Three Phase Structure with an EL Intervention Strategy Presenters: Ms. Rubio and Mr. Jimenez.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
California English Language Development Test (CELDT) and Reclassification Palm Middle School
Advertisements

English Language Learner Placement WHITTIER UNION HIGH SCHOOL DISTRICT “To Achieve and Maintain Excellence” Office of Federal & State Categorical Programs.
Teaching & Assessing English Learners on California’s Standards © Northern California Comprehensive Assistance Center, WestEd, 2001 John Carr
SAISD Board Report Office of Research and Evaluation
Handouts for Session 4 Goals, Sources of Evidence, Rubrics.
Effective Math Questioning
Regional Weather Tracking Unit Portfolio Presentation Courtney Nielsen.
Identification, Assessment and Re-classification of English Learners Initial Identification  Complete within 30 school days of enrollment Administer Home.
Closing the Gap for Mathematics in Middle School and High School Visionary Leadership for the 21st Century: Closing the Gaps That Matter February 22-24,
Dual Language Immersion Parent Listening Session October 23, :00 to 8:00 p.m.
A Collaboration between: Los Angeles USD University of California, San Diego San Diego State University University of California, Irvine Preparing for.
BECKMAN HIGH SCHOOL Priority Tutorial: EL Students.
Parent Community Student Services
Dual Language Programs: Implementation, Expectations and Benefits Simona Montanari, Ph.D. Field Elementary School, Pasadena, CA November 20, 2013.
CELDT AWARENESS Patricia Holguin, Title III Access to Core Coach Cleveland Charter High School.
Math AP Meeting January 20, 2015 Presenter: Simi Minhas Math Achievement Coach, CFN204.
Dougherty Elementary School ELAC October 22,2014.
Title III Accountability. Annual Measurable Achievement Objectives How well are English Learners achieving academically? How well are English Learners.
1 Reclassification of English Learners Making Sense of the Process.
Teaching and Learning Elementary Math November 27, :30 am – 12:30 pm.
Science This school year, all of my 6 th grade science students will demonstrate measurable growth in their ability to apply the scientific practices.
Eagle Ridge Elementary Data Presentation. Eagle Ridge: CRCT Data Review (3-5) Subject Gains/Losses Reading86%87%+1 Language Arts86%82%-4 Math81%69%-12.
Day 6. Agenda Just how is this thing supposed to go? Math! Evidence Collection Inter-rater agreement and reliability.
Math Liaison Meeting September 2014 Presenter: Simi Minhas, Math Achievement Coach Network 204.
Best Counseling Practices for Addressing the Needs of Long Term English Learners June 28, 2013 New English Language Development and Common Core State Standards.
Introduction to the LAUSD Teaching and Learning Framework
School Plan Updates Cambrian School District November 10, 2011.
+ What is th CELDT? What you need to know to be successful on this important exam.
ESSENTIAL QUESTION What does it look like and sound like when students use evidence to support their thinking?
Learner Objectives Informal Language (Basic Interpersonal Communication Skills) vs. Formal Language (Standard English in Academic Setting) Review SEL’s.
The Power of the Recommended Text List Grades 6-8
Clare-Gladwin RESD Fall 2013 Alignment for Career and College Readiness.
What is the CELDT? California English Language Development Test PURPOSE:  to identify students who are English Learners  to monitor progress in learning.
Destination--- Common Core Staff Meeting/SSC February 2013.
Los Angeles Unified School District Partnership for Los Angeles Schools Hollenbeck Articulation Process 2010 Ms. Christina Rico, Principal.
Imagine School at Town Center Academic Update June 17, 2014.
Student Growth Measures in Teacher Evaluation Using Data to Inform Growth Targets and Submitting Your SLO 1.
Problem Solving Process ELA CST 2012 % Increase Proficiency Rate Panorama High School Sandra Huerta, Instructional Coach.
ELD/CELDT Update.  12% of total population  393 students  Bagby—11%  Fammatre—15%  Farnham—12%  Sartorette—18%  Price—8%  37 Languages/All student.
English Learner Update Cambrian School District February 9, 2012.
LAUSD Student Data ELD Implementation Report 2006.
Becky Martin Continuous Improvement Facilitator Paul Hayes Secondary Student Services Facilitator 17th National Quality Education Conference October 2009.
A Closer Look Quality Goals Appropriate Assessments.
1 Back to School Night/Title 1 Parent Meeting Back to School Night/Title 1 Parent Meeting.
California English Language Development Test. 1. To identify students who are limited English proficient 2. To determine the level of proficiency 3. To.
Math Study Group Meeting #1 November 3, 2014 Facilitator: Simi Minhas Math Achievement Coach, Network 204.
Supporting the Development of Student Learning Objectives How to Create an SLO.
Somers Public Schools Building and Departmental Goals
THE CALIFORNIA ENGLISH LANGUAGE DEVELOPMENT TEST (CELDT) Poway Unified School District.
Reclassification of English Learners and Monitoring of RFEP Students Elementary Title III Master Plan Institute Language Acquisition Branch.
Foothills ELD Meeting for Parents and Students September 27, 2013.
F.M. Kearns Primary School 5 Year School Improvement Plan
K - 12 students are identified as English Language Learners (ELLs) if, at the time of their enrollment, they meet the following criteria: 1. There is a.
Poway Unified School District.  The goal of the English Learner Program is to help students learn both social and academic English. Listening Speaking.
To provide curriculum content for ELL students to ensure an academically challenging schedule. To provide students with the curriculum necessary to.
California English Language Development Test (CELDT)
SMP # 3 Think Like a Mathematician
INTRODUCTION TO THE ELPAC
In your PLC, decide on a lesson that you will be developing
San Leandro USD DELAC Meeting
Goals, Sources of Evidence, Rubrics
Common Core State Standards
Joe Sampson MPUSD EL/Intervention Coordinator
Hedenkamp Elementary School
7th Grade.
CELDT MOVEMENT BY LEVELS
Local District G ENGLISH LEARNER / CCR REVIEW FINDINGS
The RFEP Process RFEP: Redesignated Fluent English Proficient
PARENT INFORMATIONAL MEETING
Presentation transcript:

Three Phase Structure with an EL Intervention Strategy Presenters: Ms. Rubio and Mr. Jimenez

Problem “It’s fascinating to me that some of the pushback is coming from, sort of, white suburban moms who - all of a sudden - their child isn’t as brilliant as they thought they were and their school isn’t as good as they thought they were, and that’s pretty scary.” – Arne Duncan, Secretary of Ed. Will EL learners be able to access the CCSS if they are already underperforming compared to all other groups in the LAUSD?

CST Math Results Percent of Students Who are At or Above Proficient

Hillside ES CELDT Annual Assessment Results for 4 th and 5 th Grade Performance Level 4th Grade5 th GradeTotal Advanced No students at this level 212 0% 12%10% Early Advanced %41%26% Intermediate %35%38% Early Intermediate %6%18% Beginning No students at this level 19 0% 6%8%

What is Known From the Research “ELs not only face the common obstacles all students experience in attempting to gather, manage, and organize the flow of information; they also must analyze and evaluate what they read while negotiating a second language” (Bunch, G. C., Kibler, A., & Pimentel, S. (2012, p.18) Math Practices the Los Angeles Unified School District is asking our school to focus on require students to be able to listen, speak, read, and write effectively using standard English. Moschkovich (2012) points out that for EL students developing these skills, the CCSS will be especially challenging.

Rationale LAUSD’s focus for all schools in the area of Math and the CCSS: M.P.1, M.P.3, and M.P.4 – M.P.3: asks them to construct viable arguments and critique the reasoning of others by asking questions to help their classmates clarify their argument Hillsides’ Focus: – English Language Learners – Math – Three-Phase Structure Model at least once per week

Three – Phase Structure Phase I: 5 – 10 minutes – Make sure students understand the problem Phase II: 20 – 25 minutes – Students work independently to solve the problem (about 5 – 10 min.) – Students work collaboratively (15 – 20 min.) Phase III: 10 – 15 minutes – Groups present to the learning community so we can all critique and learn from their examples Phase IV (optional): 5 minutes – Students get an opportunity to revise and add to their templates

El Intervention Strategy Six Step Math Word Problem Solving Strategy

Template Actionable feedback can be provided on the template itself.

Rubric Actionable feedback can be provided here or on the template students fill in.

Learning Cycles 1 st PDSA Cycle – 5 th grade students in after school intervention class – Assessed 5 th grade intervention class for baseline data – Conducted intervention for 3 sessions and assessed students to monitor progress and effectiveness of intervention – There were two major goals: To improve lesson delivery, template, and rubric To increase student proficiency at solving math word problems

Data from Afterschool Intervention 19 out of 21 students received a Satisfactory score on their report cards (which means they showed some improvement) On the pre-assessment 1 student scored 50% or better On the post-assessment 6 students scored 50% or better

Learning Cycles 2 nd PDSA Cycle – All 5 th grade students – Assessed students using the District’s 1 st PA to establish baseline data (01/14/14) – Implemented intervention (4 sessions) – Assessed to measure student progress and implement changes if necessary

Data for 2 nd PDSA Cycle Rubios’ Class – On the pre-assessment 1 out of 28 students scored 50% or better – On the post-assessment 16 out of 28 students showed some improvement – 10 out of 28 students scored 50% or better

Data for 2 nd PDSA Cycle Jimenez’s Class – On the pre-assessment 4 out of 30 students scored 50% or better 1 EL learner (out of 16) – On the post-assessment 24 out of 30 students showed some improvement – 18 out of 30 students scored 50% or better 6 EL learners (out of 16)

Learning Cycles 3 rd PDSA Cycle – 4 th and SDC classrooms – Present intervention along with data and findings (Feb. 4 th, 2014) – Model lessons in classrooms (Week of Feb. 10 th ) – Begin intervention across multiple grade levels in multiple classrooms (Week of Feb. 17 th )

Next Steps Meet with my team to discuss data, results of PA I and PA II, and compare EL progress to that of EOs and RFEPs Implement three phase, 6-step math word problem solving strategy school wide in school year