EN DG Regional Policy & DG Employment, Social Affairs & Equal Opportunities EUROPEAN COMMISSION Luxembourg, 21 - 22 May 2007 Management and control arrangements.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 Programming period Strategy and Operational programmes DG REGIO – Unit B.3.
Advertisements

Legal Basis for Management and Control Systems in INTERREG III programmes BSR INTERREG III B Joint Secretariat Matthias Heinicke Seminar on Financial Management.
EN DG Regional Policy EUROPEAN COMMISSION Brussels, 11 October 2007 Management and control arrangements OPEN DAYS 2007 Financial Control : New.
Regional Policy EUROPEAN COMMISSION OPEN DAYS 2006 The European Week of Regions and Cities Brussels, 9 – 12 October 2006 _________________________ Workshop.
EUROPEAN COMMISSION Social and economic cohesion OPEN DAYS 2006 The European Week of Regions and Cities Brussels, 9 – 12 October 2006 _________________________.
OPEN DAYS 2006 The European Week of Regions and Cities Brussels, 9 – 12 October 2006 _______________________ Workshop 11E18: Structural Funds 2007 – 13:
Financial Instruments under the European Structural and Investment (ESI) Funds MS expert meeting 17 June 2013.
OF THE CERTIFYING AUTHORITY for the 2007 – 2013 programming period
2 Slovenia Signed Contract of Confidence for the period Compliance assessment for one programme for the new period Experience of a Certifying.
THE CERTIFYING AUTHORITY
Click to edit Master title style 1 Financial aspects of closure European Commission Felix LOZANO, DG Agriculture and Rural Development.
The Managing Authority –Keystone of the Control System
Regional Policy EUROPEAN COMMISSION OPEN DAYS 2006 The European Week of Regions and Cities Brussels, 9 – 12 October 2006 _________________________ Workshop.
“Train the trainers” seminar
Management and control systems Franck Sébert, DG Regional and Urban Policy, Head of Unit C1 SEVENTEENTH MEETING OF THE EXPERT GROUP ON.
EUROPEAN COMMISSION Social and economic cohesion OPEN DAYS 2006 The European Week of Regions and Cities Brussels, 9 – 12 October 2006 _________________________.
Management verifications Franck Sébert European Commission DG Employment, Social Affairs and Equal Opportunities.
Financial Management and Control Annual Meeting of ISPA PARTNERS 2003 Preparation for post-accession Management of Community Funds : Nicholas Martyn Regional.
Hotel Bedford, Brussels
European Union Cohesion Policy
Financial Institute for Regional Development, PI Understanding the roles and functions of Certifying and Audit Authorities in European Territorial Cooperation.
Winding-up Declaration and Audit Requirements at the Closure of INTERREG III programmes ( ) Directorate General Regional Policy Audit and.
RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN THE MANAGING AUTHORITIES AND THE PAYING AGENCIES IN THE MANAGEMENT OF RURAL DEVELOPMENT PROGRAMMES Felix Lozano, Head of.
AUDITING COHESION AND STRUCTURAL FUNDS IN SLOVENIA Nataša Prah Ljubljana, 
Hungarian Delegation Lisbon, 28 October 2008 Financial Institute for Regional Development.
Execution of annual budgets : recommendations for regional and local authorities Axel Volkery Senior Fellow and Head Environmental.
The verification of public investments.
MEETING WITH 28 th April 2011 Portuguese Certifying Authority ERFD and CF.
ESPON 2013 Programme 3 rd Financial Managers Seminar Brussels 19 May 2010.
Financial management Management and control systems Training for Programme Operators March 2012.
1 INTERREG IIIB “ATLANTIC AREA” Main points of community regulation 438/2001 financial management and control systems EUROPEAN COMMISSION SPAIN.
SEMINAR on the EEA Financial Mechanism THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION DIRECTORATE- GENERAL REGIONAL POLICY Brussels 13 June 2005 Control and Audit Nicholas Martyn.
How does the ECA assess Member States’ internal control systems? Workshop on Audit/Evaluation of Public Internal Financial Control Systems (PIFC) Ankara,
Financial management and control
Anthoula Charalambous Savvides Senior Coordination Officer, Planning Bureau Structural and Cohesion Funds Directorate Managing Authority Budapest 5 October.
Financial management and management and control 1.
Audit Authority and Auditors Group of “European Territorial Cooperation” Programmes for Lessons to be learnt from the INTERREG IIIB NWE Auditors.
Regional Policy Veronica Gaffey Evaluation Unit DG Regional Policy International Monitoring Conference Budapest 11 th November 2011 Budapest 26 th September2013.
Structural Funds in Ireland Structural Funds in Ireland Financial management, Financial management, control & audit - Ireland Dermot Byrne Head of Unit.
Closure of the Programming Period ESF TWG Luxemburg 2 nd December 2015.
EN Regional Policy EUROPEAN COMMISSION 1 DG Regional Policy’s evaluation of the compliance assessment process for the programming period COCOF.
EN EUROPEAN COMMISSION Budgetary Control Committee of European Parliament Budgetary Control Committee of European Parliament Brian Gray DG BUDGET Workshop.
1 Fraud indicators for ERDF, ESF and CF Leif HÖGNÄS, DG Regional Policy “Train the trainers” European Commission seminar for managing and certifying authorities.
S&E and BMW Regional Operational Programmes 14 – 20 Training for Local Authorities involved in DUCGS projects, 21st April 2016 REPORTING, DATA COLLECTION.
Ministry of Finance Compliance assessment of the management and control systems of the managing authorities under the Operational programmes. Conclusions.
EN DG Regional Policy & DG Employment, Social Affairs & Equal Opportunities EUROPEAN COMMISSION Luxembourg, May 2007 Risk assessment and planning.
Financial management system of structural funds. Entities involved in financial management system Managing Authorities (MA) Managing Authorities (MA)
Ministry of Finance Financial management and control of the Operational Programmes, co- financed under the Structural funds and the Cohesion fund of EU.
Financial Implementation of the Assistance from the Structural Funds and the Cohesion Fund of the EU Sylvia Indjova Head of Certifying Authority Director.
Transnational training seminar for potential Lead Partners and Partners to INTEREGG IIIB-CADSES procedures for 3° call for proposal CADSES implementation.
Structural Funds Programming Predeal, Romania
Structural Funds Financial management and Control, Romania
Structural Funds Financial Management and Control, Romania
Structural Funds Financial management and Control, Romania
Role & Responsibilities
Role & Responsibilities
Audit Requirements, Risk and Anti Fraud
Management Verifications & Sampling Methods
INTERREG IPA CBC “GREECE ALBANIA ”
INTERREG IPA CBC “GREECE ALBANIA ”
Audit Requirements, Risk and Anti Fraud
Control framework and Audit of European Structural and Investment Funds Visit of the Finance and Constitution Committee of the Scottish Parliament Brussels,
Cohesion Policy Financial Management
MINISTRY OF ECONOMY AND FINANCE
Management Verifications & Sampling Methods
Nicholas Martyn DG Regional Policy
Commission Regulation (EC)
Management & Control, Designation of Authorities State of play
ESF Training Seminar Reinforced role for the Audit Authority
Presentation transcript:

EN DG Regional Policy & DG Employment, Social Affairs & Equal Opportunities EUROPEAN COMMISSION Luxembourg, May 2007 Management and control arrangements Workshop on the new regulations for European Court of auditors Workshop on the new regulations for European Court of auditors Nicholas Martyn

DG Regional Policy & DG Employment, Social Affairs & Equal Opportunities EUROPEAN COMMISSION EN Management and control arrangements 2 Luxembourg, May 2007 Approach  Learn from experiences of (and )  Maintain architecture of system  All essential elements in Council Regulation  Commission Regulation to set clear and complete detailed rules

DG Regional Policy & DG Employment, Social Affairs & Equal Opportunities EUROPEAN COMMISSION EN Management and control arrangements 3 Luxembourg, May 2007 Lessons learned  Ex-ante assurance on compliance of set up of systems cannot be provided by Commission assessment  The Budget Discharge process and Annual Declaration by DGs make essential an Annual Assurance from Member States  The national audit effort for each programme should be under one defined body  Disadvantages of "Big Bang" closure  Control obligations must be clear and precise

DG Regional Policy & DG Employment, Social Affairs & Equal Opportunities EUROPEAN COMMISSION EN Management and control arrangements 4 Luxembourg, May 2007 Audit opinion at closure Commission audits Annual opinion based on national audits Certification of expenditure + first level verification Compliance assessment Guarantees in programme negotiations How assurance will be built up Ex ante Ex post During implementation

DG Regional Policy & DG Employment, Social Affairs & Equal Opportunities EUROPEAN COMMISSION EN Management and control arrangements 5 Luxembourg, May 2007 Division of responsibility (1/2)  Commission supervisory role –Satisfies itself that “set up” is compliant –Verifying effective functioning –Using powers of interrupting and suspension of payments –Making financial corrections

DG Regional Policy & DG Employment, Social Affairs & Equal Opportunities EUROPEAN COMMISSION EN Management and control arrangements 6 Luxembourg, May 2007 Division of responsibility (2/2)  Member State responsible for: –Set up of a management and control system which complies with requirements of regulations –Ensuring that systems function effectively - i.e. certification reliable –Preventing, detecting, correcting irregularities

DG Regional Policy & DG Employment, Social Affairs & Equal Opportunities EUROPEAN COMMISSION EN Management and control arrangements 7 Luxembourg, May 2007  For each programme: –Managing Authority (MA) –Certifying Authority (CA) –Audit Authority (AA) –Body to receive payments from Commission and disburse to beneficiaries (can be MA or CA) Authorities designated (1/2)

DG Regional Policy & DG Employment, Social Affairs & Equal Opportunities EUROPEAN COMMISSION EN Management and control arrangements 8 Luxembourg, May 2007 Authorities designated (2/2)  General provisions: –Same authorities can be designated for more than one OP –Member State can designate IB(s) to carry out some or all the tasks of the MA or CA –Some or all authorities may be part of the same body (e.g. Ministry), subject to sufficient segregation of functions

DG Regional Policy & DG Employment, Social Affairs & Equal Opportunities EUROPEAN COMMISSION EN Management and control arrangements 9 Luxembourg, May 2007 Managing Authority (1/2)  Responsibility for implementing the programme, in particular for: –Selection of operations –Desk and on-spot verifications of operations –Compliance with information and publicity requirements –Ensuring the audit trail (levels: MA/intermediate body and beneficiary) Art. 60 Council Regulation

DG Regional Policy & DG Employment, Social Affairs & Equal Opportunities EUROPEAN COMMISSION EN Management and control arrangements 10 Luxembourg, May 2007 Managing Authority (2/2)  Other responsibilities –To inform beneficiaries of all conditions for funding, including the time limit for execution –To satisfy itself (before grant approval) that beneficiary has capacity to fulfil conditions –Administrative verifications on ALL payment requests –On-spot verifications, possibly on a sample basis –Written standards and proper recording of checks Art. 13 Implementation Regulation

DG Regional Policy & DG Employment, Social Affairs & Equal Opportunities EUROPEAN COMMISSION EN Management and control arrangements 11 Luxembourg, May 2007 Certifying authority (1/4)  Responsibilities of CA practically unchanged compared to  Function: to draw up and submit to Commission certified expenditure statements and payment requests Art. 61 of C.R. and 20 Implementation Regulation

DG Regional Policy & DG Employment, Social Affairs & Equal Opportunities EUROPEAN COMMISSION EN Management and control arrangements 12 Luxembourg, May 2007 Certifying authority (2/4)  Formal designation by MS  CA and Managing Authority (MA) can be part of the same body (e.g. Ministry); but segregation of duties  Certification of expenditure with regard to: –accuracy of data; must be based on reliable accounting system and verifiable supporting documents –compliance with EU and national rules  information from MA about MA’s verifications (active role of CA to obtain adequate data and to satisfy itself about its reliability)

DG Regional Policy & DG Employment, Social Affairs & Equal Opportunities EUROPEAN COMMISSION EN Management and control arrangements 13 Luxembourg, May 2007 Certifying authority (3/4)  How does CA satisfy itself that data are accurate and that all conditions for certification are fulfilled? –Examination of information received from MA on verifications carried out to expenditure –CA’s own checks, including audit trail at level MA/intermediate body and possible sample checks of project files –Audit reports of AA for systems audits and project audits and Annual Control Report and opinion –Working document concerning good practice of the Paying Authority (period ) of January 2006 should also be applied for period

DG Regional Policy & DG Employment, Social Affairs & Equal Opportunities EUROPEAN COMMISSION EN Management and control arrangements 14 Luxembourg, May 2007 Certifying authority (4/4)  Maintaining computerized accounting records  Keeping accounts of amounts recoverable and amounts recovered Art. 61 of C.R.  Sending to Commission annual reports on amounts recoverable, recovered and withdrawn following cancellation Art. 20 Implementation Regulation

DG Regional Policy & DG Employment, Social Affairs & Equal Opportunities EUROPEAN COMMISSION EN Management and control arrangements 15 Luxembourg, May 2007 Summary MA & PA  No essential changes for the MA & CA compared to  Details already recommended by Commission as good practice now included in Council and Commission Regulations.  Commission’s guidance notes concerning verifications by MA/intermediate bodies and certification function by PA should still be applied

DG Regional Policy & DG Employment, Social Affairs & Equal Opportunities EUROPEAN COMMISSION EN Management and control arrangements 16 Luxembourg, May 2007 Legal framework  Council Regulation –Art : Management and control systems –Art : Responsibilities of Member States and Commission, compliance assessment procedure, proportionality –Art : Financial correction procedures  Commission Regulation –Art Management and control systems –Art Reporting of irregularities

DG Regional Policy & DG Employment, Social Affairs & Equal Opportunities EUROPEAN COMMISSION EN Management and control arrangements 17 Luxembourg, May 2007 Eligibility & exceptions (1/3)  General: –National rules subject to exceptions, specified in Fund regulations  Exceptions –ERDF & CF (1080/2006, Art.7 & 1084/2006, Art. 3) Recoverable VAT, interest on debt, land costs over 10%, decommissioning nuclear power stations, housing (CF) –ESF (1081/2006, Art.3) Recoverable VAT, interest on debt, various physical assets

DG Regional Policy & DG Employment, Social Affairs & Equal Opportunities EUROPEAN COMMISSION EN Management and control arrangements 18 Luxembourg, May 2007 Eligibility & exceptions (2/3)  Housing (1828/2006, Art.47)  Territorial cooperation –1080/2006, Art. 7 applicable –1828/2006, Art specific rules for: Financial charges, legal, audit cots, guarantees Cost of public authorities implementing operations In-kind contributions Overheads Depreciation

DG Regional Policy & DG Employment, Social Affairs & Equal Opportunities EUROPEAN COMMISSION EN Management and control arrangements 19 Luxembourg, May 2007 Eligibility & exceptions (3/3)  Specific rules on: –Revenue generating projects (1083/2006, Art.55) –In-kind contributions, depreciation, overheads (1083/2006, Art. 56.2) –Financial engineering and urban development funds (1083/2006, Art. 44 & 1828/2006, Art ) –Advances on state aid payments (1083/2006, Article 78.2) –Financial engineering expenditure at closure (1083/2006, Art. 78.6) –ESF : salaries and allowances paid by third parties, overheads, depreciation)

DG Regional Policy & DG Employment, Social Affairs & Equal Opportunities EUROPEAN COMMISSION EN Management and control arrangements 20 Luxembourg, May 2007 Scope of “national” eligibility rules and communication to Commission  Other comments –“National” = at the appropriate national level, i.e. not necessarily central level, can be regional or programme-specific –To be communicated with description of management and control system, at latest within 12 months of approval of programme –Commission will examine rules and may make observations