Digital Libraries Go To School Sarah Giersch Andrew Walker Mimi Recker Rena Janke

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
By: Edith Leticia Cerda
Advertisements

PQF Induction: Small group delivery or 1-1 session.
PD Plan Agenda August 26, 2008 PBTE Indicators Track
Research Experiences for Teachers (RET) in Engineering Program Engineering Education NSF Awardees Conference-Sept , 2007 Mary Poats, Program Manager-RET.
NETS Meets Common Core Teresa Knapp Gordon, NBCT
1 Why is the Core important? To set high expectations – for all students – for educators To attend to the learning needs of students To break through the.
What you can do as a teacher to ensure the technology literacy of your students. Barbara Smalla 3/2010.
Digital Libraries Go To School USU UCAR SUNY-Cortland.
National Science Foundation: Transforming Undergraduate Education in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (TUES)
Jefferson County Public Schools University of Louisville.
INACOL National Standards for Quality Online Teaching, Version 2.
Differentiated Supervision
Flexible Scheduling Improving Student Learning Through Expanded Use of the Library Media Center Library Media Center Mr. Brown's class enters Mrs. Smith's.
Reaching and Preparing 21st Century Learners
The Role of Assessment in the EdD – The USC Approach.
OER10, March 22-24, 2010 Cynthia Jimes, PhD Institute for the Study of Knowledge Management in Education ISKME: Siyavula: Building Communities to Support.
Copyright © 2004 Stevens Institute of Technology Center for Innovation in Engineering and Science Education 1 Community College Pathways to Improved Teacher.
Meeting SB 290 District Evaluation Requirements
Addressing the Pre-service Learning Needs of Education Majors in Math and Science Through Technology
1. 2 Why is the Core important? To set high expectations –for all students –for educators To attend to the learning needs of students To break through.
World Languages Portfolio. Student Growth Portfolio with Peer Review 2  THE GOAL: A holistic and meaningful picture of the value a teacher adds to students,
“Teaching Electricity and Circuits Through Inquiry” Shawna Young EdTech Leaders Online.
Resources for Teaching Teachers Earth Science Content and Pedagogy The Association for Science Teacher Education Rusty Low Shelley Olds January 2006.
Research-Based Cutting Edge Professional Development Communicate, Connect, Collaborate, Conceptualize, Create For Results Oriented Learning Experiences.
Brooke Bennett. *National Educational Technology Standards and Performance Indicators for Teachers* 1. Facilitate & inspire student learning and creativity.
Outreach to Districts and Schools ?Is there a drop down menu with three items, or does it go to a page on outreach, or both?
1 Intel ® Teach ST & ITA Summit Copyright © 2010 Intel Corporation. All rights reserved. Intel, the Intel logo, and the Intel Teach Program are trademarks.
Illinois MSP Program Goals  To increase the content expertise of mathematics and science teachers; 4 To increase teaching skills through access to the.
Sarah Giersch, Rena Janke, Mimi Recker IA Bake Off.
* Research suggests that technology used in classrooms can be especially advantageous to at-risk, EL, and special ed students. (Means, Blando, Olson,
SciencePLUS (Promoting Learning & Understanding for Students) Network A Federally Funded Project through the Math-Science Partnership and the Kentucky.
ationmenu/nets/forteachers/2008s tandards/nets_for_teachers_2008.h tm Click on the above circles to see each standard.
Iowa’s Statewide Approach to Performance Evaluation & Compensation Judy Jeffrey, Director.
TIES E2T2 Grant Project Technology Integrationist Community of Learning (TICL)
Evaluating Teacher Training changing classroom practices Richard Lambert, Ph.D.
Teresa K. Todd EDAD 684 School Finance/Ethics March 23, 2011.
Module 2 Wikispaces: A Training Module Patsy Kraj Spring 2011 University of West Georgia.
Lubbock Independent School District Technology Plan By Stacey Price.
The National Science Digital Library & Shibboleth.
Debra Brockway, Beth McGrath, Mercedes McKay Center for Innovation in Engineering and Science Education Analysis of a Statewide K-12 Engineering Program:
PRIMES Partnerships and Research Investigations with Mathematicians, Engineers, and Scientists Professional Development Model MSP Regional Meeting February.
Final Portfolio The Roles of the School Library Media Specialist Stephanie Warmoth Spring 2012.
BACK TO SCHOOL Welcome Back! Evaluation Task Force Findings.
How to use Thematic Units……. The key to successful thematic unit development and teaching is careful and thoughtful planning, combined with a thorough.
Education and Outreach Overview Susan Van Gundy Core Integration NSDL Central Office, UCAR.
BY COURTNEY N. SPEER TECHNOLOGY AS A TOOL SPRING Professional Growth & Self- Reflection.
Jim Dorward Sarah Giersch Kaye Howe Rena Janke Mimi Recker Andy Walker NSF Awards: NSDL ;TPC Using Online Science & Math Resources in Classrooms.
1. Administrators will gain a deeper understanding of the connection between arts, engagement, student success, and college and career readiness. 2. Administrators.
Christine Yang March 17, As a teacher it is critical for me to demonstrate mastery of technology teacher standards. ISTE-NETS Teacher Standards.
Copyright © 2005 Stevens Institute of Technology Center for Innovation in Engineering and Science Education 1 Stevens-NJ Community College Strategic Partnership.
Texas STaR Chart School Technology and Readiness.
Flexible Scheduling Mrs. Smith's class leaves Mr. Brown's class enters Improving Student Learning Through Expanded Use of the Library Media Center Library.
A Portfolio by: Mary S. Weinaug Enter.  As a teacher it is critical for me to demonstrate mastery of teacher standards  ISTE-NETS Teacher Standards.
Administrator-Association Collaboration-from MOUs to Problem-solving SIOUX CITY COMMUNITY SCHOOL DISTRICT.
Government of Nepal Ministry of Education National Center for Educational Development.
Writing a Professional Development Plan.  Step 1–Identify Indicators to be Assessed  Step 2 –Determine Average Baseline Score  Step 3 –Develop a Growth.
Wisconsin Administrative Code PI 34 1 Wisconsin Department of Public Instruction - Elizabeth Burmaster, State Superintendent Support from a Professional.
Fostering Sustained Impact: Lessons Learned from Geoscience Faculty Workshops Ellen Roscoe Iverson, Cathryn A. Manduca, Science Education Resource Center,
For the Students Students in elementary school right now have always used technology, classes seem outdated and boring to most because of the lack of.
Instructional Leadership and Application of the Standards Aligned System Act 45 Program Requirements and ITQ Content Review October 14, 2010.
Teacher professional development models: Inquiry into concurrent versus separate technology and pedagogical knowledge and use M. Brooke Robertshaw
D RAFT OF F RAMEWORK OF C OLLABORATION A CTIVITIES “SEAEDUNET 2.0: D IGITAL -A GE T EACHING AND L EARNING M ODEL ”
MSP Summary of First Year Annual Report FY 2004 Projects.
DPI 10 Teaching Standards
TECHNOLOGY STANDARDS FOR EDUCATORS BONNIE SMITH MAY 2, 2011
NSDL: A New Tool for Teaching and Learning.
Evaluation of An Urban Natural Science Initiative
Collaborative Leadership
What Makes a Good K-12 Resource
Final Exam Reflection IDT3600 SARAH HERBERT.
Presentation transcript:

Digital Libraries Go To School Sarah Giersch Andrew Walker Mimi Recker Rena Janke NSF Award #: TPC Hitting the Trifecta: A Professional Development Model for Creating, Using and Disseminating Open Education Resources

Tri - fec - ta (trI-'fek-tuh) In horse racing terminology, a trifecta is a parimutuel bet in which the bettor must predict which horses will finish first, second, and third in exact order. The word comes from the related betting term, "perfecta.”horse racing parimutuel bet "Trifecta" is also gaining popularity as a slang term to describe any successful phenomenon that comes in threes, for example: "She has the 'trifecta' of attractiveness, intelligence, and career success.” - Wikipedia

NSDL - what?

NSDL by the Numbers FY2000: NSF establishes the NSDL program FY2002: NSDL.org public launch FY –Over $100 million in funding –Over 200 awards (10 Pathways) –Over 1.5 million records in NSDL Annual visits to nsdl.org for the year ending August : 143,000 Content: 99.9% free, data sets, applets, demonstrations, simulations, lesson plans NSDL.org

Instructional Architect FY2000: Developed with funding from NSDL Program FY2004: Developed DLConnect workshop series for teachers Number of teacher-created objects: 2,173 (640 public) Number of visitors to date: 4,896 project visits since Aug 2006 Number of workshops: 33 workshops, 663 participants ia.usu.edu

DLgtS Project Overview 2006 Develop STEM content, pedagogy curriculum for F2F workshops Develop organizational, technical structure to support teachers at a distance Conduct in-service teacher workshops, support distributed in-service teacher community of practice 2007 Adapt workshop curriculum, deliver to pre-service teachers Adapt curriculum for delivery in alternate formats - online, CD-ROM Develop quality rubric and review resources Incorporate pre-service teachers into community of practice support network 2008 Contribute pre- / in-service teacher-created content to NSDL Continue to deliver workshops, grow communities of practice Conduct evaluation activities throughout

Personnel & Responsibilities Utah State University Mimi Recker, PI Andrew Walker 1 Grad Assistant UCAR Kaye Howe, PI Sarah Giersch Susan Van Gundy SUNY Cortland Rena Janke, Lead USU LeadUCAR Lead SUNY Cortland Lead Engage Utah pre/in service teachers Coordinate evaluation activities, quasi- experimental study Teacher & content development model Contribute content to NSDL Evaluate impact of activities Engage NY pre/in service teachers Coordinate review committee Review Committee Kim Lightle – Lead

Project Process Workshop Materials will incorporate a modified Problem-based learning framework Online Collaboration and support tools will allow for both distributed and sustained learning experiences. Master Teachers will conduct all face to face sessions Review Committee will ensure quality resources are included in NSDL for broad dissemination and re-use

Project Content Mechanics including searching digital libraries like NSDL.org for online resources as well as utilization of online resources with tools like Instructional Architect. Integration - From the outset teachers will design materials for integration into their own classrooms.

The National Science Digital Library (NSDL) is the nation’s free online library for education and research in Science, Technology, Engineering, & Mathematics Instructional Architect is an NSDL service that allows teachers to easily package online resources from a variety of sources for their students.

A sample NSDL record for the Weather Maker online resource.

A sample Instructional Architect project that incorporates a medium-granularity online resource, “Weather Maker.”

Trifecta Revealed

Project Audiences Achieve Organizational Buy-in District and building administrators District Professional Development Personnel Technology Coordinators / Media Specialists Teacher Preparation Faculty Achieve Impact on Teacher Practice In-service Teachers –Urban and Rural from New York and Utah Pre-service Teachers –USU & SUNY Cortland education students

Model: Theoretical framework Teaching as design (Brown & Edelson, 2006) –Who is responsible for guiding instructional activity? Instructional materials (offload) Shared (adaptation) Teacher (improvisation) Neutral with respect to teacher skill/experience –New territory for Brown & Edelson’s model 10 week global warming curriculum

Model: Professional/Content Development Model (Workshops) Goal 1: Increase use of digital libraries and related tools. Goal 2: Increase design capacity

Model: Workshop Details PhasePD Goals and Activities Workshop 1 (4 hours) Learn about the NSDL and IA Learn search techniques Engage in modified PBL  Participants identify authentic instructional need (Putnam & Borko, 2000)  Design project to address need Between workshop activities Continue modified PBL Activities  Implement project  Review peers’ projects (Hoffman & Thompson, 2000)  Write reflection paper noting barriers and successes Workshop 2 (4 hours) Increase design capacity with online resource Finish modified PBL activities  Present, discuss projects and implementation stories  Present, discuss pedagogical and design strategies (Pianfetti, 2001)

Model: “modified” PBL Authentic problems –Participant selected –Lead with technical skills Learner centered Teachers as Facilitators –Technical skills content provided Small group interaction –Groups a bit too small (n=2-3) –No “collaborative independent” study

Create: Tools Search NSDL+ and select online learning resources Create Instructional Architect projects with online learning resources Implement projects in the classroom

A sample Instructional Architect project that incorporates a medium-granularity online resource, “Weather Maker.”

Searching the NSDL through Instructional Architect

Aggregate online resources

Create Instructional Architect projects

Use: Implementation findings Context: –Rural school district –Varied access to technology –Teacher compensation $50 stipend continuing education credits –Administrative support –13 total participants (7 listwise) 3 elementary 1 kindergarten 3 junior high

Use: Data Collection PhasePD Goals and ActivitiesData Collected Workshop 1 (4 hours) Learn about the NSDL and IA Learn search techniques Engage in modified PBL  Participants identify authentic instructional need (Putnam & Borko, 2000)  Design project to address need Pre-survey Observations Between workshop activities Continue modified PBL Activities  Implement project  Review peers’ projects (Hoffman & Thompson, 2000)  Write reflection paper noting barriers and successes discussions and follow-up Reflection papers Webmetrics Workshop 2 (4 hours) Increase design capacity with online resource Finish modified PBL activities  Present, discuss projects and implementation stories  Present, discuss pedagogical and design strategies (Pianfetti, 2001) Group interviews Observations Post-survey

Use: Attitudes Question Pre-surveyPost-survey d MSDM Online Resources (0 – 4 Likert) Important for the quality of education Make the teacher’s job easier Computers in Education (0 – 3 Likert) 6 computers in the classroom Teacher computer with Internet in class Advantages of Computers (0 – 3 Likert) Better looking student products Students help each other more Students work more outside class Students work harder Disadvantages of Computers (0 – 3 Likert) Hard to integrate into lesson plan Students need too much help Feel I’m not really teaching

Use: Participant Knowledge (0-4 Likert) Pre-surveyPost-survey d MSDM Experience using online resources Experience creating online lesson plans

Use: Participant Behavior In the last 2 weeks... (Self reported number of instances) Pre-surveyPost-survey d MSDM Presented online resources to students Students used online resources

Use: Design Capacity (Post only) Resource Granularity Project design OffloadImprovise Small3 (23%) Medium1 (8%) Large9 (69%)

More Info http://ia.usu.edu/viewproject.php?project=ia: tutorial