National 4-H Common Measures Suzanne Le Menestrel, Ph.D. National Institute of Food and Agriculture, USDA Jill Walahoski, Ph.D. University of Nebraska-Lincoln.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Educational Specialists Performance Evaluation System
Advertisements

Training to care for people with dementia Dementia Training Partner logo here Training support Skills development Competency Assessment Scholarships Education.
Using Logic Models in Program Planning and Grant Proposals The Covenant Foundation.
Comprehensive Organizational Health AssessmentMay 2012Butler Institute for Families Comprehensive Organizational Health Assessment Presented by: Robin.
Toolkit Series from the Office of Migrant Education Webinar: SDP Toolkit August 16, 2012.
OVERVIEW OF CHANGES TO EDUCATORS’ EVALUATION IN THE COMMONWEALTH Compiled by the MOU Evaluation Subcommittee September, 2011 The DESE oversees the educators’
1 Judy W. Park, Ed.D., Associate Superintendent, Utah State Office of Education.
Governor’s Prevention Initiative for Youth: Evaluation Jane A. Ungemack, Dr.P.H. Evaluator University of Connecticut Health Center.
Linking Actions for Unmet Needs in Children’s Health
IHS Special Diabetes Program Competitive Grants Part 3: Using Idea Maps to Plan for Evaluation Cardiovascular Disease Prevention Planning Cynthia C. Phillips,
1 Reading First Internal Evaluation Leadership Tuesday 2/3/03 Scott K. Baker Barbara Gunn Pacific Institutes for Research University of Oregon Portland,
Digital Measures Managing and Reporting on Faculty Accomplishments Steve Hare Project Manager Office of Institutional Research, Assessment, and Effectiveness.
Orientation to the Physical Education K to 7 Integrated Resource Package 2006.
What should be the basis of
Assessing Financial Education: A Practitioner’s Guide December 2010.
HEALTHY KIDS LEARN BETTER A Coordinated School Health Approach.
REDCap Overview Institute for Clinical and Translational Science Heath Davis Fred McClurg Brian Finley.
SPF SIG State-Level Evaluation PARTICIPANT LEVEL INSTRUMENT (PLI)
1-2 Training of Process FacilitatorsTraining of Coordinators 4-1.
Resident Centred Care Through Service Excellence Introduction to the Resident Centred Care and Service Excellence Project.
Student Learning Objectives The SLO Process Student Learning Objectives Training Series Module 3 of 3.
Performance Standards: Opportunities for Quality Improvement for Maternal and Child Health Dennis Lenaway, PhD, MPH Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
AdvancEd Standard 4: Documenting and Using Results The district maintains an assessment system to monitor and document results to improve student performance.
Must include a least one for each box below. Can add additional factors. These problems… School Performance Youth Delinquency Mental Health [Add Yours.
Must include a least one for each box below. Can add additional factors. These problems… School Performance Youth Delinquency Mental Health [Add Yours.
Outcome Based Evaluation for Digital Library Projects and Services
Skills Online: Building Practitioner Competence in an Inter-professional, Virtual Classroom Canadian Public Health Association 2008 Annual Conference.
An Online Knowledge Base for Sustainable Military Facilities & Infrastructure Dr. Annie R. Pearce, Branch Head Sustainable Facilities & Infrastructure.
Development of coordinator competencies for the Stanford chronic disease management program in Maryland Virginia Brown, DrPH; Patsy Ezell, PhD Stanford’s.
Washington State Department of Social & Health Services One Department Vision Mission Core set of Values - Division of Behavioral Health and Recovery Prevention.
California Statewide Prevention and Early Intervention (PEI) Projects Overview May 20, 2010.
The Indiana Youth Survey Insert Your Name, Title and Organization.
Kelli Ham, Consumer Health Coordinator National Network of Libraries of Medicine, Pacific Southwest Region.
Council for Exceptional Children/Division of Early Childhood Conference October 2010 Kim Carlson, Asst. Director/619 Coordinator Ohio Department of Education.
{ Principal Leadership Evaluation. The VAL-ED Vision… The construction of valid, reliable, unbiased, accurate, and useful reporting of results Summative.
Community Board Orientation 6- Community Board Orientation 6-1.
Professionalizing Mobility Management: Developing Standards and Competencies Julie Dupree, Easter Seals Association of Travel Instruction Conference August.
User Management: Understanding Roles and Permissions for Schoolnet Schoolnet II Training – Summer 2014.
California Afterschool Outcome Measures Project California Afterschool Outcome Measures Project UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, IRVINE PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR:
1-2 Training of Process Facilitators 3-1. Training of Process Facilitators 1- Provide an overview of the role and skills of a Communities That Care Process.
Delaware’s Performance Appraisal System for Administrators DPAS 2.5 Jacquelyn O. Wilson, Ed.D. University of Delaware Director Delaware Academy for School.
REDCap Overview Institute for Clinical and Translational Science Heath Davis Fred McClurg Brian Finley.
Transitioning to a Balanced Assessment System. Overview Professional Development in Assessment Smarter Balanced Logistics.
Building relationships and bridging social capital: An inclusive approach to immigrant civic engagement within libraries A PROCESS AND OUTCOME EVALUATION,
Project KEEP: San Diego 1. Evidenced Based Practice  Best Research Evidence  Best Clinical Experience  Consistent with Family/Client Values  “The.
Using Logic Models in Program Planning and Grant Proposals The Covenant Foundation.
Oregon Standards: An Update 2009 Superintendent’s Summer Institute Oregon Department of Education August 3, 2009.
The Comprehensive Literacy Plan Pennsylvania KeystonestoOpportunity Tom Corbett Governor Ron Tomalis Secretary.
Whole Child Connection™ Bob Seemer, President & COO ets, inc. System Overview Winter, 2010 ets, inc.
Presentation to the Before and Afterschool Advisory Committee California Department of Education January 11, 2011 January 11, 2011 Pilot Findings and Field.
1 Strategic Plan Review. 2 Process Planning and Evaluation Committee will be discussing 2 directions per meeting. October meeting- Finance and Governance.
Minnesota's Approach to Comprehensive Assessment Megan E. Cox, Ph.D. Principal Leadership Academy January 11, 2016 Minnesota’s Approach to Comprehensive.
Common Core 3.0 Online Learning Classroom Skill Building Field Activities.
4-H Common Measures --Overview of the Tools Nine Surveys designed to assess the outcomes found on the National 4-H Logic Models 4-7 and 8-12 Grade Universal.
 The development of the perinatal assessment tool was a vital precursor leading to the addition of data collection of the perinatal population. Data collected.
Regional Nutrition Education and Obesity Prevention Centers of Excellence-Western Region at Colorado State University SNAP & EFNEP: Regional Nutrition.
Statewide Evaluation Cohort 7 Overview of Evaluation March 23, 2010 Mikala L. Rahn, Ph.D.
Key Leader Orientation 3- Key Leader Orientation 3-1.
1 A Multi Level Approach to Implementation of the National CLAS Standards: Theme 1 Governance, Leadership & Workforce P. Qasimah Boston, Dr.Ph Florida.
Welcoming, caring, respectful, and safe learning and working environments and student code of conduct A presentation for EIPS leadership, COSC, EIPS staff,
An Introduction to the 4-H Common Measures Suzanne Le Menestrel, Ph.D. National Institute of Food and Agriculture, USDA Jill Walahoski, Ph.D. University.
Agriculture & Food Systems Evaluation SHANNON DILL, AGRICULTURE EXTENSION EDUCATOR TERESA MCCOY, ASSISTANT DIRECTOR, EVALUATION & ASSESSMENT FEBRUARY 24.
Logic Models Performance Framework for Evaluating Programs in Extension.
Building Capacity One Click at a Time: Online Evaluation Tools at CYFERnetSEARCH.org CYFERnet Evaluation Team Lynne Borden, PhDAmy Schaller, MA Christine.
Suzanne Le Menestrel, Ph.D.
11/19/2018 Welcome to PDIS 101 An Introduction to the Professional Development Information System (PDIS) Welcome to PDIS 101. This presentation is meant.
Common Measures 2.0 – Using the Surveys Arin Weidner
Common Measures 2.0: More than a Survey – A Tool for Program Planning
National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion
Presentation transcript:

National 4-H Common Measures Suzanne Le Menestrel, Ph.D. National Institute of Food and Agriculture, USDA Jill Walahoski, Ph.D. University of Nebraska-Lincoln Jessie Bauman University of Nebraska-Lincoln Dennis Sorensen Qualtrics An Introduction to the 4-H Common Measures: Phase 2

Head. Heart. Hands. Health. 4-H Common Measures  Project Goals  Benefits, Why Common Measures?  Development Process  Overview of the Outcomes and Tools

Head. Heart. Hands. Health. Goals for Common Measures  Provide state 4-H programs with resources to assist in the planning of local, state-wide, and regional evaluations  Identify a common core of child/youth outcomes and indicators that are included in the National Institute of Food and Agriculture Plan of Work system  Identify a common core of outcomes, indicators and measures to create a standard survey tool that will be used by National 4-H Council grantees

Head. Heart. Hands. Health. What was needed?  Ability to aggregate data at the local, state, and national levels  Ability to pinpoint successes and areas for improvement  A “common language”  Accessible instruments

Head. Heart. Hands. Health. Benefits to 4-H  Writing impact statements for county, state and federal reports  Easy ability to populate other reports that you are already doing  Ability to describe 4-H consistently and simply  Friendly, feasible and brief  Open access to the product-free and readily available  Measures applicable to a broad range of programs

Head. Heart. Hands. Health. Development Process  Started with National 4-H Logic Models  Spring, 2012: Common outcomes indicators and items were identified for all outcome areas for both 4-7 and 8-12 grade  Summer, 2012: Surveys were pilot tested in LA, MT, WV, NE, and VA with Hers; included facilitator input  Fall, 2012: Print versions were made available

Head. Heart. Hands. Health. Development Process  Spring, 2013: Phase 1 online data collection system launched; training delivered to 35 LGUs and 4-H Council grant managers  Spring, 2013: Year one implementation study including psychometric analysis, report available in Spring 2014  Winter, 2013: Transition to Phase 2; Qualtrics platform and preliminary psychometric analysis  Spring, 2014: Phase 2 training and a measures development meeting for Workforce Preparation/Development items

Head. Heart. Hands. Health. Overview of the Tools The 4-H Common Measures Tool and Outcomes

Head. Heart. Hands. Health. Overview of the Tools  Eight Surveys designed to assess the outcomes found on the National 4-H Logic Models  4-7 and 8-12 Grade Universal Measures  4-7 and 8-12 Grade Citizenship Measures  4-7 and 8-12 Grade Healthy Living Measures  4-7 and 8-12 Grade 4-H Science Measures 

Head. Heart. Hands. Health. Overview of the Tools  Intended for use by 4-H programs  Unique Program Evaluation  Annual Cross-Sectional Sample “State of 4-H Youth”  Needs Assessment  Benchmark Local Data against National Samples  Grants  Paper and Pencil and Web-Based  Voluntary (Unless Grant Designated)

Head. Heart. Hands. Health. Universal Outcomes  Make positive choices  Effectively communicate  Build connections  Apply content  Contribute to the health, growth and well- being of self, family, community, nation and the world

Head. Heart. Hands. Health. 4-H Science Outcomes  Interest and engagement in Science  Positive attitudes and aspirations toward Science  Develop Science skills and abilities  Apply learning, make a contribution through Science

Head. Heart. Hands. Health. Citizenship Outcomes  Awareness of community and community issues  Appreciation of cultural diversity  Engagement in community and engagement with community issues  Understanding of the Democratic process

Head. Heart. Hands. Health. Healthy Living Outcomes  Choose food consistent with dietary guidelines  Improve physical activity practices  Avoid and prevent negative risk behaviors  Assess and regulate emotions & behaviors  Establish & maintain healthy relationships

Head. Heart. Hands. Health. Phase 2 Transition The Qualtrics platform was selected in response to the needs reported in year one, benefits include:  Customizable tools  Pre-post compatible  Improved Analysis  Improved technical support  Potential for language translation

Head. Heart. Hands. Health. Phase 2 Transition  Features of the Qualtrics Platform  Security  Access to the 4-H items in the library  Ability to customize tools  Paper and electronic survey administration  Import data entry process for paper copies  Analysis and reporting tools

Head. Heart. Hands. Health. Next steps…  Development of Workforce Preparation/Workforce Development measures  Phase 2 Training, live series and self-guided video modules  Complete the transition of data collected in the original platform  Updated online resources including the IRB guide and FAQ document  New resource development including a report template  Continue psychometric analysis  Annual feedback survey to State Program Leaders

Head. Heart. Hands. Health. Access to the Tools  LGU Account Manager  Each LGU will have an account manager that will coordinate the access at LGUs  Grant Account Manager  National 4-H Council Grantees will receive the tools necessary to administer surveys and enter data  Survey-link, paper copy and import file  Each LGU continues to be responsible for securing their own IRB approval

Head. Heart. Hands. Health. Entering Data  An anonymous link can be created for each survey and the survey can be administered electronically  Paper copies can also be generated and data can be keyed into an excel file for easy import, the formatted file can be generated in Qualtrics or responses can be individually keyed as responses to the anonymous link

Head. Heart. Hands. Health. Running a Report I’m not an account manager, how will I access my reports?  You will need to work with the account manager at your LGU or with the Grant to export data or run reports  Data and reports can be made available in Excel, Word or Pdf formats

Head. Heart. Hands. Health. Questions?

Head. Heart. Hands. Health. Contact Information  Jill Walahoski -  Jessie Bauman –  Suzanne LeMenestrel –  Information and Resources  Qualtrics Support