Reviewing, Revising and Writing Effective Constructed- Response Mathematics Items 1 Writing and scoring test questions based on Ohio’s Academic Content.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Writing constructed response items
Advertisements

Mathematics in the MYP.
Minnesota State Community and Technical College Critical Thinking Assignment Example and Assessment.
Examining Proofs ©Xtreem Geometry TEKS G.6E.
Section 3 Systems of Professional Learning Module 1 Grades 6–12: Focus on Practice Standards.
Effective Math Questioning
DAY 3: ITEM WRITING This is the item writing/task development part of our workshopPLENARY: ASSESSMENT OF LEARNING IN THE CLASSROOM: THE FAMILY OF SELECTED.
Welcome to the Practicing for the Smarter Balanced Writing Performance Task Online Session West Virginia Department of Education Office of Assessment and.
Proving Angle Relationships
Lesson 5-1 Classifying Triangles. Ohio Content Standards:
Lesson 4-5 Proving Congruence – ASA, AAS. Ohio Content Standards:
Lesson 6-6 The Pythagorean Theorem. Ohio Content Standards:
Lesson 4-2 Angles of Triangles. Ohio Content Standards:
Postulates and Paragraph Proofs
EngageNY.org Scoring the Regents Examination in Algebra I (Common Core)
Lesson 2-6 Algebraic Proofs. Ohio Content Standards:
New York State 2013 Grades 3-8 Common Core Mathematics Rubric and Scoring Turnkey Training Video 12: Guide Papers for 6 th Grade Three Point Question.
Lesson 2-7 Proving Segment Relationships. Ohio Content Standards:
ALIGNMENT. INTRODUCTION AND PURPOSE Define ALIGNMENT for the purpose of these modules and explain why it is important Explain how to UNPACK A STANDARD.
Lesson 2-4 Deductive Reasoning. Ohio Content Standards.
Title I Workshop: Testing 101 Introducing Georgia Milestones.
Assessment Cadre #3: “Assess How? Designing Assessments to Do What You Want”
1. An Overview of the Geometry Standards for School Mathematics? 2.
OPEN RESPONSE QUESTION FROM MCAS SPRING 2003 GRADE 10, #17
Educator’s Guide Using Instructables With Your Students.
SCORING. INTRODUCTION & PURPOSE Define what SCORING means for the purpose of these modules Explain how and why you should use well-designed tools, such.
Mathematics Grade 4.
Strategies for Efficient Scoring Jeanne Stone, UC Irvine PACT Conference October 22, 2009.
Welcome Math Leaders Mac Scoring Training Year 17 …analyzing student thinking and improving instruction.
NYC Schools Task Alignment Project The Common Core State Standards Aligning and Rating Math Tasks April 28, 2011.
New York State 2013 Grades 3-8 Common Core Mathematics Rubric and Scoring Site Training.
1 Focusing on the FCAT Test-Taking Strategies Grades 3-5 Nancy E. Brito, Department of Assessment , PX47521 Information.
Transitioning to the Common Core: MDTP Written Response Items Bruce Arnold, MDTP Director California Mathematics Council – South Conference November 2,
Protocols for Mathematics Performance Tasks PD Protocol: Preparing for the Performance Task Classroom Protocol: Scaffolding Performance Tasks PD Protocol:
Patterns of Square Numbers Module 1. A Question For You… You are helping your niece with her homework and she says, “I notice that every time I square.
4th Grade Math Data Analysis and Probability : Benchmark B 7; Benchmark G 4; Benchmark F 12, Geometry and Spatial Sense: Benchmark B 1;1 Benchmark.
Critical Issues in Mathematics Education 2013: Assessment of Mathematical Proficiencies in the Age of the Common Core Summary of MSRI Workshop.
Ohio Grade 4 Achievement Test – Math 2009 Data Analysis and Probability : Benchmark A 4;4 Benchmark B 45; Benchmark D 13; Benchmark F Geometry.
EQAO Assessments and Rangefinding
Pennsylvania Standard J. Geometry Standard
GEORGIA MILESTONES End of Grade ASSESSMENT SYSTEM Miller Elementary School Parent Information Meeting February 24,
Information about and Tips for Responding to Open-Ended Questions.
Module 3 January, 2009 Sponsored by The Kentucky Department of Education And The University of Kentucky (PIMSER)
Geometry EDN 322. NCTM’S STANDARD FOR GEOMETRY  analyze characteristics and properties of two-and three-dimensional geometric objects and develop mathematical.
WHAT IS BCR and EC R BCR – basic constructed response ECR – extended constructed response.
Ohio Grade 3 Achievement Test – Math 2009 Data Analysis and Probability : Benchmark C 14;14 Benchmark D 18; Benchmark F Geometry and Spatial Sense:
Lesson 5-4 The Triangle Inequality. Ohio Content Standards:
1 Focusing on the FCAT Test-Taking Strategies Grades 6-8 Nancy E. Brito, Department of Assessment , PX47521
1 Focusing on the FCAT Test-Taking Strategies Grades 9-11 Nancy E. Brito, Department of Assessment , PX47521
Georgia Milestones and CCRPI Dan McGuire, Principal Ashley Bagwell, Assistant Principal Parent Presentation February 9, 2016.
Mathematics Initiative Office of Superintendent of Public Instruction Mathematics Initiative Office of Superintendent of Public Instruction CAA Options.
Lesson 4-6 Isosceles Triangles. Ohio Content Standards:
#1 Make sense of problems and persevere in solving them How would you describe the problem in your own words? How would you describe what you are trying.
ATTACKING THE (SAR) OPEN ENDED RESPONSE. Get out a sheet of paper(or 2?)! Your responses to the questions on this power point will be your SAR test grade.
Preparation for the Wisconsin Knowledge and Concepts Examination Criterion Referenced Test (WKCE) Parent-Child Workshop.
Reviewing, Revising and Writing Effective Social Studies Multiple-Choice Items 1 Writing and scoring test questions based on Ohio’s Academic Content Standards.
SBAC-Mathematics November 26, Outcomes Further understand DOK in the area of Mathematics Understand how the new SBAC assessments will measure student.
NOTE: To change the image on this slide, select the picture and delete it. Then click the Pictures icon in the placeholder to insert your own image. SELECTED.
An Overview of Georgia Milestones 4 th Grade Parent Involvement.
Reviewing, Revising and Writing Mathematics Multiple- Choice Items 1 Writing and scoring test questions based on Ohio’s Academic Content Standards Reviewing,
Characteristics of HSAP Standards based Standards based 62 Multiple Choice items (1 point each for a total of 62 points) 62 Multiple Choice items (1 point.
Test Tips and General Info. Information learned through the Ohio Assessment Item Development and Scoring Workshop.
Writing in Math: Digging Deeper into Short Constructed Responses
What to Look for Mathematics Grade 7
DC CAS Anchor Paper Training Reading – Secondary Grades 7, 8 & 10
Series of Paragraphs Expressing an Opinion
Raising the Bar: Debunking Myths About Scoring and Data Charts Dan Wiener Administrator of Inclusive Assessment Massachusetts Department of.
NEA and AFT Item Review Boot Camp Working Session: Mathematics
Proving Congruence – SSS, SAS
Presentation transcript:

Reviewing, Revising and Writing Effective Constructed- Response Mathematics Items 1 Writing and scoring test questions based on Ohio’s Academic Content Standards

Reviewing, Revising and Writing Constructed-Response Mathematics Items Learning Objective: To learn to review, correct and write constructed-response Mathematics items based on Ohio’s Academic Content Standards. 2 Writing and scoring test questions based on Ohio’s Academic Content Standards

Reviewing Constructed-Response Mathematics Items Reviewing the Item 3 Writing and scoring test questions based on Ohio’s Academic Content Standards

Let’s review an item together and then I will hand out additional items that you can review in your groups. We will begin by reviewing a Grade 8 Mathematics item. 4 Writing and scoring test questions based on Ohio’s Academic Content Standards Reviewing Constructed-Response Mathematics Items

Standard: Geometry and Spatial Sense Benchmark: Establish the validity of conjectures about geometric objects, their properties and relationships by counterexample, inductive and deductive reasoning, and critiquing arguments made by others. Indicator: Make and test conjectures about characteristics and properties (e.g., sides, angles, symmetry) of two-dimensional figures and three-dimensional objects. Joan says that she can determine whether the figure shown is a square by measuring one side. In your Answer Document, determine if Joan is correct. If so, which side? If not, explain why not. 5 Writing and scoring test questions based on Ohio’s Academic Content Standards Reviewing Constructed-Response Mathematics Items

Yes, because if CD is 5 inches, then it is a square, and if not, then it isn’t. PointsStudent Response 2The focus of this task is to test conjectures about characteristics and properties of a quadrilateral. The response provides the correct answer of yes and the correct side. 1The response shows partial evidence of how to test conjectures about characteristics and properties of a quadrilateral; however, the solution may be incomplete or slightly flawed. 1 point sample answer: For example, the response may: Provide the correct answer of yes, but no (or an incorrect) side. 0The response provides inadequate evidence of how to test conjectures about characteristics and properties of a quadrilateral. The response provides major flaws in explanations or irrelevant information. 0 point sample answer: For example, the response may: Restate the information provided in the item. Be blank or give irrelevant information. 6 Writing and scoring test questions based on Ohio’s Academic Content Standards Reviewing Constructed-Response Mathematics Items

Let’s follow the list on your Constructed Response Review Checklist. Review Step 1: Is the item content correct, accurate, and realistic? 7 Writing and scoring test questions based on Ohio’s Academic Content Standards Reviewing Constructed-Response Mathematics Items

Review Step 2: Does the item match the standard, benchmark and indicator listed? 8 Writing and scoring test questions based on Ohio’s Academic Content Standards Reviewing Constructed-Response Mathematics Items

Review Step 3: Is the item fair and free from bias and sensitivity issues? 9 Writing and scoring test questions based on Ohio’s Academic Content Standards Reviewing Constructed-Response Mathematics Items

Review Step 4: Is the item written at or below the grade level of the students who will be taking the assessment? 10 Writing and scoring test questions based on Ohio’s Academic Content Standards Reviewing Constructed-Response Mathematics Items

Review Step 5: Does the item assess significant information? 11 Writing and scoring test questions based on Ohio’s Academic Content Standards Reviewing Constructed-Response Mathematics Items

Review Step 6: Is the item written in the passive voice? 12 Writing and scoring test questions based on Ohio’s Academic Content Standards Reviewing Constructed-Response Mathematics Items

Review Step 7: Is the item succinct, and does it contain only the needed information? 13 Writing and scoring test questions based on Ohio’s Academic Content Standards Reviewing Constructed-Response Mathematics Items

Reviewing the Prompt 14 Writing and scoring test questions based on Ohio’s Academic Content Standards Reviewing Constructed-Response Mathematics Prompts

Review Step 8: Does the prompt contain unnecessary technical language? 15 Writing and scoring test questions based on Ohio’s Academic Content Standards Reviewing Constructed-Response Mathematics Prompts

Review Step 9: Does the prompt require a more complex response than a multiple-choice item permits? 16 Writing and scoring test questions based on Ohio’s Academic Content Standards Reviewing Constructed-Response Mathematics Prompts

Review Step 10: Does the prompt require more than a yes-or-no response? 17 Writing and scoring test questions based on Ohio’s Academic Content Standards Reviewing Constructed-Response Mathematics Prompts

Review Step 11: Does the prompt contain enough information to focus the student on the task that must be accomplished? 18 Writing and scoring test questions based on Ohio’s Academic Content Standards Reviewing Constructed-Response Mathematics Prompts

Review Step 12: Does the prompt indicate the amount and type of information that must be Included in the response? 19 Writing and scoring test questions based on Ohio’s Academic Content Standards Reviewing Constructed-Response Mathematics Prompts

Review Step 13: Does the prompt ask for multiple repetitions of the same task to gain additional points? 20 Writing and scoring test questions based on Ohio’s Academic Content Standards Reviewing Constructed-Response Mathematics Prompts

Review Step 14: Does the prompt indicate score-point dependencies? 21 Writing and scoring test questions based on Ohio’s Academic Content Standards Reviewing Constructed-Response Mathematics Prompts

Review Step 15: Does the prompt present a task that can be completed in the allotted time? 22 Writing and scoring test questions based on Ohio’s Academic Content Standards Reviewing Constructed-Response Mathematics Prompts

Reviewing the Rubric 23 Writing and scoring test questions based on Ohio’s Academic Content Standards Reviewing Constructed-Response Mathematics Rubrics

Review Step 16: Is the rubric aligned with the prompt? 24 Writing and scoring test questions based on Ohio’s Academic Content Standards Reviewing Constructed-Response Mathematics Rubrics

Review Step 17: Does the rubric permit multiple solutions in the response? 25 Writing and scoring test questions based on Ohio’s Academic Content Standards Reviewing Constructed-Response Mathematics Rubrics

Review Step 18: Do the score-point descriptors clearly delineate what a student must do to earn each point? 26 Writing and scoring test questions based on Ohio’s Academic Content Standards Reviewing Constructed-Response Mathematics Rubrics

Review Step 19: Does the rubric contain scoring rules that do not correspond to what is asked in the prompt? 27 Writing and scoring test questions based on Ohio’s Academic Content Standards Reviewing Constructed-Response Mathematics Rubrics

Review Step 20: Does the rubric contain unambiguous response exemplars? 28 Writing and scoring test questions based on Ohio’s Academic Content Standards Reviewing Constructed-Response Mathematics Rubrics

As a result of our review, we now know that this item has several flaws. 29 Writing and scoring test questions based on Ohio’s Academic Content Standards Reviewing Constructed-Response Mathematics Items

ACTIVITY 5 Reviewing Items 30 Writing and scoring test questions based on Ohio’s Academic Content Standards Reviewing Constructed-Response Mathematics Items

In ACTIVITY 5, we will be reviewing Mathematics items in our small groups. Turn to Activity 5 in your binders. 31 Writing and scoring test questions based on Ohio’s Academic Content Standards Reviewing Constructed-Response Mathematics Items

Please begin reviewing the items. Remember to go through all 20 steps to detect all the flaws in the items. 32 Writing and scoring test questions based on Ohio’s Academic Content Standards Reviewing Constructed-Response Mathematics Items

When you have finished your review, we will share your group’s review comments with the other groups. 33 Writing and scoring test questions based on Ohio’s Academic Content Standards Reviewing Constructed-Response Mathematics Items

Let’s go back to the first item we reviewed together. If you remember, we listed the flaws on the flip chart. 34 Writing and scoring test questions based on Ohio’s Academic Content Standards Revising Constructed-Response Mathematics Items

Let’s fix the item together. Let’s look at each flaw we have listed on the flip chart and revise the item to eliminate the flaw. 35 Writing and scoring test questions based on Ohio’s Academic Content Standards Revising Constructed-Response Mathematics Items

ACTIVITY 6 Revising Items to Correct the Flaws 36 Writing and scoring test questions based on Ohio’s Academic Content Standards Revising Constructed-Response Mathematics Items

Go back to the items you reviewed in your groups. Now that you have determined the flaws in these items, work in your groups to correct them. Make sure that after you have corrected a flaw you check to see that you have not introduced any new flaws. If you need to check the accuracy of the content in your items, please feel free to use the computer to do an Internet search. 37 Writing and scoring test questions based on Ohio’s Academic Content Standards Revising Constructed-Response Mathematics Items

If you turn to Activity 6 in your binder, you will see blank item cards. Use these to rewrite the flawed items. 38 Writing and scoring test questions based on Ohio’s Academic Content Standards Revising Constructed-Response Mathematics Items

After we have finished this activity, each group will share their revisions with the other groups. 39 Writing and scoring test questions based on Ohio’s Academic Content Standards Revising Constructed-Response Mathematics Items

Now let’s try writing a 2-point constructed-response item for Grade 5. Let’s write a constructed-response item for the following standard, benchmark and indicator: Standard: Number, Number Sense and Operations Benchmark: Use order of operations, including use of parenthesis and exponents to solve multi-step problems, and verify and interpret the results. Indicator: Identify and use relationships between operations to solve problems. 40 Writing and scoring test questions based on Ohio’s Academic Content Standards Writing Constructed-Response Mathematics Items

Can someone suggest a prompt? Let’s review the prompt to make sure it meets all our guidelines. Can someone suggest an exemplar for the rubric? Can someone suggest wording for the 2-point score descriptor? For the other score point descriptors? Let’s review the rubric together to make sure it meets all our guidelines. 41 Writing and scoring test questions based on Ohio’s Academic Content Standards Writing Constructed-Response Mathematics Items

ACTIVITY 7 Writing Effective Constructed-Response Mathematics Items 42 Writing and scoring test questions based on Ohio’s Academic Content Standards Writing Constructed-Response Mathematics Items

Now we are going to write our own items. Please write a constructed- response item to the standards, benchmarks, and indicators listed in Activity 7 of your binder. 43 Writing and scoring test questions based on Ohio’s Academic Content Standards Writing Constructed-Response Mathematics Items

After you have completed this activity, we will share your group’s items with the other groups. The other groups will act as the reviewers of your group’s items and comment on them using the 20 guidelines we have been using. 44 Writing and scoring test questions based on Ohio’s Academic Content Standards Writing Constructed-Response Mathematics Items

We hope you have enjoyed the day and that you are now more confident that you can write effective constructed response items for your classroom tests. 45 Writing and scoring test questions based on Ohio’s Academic Content Standards Reviewing, Revising and Writing Constructed-Response Mathematics Items