CMS Cathode Strip Chambers Performance with LHC Data Vladimir Palichik JINR, Dubna NEC’2013 Varna, September 10, 2013 1.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
E.K.Stefanides March 07, The Muon Spectrometer of the ATLAS detector: progress report on construction and physics studies at the University of Athens.
Advertisements

Giuseppe Roselli (CMS-RPC) Università degli Studi di Bari – INFN RPC Efficiency with Track Reconstruction Giuseppe Roselli.
CMS reconstruction and identification Part II CMS reconstruction and identification Part II A. Nikitenko Tau jetsTau jets Missing E T (briefly)Missing.

28/2/2006S. Rosati - MC Workshop1 Muon Identification and Reconstruction Stefano Rosati INFN – Roma 1.
The ATLAS B physics trigger
First CMS Results with LHC BeamToyoko Orimoto, Caltech 1 First CMS Results with LHC Beam Toyoko Orimoto California Institute of Technology On behalf of.
IJAZ AHMEDNational Centre for Physics1. IJAZ AHMEDNational Centre for Physics2 OUTLINES oLHC parametres oRPCs oOverview of muon trigger system oIdea of.
Muon Seeding Endcap: Cathode Strip Chambers up to 6 hits/station Barrel: Drift Tubes up to 12 hits/station.
Individual Particle Reconstruction Norman Graf SLAC April 28, 2005.
LHeC : Muon Systems L. Pontecorvo.
A data-driven performance evaluation method for CMS RPC trigger system & Study of Muon trigger efficiencies with official Tag & Probe package for ICHEP.
Study of the Optimum Momentum Resolution of CMS Experiment Presented by: Timothy McDonald Faculty Mentor: Darin Acosta.
The SLHC and the Challenges of the CMS Upgrade William Ferguson First year seminar March 2 nd
Approved Plots from CMS First Beam Runs 2-October-2008.
Toward Assessing HF with Beam Halo Muons & Beam-Gas Events …tuning HF when beam returns excerpts from US-CMS presentation 9/26/08 Michael Schmitt, NWU.
CLASHEP 2011 Angela Romano on behalf of Group A. Group Leader E. Fraga Argentina G. Sborlini Brazil C. Baesso E. Basso A. Custódio M. Griep M. Martins.
Large Magnetic Calorimeters Anselmo Cervera Villanueva University of Geneva (Switzerland) in a Nufact Nufact04 (Osaka, 1/8/2004)
Efficiency of the CMS Level-1 Trigger to Selected Physics Channels by: Corey Sulkko Faculty Mentor: prof. Darin Acosta Funded by: National Science Foundation.
CHEP06, Mumbai-India, Feb 2006V. Daniel Elvira 1 The CMS Simulation Validation Suite V. Daniel Elvira (Fermilab) for the CMS Collaboration.
International Workshop on Linear Colliders, Geneve Muon reconstruction and identification in the ILD detector N. D’Ascenzo, V.Saveliev.
Barrel RPC Chamber consists of 2 double-gaps, each equipped with a common plane of 96 strips read-out by 6 front-end boards. The two double- gaps have.
Il Trigger di Alto Livello di CMS N. Amapane – CERN Workshop su Monte Carlo, la Fisica e le simulazioni a LHC Frascati, 25 Ottobre 2006.
Muon Software Tutorial Rick Wilkinson Caltech. The Basics Q: Is there a Muon class? A : No. A muon is just a RecTrack, the same class as the Tracker uses.
C. K. MackayEPS 2003 Electroweak Physics and the Top Quark Mass at the LHC Kate Mackay University of Bristol On behalf of the Atlas & CMS Collaborations.
Marcello Bindi, on behalf of ATLAS Collaboration KRUGER 2010 : Workshop on Discovery Physics at the LHC 06/12/20101.
Operation of the CMS Tracker at the Large Hadron Collider
María Cepeda (CIEMAT, Madrid) Valencia, II CPAN days 1.
CHEP07 conference 5 September 2007, T. Cornelissen 1 Thijs Cornelissen (CERN) On behalf of the ATLAS collaboration The Global-  2 Track Fitter in ATLAS.
P ARTICLE D ETECTORS Mojtaba Mohammadi IPM-CMPP- February
CMS101 Introduction to the CMS Trigger Darin Acosta University of Florida.
The CMS detector as compared to ATLAS CMS Detector Description –Inner detector and comparison with ATLAS –EM detector and comparison with ATLAS –Calorimetric.
Detection of electromagnetic showers along muon tracks Salvatore Mangano (IFIC)
Tracking in High Density Environment
Observables in heavy-ion collisions at CMS Haidong Liu
Status of RPC trigger analysis and Muon Trigger efficiencies for W-> μν study By Archana Sharma, Suman B. Beri Panjab University Chandigarh India-CMS Meeting.
Bangalore, India1 Performance of GLD Detector Bangalore March 9 th -13 th, 2006 T.Yoshioka (ICEPP) on behalf of the.
Jessica Leonard, U. Wisconsin, December 19, 2006 Preliminary Exam - 1 H->  Jessica Leonard University of Wisconsin - Madison Preliminary Examination.
First CMS Results with LHC Beam
1 OO Muon Reconstruction in ATLAS Michela Biglietti Univ. of Naples INFN/Naples Atlas offline software MuonSpectrometer reconstruction (Moore) Atlas combined.
Simulation of the CMS Endcap Alignment Scheme Using COCOA.
LCWS11 – Tracking Performance at CLIC_ILD/SiD Michael Hauschild - CERN, 27-Sep-2011, page 1 Tracking Performance in CLIC_ILD and CLIC_SiD e + e –  H +
Search for Extra Dimensions in diphotons at CMS Duong Nguyen Brown University USLOU Meeting Fermilab, Oct , 2010.
Preliminary results on DT T0s in beam collisions J. Santaolalla, J. Alcaraz (+ help/suggestions from C. Battilana, C. Fouz)
TeV muons: from data handling to new physics phenomena Vladimir Palichik JINR, Dubna NEC’2009 Varna, September 07-14, 2009.
TeV Muon Reconstruction Vladimir Palichik JINR, Dubna NEC’2007 Varna, September 10-17, 2007.
July 27, 2002CMS Heavy Ions Bolek Wyslouch1 Heavy Ion Physics with the CMS Experiment at the Large Hadron Collider Bolek Wyslouch MIT for the CMS Collaboration.
B-Tagging Algorithms at the CMS Experiment Gavril Giurgiu (for the CMS Collaboration) Johns Hopkins University DPF-APS Meeting, August 10, 2011 Brown University,
( ATLAS was designed for LHC: L=10 34 cm -2 s -1 ) [ Now we expect 7.5 x instantaneous and 10 x integrated luminosity ] PILEUP: from ~30  >200 proton.
BESIII offline software group Status of BESIII Event Reconstruction System.
The CMS Muon System BAN Yong, Peking University 2006/12/12 IHEP, Beijing, China Outline: CMS-Muon system: introduction China’s contribution to CMS Muon.
Tracking software of the BESIII drift chamber Linghui WU For the BESIII MDC software group.
 reconstruction and identification in CMS A.Nikitenko, Imperial College. LHC Days in Split 1.
Track Reconstruction in MUCH and TRD Andrey Lebedev 1,2 Gennady Ososkov 2 1 Gesellschaft für Schwerionenforschung, Darmstadt, Germany 2 Laboratory of Information.
David Lange Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory
A. Parenti 1 RT 2007, Batavia IL The CMS Muon System and its Performance in the Cosmic Challenge RT2007 conference, Batavia IL, USA May 03, 2007 Andrea.
XLIX International Winter Meeting on Nuclear Physics January 2011 Bormio, Italy G. Cattani, on behalf of the ATLAS Collaboration Measurement of.
Roberto Covarelli (CERN) on behalf of the CMS collaboration
CMS muon detectors and muon system performance
Approved Plots from CMS Cosmic Runs (mostly CRUZET, some earlier)
Particle detection and reconstruction at the LHC (IV)
Northwestern University
The Compact Muon Solenoid Detector
Individual Particle Reconstruction
by M. Della Negra, P. Jenni, and T. S. Virdee
Project Presentations August 5th, 2004
CMS tracker reconstruction performance
MUC simulation and reconstruction
The CMS muon system performance
Contents First section: pion and proton misidentification probabilities as Loose or Tight Muons. Measurements using Jet-triggered data (from run).
Presentation transcript:

CMS Cathode Strip Chambers Performance with LHC Data Vladimir Palichik JINR, Dubna NEC’2013 Varna, September 10,

O u t l i n e the principle of CSC working CMS muon reconstruction algorithm in the endcap cathode strip chamber spatial & time resolution with LHC data CSC local reconstruction efficiency Higgs boson with CSC data 2

 r  ~ 2% of strip width, i.e. ~  for ME1/1 (CMS requirement: <150  ) Reconstructed hit (RecHit) in a layer is a 2-dim object representing where a hit wire(group) intersects with the hit strip position. Segment building in CSC: straight line fit to the RecHits in each of the 6 layers of one CSC. 3 View to one layer of the 6-layer CSC

Bremsstrahlung and e-m showering close to hard muons lead to the problems with reconstruction in the muon system 4

5

Endcap Muon Reconstruction Endcap Muon Reconstruction Local pattern recognition: Local Regional Global (individ.detectors) (Muon system) (Muon & Tracker system) 1.Drift Tubes in the Barrel 2.CSCs in the Endcap: clusters of Digis *) fitted into RecHits, i.e. position of hits in the detector layers. 3.Track-segment building (track following & track road methods) with the compatible RecHits in muon chambers. The track-segments are selected by a goodness of fit criteria (  2 ). *) “Digis” – digitized electronic signals 6

Regional Muon Reconstruction Standalone Muon system (DT,CSC and RPC): I Y Station 1 Station 3 Station 2 Station 4 e.m.showers& punchthrough Multiple scattering, energy losses, bremsstrahlung, e + e - pair production etc. in Iron Yokes (I Y) Recursive track fitting (from hit to hit in endcap; with use segments in barrel) by the least squares method ( Kalman filter propagation & parameter estimation) HCALHCAL from Hadron Calorimeter (HCAL) Muon trajectory is built on a base of CSC and DT track-segments 7

Global Muon Reconstruction inclusion of tracker hits starts from standalone reconstructed muons, propagated through calorimeters to outer tracker surface regional track reconstruction is performed using Tracker hits within this (  )- region; to resolve the ambiguities, all the reconstructed tracks are then refitted including the tracks in the muon chambers TeV Muons: In the Tracker hard muons look like straight lines easy to reconstruct but it is impossible to estimate Pt for the straight lines. It is necessary to include hits from the Muon system into the Global reconstruction. 8

9

10

2012 resolution is similar to 2011 Pt = sqrt (Px 2 + Py 2 ) – transverse momentum 11

and higher 12

ADC TimeBins Strips 13

Tag&Probe method: A global muon anywhere in the muon system (Tag) combines with a tracker-track (within CSC, Probe) and forms an invariant mass within the Z (or J/Psi) mass window. - CSC segment reconstruction efficiency is high ( >95%) both for J/Psi and Z-boson data - good agreement between data and MC 14

- CSC segment reconstruction efficiency is high ( >95%) - good agreement between data and MC - efficiency is uniform with Phi 15

16

17

18

Conclusions Cathode Strip Chambers play an important role in CMS On LHC pp data: -CSC spatial resolution is about microns per station which is in a good agreement with CMS requirements -CSC time resolution ~ 3 ns - CSC high efficiency of segment reconstruction (96-98%) 19