Closing Session Modeling Vapor Attenuation Workshop Annual International Conference on Soils, Sediments, and Water October 19, 2004 Amherst, MA.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Felicia Barnett Ronald B. Landy USEPA Office of Research and Development Office of Science Policy Regional Science Program.
Advertisements

Case Study of Subsurface Vapor Intrusion at a Dry Cleaner Site Amy Goldberg Day AEHS Annual East Coast Conference on Soils, Sediments.
COMPARISONS OF SUB-SLAB SOIL GAS MEASUREMENTS TO MODELED EMISSIONS FROM SUBSURFACE CONTAMINATION by John A. Menatti and Robin V. Davis Utah Department.
2014 Vapor Intrusion Guidance Amendments Discussion Points Waste Site Cleanup Advisory Committee Meeting May 22, 2014.
Vapor Intrusion. What is Vapor Intrusion? The migration of volatile chemical vapors from the subsurface to overlying buildings.
Understanding the MRBCA Program UST Program Implications Petroleum Storage Tank Insurance Fund May 2004.
Identify source area and COCs Determine nature and extent of discharge Evaluate potential risks to public health and the environment Develop Investigation.
By Robin V. Davis, P.G. Project Manager Utah Department of Environmental Quality Leaking Underground Storage Tanks Methods.
Green Remediation An Overview of the State of the Practice
Module 8: Risk Assessment. 2 Module Objectives  Define the purpose of Superfund risk assessment  Define the four components of the human health risk.
Recent Developments in the Evaluation of Vapor Intrusion at Petroleum Release Sites 25 th Annual International Conference on Soil, Water, Energy, and Air.
Ecological Risk Asssessment Part I – The Basics. Introduction Subject normally taught at end of course, after exposure to background material Subject.
Vapor Intrusion Workgroup July 29,
Vapor Intrusion Guidance Proposed Updates
Phase I and Phase II Environmental Site Assessments Environmental Specialist Brownfields/Voluntary Cleanup Program June 2014.
DRAFT Field Sampling Guidance To be used this field season by DEC and consultants Initial focus on soil, groundwater, and vapor intrusion Future versions.
1 Risk Assessment Develop Objectives And Goals Develop and Screen Cleanup Alternatives Select Final Cleanup Alternative Communicate Decisions to the Public.
1. Identify Stakeholders 2. Establish the Criteria 3. Identify Potential Sites 4. Initial Screening/ Evaluations & Short List 5. Specific Site Study 6.
Common Issues for Exposure Scenarios without GNS VAP CP Summer Coffee July 14 th, 2015 Mike Allen Ohio EPA CO- Supervisor
Module 4: Getting Ready: Scoping the RI/FS. 2 Module Objectives  Explain the purpose of the scoping phase of the RI/FS  Identify existing data which.
Vapor Intrusion Guidance Comments & Database USEPA’s (OSWER) 11/03 Draft Guidance for Evaluating the Vapor Intrusion to Indoor Air Pathway from Groundwater.
Vapor Intrusion Evaluation Strategy and Modeling Developments
1 Uncertainty in Ecological Risk Assessments Larry Tannenbaum, U.S. Army Center for Health Promotion and Preventive Medicine (USACHPPM)
Employee Presentation p 1
Ohio EPA Targeted Brownfield Assessment and Technical Assistance Programs.
Update for 2011 ITRC Spring Anna Willett ITRC Director 2011 ITRC Spring Meeting Minneapolis, MN, April 4-8, 2011.
Pennsylvania Brownfields 2013 PRACTICAL APPROACH TO MANAGING THE UNCERTAINTIES OF VAPOR INTRUSION IN REDEVELOPMENT PROJECTS December 10, 2013 Christopher.
Overview of US EPA’s Vapor Intrusion Guidance VAP CP Summer Coffee July 14 th, 2015 Carrie Rasik Ohio EPA CO- Risk Assessor
Of Massachusetts Department ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION Soil Vapor Intrusion... A Decade of Regulatory Requirements & Experiences Paul W. Locke MA DEP Bureau.
Overview of USGS Groundwater Quality Assessment Activities and Related Data in Alabama 2011 Alabama Water Resources Conference September 9, 2011, Perdido.
Gradient CORPORATION Vapor Intrusion Attenuation Factors (AFs) – Measured vs. EPA Defaults A Case Study Presented by Manu Sharma and Jennifer DeAscentis.
DTSC VAPOR INTRUSION GUIDANCE California Industrial Hygiene Council 16 th Annual Conference Dan Gallagher Department of Toxic Substances Control California.
Predicting Vapor Intrusion Risks in the Presence of Soil Heterogeneities and Anthropogenic Preferential Pathways Brown University Ozgur Bozkurt, Kelly.
GeoSyntec Future Directions for Assessing Vapor Intrusion by Todd McAlary, GeoSyntec Consultants, Inc. AEHS VI Workshop October 19, 2004.
Modeling Vapor Attenuation Workshop A Study of Vapor Intrusion Modeling in the Context of EPA’s Guidance The 20 th Annual International Conference on Soils,
Contaminated land: dealing with hydrocarbon contamination Assessing risks to other receptors.
Statistical Evaluation of Attenuation Factors at Lowry Air Force Base, CO Helen E. Dawson, PHD Regional Superfund Hydrogeologist US EPA Region VIII Denver,
Modeling Vapor Attenuation Workshop A Study of Vapor Intrusion Modeling in the Context of EPA’s Guidance USEPA’s (OSWER) Nov Draft Guidance for Evaluating.
Draft Policy for Assessing & Managing Contaminants in soil: a progress report WMINZ Conference, 15 October 2009 James Court and Howard Ellis Ministry for.
Bioremediation-From the Lab to the Field
VI Draft Guidance: Overview of Comments to November, 2002 OSWER VI Guidance Michael Sowinski DPRA, Inc.
Monitored Natural Attenuation and Risk-Based Corrective Action at Underground Storage Tanks Sites Mike Trombetta Department of Environmental Quality Environmental.
USEPA Region 2 Vapor Intrusion Study Cayuga Groundwater Contamination Site March 4, 2009.
Module 6: Alternatives. 2  Module 6 contains three sections: – 6.1 Development and Screening of Alternatives – 6.2 Detailed Analysis of Alternatives.
Potential Addition of Vapor Intrusion to the Hazard Ranking System U.S. EPA Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response February 24, 2011 Listening Session.
The Superfund ERA Process. What is Superfund? Superfund was created on December 11, 1980 when Congress enacted the Comprehensive Environmental Response,
Area I Burn Pit Santa Susana Field Laboratory RCRA Facility Investigation Work Plan February 19, 2008 Laura Rainey, P.G. Senior Engineering Geologist California.
Waste Program Monitoring Technology Needs and the 21M 2 Effort ETC Brownbag Thursday, May 19, 2005 Daniel Powell, U.S. EPA Office of Superfund Remediation.
Public Health Assessment Process Jack Hanley, M.P.H. Environmental Health Scientist Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry.
Vapor Intrusion Guidance Updates VAP CP Training October 27, 2015 Audrey Rush Ohio EPA DERR
Evaluating the Practicality of LNAPL Recovery Jeff Lane, P.G. November 17, 2015 International Petroleum Environmental Conference (IPEC) IPEC 22 Contact.
Charge Questions for Expert Panel Modeling Vapor Attenuation Workshop Annual International Conference on Soils, Sediments, and Water October 19, 2004 Amherst,
Proposed Topics for Application of Sediment Quality Objectives.
SABR Updates Amy Yersavich, Ohio EPA VAP Certified Professional Annual Training October 27, 2015.
Forging Partnerships on Emerging Contaminants November 2, 2005 Elizabeth Southerland Director of Assessment & Remediation Division Office of Superfund.
Integrated Health Assessments Jacksonville, Florida – Fairfax St. Wood Treaters Presented by Vernice Miller-Travis and Sarah Malpass.
By Ben Bentkowski, P.G. Scientific Support Section, R4 Superfund Presented at the March 29, 2016 Air & Waste Management Association Regulatory Update Conference.
Building Trust. Engineering Success. Real-time Vapor Intrusion Investigations in Industrial Buildings Using Portable GC-MS Presented by: Paul Gallagher,
The Truth about Ecological Revitalization – Case Studies and Tools to Improve your Cleanups Michele Mahoney Office of Superfund Remediation and Technology.
Risk CHARACTERIZATION
What’s the Problem: The Vapor Intrusion Issue Brownfields 2008 Heavy Starch: Cleaning the Dry Cleaners Detroit, MI May 5, 2008 Presented by: Henry Schuver,
ASTM Standard Practice for Assessment of Vapor Intrusion Into Structures on Property Involved in Real Estate Transactions: Status Report presented by Anthony.
Fort Detrick Installation Restoration Program Area B Groundwater November 1, 2010 Fort Detrick, Maryland A Sustainable Community of Excellence.
Anniston PCB Site Review of Risk Assessments for OU-1/OU-2
THE SUPERFUND PROCESS Assessment and Listing
General Principles for Hydrocarbon Vapor Intrusion
Non-Residential Settings
Quarterly Journal of Engineering Geology and Hydrogeology
Hold Your Breath—Ohio EPA’s TCE Initiative
A&WMA Regulatory Conference Symposium UST Risk Based Corrective Action
Presentation transcript:

Closing Session Modeling Vapor Attenuation Workshop Annual International Conference on Soils, Sediments, and Water October 19, 2004 Amherst, MA

Workshop Goals Scope = OSWER VI Guidance Purpose: Improve OSWER VI Guidance Objectives = Evidence-based Improvements Henry Schuver, US EPA, OSWER-OSW Annual Int. Conf. on Soils, Sediments and Water October 19, Amherst, MA

Overview: What Is The Intent of This Guidance? “a tool to … conduct a screening evaluation as to whether or not … pathway is complete and, if so, whether it poses an unacceptable risk” For Current and Future conditions Today’s Objective: Use evidence to Improve Guidance More cost-effective exposure reductions (via screening) i.e., fewer false positives (w/ min. false negatives)

Closing Topics Lenny Siegel – Community Perspective Todd McAlary – Future directions for Assessing Vapor Intrusion Ian Hers – Mass Flux Considerations Henry Schuver – Potential VI Guidance Appendices

VI Guidance – Potential Appendices Additional Guidance for Risk Assessment Underground Storage Tanks and Petroleum Hydrocarbons Use of Real-Time Measurement Methods Soil-gas Sampling Methods - Recommendations & Methods Review

VI Guidance – Potential Appendices Use of Superfund Spreadsheets in Site- Specific Screening Screening for Future Land Use Extending Figure 3 to less than 5 ft depths and including Crawlspaces Considerations for Remedy Selection

VI Guidance – Potential Appendices Toxicity - Maintaining Current Values Practical Approaches to Determining Appropriate Sampling Methods Amount and Frequency of Data Needed for Confidence in Screening

iavi.rti.org