SOCRATES Program Intelligence Support

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Ninth Lecture Hour 8:30 – 9:20 pm, Thursday, September 13
Advertisements

Office of Small Business Programs
VistA Imaging Modernazation Project December 11, 2007 Project Overview.
Copyright 2009  Develop the project charter: working with stakeholders to create the document that formally authorizes a project—the charter  Develop.
Tom Sheridan IT Director Gas Technology Institute (GTI)
Rational Unified Process
MSIS 110: Introduction to Computers; Instructor: S. Mathiyalakan1 Systems Design, Implementation, Maintenance, and Review Chapter 13.
Dean Cox Naval Undersea Warfare Center, Keyport Capability maturity model integration CMMI FOR Washington state university 16 September 2009.
Fundamentals of Information Systems, Second Edition
1 IS112 – Chapter 1 Notes Computer Organization and Programming Professor Catherine Dwyer Fall 2005.
8 Systems Analysis and Design in a Changing World, Fifth Edition.
COMP8130 and 4130Adrian Marshall 8130 and 4130 Test Management Adrian Marshall.
New Employee Training Market Research
Best Procurement Practices and Helpful Information August 2011.
Basel Accord IITRANSITIONSERVICES Business Integration Support FCM Management Limited Paris New York Toronto.
What is Business Analysis Planning & Monitoring?
1 COMBAT VEHICLES SUPPORT INITIATIVE (CVSI) Industry Day Briefing Defense Supply Center Columbus 16 Oct 2007.
Unclassified. Program Management Empowerment and Accountability Mr. David Ahern Director, Portfolio Systems Acquisition AT&L(A&T) 14 April 2009 The Acquisition.
GENERAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION USAContact Program Multi-channel Contact Center Services Pre-solicitation Conference Robert H. Corey Contracting Officer.
GWAC Ordering Procedures Overview
UNCLASSIFIED Joint and Coalition Warfighting Mr. John Vinett March 2012 Technical Baseline Capability.
OFC 200 Microsoft Solution Accelerator for Intranets Scott Fynn Microsoft Consulting Services National Practices.
State of Maine NASACT Presentation “Using the Business Case to Guide a Transformation Procurement” 1 Using the Business Case to Guide a Transformation.
Introduction to South Region for NDIA’s Space & Missile Defense Working Group August 20th 2015.
2 Systems Architecture, Fifth Edition Chapter Goals Describe the activities of information systems professionals Describe the technical knowledge of computer.
Partnering in Federal Procurement Presented by: Joe Grabenstein September 21, 2012 MBDA Federal Procurement Center Operated by the Metropolitan Economic.
SCSC 311 Information Systems: hardware and software.
87th Air Base Wing Ms. Karen Thorngren Flight Chief, 87 CONS Business Processes.
Principles of Information Systems, Sixth Edition Systems Design, Implementation, Maintenance, and Review Chapter 13.
Certification and Accreditation CS Phase-1: Definition Atif Sultanuddin Raja Chawat Raja Chawat.
Setting Your Fees Project Cost and Setting Your Fees.
Overview Lifting the Curtain - Debriefings FAI Acquisition Seminar.
What is a Business Analyst? A Business Analyst is someone who works as a liaison among stakeholders in order to elicit, analyze, communicate and validate.
2010 W EST V IRGINIA GIS C ONFERENCE Wednesday, June 9, 2010.
Presented by: Masoud Shams Ahmadi February 2007 Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) Selection Presented by: Masoud Shams Ahmadi
Research & Technology Implementation TxDOT RTI OFFICE.
Command & Control Capabilities
2.2 Acquisition Methodology. “Acquisition methodology” – the processes employed and the means used to solicit, request, or invite offers that will normally.
Fundamentals of Information Systems, Second Edition 1 Systems Development.
Kevin M Jans President Prior US Government Contracting Officer Skyway Acquisition Solutions, LLC.
B1B AIRCRAFT MAINTENANCE HANGAR DAHA99-01-R-4001 Debriefing July 16, 2001.
Principles of Information Systems, Sixth Edition 1 Systems Design, Implementation, Maintenance, and Review Chapter 13.
US Army Corps of Engineers BUILDING STRONG ® Mr. Daniel Carrasco Chief, Contracting Division USACE – LA District 13 OCT 2015.
{Project Name} Pre-Award Debriefing to {Insert Offeror Name} {Insert Date} Presented by: {Name}, Technical Team Lead {Name}, Contracting Officer Presented.
Contract Year 1 Review IMT Tilt Thompkins MOS - NCSA 15 May 2002.
Independent Expert Program Review (IEPR) February 2006.
Chris Harrington Office of Small Business Programs.
Donna M. Jenkins, Director National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) Use Of Past Performance Information June 10, 2014 William P.
~ pertemuan 4 ~ Oleh: Ir. Abdul Hayat, MTI 20-Mar-2009 [Abdul Hayat, [4]Project Integration Management, Semester Genap 2008/2009] 1 PROJECT INTEGRATION.
LOG 101 Curriculum Review 28 Jun 02 Richard A. Andrews, CPL Course Manager.
Quarterly Customer Meeting Office 365 License Activation and Office 365 Cloud Services Assessment Status April 2014.
LECTURE 5 Nangwonvuma M/ Byansi D. Components, interfaces and integration Infrastructure, Middleware and Platforms Techniques – Data warehouses, extending.
Federal Acquisition Service U.S. General Services Administration Area Facility Operation Specialist (aFOS) 88 th Regional Support Command Pre-Bid Meeting.
IV&V Facility 7/28/20041 IV&V in NASA Pre-Solicitation Conference/ Industry Day NASA IV&V FACILITY July 28, 2004.
Small Business and Subcontracting. Subcontracting for Small Business 6 steps to successful subcontracting 6. Report Contractor performance 1. Consider.
Systems Analysis and Design in a Changing World, Fifth Edition
ISO 9001:2008/ AS9100 Registered Management Systems Registration
Discovering Computers 2010: Living in a Digital World Chapter 14
Administrivia Settings Controls Attendees Record
Enterprise Content Management Owners Representative Contract Approval
Hyper-V Cloud Proof of Concept Kickoff Meeting <Customer Name>
Phase 2 Tollgate Review Discussion Template
Request for Proposal & Proposal
Phase 2 Tollgate Review Discussion Template
Phase 2 Tollgate Review Discussion Template
Independent Expert Program Review (IEPR)
U.S. Army Contracting Command
Omnibus IV Contracting Strategy Michael D’Alessandro
Executive Project Kickoff
Ms. Kristyn E. Jones Director, Financial Information Management
Presentation transcript:

SOCRATES Program Intelligence Support WELCOME TO USSOCOM INDUSTRY DAY SOCRATES Program Intelligence Support

Welcome! Rules of Engagement Government Team Introductions Christopher Harrington, Director U.S. SOCOM Small Business Gary Salava, Chief SITEC Contracting Office Jerry McGhee, Contracting Officer Greg Brauer, Primary Contracting Officer Representative Heath Headrick, J2 Mike McDermott, J2 Malachi Keddington, J2 Gaylen Ordway, PEO C4 Program Manager - SOCRATES One-Way Guard SIPR to JWICS and One-Way Guard NIPR to SIPR projects were eliminated due to Defense Information Assurance Security Accreditation Working Group (DSAWG) mandate. SOF Information Data Layer Development Layer realigned under the DCGS-SOF program.

USSOCOM OFFICE OF SMALL BUSINESS PROGRAMS BOI: SOCRATES: 2458 (2245 Workstations 213 EIW's) SOIS/JSOC: 3445 (3220 Workstations 225 EIW)   Grand Total is 5,903, supports ~8000 users Mr. Christopher Harrington Director, U.S. Special Operations Command Small Business Programs 813-826-9475 Christopher.Harrington@socom.mil

USSOCOM OFFICE OF SMALL BUSINESS PROGRAMS Over the next 18 months Approximately 31 +/- SITEC Application Management Task Orders will expire over the next 18 months Competed on GSA Alliant Small Business Approximate value $200M

Small Business Program FY14 ($M) 667.7 173.5 79.9 230.4 12.8 FY15 ($M) 905.0 287.6 124.5 294.9 62.8 Reporting Through 30 Sep 15

OSBP POCs Chris Harrington, Director, Small Business Programs Christopher.Harrington@socom.mil - 813-826-9475 Angela Mitchell, Small Business Administrator - 813-826-7338

The Recompete Schedule Mr. Jerry McGhee USSOCOM SOF AT&L KS Contracting Officer 813-826-3470 Jerry.mcghee@socom.mil

Quick Disclaimer About the Recompete Schedule All source selection start dates are subject to change The list is a current “as is” state of SITEC Application Management All requirements on this list still need to be reviewed for continued performance Some requirements may be accelerated, some may be deleted some will remain as projected for source selection A very low percentage (<1%) of these requirements may get rolled into SITEC II enterprise if it is in the best interest of the Government. A very low percentage (<1%) of these requirements may get recompeted on GSA Alliant Some requirements may get deleted based on needs of the Government Some new requirements may get added (highly likely!) to this list.

The Contracting Officer’s Plan on the Recompete Schedule My plan is to publish this recompete list on GSA Alliant Small Business as an 18 month Recompete Schedule It will remain open for 18 months on eBuy My plan is to update the recompete schedule every quarter or as required if it is a significant acceleration. If a requirement is deleted I will attempt to offer an explanation if at all possible. The intent is to allow the 68 GSA Alliant Small Business prime contractors an opportunity to team and forecast their bid and proposal budgets to target requirements that are well within your capability.

AREAS OF RESPONSIBILITY

USSOCOM CONUS Combatant Commands NAVSOC USASOC MARSOC NAVSOC AFSOC USSOCOM

2015 SITEC Application Management Task Orders To be Competed on GSA Alliant Small Business Incumbent Current Contract # TO# Source Selection Start Date New Contract Award Date Gov’t Customer FTEs Description Notes L-3 H92222-11-D-0021 0001 1 OCT 2015 10 JAN 2016 J2 5 Provide training support services to USSOCOM Enterprise users at all levels of experience, covering all intelligence-related applications and subject areas. The Intel Training Team shall also work with representatives of all task orders, regardless of the vendor affiliation, to craft training appropriate to emerging subject areas. Currently being recompeted on GSA Alliant Small Business 0007 Geospatial Information Systems (GIS) software development and system administration support for all imagery and geospatial data in a Common Intelligence Picture/Common Operational Picture (CIP/COP) architecture, to include CIP/COP software development and system administration Being recompeted with TO 0002 on GSA Alliant Small Business

2016 SITEC Application Management Task Orders To be Competed on GSA Alliant Small Business Incumbent Current Contract # TO# Source Selection Start Date New Contract Award Date Gov’t Customer FTEs Description L-3 H92222-11-D-0021 0016 23 May 2016 24 SEP 2016 J3 1 Support all phases of solution planning, implementation, and finalized production that the WTCF OPT requires Pragmatics H92222-11-D-0024 0001 25 May 2016 26 Sep 2016 NSWC 8 development, migration, testing, documentation, integration, and maintenance of GOTS/COTS web-based software, database development software, and application development software; provide end-user training for developed and legacy software solutions 0020 27 May 2016 28 Sep 2016 20 development, testing, migration, documentation, and maintenance of NAVSOC portal, web, application, and database services that support functionally diverse business processes within NAVSOC and its subordinate units, to include their tactical operations. Provide sustainment support for the SWALIS, SWIFT & other current and legacy GOTS / COTS applications. Support NAVSOC Knowledge Management objectives. BAH H92222-11-D-0018 0002 1 Jun 2016 8 Sep 2016 PEO-C4 5 Implementation of PKI and development of associated software 0023 16 Jun 2016 17 Sep 2016 J32 The DefenseReady application implemented will provide USSOCOM with a single enterprise-level system that is capable of meeting current and future personnel and organization management and readiness requirements. This effort provides the overall maintenance and sustainment of the application that has been implemented. SRA H92222-11-D-0020 25 Jun 2016 J2 4 development, migration, testing, documentation, integration, and web-based software, database development software, and application development software in support of Biometrics and Identity Operations

2016 SITEC Application Management Task Orders To be Competed on GSA Alliant Small Business Incumbent Current Contract # TO# Source Selection Start Date New Contract Award Date Gov’t Customer FTEs Description SRA H92222-11-D-0020 0001 26 Jun 2016 27 Sep 2016 AFSOC 3 Enhancements, maintenance and support for SUASMAN, a web based application supporting DoD-wide unmanned aerial vehicle logistics and operations BAH H92222-11-D-0018 0004 1 Aug 2016 1 Dec 2016 10 AFSOC SF Dev, Legacy App, business process, MS Project 0005 MARSOC 2 MARSOC SharePoint and web application development and maintenance BAE H92222-11-D-0023 6 Aug 2016 7 Dec 2016 1 operational and development systems that include Microsoft (MS) Office SharePoint servers, MS Office Communicator servers, MS SQL servers, MS Internet Information servers, and other collaborative systems as directed and identified by the AF EIS program managers L-3 H92222-11-D-0021 10 Oct 2016 11 Jan 2017 PEO-C4 6 Provide both consultant and technical solutions to support ISP baseline sustainment, software-specific training, improvements, implementation, and enhancements to the ISP production, survey, and visualization systems. Including providing planning, technical, integration, testing, and software maintenance activities for the ISP SOFM 11 database and application maintenance, development, and administration services to fulfill the requirements of the Financial Systems and Applications owned and used throughout USSOCOM/SOFM and other USSOCOM users with related financial systems requirements

2016 SITEC Application Management Task Orders To be Competed on GSA Alliant Small Business Incumbent Current Contract # TO# Source Selection Start Date New Contract Award Date Gov’t Customer FTEs Description L-3 H92222-11-D-0021 0006 10 Oct 2016 11 Jan 2017 J2 6 developing web- and server-based portals, databases, and applications. This task applies to the Intelligence Directorate, Headquarters, U.S. Special Operations Command (USSOCOM) in support of current and future mission objectives Pragmatics H92222-11-D-0024 0003 12 Oct 2016 13 Jan 2017 JSOU 2 SharePoint portal management support, web part development and integration, and business process automation services to JSOU; provide database administration and programming services 0010 31 Oct 2016 1 Feb 2017 SOCS 7 improve HQ USSOCOM's key business processes and provide rapid response to technical issues encountered by the USSOCOM staff—to include Components and Theater Special Operations Commands (TSOC)—related to deployed workflow solutions 0011 J3 5 Provide SharePoint portal application development and management support, web part development and integration, and business process automation services for the J3 under direction of the Chief, J3 Collaboration and Information Sharing Office (CISO) 0012 USASOC Content and Information Management services for the U.S. Army Special Operations Command (USASOC) Knowledge Management (KM) Program. The contractor shall provide a wide range of KM services to USASOC, its Major Subordinate Commands and Major Subordinate Units (MSC/MSU), and warfighters around the globe 0004 3 USASOC Sensitive Activities (formerly named ACE) for planning, engineering, and testing of web portal and database intensive applications into an existing architecture.

2016 SITEC Application Management Task Orders To be Competed on GSA Alliant Small Business Incumbent Current Contract # TO# Source Selection Start Date New Contract Award Date Gov’t Customer FTEs Description Pragmatics H92222-11-D-0024 0005 31 Oct 2016 1 Feb 2017 USASOC 16 portal, web, database, and development support in support of USASOC centric applications BAH H92222-11-D-0018 0011 1 Dec 2016 1 Apr 2017 PEO-C4 9 SOF AT&L Enterprise Architecture expertise, SharePoint portal management support, web/portal development and integration, mobile development and integration, application programming interface development and integration, business process automation services, and configuration management services L-3 H92222-11-D-0021 0021 SOCS 4 create and sustain effective portal sites around USSOCOM's most important information and processes. This environment will consist of portal site collections for each Center, Directorate, and unique business activities for the HQ USSOCOM collaboration portal farm. 0024 11 Dec 2016 11 Mar 2017 2 Develop, administer, and maintain local MS Office SharePoint portals (NIPRNet, SIPRNet, ACCM). Portal/site administration will include user account control, management of performance, and clarification of new capabilities and requirements. Contractor database support shall include monitoring and performance tuning, identification of data repositories, and the potential for expanded use of stored 160th SOAR (A) data.

2017 SITEC Application Management Task Orders To be Competed on GSA Alliant Small Business Incumbent Current Contract # TO# Source Selection Start Date New Contract Award Date Gov’t Customer FTEs Description Pragmatics H92222-11-D-0024 0006 4 Jan 2017 5 May 2017 SRSE 34 development, systems engineering, integration, and maintenance efforts to field, standardize, modernize, sustain, and maintain the DCGS-SOF system L-3 H92222-11-D-0021 0013 8 Jan 2017 9 Apr 2017 AFSOC 1 provides generalized and specialized training throughout USSOCOM and AFSOC that is tailored to meet the local Command’s objectives. The types of training available include: ad hoc, user-specific, formal, one-on-one, classroom-oriented, and others depending on users’ needs. 0022 SOC NORTH application development/maintenance support for SOCNORTH. SOCNORTH will primarily be using Microsoft SharePoint portals hosted by NORAD‐NORTHCOM (N‐NC), US Special Operations Command (USSOCOM), and Intel Link. In addition, SOCNORTH will be touching numerous data systems that may require data synchronization CACI H92222-11-D-0022 0004 26 Jan 2017 27 Apr 2017 SOF AT&L K 3 Provide SPS technical, functional, system administration, and management support for the SOCOM SPS user community BAH H92222-11-D-0018 0009 13 Apr 2017 14 Jul 2017 J6 9 HQ SharePoint and web application development and maintenance, HP Trim application development, records management and maintenance supporting KM/RM 0007 15 Apr 2017 16 Jul 2017 NAVSOC 2 support the continued analysis and development of existing business systems for the NSW Training and Resources Management System (NTRMS).

SOCRATES PROGRAM INTELLIGENCE SUPPORT SOCRATES INDUSTRY DAY SOCRATES PROGRAM INTELLIGENCE SUPPORT 19 OCT 2015

SOCRATES BACKGROUND Description: SOCRATES is the USSOCOM SCI intelligence automation enterprise architecture to include the JSOC SOIS that directly supports USSOCOM’s global mission by providing a seamless and interoperable interface to SOF, DoD, national, and service intelligence information systems. It provides the capabilities to exercise command and control, planning, collection, geospatial collaboration, automated mapping services from NGA, data processing, video mapping, and a wide range of automated intelligence analysis, direction, intelligence dissemination, imagery tools and applications, as well as news and message traffic. Key Performance Parameters: Availability, Reliability, and Sustainment Enterprise Protection and Enterprise Baseline Updates Enterprise Metrics and Asset Management SOF Intelligence KM Net-Ready BOI: SOCRATES: 2458 (2245 Workstations 213 EIW's) SOIS/JSOC: 3445 (3220 Workstations 225 EIW)   Grand Total is 5,903, supports ~8000 users

SOLICITATION This acquisition is a CPFF, which includes a base performance period of 12 months and four 12-month options. Technical is significantly more important than Past Performance, which is more important than Task Order Cost. Three Separate CLINS Labor Travel IT Acquisition Award determination will be based on the proposal that represents “best value” to the government. This permits tradeoffs among cost or price and non-cost factors and allows the Government to award to other than the lowest priced proposal or other than the highest technically rated Offeror.

TECHNICAL OVERVIEW SGE Hardware/Software Operations & Maintenance Technical Support for NGA, AFRL, and NRL Intelligence Tools SOCRATES Intelligence Training Application Testing J24 Knowledge Management Support Hardware and Software Acquisitions Staffing Transition-In/Out

PAST PERFORMANCE OVERVIEW Provide two examples of past performance under a federal contract/task order that show relevant past performance in which the work performed was similar in scope and complexity to the requirements described in the SOW. The Government will evaluate the technical similarity, quality, timeliness, and customer satisfaction of the contractor’s performance. In evaluating past performance; the Government reserves the right to use data obtained from other sources as well as that provided in the proposal. This includes information contained in the Past Performance Information Retrieval System (PPIRS).

PRICING OVERVIEW Offerors shall submit a cost proposal, consistent with their Alliant contract, with supporting information for each cost element, including, but not limited to: direct labor (based on Alliant Contract labor categories), fringe benefits, overhead, general and administrative (G&A) expenses, facilities capital cost of money, ODCs, and profit consistent with their cost accounting system, provisional billing rates, and forward pricing rate agreements. The cost proposal shall include a Basis of Estimate (BoE) that explains the rationale for proposed costs and contains a concise level of detail to fully support the review of the proposal. The BoE shall discuss the methodology used to prepare the cost proposal. Offerors shall clearly explain the application methodology for all indirect rates. These rates will be used in the evaluation when calculating the Offeror’s total cost.

EVALUATIONS OVERVIEW # FACTORS RATING METHOD 1 Technical Color 2 Past Performance Assigned Rating 3 Task Order Cost/Price (Sum of the Basic year plus the four 1-year options) Most Probable Cost (MPC)

TECHNICAL RATING OVERVIEW RATINGS Color Description Blue Proposal meets requirements and indicates an exceptional approach and understanding of the requirements. Strengths far outweigh any weaknesses. Risk of unsuccessful performance is very low. Purple Proposal meets requirements and indicates a thorough approach and understanding of the requirements. Proposal contains strengths which outweigh any weaknesses. Risk of unsuccessful performance is low. Green Proposal meets requirements and indicates an adequate approach and understanding of the requirements. Strengths and weaknesses are offsetting or will have little or no impact on contract performance. Risk of unsuccessful performance is no worse than moderate. Yellow Proposal does not clearly meet requirements and has not demonstrated an adequate approach and understanding of the requirements. The proposal has one or more weaknesses which are not offset by strengths. Risk of unsuccessful performance is high. Red Proposal does not meet requirements and contains one or more deficiencies. Proposal is unawardable.

PAST PERFORMANCE RATING OVERVIEW Past and Present Performance Factor Ratings RATING Description Exceptional Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor was highly effective. Very Good some to the Government’s benefit. The contractual was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor was effective. Satisfactory Performance meets contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor appear or were satisfactory. Unsatisfactory Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains a serious problem(s) for which the contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.

PRICING OVERVIEW The Cost/Price Team will evaluate the Offeror’s cost/price proposal by determining reasonableness and realism, using one or more of the techniques in FAR 16.306 CPFF Contracts (with compliance in FAR15.404), to arrive at a Most Probable Cost (MPC). The Offeror’s proposal will be evaluated for award based upon the proposed price for the entire period of performance (including option years).

NATIONAL DEFENSE INDUSTRY ASSOCIATION (NDIA) www.tampabayndia.org Mike Cummins President, NDIA Tampa Bay Chapter Cummins_michael2@bah.com Joe Wotton Secretary, NDIA Tampa Bay Chapter jwotton@us.ibm.com

CONCLUSION Questions?