ONSTRUCTION G RANT Elementary School (K-5) 458$11,717$5,366,386 Middle School (6-8) 197$12,409$2,444,573 High School (9-12) 144$15,432$2,222,208 T OTAL 799NA$10,033,167

10 ◦ Allows up to 50% of Site Acquisition and Site Development Costs to be Added Site Development Costs ◦ Service Site, Off-site, Utility Costs ◦ JM Amador Site Development Costs-$450,000/acre (2014$) ◦ Indexed to 2016$ by % Change in State Grant Amounts ◦ $482,000/acre

11 Site Acquisition Costs ◦ Ground Lease Option with City (Jordan Ranch Site) ◦ Last Land Appraisal Prepared in 2014-$3m/acre ◦ How to Update to Current Costs? ◦ Updated Land Appraisal ◦ Review of Recent Land Sale Transactions ◦ Discussion with Land Brokers ◦ Index 2014 Values to Current Dollars ◦ Change in Median Homes Sales Price (19-22%) ◦ Change in Land Cost Index (19.6%) ◦ Utilized Land Cost Index--Estimated Land $3.59m/acre, plus 4% (surveys, appraisal, CDE approval) = $3.73m/acre

12 S CHOOL L EVEL S TUDENT C APACITY S ITE A CREAGE K-8 Site High School (9-12) 2, ◦ Site Acreages per 1998 CDE Guidelines S CHOOL L EVEL P ROJECTED U NHOUSED S TUDENTS S CHOOL F ACILITY C APACITY N UMBER OF S CHOOL F ACILITIES R EQUIRED K-8 Site High School (9-12) 1442, Future Site Capacities and Size Requirement (Not Site Specific) Number Of Facilities Required (Not Site Specific) S CHOOL L EVEL T OTAL S ITE C OST 50% OF T OTAL S ITE C OSTS N UMBER OF S CHOOL F ACILITIES R EQUIRED T OTAL S ITE A CQUISITION AND S ITE D EVELOPMENT C OSTS K-8 Site $56,469,570$28,234, $19,482,002 High School (9-12) $198,486,323$99,243, $5,954,590 TOTAL$25,436,592 Site Acquisition and Site Development Costs from Projected Unhoused Students

13 Level II Fee Permissible Cost D ESCRIPTION A MOUNT Total New Construction Cost$10,033,167 Total Site Acquisition and Development Cost$25,436,592 Less Local Funds Credit$0 P ERMISSIBLE L EVEL II F EE C OST $35,469,759 D ESCRIPTION A MOUNT Maximum Level II Fee Cost$35,469,759 Maximum Level II Fee Cost$35,469,759 P ERMISSIBLE L EVEL III F EE C OST $70,939,518 Level III Fee Permissible Cost

14 Average Square Footage Per Unit Determination: ◦ Parcel Attribute Data (City GIS) -Units built previous 5-years ◦ Review of City Building Permit Records ◦ Review of Plan Sizes for Planned/Active Projects as Available ◦ Average Square Footage Estimates Submitted to and Reviewed by City R ESIDENTIAL C ATEGORY U N M ITIGATED P ROJECTED U NITS A VERAGE S QUARE F OOTAGE P ER U NIT T OTAL P ROJECTED S QUARE F EET SFD 6102,8901,762,900 SFA 4781,980946,440 MF ,380 T OTAL 1,719NA3,327,720

15 D ESCRIPTION A MOUNT Level II Permissible Cost$35,469,759 Total Square Footage of Unmitigated Projected Units3,327,720 L EVEL II F EE PER S QUARE F OOT $10.66 Preliminary Level II Fee Per Square Foot D ESCRIPTION A MOUNT Level III Permissible Cost$70,939,518 Total Square Footage of Unmitigated Projected Units3,327,720 L EVEL III F EE P ER S QUARE F OOT $21.32 Preliminary Level III Fee Per Square Foot

16  Estimates “True Cost” Impact per Square Foot  Based on Facilities Master Plan Estimates  $32.87/square foot of new housing  Summarizes Level III Reimbursement Provision  Addresses General Guidelines for Redevelopment  Evaluate Additional Impact of Development  Provides Detailed Evaluation of Local Fund Availability  GO Obligation Funds, Fee Revenues, Potential State funding  Deducts Inter-District Impact and Impact from Existing Development  Review of Prior Year SFNAs (2012 through 2014)

17