How do we determine, and then improve, quality and standards for HIA? 9 th October 2008 9 th International HIA Conference Liverpool Mette Winge Fredsgaard.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

Process and Procedure Documentation. Agenda Why document processes and procedures? What is process and procedure documentation? Who creates and uses this.

Advertisements

The concepts/mechanisms/tools for developing a Joint Programme: Critical issues and UNDG Joint Programme Guidance and formats.

1 Service Providers Capacity Assessment Framework Presentation to the Service Delivery Advisory Group August 28, 2008.

AN INTRODUCTION TO SPHERE AND THE EMERGENCY CONTEXT

Future Directions for the National Healthcare Quality and Disparities Reports AHRQ 2010 Annual Conference September 27, 2010.

Presentation by Cambodian Participants Phuket, Thailand February 2012 Health Impact Assessment Royal Government of Cambodia.

First Evaluation of Good Governance for Medicines Programme Brief Summary of Findings.

Enhancing Data Quality of Distributive Trade Statistics Workshop for African countries on the Implementation of International Recommendations for Distributive.

8. Evidence-based management Step 3: Critical appraisal of studies

Keeping Childbirth Natural and Dynamic (KCND) Scottish Government Health Directorates.

Session 3 - Health Needs Assessment

Knowledge Translation Curriculum Module 3: Priority Setting Lesson 2 - Interpretive Priority Setting Processes.

Standards for Internal Control in the Government Going Green Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government 1.

Performance management guidance

Introducing Regulatory Impact Analysis into the Turkish Legal Framework Prime Minister’s Office, Better Regulation Group The Project Implementation Team.

INTEGRATING BENEFICIARY FEEDBACK INTO EVALUATION- A STRUCTURED APPROACH Presentation to UKES Conference May 2015 Theme: Theory and practice of inclusion.

Quality evaluation and improvement for Internal Audit

Integration, cooperation and partnerships

FAO/WHO CODEX TRAINING PACKAGE

Opportunities & Implications for Turkish Organisations & Projects

From Evidence to EMS Practice: Building the National Model Eddy Lang, MD, CFPC (EM), CSPQ SMBD-Jewish General Hospital, McGill University Montreal, Canada.

Creating a world where environmental sustainability and social justice are the normal conditions of business

Analysis of Local Integrated Workforce Strategies Paul Gutherson Research Consultant CfBT Education Trust.

Environmental Impact Assessment Prepared by: Miss Syazwani Mahmad Puzi School of Bioprocess Engineering UniMAP.

Accessibility Planning, Training & Advisory Programme Making the connections—making it happen Putting Accessibility Planning withinreach! Derek Palmer.

Presentation on Managing for Development Results in Zambia By A. Musunga Director M&E MOFNP - Zambia.

Strategic Environmental Assessment and environmental issues in programme evaluation Ivana Capozza Italian Evaluation Units Open Days Roma, July 5, 2006.

Basics of OHSAS Occupational Health & Safety Management System

Evaluation methods and tools (Focus on delivery mechanism) Jela Tvrdonova, 2014.

Toward International Collaboration on Competencies and Accreditation in Health Promotion and Health Education: The Galway Consensus Conference Viv Speller.

1 RBM Background Development aid is often provided on a point to point basis with no consistency with countries priorities. Development efforts are often.

Development and application of guidance documents – industry view Dr Martin Schaefer ECCA-ECPA Conference March 2014.

Accountability in Health Promotion: Sharing Lessons Learned Management and Program Services Directorate Population and Public Health Branch Health Canada.

EFQM Excellence Model & Levels of Excellence Learning Edge - July 05.

ADD Perspectives on Accountability Where are We Now and What does the Future Hold? Jennifer G. Johnson, Ed.D.

The basics of health impact assessment (HIA): Part 1 Erica Ison Specialist Practitioner in HIA and HiAP Expert Adviser in HIA, WHO Network of European.

A Comparison of 42 Local, National, and International HIA Guidelines Andrew L. Dannenberg, MD, MPH Katherine Hebert, MCRP Arthur M. Wendel, MD, MPH Sarah.

Setting the Stage: Workshop Framing and Crosscutting Issues Simon Hearn, ODI Evaluation Methods for Large-Scale, Complex, Multi- National Global Health.

Evidence-Based Public Health Nancy Allee, MLS, MPH University of Michigan November 6, 2004.

Development & Implementation of an Equity- Focused HIA Methodology for the Mongolian Mining Sector Craig R. Janes, Ts. Sodnompil, Oyunaa Lkhagvasuren,

The report of the IHF/ICGP/IHF Primary Palliative Care in Ireland outlined the absence of a framework for Primary Care teams to support the delivery of.

Health Promotion as a Quality issue

Census Quality: another dimension! Paper for Q2008 conference, Rome Louisa Blackwell Quality Assurance Manager, 2011 Census.

Looking at our School—LAOS School Development Planning Initiative.

Public Health Performance Standards District System Assessment Karen O’Rourke, MPH Joan Orr, CHES 2009.

Mr. Walter Balfe, Development Officer, FETAC Provider Self Evaluation of Programmes and Services Walter Balfe Development Officer – FETAC 4 October 2007.

Name Speaker This work is part of the Joint Action on Improving Quality in HIV Prevention (Quality Action), which has received funding from the European.

PUBLIC–PRIVATE PARTNERSHIP (PPP) FRAMEWORK AND GUIDELINES Syed M. Ali Zaidi, P.Eng. PM(Stanford), Ph.D. Director, Strategic Partnerships Alberta Infrastructure.

ISSAI 400 Compliance Audit Subcommittee

Relating examinations to the CEFR – the Council of Europe Manual and supplementary materials Waldek Martyniuk ECML, Graz, Austria.

The Stratford City Development: Long Term Health Effects of Major Development Projects 5th April 2006 Rebecca Morgan 7th International HIA Conference Cardiff.

PAYMENT BY RESULT STATUS REPORT Heleno Ferraz Senior Project Specialist Mental Health PbR & Outcome.

Monitoring Afghanistan, 2015 Food Security and Agriculture Working Group – 9 December 2015.

John N. Lavis, MD, PhD Professor and Canada Research Chair in Knowledge Transfer and Exchange McMaster University Program in Policy Decision-Making McMaster.

EuropeAid 1 Update on development of the PPCM Guidance.

Company LOGO. Company LOGO PE, PMP, PgMP, PME, MCT, PRINCE2 Practitioner.

May 1, 2012PIA Congress 2012 Roger Swinbourne - AECOM Integrating sustainable decision making into urban development.

Capacity for Health Impact Assessment Debbie Abrahams Director IMPACT+ West Midlands Public Health Observatory, Birmingham, 25 th June 2008.

Developing a national governance framework for health promotion in Scottish hospitals Lorna Smith Senior Health Improvement Programme Officer NHS Health.

Using Public Health Tools for change Dr Bobbie Jacobson & Dr Jenny Mindell London Health observatory Monitoring health and health care in the capital,

Context and Problem Effects of Changes Strategy for Change Aim: To reduce the length of handover by standardising the quality of information transmitted.

Health in Strategic Environmental Assessment Colleen Williams: Department of Health Paul Fisher: Health Protection Agency

9 th International HIA Conference A framework for public health officials to integrate HIA considerations in municipal project undertakings for the City.

New Ecological Science Advice for Ecosystem Protection The EPA Science Advisory Board (SAB) Staff Office supports three external scientific advisory committees.

Health in All Policies - Health Impact Assessment and other approaches

GIFT and IBP Pilot PROJECT on PUBLIC PARTICIPATION

Instrument PDR Summary of Objectives

Assessment of Quality in Statistics GLOBAL ASSESSMENTS, PEER REVIEWS AND SECTOR REVIEWS IN THE ENLARGEMENT AND ENP COUNTRIES Mirela Kadic, Project Manager.

Francesca Bernardini Co-Secretary to the Protocol, UNECE

Use of Health Impact Assessment at National Policy Level in England

Presentation transcript:

How do we determine, and then improve, quality and standards for HIA? 9 th October th International HIA Conference Liverpool Mette Winge Fredsgaard Ben Cave Alan Bond

Review panel / Consensus Development Panel Martin BirleyBirleyHIA Tim ChapmanATLAS: Advisory Team for Large Applications Margaret DouglasHealth Scotland Josh FothergillIEMA Liz GreenWelsh Health Impact Assessment Support Unit/ Uned Gymorth Asesu Effaith Martin HigginsNHS Lothian Paul IgguldenBen Cave Associates Ltd Erica IsonSelf-employed consultant John KemmWest Midlands Public Health Observatory Ross MarshallEnvironment Agency Owen MetcalfeInstitute of Public Health in Ireland Dawn MorganYorkshire & Humber Public Health Observatory Alex Scott-SamuelIMPACT Salim VohraInstitute of Occupational Medicine Colleen WilliamsDepartment of Health, England

Why the need for quality assessment? HIA applied in various areas on various levels Need for structure in order to set a quality standard Consistency and transparency How can a commissioner evaluate the quality of HIA reports?

Aims of the project To improve the quality of HIA reports. Establish a set of common criteria of ‘good’ quality HIA (reports).

Objectives Develop a quality assessment review package for HIA reports on project level. This tool should assist practitioners and commissioners to assess the quality of completed HIA reports. The target groups are: Public Health Specialists; HIA practitioners and reviewers, commissioners both in the public and private sector, public authorities, planners and developers.

The concept of quality assurance and standards How can we establish quality assurance and with this review package? Components relevant to QA of HIA: –Process –Product (report) –Evidence –Outcome (health, values)

Theory and Method Preliminary Assessment Revision and consultation Consensus establishment 2 nd draft

The review package - 1 st draft Introduction Review procedure Review tool –4 review areas –15 categories –59 sub-categories Overall grades Collation sheet Summary of the overall quality

Review areas - 1 st draft Description of the development, the local population and the baseline health conditions Identification and evaluation of key health impacts Identification of impacts Alternatives and mitigation Communication of results

Theory and Method Preliminary Assessment Revision and consultation Consensus establishment 2 nd draft

Themes from 1 st consultation Simplicity PH and equity focus Evidence, qualitative and quantitative evidence Level of application? Integration? Benchmarking and use of scores?

Theory and Method Preliminary Assessment Revision and consultation Consensus establishment 2 nd draft

Theory behind the redevelopment of the draft Context: Site description, policy framework, PH profile. Project: Project description. Process: Description of the HIA, stages, methods for identification of potential impacts, identification of population and engagement. Outcome: The risk assessment, methods, recommendations and management plan. Communication of the results: layout, citation, language, bias and non-technical summary. Pawson & Tilley, 1997 ’Realistic Evaluation’

Theory and Method Preliminary Assessment Revision and consultation Consensus establishment 2 nd draft

Pilot testing - discussion Pilot testing on a sample of HIA development project reports –Test the applicability of the review package. Is the review package applicable for intended users? –Test the appropriateness and outcome of the review package. Identification of good and bad quality HIA reports? How to calibrate the results? Implementation of the review package/review process? How standardized should HIA become?

Mette Winge Fredsgaard Ben Cave T E Thank you!