World Intellectual Property Organization Geographical indications: the international legal framework; latest developments Bratislava, December 1st., 2009.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Doha's Impact on TRIPS: Balancing Geographical Indications Protection Clark W. Lackert Chair, INTA International Amicus Committee and Partner, King & Spalding.
Advertisements

Sui generis system for the protection of non-agricultural geographical indications – the Hungarian example András Jókúti Legal and International Department.
World Intellectual Property Organization The Protection of Geographical Indications: the Context Marie-Paule Rizo Head of the Design and Geographical Indication.
TRADEMARKS CONTAINING A NATIONAL FLAG
International Plant Protection Convention CPM 7, Rome March 2012
WIPO NATIONAL SEMINAR ON OMANI TRADITIONAL VALUES IN A GLOBALIZED WORLD Muscat, February 13 and 14, 2005 International Legal Framework for the Protection.
Lisbon System Protection of Geographical Indications - international legal framework National Roving Seminars on Geographical Indications Chennai, January.
Geographical indications and their use to promote local products Damascus, May 2007 Octavio Espinosa WIPO.
INTERNATIONAL TRADEMARK ASSOCIATION INTA GI TRIPS 23.4 Multilateral Register Proposal CLARK W. LACKERT, Chair, INTA GI Committee and Partner, King & Spalding.
1 CHALLENGES TO THE LISBON SYSTEM Presentation by Mihály Ficsor, Vice-President, Hungarian Patent Office WIPO/INPI Forum on Geographical Indications and.
International Registration of Geographical Indications and Appellations of Origin Matthijs Geuze, WIPO National Seminar on the Use of Industrial Property.
Geographical Indications Law: a new tool for Africa? All Africa House (UCT) Aug. 28, 2012 Seble Baraki Open A.I.R. Research Fellow.
Worldwide Symposium on Geographical Indications Parma, June International Registration Burkhart Goebel Partner, Lovells, Madrid Chair of the INTA.
Marcus Höpperger Acting Director
Brussels Briefing n. 31 Geography of food: reconnecting with origin in the food system 15 th May Existing global and.
1 XI INT. CONGRESS AAAML A comparison of the three GI schemes in the EU A trade mark practioner’s perspective… Benjamin Fontaine Parma, March 2013.
AIPPI-MIE-MSZJF Budapest 2005 “Enforcement of IP Rights in the Enlarged EU" Similarities and differences in the enforcement of trademarks and designations.
DS 174 – Trademarks & Geographical Indications
GEOGRAPHICAL INDICATIONS
International Intellectual Property Law
Geographical Indications Intellectual Property & Competition Law Presentation By: Brinda Sreedharan Ravi Teja Rethu Kumari.
THE PROTECTION OF INDUSTRIAL PROPERTY AND TREATIES ADMINISTERED BY WIPO TK.
By Prof. A. Damodaran Indian Institute of Management, Bangalore
RED DE PROPIEDAD INTELLECTUAL E INDUSTRIAL EN LATINOAMÉRICA PILA-Network is a project co-funded by the European Union in the framework of the ALFA programme.
Ato2461 INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY AND DEVELOPMENT Presentation by Adrian Otten Director, Intellectual Property Division, WTO Secretariat Panel Discussion 7.
AIPPI FORUM AND EXCO TH OCTOBER 2011 INDIA AND THE MADRID PROTOCOL HIMANSHU W. KANE Advocate & Solicitor W. S. Kane & Company.
Enforcement of IP Rights in the Enlarged EU 13th Enforcement of IP Rights in the Enlarged EU 13th AIPPI-MIE International Conference Budapest, September.
Alexander Anton Attorney-at-Law German Dairy Association (MIV), Brussels Trademarks, Geographical Indications and Generics in cheeses.
Trademark Issues in Current Negotiations Prof. Christine Haight Farley American University.
Geographical Indications in the WTO and the Doha Negotiations Worldwide Symposium on Geographical Indications WIPO/Italian Foreign Affairs Ministry Parma,
Perspectives for Geographical Indications Teresa Mera June, 2009.
Legal Framework (II) October 2010 Diego Agustín CARRASCO PRADAS Head, Legal Section, Legal and Promotion Division, International Registries of Madrid and.
1 Licensing Agreements and the Protection of Intellectual Property Chapter 17 © 2005 Thomson/West Legal Studies In Business.
Framework of IPR Introduction International IP Law - Course Professor Niklas Bruun IPR University Center University of Helsinki 25 October 2010.
The international framework for the protection of geographical indications Damascus, May 2007 Octavio Espinosa WIPO.
1 International Legal Framework for the Protection of Geographical Indications Warsaw, 26 April 2006 Denis Croze Acting Director Advisor Economic Development.
The Lisbon System for the Notification and Registration of Appellations of Origin.
GEOGRAPHICAL INDICATIONS AND APPELLATIONS OF ORIGIN: AN OVERVIEW
IPO-PAKISTAN INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY ORGANIZATION OF PAKISTAN 1 GIs as Economic Tool for SMEs Development: Current Status of Protection in Pakistan; Future.
World Intellectual Property Organization The importance of facilitating international protection Lisbon, October 31, 2008 Maria Paola Rizo Senior legal.
THE PROTECTION OF PATENTS, TRADEMARKS, INDUSTRIAL DESIGNS AND GEOGRAPHICAL INDICATIONS AND THEIR ROLE IN TRADE AND COMMERCE TK.
Understanding Industrial Property By Ronald De Four The University of the West Indies St. Augustine The material presented in this document was sourced.
THE MADRID SYSTEM Legal Framework (I) October 2010 Diego Agustín CARRASCO PRADAS Head, Legal Section, Legal and Promotion Division, International Registries.
CAPACITY BUILDING TRAINING PROGRAMME ON IPR, WTO RELATED ISSUES AND PATENT WRITING April 28-May 2, 2008 Session 10 GIs negotiations in the WTO and other.
LECTURE XI. INTERNATIONAL AGREEMENTS Copyright Law and Media Law JUDr. Eva Ondřejová, LL.M. 1.
EPA Negotiations: Intellectual Property and Sustainable Development for ECOWAS Countries By Catherine Grant Director: Trade Policy Business Unity South.
“Legal frameworks for the protection of Geographic Indications” Carmen Bullon FAO Development Law Service.
World Intellectual Property Organization International Protection of Geographical Indications Overview and Recent Developments Tbilisi, October 28, 2009.
Session 6 : An Introduction to the TRIPS Agreement UPOV, 1978 and 1991 and WIPO- Administered Treaties.
Chinese Foreign Trade Law Jiaxiang Hu Professor of Law, School of Law, SJTU.
The Doha Declaration and the Protocol amending the TRIPS Agreement Islamabad, 28 November 2007 Octavio Espinosa WIPO.
© 2008 International Intellectual Property June 24, 2009 Class 8 Patents: Multilateral Agreements (WTO TRIPS); Global Problem of Patent Protection for.
Agreement on TRIPS TRIPS Agreement  When the WTO was established, it led to 18 specific agreements to which all members need to adhere. Members necessarily.
Olivier Rukundo. Copyright provisions Article 6 A work, except a broadcast, programme-carrying signal or a traditional work, shall not be eligible for.
Geographical Indications and WIPO Recent Developments Marcus Höpperger, WIPO.
Recently Established Registration Systems for Geographical Indications JAMAICA Loreen Walker Executive Director Jamaica Intellectual Property Office.
WTO and the TRIPS Agreement Wolf R. MEIER-EWERT WTO Secretariat A Business-oriented overview of Intellectual Property for Law Students WIPO, Geneva 20.
International Registration of GIs: Building on Existing Systems Matthijs Geuze WIPO.
1 THE NEGOTIATIONS ON GEOGRAPHICAL INDICATIONS AT THE WTO AND THEIR EFFECTS ON AGRICULTURE NEGOTIATIONS David Vivas Eugui UNCTAD, Commercial Diplomacy.
REVIEW OF THE LISBON AGREEMENT FOR THE PROTECTION OF APPELLATIONS OF ORIGIN AND THEIR INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION: LATEST DEVELOPMENTS Florence Rojal Legal.
Lisbon System Built-in Flexibilities of the Lisbon System Forum on Geographical Indications and Appellations of Origin Lisbon, October 30 and 31, 2008.
Geographical indications of source Dr. Ioannis Kikkis, EPLO, Head of Intellectual Property dpt. 16 March 2015 Workshop on intellectual property protection.
Dispute settlement mechanism within the Lisbon system 6 December 2013 Massimo Vittori, Managing Director.
International Treaties regarding the Protection of Trademark.
Recent Developments at the International Level
Existing Approaches on the National and International Levels
Geographical Indications
IP Protection under the WTO
Community protection of geographical indications :
The Lisbon System for the Notification and Registration of Appellations of Origin The Lisbon System facilitates the protection of appellations of origin.
Presentation transcript:

World Intellectual Property Organization Geographical indications: the international legal framework; latest developments Bratislava, December 1st., 2009 Marie-Paule Rizo Head of Geographical Indication and Industrial Design Law Section Brands and Designs Division WIPO

Five multilateral treaties applicable to GIs: WIPO:Paris Convention for the Protection of Industrial Property(1883) Madrid Agreement on the Repression of False or Deceptive Indications of Source on Goods (1891) Lisbon Agreement for the Protection of Appellations of Origin and their International Registration (1958) Madrid Agreement and Protocol for the international registration of marks (1891 and 1989) WTO:TRIPS Agreement (1994) International legal framework

The Paris Convention- Provisions relevant to the protection of GIs Article 1(2) « The protection of industrial property has as its object… indications of source or appellations of origin… »

The Paris Convention- Provisions relevant to the protection of GIs Article 1(3) « Industrial property shall be understood in the broadest sense and shall apply not only to industry and commerce, but likewise to agricultural and extractive industries and to all manufactured or natural products, for example, wines, grain tobacco leaf, fruit, cattle, minerals, mineral waters, beer, flowers, and flour. »

Article 10.1) Goods making a direct or indirect use of a false indication of the source of the goods must be seized on importation The Paris Convention - Provisions relevant to the protection of GIs

Paris Convention (text of 1925) Direct reference Cognac, Roquefort, Havana, Porto, Tequila… Indirect reference

Article 10bis Obligation to assure effective protection against acts of unfair competition: any act of competition contrary to honest practices in industrial or commercial matters The following acts, in particular, : acts likely to create confusion by any means whatever with the establishment, the goods, or the industrial or commercial activities, of a competitor false allegations in the course of trade likely to discredit the establishment, the goods, or the activities, of a competitor; indications or allegations liable to mislead the public as to the nature, manufacturing process, characteristics, suitability for their purpose, or quantity, of the goods The Paris Convention - Provisions relevant to the protection of GIs

Appellation of Origin (Lisbon) Geographical Indication (TRIPS) Indication of Source (Paris) Terminology

The TRIPS Agreement Definition (Art. 22.1) Standard level of protection (Art. 22.2) Additional protection for wines and spirits (Art. 23) Exceptions (Art. 24)

The Lisbon Agreement (1958) 26 Members States

The States undertake to protect on their territories, in accordance with the terms of the Agreement, the appellations of origin of other countries of the Lisbon Union recognized and protected in the country of origin and registered at the International Bureau of WIPO The main principle of the Lisbon Agreement

Establishes an international register for appellations of origin and a procedure for their registration Provides a definition of appellation of origin (Art. 2(1)): “the geographical denomination of a country, region or locality which serves to designate a product originating therein, the quality/characteristics of which are due exclusively or essentially to the geographical environment, including natural and human factors.” The Lisbon Agreement- Principles

Flexibility: in practice traditional appellations that have the “quality link” have been assimilated to appellations of origin: e.g. MUSCADET (Nº 279, wine, France) REBLOCHON (Nº 458, cheese, France) VINHO VERDE (Nº 564, wine, Portugal) The Lisbon Agreement - Principles (2/2)

Any sort of product may be designated by an AO: - natural products (e.g. mineral water, marble) Karlovarska Voda, Marble Lepenica - manufactured products (e.g. crystalware, porcelain) Joblonec, Herend - agricultural, food and handicraft products Fontina, Huile d’olive de Nyons, Bordeaux, Olinalá The Lisbon Agreement - Principles (2/2)

International application INTERNATIONAL BUREAU Records in the International Register Publishes in Bulletin Appellations of origin Notifies other members OTHER MEMBERS examine 12 months REFUSAL 12 months NO REFUSAL = protection General view of the procedure country of origin Appellation protected as such

Declaration of refusal Within a time limit: one year from the receipt of the notification of registration Indicate the grounds for refusal, e.g. –Denomination does not meet the definition –Generic indication of a type of product –The denomination is not geographical –Existence of an earlier trademark –The appellation is refused only partially: it cannot be used to prevent the use of a specified homonymous appellation

The Lisbon Agreement- after registration Withdrawal of declaration of refusal: –at any time –in whole or in part (inter-party negotiation possible) Period to terminate use by third parties –may be granted by competent authority of country –maximum period of two years (negotiation possible) Possible coexistence of homonymous AO Invalidation: before the competent authorities of the country in which invalidation is sought WIPO

Effects of international registration : States that have not refused a notified AO within 12 months from receipt of the notification –must ensure protection of the appellation against usurpation or imitation, even if the true origin of the product is stated, or if the appellation is used in translated form or accompanied by a disclaimer or a delocalizer (“type”, “method”, “system”) –cannot deem that the appellation has become generic as long as it remains protected as an appellation of origin in its country of origin The Lisbon Agreement- after registration (2/3)

–Term: Protection of the appellation of origin in each member country that has not refused protection continues without renewal as long as the appellation is protected as such in its country of origin –No renewal is required to maintain the international registration The Lisbon Agreement- after registration (3/3)

887 appellations of origin registered, of which 813 are in force The Lisbon Agreement Parmigiano-Reggiano Tequila Muscat de Kélibia Pisco Habanos Champagne Romăneşti Slovenský Oštiepok …

Relationship

GIs Under Construction WTO (Doha Agenda) WIPO Bilateral Agreements National/Regional Developments

WTO- the Doha Agenda 1.Multilateral register for wines and spirits (TRIPS Art. 23.4) 2.Extension (?) July call for negotiation in parallel of three IP issues: GI Register/Extension/TRIPS-CBD

WIPO- Possible improvements to the procedures under the Lisbon Agreement WG established by the Assembly of the Lisbon Union met in March 2009 and will hold further meetings to explore further improvements

Possible improvements of the Lisbon system The Assembly of the Lisbon Union adopted at its session in September 2009: new Rule 11bis: optional statements of grant of protection new Rule 23bis: Administrative Instructions electronic communications

Possible improvements of the Lisbon system The Assembly agreed that: the IB conduct a survey to ascertain how the Lisbon system might be improved the IB conduct a study on the relationship between regional systems for the protection of geographical indications and the Lisbon system

Thank you!