2011 RTD Customer Satisfaction Research Results: Executive Summary – Ops Committee March 2013.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Evaluations Kristy Myers Manager, Program Evaluations Presented by: Tom Lipetzky VP, International Programs Washington, D.C. – May 26, 2005.
Advertisements

1 FirstGroup plc Pre-close Trading Update for the 12 months to 31 March 2010 Wednesday 31 March 2010.
On-board Survey of Bus and Light Rail Customers May 8, 2006 Transit Marketing, LLC CJI Research Corporation.
October 4-5, 2010 TCRP H-37: Characteristics of Premium Transit Services that Affect Choice of Mode Prepared for: AMPO Modeling Subcommittee Prepared by:
NEW YORK CITY TRAFFIC CONGESTION MITIGATION COMMISSION NYSDOT Comments on New York City Traffic Congestion Mitigation Plan Bob Zerrillo, Director, Office.
UGA Libraries Compensation Satisfaction Consulting Project Carrie McCleese Starr Daniell.
Hays City Services Survey 2002 By Brett Zollinger, Ph.D. University Center for Survey Research Fort Hays State University Hays, Kansas
September 2013 COMMUTER TRANSPORTATION BENEFITS PLAN AN EMPLOYEE COMMUNICATION PRESENTATION.
 Travel patterns in Scotland Frank Dixon and Stephen Hinchliffe, Transport Statistics branch, Scottish Executive.
PROJECTED RIDERSHIP OF THE HOUSATONIC RAILROAD STUDY Presented by Julie Pokela, Ph.D. August, 2010.
2012 Citizen Survey results Background Implementing Our Vision Action Chart Key Drivers Areas of Significant Change Trends over Time What’s Next?
HOW DISCONFIRMATION, PERCEPTION AND ACTUAL WAITING TIMES IMPACT CUSTOMER SATISFACTION Authors: Mark M Davis Janelle Heineke Presented by: Yvette Guajardo.
Attitudes to alternative transport funding Graeme Colman Principal, Horizon Research Limited NZCID 25 July 2012.
Alasdair Cain & Jennifer Flynn National Bus Rapid Transit Institute Center for Urban Transportation Research University of South Florida Mark McCourt &
1 Research go bus Impact Study TRB National Transportation Planning Applications Conference Atlantic City, May 2015.
Downtown Pittsburgh IDA Member Image Study Wave I Summary July 2007 Prepared by: STRATEGIC METRICS GROUP
Customer Satisfaction Research Produced for: Raven Housing Trust – November 2012 Presented by Emma Hopkins Customer Satisfaction Research Produced for:
1 Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority Customer Satisfaction Measurement FY 2006 Q3 Comparison April 28, 2006.
Student Engagement Survey Results and Analysis June 2011.
Satisfaction with the quality of the sporting experience survey (SQSE 3) Results for: Swimming July 2011 Creating sporting opportunities in every community.
Bureau of Transportation Statistics U.S. Department of Transportation Overall Travel Patterns of Older Americans Jeffery L. Memmott
MAT Paratransit for Persons with Disabilities. Who is Eligible ADA Paratransit Eligible per Americans with Disabilities Act Persons with disabilities.
Commuter Transportation Benefits Plan An Employee Communication Presentation.
Materials developed by K. Watkins, J. LaMondia and C. Brakewood Service Planning & Standards Unit 4: Service Planning & Network Design.
Materials developed by K. Watkins, J. LaMondia and C. Brakewood Data Collection With Surveys Unit 2: Describing Transit Systems with Data.
Rochdale Key Centre Analysis 1 This PowerPoint presentation has been created to accompany GMTU Report 998 – GMATS Rochdale Key Centre report Whereas report.
First UK Bus: Regional Report: Scotland Illuma Research Ltd Richmond Bridge House 419 Richmond Road Twickenham Middlesex TW1 2EX T: E:
Prepared by: DECEMBER 2008 Metro Transit Light- Rail and Bus Rider Survey FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS PERISCOPE.
Noel-Levitz Student Satisfaction Survey of Classroom and Online Students Conducted Spring 2008.
2005 CALIFORNIA CASH FOR COLLEGE A Project of the California Student Aid Commission Workshop Evaluation Results April 30, 2005.
Wigan Key Centre Analysis 1 This PowerPoint presentation has been created to accompany GMTU Report 1001 – GMATS Wigan Key Centre report Whereas report.
Tameside Key Centre Analysis 1 This PowerPoint presentation has been created to accompany GMTU Report 999 – GMATS Tameside Key Centre report Whereas report.
Copyright, © 2004, Theresa M. Welbourne, Ph.D. 1 HR Confidence June Leadership Pulse Dr. Theresa M. Welbourne Preliminary Report June 16, 2004.
Survey Methodology Four Point Scale Very SatisfiedSatisfiedDissatisfiedVery Dissatisfied.
Teacher Engagement Survey Results and Analysis June 2011.
Stockport Key Centre Analysis 1 This PowerPoint presentation has been created to accompany GMTU Report 947 – GMATS Stockport Key Centre report Whereas.
Bolton Key Centre Analysis 1 This PowerPoint presentation has been created to accompany GMTU Report 974 – GMATS Bolton Key Centre report Whereas report.
Part 3 UNDERSTANDING CUSTOMER REQUIREMENTS. Company Perceptions of Consumer Expectations Expected Service CUSTOMER COMPANY Listening Gap Provider Gap.
Oldham Key Centre Analysis 1 This PowerPoint presentation has been created to accompany GMTU Report 997 – GMATS Oldham Key Centre report Whereas report.
National Household Travel Survey 2010 Introduction NHTS provides very valuable information for Transport Malta and other entities involved in transport.
1 Employer Participation in the Texas Workers’ Compensation System: 2006 Estimates Texas Department of Insurance Workers’ Compensation Research Group October.
Transport Focus Update Nina Howe Passenger Manager.
Peak Season Market Research Onsite Guest Intercept Surveys August 11, 2015 prepared by:
BEST 2010 BEST 2010 Results of the survey Kjetil Vrenne BEST Project Manager May 27 th, 2010 BEST Survey 2010 Results & Analyses Page 1.
Prepared by: May Metro Transit Train and Bus Rider Surveys COMPARATIVE RESULTS Bruce Howard Director of Marketing.
Agenda Methodology Major Findings –Perceptions of Congestion –Ease of Travel –Transportation Planning Issues –Interest in Using Public Transportation.
August 2013 Performance Report RM Education Stoke BSF and Stoke CIS.
2009 COMMUNITY SURVEY Presentation of Final Results January 21, 2010.
Customs Index with the support of the InMind research company EBA Customs INDEX Based on I/II quarter 2011 Conducted by EBA with the support of InMind.
CITY COUNCIL WORKSHOP – FEBRUARY 23, National Citizen Survey Results.
Survey Overview: - Promotion: Metro rider alerts, instant updates and through the CAC - Conducted online from Dec. 3 – 31, multiple choice.
2012 Citizen Survey Results Presentation City of Twin Falls, Idaho.
The Value Builder System TM is a statistically proven method for increasing the value of a company by 71%. The Sellability Tracker
ACF Office of Community Services (OCS) Community Services Block Grant (CSBG) Survey of Grantees Satisfaction with OCS Survey of Eligible Entities Satisfaction.
C.A.R. RESEARCH HIGHLIGHTS June 5, 2008 Joel Singer Executive Vice President California Association of REALTORS®
FARE STUDY: STRUCTURE & LEVEL RECOMMENDATION Operations & Customer Service Committee February 10,
FARE STUDY ECOPASS Board of Directors Study Session August 25, 2015.
Northern Lights Express Minneapolis/Duluth-Superior Passenger Rail Alliance February 24, Northern Lights Express Minneapolis/Duluth-Superior Passenger.
Office of Research and Information Technology CVSA and FMCSA SSDQ Performance Measures: Crash Timeliness Inspection Timeliness April , 2013 CVSA.
Transportation System Engineering 1 , 61360
Driver Rating Program.  Why Evaluate Driver Performance?  Easily identify problem areas to develop management strategy.  Identify specific driver deficiencies.
Go wherever life takes you – on Public Transit! Seniors On the Move.
FARE STUDY UPDATE Operations & Customer Service Committee September 9,
2013 RTD Paratransit Customer Satisfaction Survey Results – Executive Summary July, 2013.
New product demo + real-time update
The Passenger View David Beer Passenger Executive.
Summary of Outreach Webpage with video & comment form Public meetings
The sample under analysis at the end of the scoring was made up of 99 participants as follows:
SATC 2017 Influence Factors for Passenger Train Use
WP3 - T3.3 presentation What the passenger really wants:
Presentation transcript:

2011 RTD Customer Satisfaction Research Results: Executive Summary – Ops Committee March 2013

Purpose Customer satisfaction research has a long history and has proven a reliable indicator of: –Lifetime customer value –Frequency of use of a service –Forgiveness of service issues At RTD the Customer Satisfaction research is used to: –Provide key information on who our customers are and how they use the service: Payment method Trip purpose Frequency of riding Other RTD services that are used or not used –What aspects of the service have the greatest influence on customers’ overall perceptions and how well RTD performs on those factors We also use information from the surveys to: –Track service over time –Monitor the success of improvement efforts –Compare service types or service areas –Prioritize projects 2

Methodology Based on the excellent response rate, the statistical confidence, and congruence with previous results, the results of this survey are considered representative and valid. Sampling plans for all services were carefully constructed to help ensure representativeness of the sample. In order to encourage participation in the survey, each survey was accompanied by 2 Free Ride Coupons. A drawing for one of twenty $50 King Soopers gift certificates was held in order enhance the response rate. A total of 6221 completed surveys were received. This represents a response rate of 37% overall and a response rate varying between 30.3%-40.9% depending on the service type. Statistical accuracy for these results ranges from a 1.5% margin of error for Total Bus and up to a 4.9% margin of error for Call-n-Ride. 3

Key Findings Overall All RTD services received outstanding positive Overall Satisfaction ratings. The very high Overall Customer Satisfaction with RTD services has changed little since the last iteration of surveys in Operator performance is a highlight of Bus, Call-n-Ride and SkyRide service. Commuting to or from work is the primary reason customers use RTD services. Light rail passengers that pay for parking have a statistically lower rating of light rail service overall and “Value received for the fare you paid for this trip” when compared with those that are not required to pay for parking. Customers that self-identified as disabled predominantly rated service attributes higher than those that self-identified as not having a disability. Average Overall Satisfaction Ratings by Service Total Bus (Weighted)Light RailCall-n-RideSkyRide Overall Customer Satisfaction Rating (Scale: 1 = Poor to 5 = Excellent) Bus Total (Excluding SkyRide) Light RailCall-n-RideSkyRide Commuting to or from work68.40%66.00%80.50%68.00% 4

Key Findings - Bus Operator performance is a highlight of bus service. Convenience scores slightly declined as a result of decreases in satisfaction with weekend and evening service availability. Availability of bus shelters and the cleanliness of those shelters bring down comfort factor ratings. However, on-vehicle comfort factors are more important to customers and are evaluated more favorably. Bus Performance Dimensions Overall4.2 Convenience Comfort Travel Time Driver Performance Security/Safety4.1 Customer Information3.8 Pricing/Fares

Key Findings – Light Rail 35% of light rail passengers reported using an RTD bus, other than the Mall Shuttle, in the 12 months prior to the survey. Lower ratings for evening and weekend service availability impacted the convenience factor evaluations. Lower ratings of protection from bad weather at stations were responsible for the slight decline in station satisfaction. The cleanliness of stations and safety at stations are evaluated more favorably. Somewhat lower ratings of the availability of seats, and lower vehicle interior cleanliness ratings bring down comfort ratings. Customer comments indicate that more frequent fare inspections are desired to address the perception that a some light rail riders do not have a valid fare. Light Rail Performance Dimensions Overall Convenience Stations Travel Time Comfort Customer Information4.0 Pricing/Fares

Key Findings – Call-n-Ride Call-n-Ride service is evaluated very positively by customers. Driver performance is a highlight of Call-n-Ride service. Lower ratings of evening and weekend Call-n-Ride service availability are the only aspects of Call-n-Ride service that are not evaluated extremely positively. The 2012 service reductions are expected to lower service availability evaluations. Call-n-Ride Performance Dimensions Overall Satisfaction4.6 Convenience Comfort Travel Time Driver Performance Safety4.7 Customer Information Fares/Value4.4 7

Key Findings - SkyRide SkyRide service is rated very high by customers that use the service. The performance of SkyRide operators are again a highlight of SkyRide service. 68% of SkyRide passengers are using SkyRide to get to work either at or near DIA. 26% of passengers are using SkyRide to get to or from a business or personal flight. SkyRide Performance Dimensions Overall4.4 Convenience4.1 Comfort Travel Time4.0 Operator Performance4.6 Security/Safety Customer Information4.1 8