Progress Monitoring Goal Setting Overview of Measures Keith Drieberg, Director of Psychological Services John Oliveri, School Psychologist Cathleen Geraghty,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Progress Monitoring And RtI System
Advertisements

Scott Linner Aimsweb Trainer Aimsweb support
OVERVIEW OF CURRICULUM-BASED MEASUREMENT AS A GENERAL OUTCOME MEASURE
Chapter 9 Fluency Assessment Jhanyce A. Acosta. What? * Fluency Assessment -a method of listening to students read aloud in order to gathering their data,
Overview of Progress Monitoring Training Session Part of a training series developed to accompany the AIMSweb Improvement System. Purpose is to provide.
Progress Monitoring and Goal Writing
Big Ideas About Frequent Formative Evaluation Using General Outcome Measures and the Progress Monitoring Program One of the most powerful interventions.
DIBELS Part I SEDL 368. To access the materials, you will need to go to Download.
Progress Monitoring project DATA Assessment Module.
Plan Evaluation/Progress Monitoring Problem Identification What is the problem? Problem Analysis Why is it happening? Progress Monitoring Did it work?
Goal Writing. To improve our goal writing:  Remember: goals are statements about the power or impact of our instructional programs.  Goals need to be.
An Introduction to Response to Intervention
Universal Screening: Answers to District Leaders Questions Are you uncertain about the practical matters of Response to Intervention?
Progress Monitoring and Goal Writing Using CBMs to write RtI goals Using CBMs to write RtI goals.
DATA-BASED DECISION MAKING USING STUDENT DATA-BECAUSE IT’S BEST PRACTICE & IT’S REQUIRED Dr. David D. Hampton Bowling Green State University.
Thinking Smart About Assessment Ben Clarke, Ph.D. Rachell Katz, Ph.D. August 25, 2004 Oregon Reading First Mentor Coach Training © 2004 by the Oregon Reading.
Aimsweb overview Group-Administered Measures: Training Format
Universal Screening and Progress Monitoring Nebraska Department of Education Response-to-Intervention Consortium.
 “Fluency assessment consists of listening to students read aloud and collecting information about their oral reading accuracy, rate, and prosody.” (Page.
Reading First Assessment Faculty Presentation. Fundamental Discoveries About How Children Learn to Read 1.Children who enter first grade weak in phonemic.
Response to Intervention How to Monitor RTI Reading Interventions Jim Wright
Chapter 9 Fluency Assessment Tina Jensen. What? Fluency Assessment Consists of listening to students read aloud for a given time to collect information.
Progress Monitoring and Goal Writing Using CBMs to write RtI goals.
Grade-level Benchmark Data Meetings
Schoolwide Reading Improvement Model - RTI Name:___________________________ Grade:___________________________ School:__________________________ CONSULTING.
Setting Ambitious & Attainable Student Goals OrRTI Spring Training May 3 rd, 2011.
Research Foundations and EGRA Protocols or Why these measures? Sylvia Linan-Thompson.
Utilizing AIMSweb to Inform Instruction June 25, 2012.
Reevaluation Using PSM/RTI Processes, PLAFP, and Exit Criteria How do I do all this stuff?
1 Using Progress Monitoring to Develop Strong IEPs Nancy Safer Whitney Donaldson National Center on Student Progress Monitoring Ingrid Oxaal OSEP OSEP.
Response to Intervention RTI Data Challenge: Setting Individual RTI Academic Goals Using Research Norms for Students Receiving.
Progress Monitoring and Response to Intervention Solution.
PSM/RtI Formal Evaluation Level 2 at Middle School Curriculum Based Assessment.
Intervention Management. Keeping RtI on Track Jigsaw chapter 1 (pps. 1-6) Each person reads one section Share a big idea from your section and answer.
DIBELS: Dynamic Indicators of Basic Early Literacy Skills 6 th Edition A guide for Parents.
Today’s Learning Objectives: 1.What is Progress Monitoring? 2.Brief review of Universal Screening data, 2.Brief review of Universal Screening data, identifying.
School-wide Data Analysis Oregon RtI Spring Conference May 9 th 2012.
PROGRESS MONITORING FOR DATA-BASED DECISIONS June 27, 2007 FSSM Summer Institute.
RTI Procedures Tigard Tualatin School District EBIS / RTI Project Jennifer Doolittle Oregon Department of Education, January 27, 2006.
1 Curriculum Based Measures Improving Student Outcomes through Progress Monitoring.
Vision: Every child in every district receives the instruction that they need and deserve…every day. Oregon Response to Intervention Vision: Every child.
Using Data in the EBIS System Universal Screening and Progress Monitoring.
From Screening to Verification: The RTI Process at Westside Jolene Johnson, Ed.S. Monica McKevitt, Ed.S.
Progress Monitoring and the Academic Facilitator Cotrane Penn, Ph.D. Intervention Team Specialist East Zone.
Reevaluation Using PSM/RTI Processes, PLAFP, and Exit Criteria How do I do all this stuff?
McGraw-Hill/Irwin © 2012 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. What is Student Progress Monitoring and How Will it Help Me? Laura Florkey.
Progress Monitoring Strategies for Writing Individual Goals in General Curriculum and More Frequent Formative Evaluation Mark Shinn, Ph.D. Lisa A. Langell,
Special Education Referral and Evaluation Report Oregon RTI Project Sustaining Districts Trainings
HOW DO WE USE DIBELS WITH AN OUTCOMES-DRIVEN MODEL? Identify the Need for Support Validate the Need for Support Plan Support Evaluate Effectiveness of.
Class Action Research: Treatment for the Nonresponsive Student IL510 Kim Vivanco July 15, 2009
RtI Team 2009 Progress Monitoring with Curriculum-Based Measurement in Reading -DIBELS.
Data-Based Decision Making: Universal Screening and Progress Monitoring.
DIBELS: Doing it Right –. Big Ideas of Today’s Presentation Reading success is built upon a foundation of skills DIBELS (Dynamic Indicators of Basic Early.
Types of Assessment: Curriculum Based Measurement Characteristics : Simple Accurate Efficient Generalizable Reliable and valid Predictive Sensitive Flexible.
1 Average Range Fall. 2 Average Range Winter 3 Average Range Spring.
Intensive Reading Support 6.0 Evaluate Instructional Support
Intensive Reading Support 6.0 Evaluate Instructional Support 21.
Progress Monitoring Goal Setting/Graphing Administration of ORF/Maze Keith Drieberg, Director of Psychological Services John Oliveri, School Psychologist.
Response to Intervention (RtI) Aldine ISD District Staff Development August 18, 2009.
RtI Team 2009 Progress Monitoring with Curriculum-Based Measurement in Reading - AIMS.
WestEd.org Washington Private Schools RtI Conference Follow- up Webinar October 16, 2012 Silvia DeRuvo Pam McCabe WestEd Center for Prevention and Early.
RTI Trends & Issues Keith Drieberg Brad McDuffee San Bernardino City Unified School District Keith Drieberg Brad McDuffee San Bernardino City Unified School.
Addressing Questions with KN, 1st and 2nd Grade Reading
K-5: Progress Monitoring JANUARY, 2010 WAKE COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOL SYSTEM INTERVENTION ALIGNMENT.
What is AIMSweb? AIMSweb is a benchmark and progress monitoring system based on direct, frequent and continuous student assessment.
Data Collection Challenge:
DIBELS Next Overview.
Curriculum-Based Measurement: A Method for Monitoring Student Academic Progress in Basic Skills.
Data-Based Instructional Decision Making
Special Education teacher progress monitoring refresher training
Presentation transcript:

Progress Monitoring Goal Setting Overview of Measures Keith Drieberg, Director of Psychological Services John Oliveri, School Psychologist Cathleen Geraghty, School Psychologist

Overview Comparison of Terms Between Systems TermAIMSWEBDistrictGrade Level Frequency I/II/IIILevelsTiers III (Red Zone)Progress Monitor IntensiveInstructionalWeekly II (Yellow Zone)StrategicTargetedAssigned1 x Monthly I (Green Zone)BenchmarkSchool- wide Screenings Assigned3 Times a Year

General Education Screening and Progress Monitoring in General Education

Screening Screening allows for quick identification of students that are at-risk for academic difficulties Different screening measurements When to do screenings Who is screened?

Screening When and Why? 1st Screening - identification 2nd Screening - prediction and identification 3rd Screening - goal attainment

Which Measures Kindergarten –Fall - Letter Naming Fluency (LNF) –Winter - LNF & Phoneme Segmentation Fluency (PSF) –Spring - LNF & PSF 1st Grade –Fall - Nonsense Word Fluency (NWF) & Oral Reading Fluency (ORF) –Winter - NWF & ORF –Spring - NWF & ORF 2nd Grade –Fall - ORF –Winter - ORF Spring - ORF

Administration for Early Literacy

Letter Naming Fluency

Example: Letter Naming Fluency

Phoneme Segmentation Fluency

Example: Phoneme Segmentation Fluency

Nonsense Word Fluency

Example: Nonsense Word Fluency

Oral Reading Fluency

ORF (R-CBM) Administration Student’s read the passage aloud for 1 minute Number of words read correct and number of errors are counted –WRC/errors

Example: Oral Reading Fluency

Curriculum Based Measurement Reading Maze AreaTimingTest ArrangementsWhat is Scored? CBM Maze Reading 3 minutes Individual, Small Group, or Classroom Group # of Correct Answers CBM Maze is designed to provide educators a more complete picture of students’ reading skills, especially when comprehension problems are suspected.

An example of CBM Maze

Who is Screened? Ideally, all students are screened in the Fall, Winter, and Spring Students scoring below the 25th percentile are considered at-risk and should be progress monitored

What Is & Why Progress Monitor What is Progress Monitoring –Formative assessment tool Why Progress Monitor –Tell us whether students are profiting from the curriculum, and whether or not an intervention is effective for that particular student Some Everyday Examples of How We Use Informal Progress Monitoring

What is Progress Monitoring Technically adequate –reliability and validity Capacity to model growth –able to represent student achievement growth within and across academic years Treatment sensitivity –scores should change when students are learning Independence from specific instructional techniques –instructionally eclectic so the system can be used with any type of instruction or curriculum Capacity to inform teaching –should provide information to help teachers improve instruction Feasibility –must be doable

Why Progress Monitor Screening is not enough for some students because they may be in ineffective programs for too long. Progress monitoring allows for individualized goals to be written and determination of a feasible amount of time for the goal to be reached. Allows for an analysis of student need and resources for determining progress monitoring frequency. –Programs that are more intensive (e.g., special education), should monitor student outcomes more frequently that 3x per year.

More Frequent Evaluation

Progress Monitoring Plan –No Learning Center Monitor at-risk students, once a month at grade level –Learning Center Monitor at-risk students –once a month at grade level –every week at instructional level Collect data on Wednesday or Thursday

Goal Setting - General Each student should have a year-long goal (you want the student to be performing at the 50th percentile on grade level material) Every goal should have: –Time frame (when the goal should be reached) –Behavior (what the desired level of performance is) –Condition (which measure and where you obtained it from) –Criterion (which grade level passage you are using - if applicable)

Sample ORF Goal Oral Reading Fluency (Fluency) –In (#) of weeks (student name) will read (#) word correct in 1 minute as measured by a (grade ___ ) (AIMSWeb Oral Reading Fluency Measure).

Norms and Growth Rates

Year-Long Goal Expected weekly growth –If the student is not at-risk use the average rate of growth –If the student is at-risk use the ambitious rates of growth (e.g., below the 25th percentile) Multiply the growth rate by 36 (weeks of school) and add it to the baseline level of performance

Year-Long Goal Example In the fall, a 4th grade student’s instructional level is 2nd grade and the student reads 22 words correct per minute. Ambitious growth for 2nd grade is 2 words per week –22 + (2 x 36) = 94 –The year-long goal would be 94 words correct per minute

Short-Term Goal All students being progress monitored need shorter-term goals These goals should use ambitious rates of growth to help the students ‘catch-up’

Short-Term Goals Determine what level of performance is needed to move up a percentile rank (e.g., 10th to 25th; 25th to 50th) Take the difference in performance (e.g., how many words correct the student will need to move from the 10th to 25th percentile), and divide by the ambitious rate of growth –This product will be the approximate number of weeks needed for the student to reach the next percentile rank

Short-Term Goals If using early literacy measures (LNF, PSF, NWF) move up instructional level until the student has mastered that skill, then move up to the next skill

Short-Term Goals In the Winter, a 3rd grade student’s instructional level is 2nd grade and the student reads 29 words correct per minute. –The student is currently performing at the 10th percentile. The short term goal should be at the 25th percentile. Difference between the 25th and 10th percentile at the 2nd grade level is 24. Divide 24 by the ambitious growth rate (2.0) and you get 12. That is the number of weeks it should take the student to move from the 10th to the 25th percentile.

Charting Progress Once you set the goal, you need to chart progress to see if the student is responding to the change in instruction

Evaluating Goal Attainment Process of assessing student achievement during instruction to determine whether an instructional program is effective for individual students.Process of assessing student achievement during instruction to determine whether an instructional program is effective for individual students. –When students are progressing, keep using your instructional programs. –When tests show that students are not progressing, you can change your instructional programs in meaningful ways. –Has been linked to important gains in student achievement (Fuchs, 1986) with effect sizes of.7 and greater.

Trendline Goal Line

Trendline

Goal line Trend Line

Special Education How can Progress Monitoring be used in Special Education?

Educational Benefit Progress monitor at both instructional and grade level –Grade Level Goals How is the student performing relative to his/her peers? –Instructional Level Goals How is the student’s performance changing as a function of the current instruction / intervention? –Instructional level progress monitoring is sensitive to growth.

General Goal Setting Long-Term Goal –The long-term goal should be either to move the student: Up a full grade level (Ex. 50 th percentile on a 1 st grade probe to 50 th percentile on a 2 nd grade probe) Up to a higher skill (Ex. Letter Naming Fluency to Letter Sound Fluency)

General Goal Setting (continued) Short-Term Goals (Benchmark 1 & 2) –The benchmark goals should be to move the student up a percentile level within their instructional level (could be the same as grade level). (Ex. Move from the 25 th to the 50 th percentile).

Review/Overview Comparison of Terms Between Systems Term AIMSWEB District Grade Level Frequency I/II/IIILevelsTiers III (Red Zone) Progress Monitor Intensive Instructional Weekly II (Yellow Zone) StrategicTargetedAssigned 1 x Monthly I (Green Zone) BenchmarkSchool- wide Screenings Assigned 3 Times a Year

First Example (Topic Two ) The Movie “City Slickers” The Cattle Drive----

That Great Line: “Don’t Know Where We Are At; Don’t Know Where We Are Going; But We Are Sure Are Making A Lot Of Progress”

That Great Line: A Case For Level I Bench Mark Screenings At Assigned Grade Levels For All Students Don’t Know Where We Are At No Base Line Point Don’t Know Where We Are Going No Goal Point Not Sure Of Progress No Goal Line or Aimline

What We Already Know : A Case For Level II Strategic/ Targeted Assigned Grade Level Progress Monitoring On a Regular Basis The Earlier We Start Interventions; The Less Behind the Student is in Comparison to Their Grade Level Peers; and The Sooner A Student Starts to Makes Progress Their Peer Growth Rate Is High And Student “Catches Up Quickly” (within about a year) Because They are Not Too Far Behind (Assigned Grade Level Progress Monitoring / Strategic/Targeted – ideal 1 x Monthly)

What We Need to Think More About: A Case For Level III Progress Monitor/Intensive Instructional Level Progress Monitoring Higher Grade Levels (Especially 4 th Grade +) Student Significantly Farther Behind Assigned Grade Level Peers Need Long Term Goals (Takes Longer Than One Year to “Catch Up”) Kids Give Up On Themselves (Highest Drop Out Rate 9 th Grade) We Expect Less of Students at Higher Grade Levels and Blame Others (Instructional Grade Level Progress Monitoring To Know If Intervention is Workng; Appreciate Progress Sooner; and Receive Frequent Feedback )

What We Need to Think More About: Instructional Grade Level Progress Monitoring Higher Grade Levels (Especially 4 th Grade +) Student Significantly Farther Behind Assigned Grade Level Peers Need Long Term Goals (Takes Longer Than One Year to “Catch Up”) In Addition, Peer Growth Rate Is Slower at Higher Grade Levels If We and the Student Continue Ambitious Goals Each Year The Student Will Make Significant Gains and Eventually “Catch Up”- (Instructional Grade Level Progress Monitoring)

Why We Need Both Assigned Grade Level and Instructional Grade Level Goals and Progress Monitoring 6 th Grade90 WC 7 th Grade120 WC 8 th Grade150 WC