Cluster Active Archive 1 Drift Velocity/Electric Field Comparison: CIS, EDI, EFW, FGM Jonathan Kissi-Ameyaw Cluster Active Archive ESTEC.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Nesstar, ESDS International and ESDS Qualidata online demonstrations ASLIB visit to the UK Data Archive Wednesday 24 November 2004 Louise Corti, Associate.
Advertisements

Cluster Reveals Properties of Cold Plasma Flow May 15, 2009 Erik Engwall.
Colorado Center for Astrodynamics Research The University of Colorado ASEN 5070 OD Accuracy Assessment OD Overlap Example Effects of eliminating parameters.
Model Adequacy Checking in the ANOVA Text reference, Section 3-4, pg
© 2002 Prentice-Hall, Inc.Chap 3-1 Basic Business Statistics (8 th Edition) Chapter 3 Numerical Descriptive Measures.
Statistics: Data Analysis and Presentation Fr Clinic II.
Statistics: Data Presentation & Analysis Fr Clinic I.
Why Geography is important.
© 2003 Prentice-Hall, Inc.Chap 3-1 Business Statistics: A First Course (3 rd Edition) Chapter 3 Numerical Descriptive Measures.
Influenza Neuraminidase Inhibitor IC 50 Data: Calculation, Interpretation and Statistical Analyses.
Nonstationary Time Series Examples Consider the Chemical Process Viscosity data set Is this time series stationary? Why or why not? Time effect present?
Uncertainty in Wind Energy
Hydrologic Statistics
Title: Spatial Data Mining in Geo-Business. Overview  Twisting the Perspective of Map Surfaces — describes the character of spatial distributions through.
How to Analyze Data? Aravinda Guntupalli. SPSS windows process Data window Variable view window Output window Chart editor window.
Correlation and regression 1: Correlation Coefficient
Chapter 2 Describing Data with Numerical Measurements General Objectives: Graphs are extremely useful for the visual description of a data set. However,
Biostatistics Unit 9 – Regression and Correlation.
© The Catholic University of America Dept of Biomedical Engineering ENGR 104: Lecture 2 Statistical Analysis Using Matlab Lecturers: Dr. Binh Tran.
CLUSTER Electric Field Measurements in the Magnetotail O. Marghitu (1, 3), M. Hamrin (2), B.Klecker (3), M. André (4), L. Kistler (5), H. Vaith (3), H.
Cluster photoemission Aug 24, 2011.
Part IV Significantly Different: Using Inferential Statistics
Chapter 8 Making Sense of Data in Six Sigma and Lean
© Buddy Freeman, Independence of error assumption. In many business applications using regression, the independent variable is TIME. When the data.
§ 5.3 Normal Distributions: Finding Values. Probability and Normal Distributions If a random variable, x, is normally distributed, you can find the probability.
Testing the Equipotential Magnetic Field Line Assumption Using SuperDARN Measurements and the Cluster Electron Drift Instrument (EDI) Joseph B. H. Baker.
A. Vaivads, M. André, S. Buchert, N. Cornilleau-Wehrlin, A. Eriksson, A. Fazakerley, Y. Khotyaintsev, B. Lavraud, C. Mouikis, T. Phan, B. N. Rogers, J.-E.
Comparison of STAFF-SA and WBD Magnetic components of intense whistler-mode chorus Prepared by Ondrej Santolik 14th CAA Cross-Calibration meeting, York,
Linear Discriminant Analysis and Logistic Regression.
Catalogued parameters… Current sheet normal vector and velocity, derived using a timing analysis. Later used to calculate an accurate measure of current.
EFW SOC DATA John Wygant SWG June Redondo Beach.
Section 1.6 Fitting Linear Functions to Data. Consider the set of points {(3,1), (4,3), (6,6), (8,12)} Plot these points on a graph –This is called a.
V. Rouillard  Introduction to measurement and statistical analysis CURVE FITTING In graphical form, drawing a line (curve) of best fit through.
Electric field, electric potential, and ‘density’ measurements at quasi-perpendicular collisionless shocks: Cluster/EFW measurements Stuart D. Bale, Ryan.
Method 3: Least squares regression. Another method for finding the equation of a straight line which is fitted to data is known as the method of least-squares.
Update on the interpretation of spacecraft potential during active control Klaus Torkar IWF/OAW, Graz, Austria MSSL, October 26 th, 2006 acknowledging.
1 CAA 2009 Peer Review, Jesus College, Cambridge, UK, March CAA Peer Review: Selected Recommendations.
Welcome to Uppsala! Thursday May 18 13:00, room Å :00 Coffee (17:30 Dinner) Friday May 19 09:00, room Å :00 Coffee splinters (other locations)
9 th CAA Cross-Calibration Workshop, Jesus College, Cambridge, UK, March /17 CAA Graphics: Pre-generated/On-demand Panels and Cross-Calibration.
CAA 8th Cross-Cal meeting Kinsale (Ireland), 28 Oct 2008 Edita Georgescu EDI Status of Calibration and Archiving Activities.
Cross-Calibration Meeting, ESTEC, February Comparison of the EDI and FGM Measurements of the Magnetic Field Magnitude Plot shown.
Reconstructing the spacecraft potential of Cluster when in active control and other issues Maria Andriopoulou Klaus Torkar Rumi Nakamura Space Research.
(Unit 6) Formulas and Definitions:. Association. A connection between data values.
14 th CAA Cross-Calibration Workshop, 5th – 7th October 2011, York, UK PEACE OPS TEAM Presented by Natasha Doss UCL Department of Space and Climate Physics.
Cluster Active Archive Science User Working Group (CAASUWG) - update Matt Taylor on behalf of CAASUWG.
1 CAA 21 th Cross Calibration Meeting, Leiden, th Mar 2015 CAA Cross Cal Meeting Mar 2015 Automated Pipeline Processing.
Status of EDI Archiving and Calibration Activities March 25-26, 2013 Darmstadt.
1 11 th CAA Cross-Calibration Workshop, Hotel die Tanne, Goslar, Germany 7-9 April 2010 CAA 11 th Cross-Calibration Workshop Hotel die Tanne, Goslar, Germany.
MSSL * A.N. Fazakerley, I. Rozum, N. Doss, B. Mihaljcic & the PEACE ops team PEACE CAA Action Items Status 11 th CAA Cross Calibration Meeting, 7 – 9 April.
CAA PEACE Status PEACE Operations Team Presented by Iryna Rozum MSSL Cross-Calibration Meeting, Uppsala, Sweden, April 2011.
Mullard Space Science Laboratory CAA Cross-Calibration Meeting ESTEC 16 th May 2006 H. Khan, A. D. Lahiff, A.N. Fazakerley, I. Rozum, R. J Wilson MSSL-UCL.
8 th Cross-Calibration Workshop, Kinsale, Ireland, October 20081/14 Draft Replies and Actions to the Recommendations of the Review Panel for Final.
20 th CAA Cross-Calibration Workshop MPS, Göttingen, Germany Oct Ways of Measuring DC Electric Field: Who Does it Correctly?
CHAPTER 15: THE NUTS AND BOLTS OF USING STATISTICS.
Correlation & Forecasting
Linear Regression.
Data-Model Comparisons
Chapter 16: Exploratory data analysis: numerical summaries
Course Review Questions will not be all on one topic, i.e. questions may have parts covering more than one area.
Correlation, Bivariate Regression, and Multiple Regression
Cluster Active Archive – Wideband data BM2 mode
EDI – CAA STATUS REPORT EDI CAA Status
Edexcel: Large Data Set Activities
The greatest blessing in life is
BA 275 Quantitative Business Methods
Graphing Techniques.
Descriptive and Inferential
Behavior Modification Report with Peak Reduction Component
Identification of highly variable transcripts.
Presentation transcript:

Cluster Active Archive 1 Drift Velocity/Electric Field Comparison: CIS, EDI, EFW, FGM Jonathan Kissi-Ameyaw Cluster Active Archive ESTEC

Cluster Active Archive 2 Generating graphical products comparing instrument drift velocity and electric field data using CAA software architecture Briefly examine the process of product generation Have a quick look at an example of the output Summary Drift Velocity/Electric Field Comparison: CIS, EDI, EFW, FGM Contents

Cluster Active Archive 3 CP_EFW_L3_E3D_INERT E_Vec_xyz_ISR2 E_quality CP_EFW_L3_V3D_INERT v_drift_ISR2 E_quality CP_EFW_L3_P Spacecraft_potential CP_EDI_SPIN V_ed_xyz_gse E_xyz_gse Status CP_CIS-HIA_ONBOARD_MOMENTS velocity_isr2 Drift Velocity/Electric Field Comparison: CIS, EDI, EFW, FGM Datasets CP_PEA_MOMENTS Data_Velocity_GSE CP_FGM_SPIN B_vec_xyz_gse CP_AUX_POSGSE_1M sc_r_xyz_gse sc_v_xyz_gse JP_PMP L_value Mag_Local_time Invar_Lat

Cluster Active Archive 4 Using CP_AUX_POSGSE_1M: sc_r_xyz_gse, sc_v_xyz_gse JP_PMP: L_value, Mag_Local_time, Invar_Lat L-Shell, Invariant Latitude and Magnetic Local Time data captured and displayed at top of each product Median averaging of SC information and conversion of position information to Earth Radii Drift Velocity/Electric Field Comparison: CIS, EDI, EFW, FGM Spacecraft Position Information

Cluster Active Archive 5 Filter data for Fillvals and NaN’s ‘Nearest neighbour’ time interpolation carried out: Drift Velocity EFW readings interpolated to CIS/EDI time +/- 2 second intervals Electric Field EFW readings interpolated to CIS-E/EDI time +/- 2 second intervals Status Quality visualisation where possible (CIS-HIA, EDI, EFW)  = Lower quality data  = Higher quality data For CIS – Electric Field Calculation of CIS-E by using Cross product of CIS Ion velocity and FGM Spin Magnetic field (/10 3 ) Each product contains a Time Series showing EFW SC Potential over the interval Drift Velocity/Electric Field Comparison: CIS, EDI, EFW, FGM Data Treatment

Cluster Active Archive 6 Extreme values For velocities, values of an absolute difference > 30 are excluded For fields, values of an absolute difference > 3 are excluded  = Excluded data Perform Robust Linear Regression Capture and display statistical information Post interpolation/post regression fitting Individually Min/Max values Median values Combined y = [m]x + [b] with +/- error factors Number of Data points used Curve correlation – Robust Standard Deviation (σ) Drift Velocity/Electric Field Comparison: CIS, EDI, EFW, FGM Data Treatment continued…

Cluster Active Archive 7 Drift Velocity/Electric Field Comparison: CIS, EDI, EFW, FGM CIS/EFW Graphical Product (Velocity)

Cluster Active Archive 8 Drift Velocity/Electric Field Comparison: CIS, EDI, EFW, FGM EDI/EFW Graphical Products (Velocity)

Cluster Active Archive 9 Drift Velocity/Electric Field Comparison: CIS, EDI, EFW, FGM EDI/EFW Graphical Product (Field)

Cluster Active Archive 10 Drift Velocity/Electric Field Comparison: CIS, EDI, EFW, FGM CIS-E/EFW Graphical Products (Field)

Cluster Active Archive 11 The main topics discussed today were: Drift Velocity/Electric Field comparisons over a set time Performed various statistical analyses on the data Generated scatter and time series graphical products illustrating results Drift Velocity/Electric Field Comparison: CIS, EDI, EFW, FGM Summary

Cluster Active Archive 12 Questions Drift Velocity/Electric Field Comparison: CIS, EDI, EFW, FGM Thank you

Cluster Active Archive 13 Resolve scaling issues PEACE – EFW comparison to follow Drift Velocity/Electric Field Comparison: CIS, EDI, EFW, FGM Future Tasks

Cluster Active Archive 14 New graphical products showing original comparison plots next to time series for each vector Each time series shows drift velocity/electric field readings pre- interpolation and pre-regression Drift Velocity/Electric Field Comparison: CIS, EDI, EFW, FGM Recent Developments/Additions

Cluster Active Archive 15 Drift Velocity/Electric Field Comparison using CAA Software Background 1)Background info – data used CIS-HIA, EDI – Field/velocity, EFW – field/velocity, SC potential, JSOC PMP, AUX POSGSE, FGM Spin 2) Data treatment Fillvall/NaN removal Time interpolation – 2 second intervals to WHISPER Extreme values: for velocities, values of an absolute difference greater > 50 are excluded Extreme values: for fields, values of an absolute difference greater than 20 are excluded Linear regression Robust fitting Variable capture status quality visualisation (EFW/EDI) Calculation of CIS-Electric field by using Cross product of CIS Ion vel and FGM Spin Mag field (/10e^3) Orbit information capture and display: Capture of L-Shell, Invariant Latitude and Magnetic Local Time info Averaging of SC position info to Earth Radii EFW SC potential time series for each plot interval (non-interpolated) 3)Recent developments – additions to comparisons Each plot has sister plot containing time series for each of the 3 vectors. Each time series shows non- interpolated data. Non-interpolated data time series for each interval 4) Summary Scaling issues need resolving PEACE – EFW comparison to be completed