Geographical indications of source Dr. Ioannis Kikkis, EPLO, Head of Intellectual Property dpt. 16 March 2015 Workshop on intellectual property protection.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
WTO, Trade and Environment Division
Advertisements

Sui generis system for the protection of non-agricultural geographical indications – the Hungarian example András Jókúti Legal and International Department.
Scope of protection of geographical indications PATENT OFFICE OF THE REPUBLIC OF BULGARIA.
International Plant Protection Convention CPM 7, Rome March 2012
Geographical indications and their use to promote local products Damascus, May 2007 Octavio Espinosa WIPO.
INTERNATIONAL TRADEMARK ASSOCIATION INTA GI TRIPS 23.4 Multilateral Register Proposal CLARK W. LACKERT, Chair, INTA GI Committee and Partner, King & Spalding.
Workshop on wines for making a protected geographical indication Technical File Anabela Alves BELGRADE, SERBIA 30th of January 2013.
International Registration of Geographical Indications and Appellations of Origin Matthijs Geuze, WIPO National Seminar on the Use of Industrial Property.
Geographical Indications Law: a new tool for Africa? All Africa House (UCT) Aug. 28, 2012 Seble Baraki Open A.I.R. Research Fellow.
Collective Marks and Certification Marks
Marcus Höpperger Acting Director
Rule-Making Book II EU Administrative Procedures – The ReNEUAL Draft Model Rules 2014 Brussels, May th Herwig C.H. Hofmann University of Luxembourg.
Brussels Briefing n. 31 Geography of food: reconnecting with origin in the food system 15 th May Existing global and.
1 “Introduction to EU Trade Policy” – July 2008 How We Make Trade Policy n Contents n Part I: EU Trade Powers n Part II: The evolving scope of Trade Policy.
1 XI INT. CONGRESS AAAML A comparison of the three GI schemes in the EU A trade mark practioner’s perspective… Benjamin Fontaine Parma, March 2013.
The Protection of the Protected Geographical Indications in Europe TAIEX Seminar on Trade Marks and Designs Warsaw November 28 Rafael Fernández Ibiza.
Geographical Indications Intellectual Property & Competition Law Presentation By: Brinda Sreedharan Ravi Teja Rethu Kumari.
THE PROTECTION OF INDUSTRIAL PROPERTY AND TREATIES ADMINISTERED BY WIPO TK.
By Prof. A. Damodaran Indian Institute of Management, Bangalore
Enforcement of IP Rights in the Enlarged EU 13th Enforcement of IP Rights in the Enlarged EU 13th AIPPI-MIE International Conference Budapest, September.
Trademark Issues in Current Negotiations Prof. Christine Haight Farley American University.
EU: Bilateral Agreements of Member States
EU: Bilateral Agreements of Member States. Formerly concluded international agreements of Member States with third countries Article 351 TFEU The rights.
Perspectives for Geographical Indications Teresa Mera June, 2009.
The international framework for the protection of geographical indications Damascus, May 2007 Octavio Espinosa WIPO.
1 International Legal Framework for the Protection of Geographical Indications Warsaw, 26 April 2006 Denis Croze Acting Director Advisor Economic Development.
GEOGRAPHICAL INDICATIONS AND APPELLATIONS OF ORIGIN: AN OVERVIEW
GEOGRAPHICAL INDICATIONS AND COLLECTIVE MARKS
IPO-PAKISTAN INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY ORGANIZATION OF PAKISTAN 1 GIs as Economic Tool for SMEs Development: Current Status of Protection in Pakistan; Future.
Brussels Briefing n. 31 Geography of food: reconnecting with origin in the food system 15 th May Overview of origin-linked.
World Intellectual Property Organization The importance of facilitating international protection Lisbon, October 31, 2008 Maria Paola Rizo Senior legal.
Annual Exporters Conference 2014
Introduction to the GI system. Origin Linked Products (OLP) are products that have a specific link to their area of origin because of their reputation.
IPR-INSIGHTS CONSULTING AND RESEARCH 1116 BUDAPEST, KONDORFA U. 10. TEL.: (+36-1) FAX: (+36-1)
Baker & McKenzie Presented by Gabriela Vendlova 3 December 2002 Intellectual Property Rights: Importance of Trademark Protection in the Digital World.
Czech Presidency High Level Conference on the Future of Quality Policy of Agricultural Products and Foodstuff PDOs/PGIs: The point of view of GI producers.
EPA Negotiations: Intellectual Property and Sustainable Development for ECOWAS Countries By Catherine Grant Director: Trade Policy Business Unity South.
1 Vietnam study tour Geographical Indications: Control, Certification and Accreditation Swiss experiences Peter Damary, AGRIDEA 28 th october 2009,
Overview of the EU Food Safety Requirements
World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) Elements for the Organization of Geographical Indications under Article 22.1 of the TRIPS Agreement Warsaw,
World Intellectual Property Organization International Protection of Geographical Indications Overview and Recent Developments Tbilisi, October 28, 2009.
Session 6 : An Introduction to the TRIPS Agreement UPOV, 1978 and 1991 and WIPO- Administered Treaties.
History of the GI system How it all started. History of the GI system Foods have be named after their geographical origin since Antiquity: examples: 5th.
A: Copy –Rights – Artistic, Literary work, Computer software Etc. B: Related Rights – Performers, Phonogram Producers, Broadcasters etc. C: Industrial.
© Melanie Fiedler, Attorney at law 2005 Sofia The Community Trade Mark The functions of a trade mark distinguishing the goods or services of one undertaking.
Recently Established Registration Systems for Geographical Indications JAMAICA Loreen Walker Executive Director Jamaica Intellectual Property Office.
WTO and the TRIPS Agreement Wolf R. MEIER-EWERT WTO Secretariat A Business-oriented overview of Intellectual Property for Law Students WIPO, Geneva 20.
CZECH PRESIDENCY HIGH LEVEL CONFERENCE ON THE FUTURE OF AGRICULTURAL PRODUCT QUALITY POLICY Prague, 13 March 2009 DRAFT CONCLUSIONS OF WORKSHOP B: EU.
Milano, TRADEMARK. A trademark is a sign capable of distinguishing the goods or services produced or provided by one company from those of.
© 2004 The IPR-Helpdesk is a project of the European Commission DG Enterprise, co-financed within the fifth framework programme of the European Community.
Lisbon System Built-in Flexibilities of the Lisbon System Forum on Geographical Indications and Appellations of Origin Lisbon, October 30 and 31, 2008.
World Intellectual Property Organization Geographical indications: the international legal framework; latest developments Bratislava, December 1st., 2009.
Protection of GIs in the EU - WarsawSlide 1 of 18 The Protection of Geographical Indications - The EU system - TAIEX Seminar on the protection.
CLAUDIA PANAIT TAIEX Expert – European Commission Legal Adviser Ministry of Health, ROMANIA.
M O N T E N E G R O Negotiating Team for the Accession of Montenegro to the European Union Working Group for Chapter 11 – Agriculture and rural development.
The Community Trade Mark (CTM) System. The Legal Framework Council Regulation (EC) No 40/94 of 20 December 1993 on the Community trade mark Council Regulation.
WIPO Patent Search. DO I NEED A PATENT SEARCH ? A patent search is a good idea but it costs money upfront. Deciding whether to spend the money on a patent.
M O N T E N E G R O Negotiating Team for the Accession of Montenegro to the European Union Working Group for Chapter 11 – Agriculture and rural development.
Overview of presentation
Recent Developments at the International Level
Geographical Indications
Existing Approaches on the National and International Levels
Geographical Indications
THE SCOPE OF PROTECTION OF WELL-KNOWN TRADEMARKS
1st December 2009, Bratislava
Options to Protect an Invention: the Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT) and Trade Secrets Hanoi October 24, 2017 Peter Willimott Senior Program Officer WIPO.
SPCs and the unitary patent package
IP Protection under the WTO
Community protection of geographical indications :
The Lisbon System for the Notification and Registration of Appellations of Origin The Lisbon System facilitates the protection of appellations of origin.
Presentation transcript:

Geographical indications of source Dr. Ioannis Kikkis, EPLO, Head of Intellectual Property dpt. 16 March 2015 Workshop on intellectual property protection ETT organised in co-operation with The Centre for Innovation and Technology, Industrial Research Institute of Lebanon

The opinions expressed in this presentation are those of the author and can in no way be taken to reflect the opinion of the European Union Delegation in Beirut or any other Organisation mentioned

Introduction Geographical indications of source (GIs) an ancient form of Intellectual Property. (5 th Century BC wine from the Greek island of Chios). Reference in Article 1(2) and 1 (3) of the Paris Convention for the Protection of Industrial Property of 1883 Few countries traditionally pursued active GI policies but increasing attention from policymakers and producers. Multilateral protection of GIs: – Madrid Agreement for the Repression of False or Deceptive Indications of Source on Goods of 1891 – Lisbon Agreement for the Protection of Appellations of Origin and their International Registration of 1958 (Lisbon Agreement) – Special section on GIs in the TRIPS Agreement, of 1994

Value of GIs GIs, if well managed, are intangible assets with interesting potential for product differentiation and marketing. (consumers to pay more, development of specific markets) Creation of added value (development in rural areas, more jobs, higher income, promotion of a region) Spin-off effects in areas related to the primary product for which the GI is known (tourism, gastronomy). Collectively owned with a strong geographical origin- base. Those who produce and market GIs must engage in collective action with regard to production methods, quality standards and control, as well as product distribution and marketing.

Definition Article 22.1 of the TRIPS Agreement : …indications which identify a good as originating in the territory of a Member [of the World Trade Organization], or a region or locality in that territory, where a given quality, reputation or other characteristic of the good is essentially attributable to its geographical origin. A geographical indication is a sign used on products that have a specific geographical origin and possess qualities or a reputation that are due to that origin. Examples: Roquefort, Darjeeling Cognac,

Description Name of the place of origin of the good (Darjeeling). Non-geographical names (Argan Oil, Vinho Verde), or symbols commonly associated with a place. Whether a sign functions as a GI is a matter of national law and consumer perception. GI= a sign must identify a product as originating in a given place. The qualities or reputation of the product should be essentially due to the place of origin. Link between the product and its original place of production. Agricultural products typically have qualities that derive from their place of production and are influenced by specific local, geographical factors (climate and soil). Majority of Gis applied to agricultural products, foodstuffs, wine and spirit drinks. Not limited to agricultural products. A GI may also highlight specific qualities of a product due to human factors found in the product’s place of origin, such as specific manufacturing skills and traditions. (handicrafts, swiss watches, chulucanas ceramics of Peru)

Distinction from trademarks Both distinctive signs for goods or services in the marketplace. Both convey information about the origin of a good or service, and enable consumers to associate a particular quality with a good or service. Trademarks identify a good or service as originating from a particular company. It consists of a fanciful or arbitrary sign that may be used by its owner or another person authorized to do so. A trademark can be assigned or licensed to anyone, anywhere in the world. Geographical indications identify a good as originating from a particular place. GI usually corresponds to the name of the place of origin of the good, or to the name by which the good is known in that place. A GI may be used by all persons who, in the area of origin, produce the good according to specified standards and cannot be assigned or licensed to someone outside that place or not belonging to the group of authorized producers.

Distinction from appellation of origin Appellations of origin special kind of GIs. The term is used in the Paris Convention and defined in the Lisbon Agreement (art. 2) “(1)… the geographical denomination of a country, region, or locality, which serves to designate a product originating therein, the quality or characteristics of which are due exclusively or essentially to the geographical environment, including natural and human factors. Both qualitative link between the product to which they refer and its place of origin. Both inform consumers about a product’s geographical origin and a quality or characteristic of the product linked to its place of origin. Basic difference the link with the place of origin must be stronger in the case of an appellation of origin. Geographical indication is a more general concept that does not determine a specific mode of protection.

Importance of GI protection A GI’s reputation is a collective, intangible asset. If not protected, it could be used without restriction and its value diminished and eventually lost. Use of GIs by unauthorized parties is detrimental to legitimate producers and to consumers. Such use deceives consumers and leads them to believe they are buying a genuine product with specific qualities and characteristics, whereas they get an imitation. Take measures against others who use it without permission and benefit from its reputation free of charge (“free-riders”). Forestall registration of the indication as a trademark by a third party Limit the risk of becoming a generic term.

How to protect a GI? Variety of approaches for protecting GIs - different legal traditions, historical and economic conditions. 3 main modalities of protection for GIs: – (a) sui generis systems; – (b) collective and certification marks; – (c) modalities focusing on business practices including administrative product approval schemes.

Sui generis protection systems A specific right over GIs, separate from a trademark right or any other IP right. (EU, India, Switzerland, the Andean Community countries and the African Intellectual Property Organization (OAPI)). “the product specification”: – delimitation of the geographical area of production – description of the product’s characteristics, quality or reputation; – standards of production with which users of the right should conform. – the link between the product’s characteristics and the geographical area must be substantiated. verification and control schemes Protection against any use of the GI that would mislead consumers as to the true geographical origin of the product, or that constitutes an act of unfair competition. GIs for wines and spirits, even against use does not result in consumers being misled or in an act of unfair competition. Protection against use in a translation, or against imitation or evocation.

EU Legal framework EU Regulation 1151/2012 on quality schemes for agricultural products and foodstuffs. EU Commission Delegated Regulation 664/2014 supplementing EU Regulation 1151/2012 with regard to the establishment of the Union symbols for protected designations of origin, protected geographical indications and traditional specialities guaranteed and with regard to certain rules on sourcing, certain procedural rules and certain additional transitional rules EU Commission Implementing Regulation 668/2014 laying down rules for the application of EU Regulation 1151/2012 on quality schemes for agricultural products and foodstuffs EU Commission Delegated Regulation 665/2014 supplementing EU Regulation 1151/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council with regard to conditions of use of the optional quality term ‘mountain product’

EU quality schemes Protected Designation of Origin - PDO: covers agricultural products and foodstuffs which are produced, processed and prepared in a given geographical area using recognised know-how. Protected Geographical Indication - PGI: covers agricultural products and foodstuffs closely linked to the geographical area. At least one of the stages of production, processing or preparation takes place in the area. Traditional Speciality Guaranteed - TSG: highlights traditional character, either in the composition or means of production

EU registration procedure for PGIs, PDOs and TSGs Competent EU Authority: European Commission, DG AGRI, Unit on Quality Policy for Agricultural Products and Foodstuffs. 5 stages: a) application to the Commission b)examanition of the application by the Commission c) publication of the application d) objection procedure e) registration of the name and publication of the registered name

Application-Examination The applications from the EU after following the national stage of procedure and from the third countries should be sent to the Commission (by the EU Competent National Authorities – for the EU, directly or via the competent authorities – from the third country concerned). Only those names that are already protected in the country of origin qualify for protection. Examination by the Commission in an appropriate manner to check whether the application is justified and meets the conditions of the Regulation. The examination should not exceed a period of 6 months. Where this period is exceeded, the Commission shall indicate in writing to the applicant the reasons for the delay

Publication of the application The Commission is under the obligation to publish the list of names for which registration applications have been submitted with indications of the date of submission to the Commission. Where the conditions laid down in this Regulation appear to be met, the Commission publishes in the Official Journal of the European Union the single document of the application and assures an electronic access to this publication. Where that is not the case, the Commission can decide to reject the registration application under the procedure referred in Articles 4 and 7 of Decision 1999/468/EC

Objection procedure Within three months from the date of publication in the Official Journal of the European Union, any Member State or third country may object to the registration proposed, by sending within two months a duly substantiated statement to the Commission. The Regulation also provides the possibility to any natural or legal person having a legitimate interest to object. However, in the case of natural or legal persons established or resident in a third country, such statement shall be lodged with the Commission, either directly or via the authorities of the third country concerned. Where an objection is admissible, the Commission will invite the interested parties to undertake appropriate consultations, which would aim at conclusion of an agreement. The outcome of consultations would be communicated to the Commission, on the basis of which the Commission would start its new examination or publish the factors that made the agreement possible. If no agreement is reached, the Commission will take a decision under the procedure referred in Articles 5 and 7 of Decision 1999/468/EC. The decision of the Commission will be published in the Official Journal of the European Union.

Registration of the name and publication of the registered name If no objections is made or the Commission received inadmissible objections, the name would be registered and entry the European Register of Protected Geographical Indications and Designations of Origin (or TSG). The registration will be published in the Official Journal of the European Union.

Overview of EU registration procedure for PGIs, PDOs and TSGs

Official Control and Verification of Compliance To use a registered name, products with PDOs, PGIs and TSGs must comply with registered specifications. So the applicant group must identify one or more body, which will undertake controls to ensure that the specifications are met. Verification of compliance with the specifications, in respect of the geographical indications and designations of origin relating to a geographical area in the EU or a third country, before placing the product on the market, have to be ensured by: – one or more public authorities designated by the third country and/or – one or more product certification bodies. The product certification bodies are required to comply with and, as from 1 May 2010 be accredited in accordance with European standard EN or ISO/IEC Guide 65 (General requirements for bodies operating product certification systems).

Collective Marks and Certification Marks Protection of GIs under trademark law (Australia, Canada, China and USA). Common feature of Collective and Certfication marks to be used by more than one person, as long as the users comply with the regulations of use or standards established by the holder. Requirement to be used only in connection with goods that have a particular geographical origin or specific characteristics. Main difference: Collective marks may only be used by members of an association, while certification marks may be used by anyone who complies with the standards defined by the holder of the mark. The holder, which may be a private or a public entity, acts as a certifier verifying that the mark is used according to established standards. Generally, the holder of a certification mark does not itself have the right to use the mark. Protection against use in the course of trade by third parties without the owner’s consent, of identical or similar signs for identical or similar goods, where such use wouldresult in a likelihood of confusion.

Laws focusing on business practices Geographical indications may be protected through certain laws that focus on business practices, such as laws relating to the repression of unfair competition, consumer protection laws or laws on the labeling of products. These laws do not create an individual industrial property right over the GI. However, they indirectly protect GIs insofar as they prohibit certain acts that may involve their unauthorized use.

Combining different means of protection GI can be protected through a sui generis system, for example as an appellation of origin, and also as an individual or a collective mark. A mark may be used to protect the product label, which can include the GI and an additional figurative element affixed to the product to indicate to consumers that it complies with the product specifications for the appellation of origin. Parmigiano Reggiano protection as an appellation of origin in Italy and registration as a Protected Designation of Origin (PDO) in the EU. At the same time, the name Parmigiano Reggiano is protected by a collective mark for the pin-dot writing printed on the rind of the cheese, where it is commercialized pre-packaged. In addition, a label including the name Parmigiano Reggiano is used on the packaging. That label is also protected as a collective mark. RIOJA appellation of origin in Spain and PDO registration in the EU for a wine produced in the Rioja region of Spain. The PDO protects the name RIOJA as such. 2 logos including the name RIOJA are registered as a collective and an individual mark in order to reinforce protection of the name against misuse.

Legal obstacles for GI protection Conflict with a prior mark Generic character Homonymous geographical indications The indication is the name of a plant variety or animal breed

International value Territoriality principle of IP protection Requirement to first protect the GI in the country of origin. 4 main routes for protecting a GI abroad: – Direct protection in the desired jurisdiction; – Lisbon Agreement for the Protection of Appellations of Origin and their International Registration; – Madrid System for the International Registration of Marks (for GIs protected in the country of origin as a collective or certification mark); – Bilateral agreements between States or commercial partners.

Direct protection in the EU Those seeking protection in the EU for GIs identifying agricultural products or foodstuffs can apply for registration of a Protected Geographical Indication (PGI) or a Protected Designation of Origin (PDO). It is also possible to file an application for registration of a collective Community trademark with the EU’s Office for Harmonization in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM).

International legal framework- Paris Convention The Paris Convention for the Protection of Industrial Property (1883) is the first international treaty to include provisions relating to indications of geographical origin. Recognition in art. 1(2), no definition included. In cases of use of false indications of source on goods, the goods in question are to be seized upon importation or, ultimately, to be subject to the actions and remedies available in the country of importation. Obligation of Member States to ensure appropriate legal remedies for repressing the use of false indications of source. Members to ensure effective protection against unfair competition.

International legal framework- The Madrid Agreement Geographical indications can be protected in several countries as collective or certification marks through the Madrid Agreement Concerning the International Registration of Marks, concluded in 1891, and the Protocol relating to the Madrid Agreement, adopted in Both treaties constitute the Madrid system and are administered by WIPO. It offers the possibility to protect a mark, including a collective mark or a certification or guarantee mark, in several countries, by filing one application (an international application) directly with the applicant’s national or regional trademark office (the office of origin) and obtaining one registration (international registration). A mark may be the subject of an international application only if it has already been registered by or applied for with the trademark office of the Contracting Party with which the applicant has the necessary “connection” to the system.

Procedure under The Madrid Agreement The applicant designates, in the international application, the Contracting Parties in whose territories protection is sought. WIPO communicates the mark to the offices of the designated Contracting Parties, which examine it in exactly the same way as if it had been filed as a national application. If examination results in grounds for refusal, or if a third party files an opposition, the office of the designated Contracting Party may, within a fixed time limit, declare that protection cannot be granted in its territory. If no refusal is issued by that office, or if a refusal is subsequently withdrawn, the international registration obtained for the mark under the Madrid system has the same effects, in the Contracting Party concerned, as a national registration. An international registration is initially valid for 10 years and can be renewed indefinitely for 10-year terms. International registrations for marks protected under the Madrid system can be searched through the ROMARIN database, available on WIPO’s website at

International Legal Framework- The Lisbon Agreement (1) The Lisbon Agreement was established to facilitate the protection of appellations of origin at the international level. It offers a means of obtaining protection for an appellation of origin originating in one Member State in the territories of all other members through a single registration called “an international registration”. Only an appellation of origin that is recognized and protected in its country of origin may be the subject of an application for international registration. The “country of origin” is defined as “the country whose name, or the country in which is situated the region or locality whose name, constitutes the appellation of origin which has given the product its reputation”. Applications for international registration must be filed with WIPO by the competent authority of the country of origin. Individual applicants cannot present applications to WIPO, even were they to have the right to use the appellation of origin concerned.

International Legal Framework- The Lisbon Agreement (2) WIPO notifies the other States party to the Lisbon Agreement of any applications it receives. Any Member State may declare, within a period of one year, that it cannot protect the appellation of origin notified to it. The Agreement does not set forth the grounds on which a notification of international registration may be refused, but leaves it to Member States to determine the grounds on which it cannot protect a given international registration in their territory. If no declaration of refusal is communicated to WIPO by a Member State within the one-year time limit following receipt of a notification of registration, the protection of the appellation of origin takes effect in that country as of the date of international registration. However, a Member State may declare that protection is assured in that country as of a different date, which may not be later than the date of expiry of the one-year refusal period.

International Legal Framework- The Lisbon Agreement (3) Appellations of origin registered under the Lisbon Agreement are protected against any usurpation or imitation of the appellation, even if the true origin of the product is indicated or if the appellation is used in translated form or accompanied by terms such as “kind”, “type”, “make”, “imitation” or the like. Once an appellation of origin has been internationally registered, it is protected without any limitation in time, meaning with no need for renewal. An appellation that has been granted protection by a Member State cannot be deemed to have become generic in that State as long as it is protected as an appellation of origin in the country of origin.

International Legal Framework- The TRIPS Agreement The TRIPS Agreement includes a section on the protection of GIs (Part II, Section 3). Definition of a GI and contains a general obligation for WTO Members to provide protection against misleading use of a GI and against use that constitutes an act of unfair competition. Members to refuse or invalidate registration of a trademark that contains or consists of a GI with respect to goods not originating in the territory indicated, if use of the indication on the trademark for such goods might mislead the public as to the true place of origin. Members to provide protection against any use of GIs for wines and spirits and against registration as trademarks of those indications, even if such use or registration does not mislead the public as to the true origin of the goods. Exceptions to the obligation to provide protection for GIs. A first exception applies to GIs for wines and spirits only, for those WTO Members in which the indications have been used in a continuing and similar manner for a number of years. Exception for a trademark acquired in good faith in the territory of a WTO Member before the date of application of the TRIPS Agreement in that WTO Member, or before the GI is protected in the country of origin. Exception applies where the indication is considered by a WTO Member to be the customary term in common language (the common name) for the identified goods or services.

Concluding remarks TRIPS Agreement triggered focus on GIs. Countries realized that the potential value in GIs protection. The fact that GIs are embedded in a territory means they can be effective tools for promoting locally-based development. Their close linkage with tradition suggests that they can have a positive impact on the preservation of Traditional Cultural Expressions and Traditional Knowledge. With the increasing recognition of GIs’ multifunctional character, the challenge will be to design and implement a comprehensive GI scheme that could constitute the basis for sustainable development.