Planning Performance Agreements in Islington PAS Pre-Application Services Workshop 19 th June 2014 Victoria Geoghegan Head of Development Management &

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
CLACKMANNANSHIRE COUNCIL Modernising the Planning Service in Clackmannanshire Stephen Bell Head of Development Services.
Advertisements

What is involved in the planning process and who makes the decisions?
Planning: Can localism work in your area? Dr Michael Harris Deputy Head of Policy & Research John Romanski Senior Neighbourhood Planning Advisor, Planning.
Interested in Neighbourhood Planning in Cotswold District?
Strategic Environmental Assessment: Where does Hong Kong stand? LAM Kin Che Chairman, Advisory Council on the Environment Head, Department of Geography.
Public Engagement in a Multi-Stakeholder World Don Lenihan June 2008.
Agenda 1.Who we are 2.The critical issues 3.The tools we use now 4.How we could really work together
Independent, impartial, inclusive The Infrastructure Planning Commission and the application process Gideon Amos OBE – Commissioner Jessica Potter – Case.
FOUNDATION TRUST STATUS. What is a Foundation Trust? It is an NHS organisation, first established in April 2004 Foundation Trusts operate according to.
Engaging with Planning Agents Reform of the Planning System 30 April 2015.
Opportunities and risks: Recent research on shared services in the community sector Dr June Lennie June Lennie Research and Evaluation
Update of Development Trends in Westminster 27 June 2005 CITY DEVELOPMENT OVERVIEW AND SCRUTINY COMMITTEE.
1 Consultation on Funding Reform Reforming care and support: funding adult social care Joseph Levitt.
New Procurement & Delivery Arrangements for the Schools’ Estate Presentation to Strategic Advisory Group 18 April 2005.
Aberdeenshire Local Development Plan 2016 Identification of issues.
Affordable Housing: Policies into Practice Louise Dwelly Housing Strategy & Enabling Manager October 2004.
Copyright 2009 Northumberland County Council A Neighbourhood Plan for Broomhaugh and Riding Peter Rutherford, Northumberland.
GRAFFITI HOTSPOTS PROJECT. THE PROBLEM  Increased reports of graffiti and antisocial behaviour around the municipality received through Council’s Graffiti.
A Sustainable Wales Better Choices for a Better Future Sustainable Development White Paper A Sustainable Wales - Better Choices for a Better Future.
LOCAL BUFFER SUPPORT PROGRAM 1 May 2014 MAV. Liveability, growth and waste As Melbourne continues to grow, we need secure the right mix of resource recovery.
Guidance for AONB Partnership Members Welsh Member Training January 26/
Emerging plans at local and neighbourhood level Sarah O’Driscoll Service Manager City Planning 22 nd April 2014.
Deakin Richard Tan Head, Information Technology Services Division DEAKIN UNIVERSITY 14 th October 2003.
The Social Housing Regulator Business as usual - All change.
PLANNING OBLIGATIONS Environmental, Housing and Planning Scrutiny Committee 23 rd September 2005.
UNEP Training Resource Manual Topic 10 Slide 1. UNEP Training Resource Manual Topic 10 Slide 2 EIA is a process to: F gather information necessary for.
The Local Development Framework and other Planning matters Presentation to the Bradford Property Forum 19 June 2007.
Review of the implementation in England of the Habitats and Wild Birds Directives Nature Directors 23 May 2012 Robin Mortimer, Defra.
The Planning Act 2008 Presentation to local authorities affected by the proposed Navitus Bay Wind Park 22 January 2014 Kay Sully, Senior Case Manager Richard.
REGIONAL GOVERNMENT The South East England Regional Assembly (SEERA or the Assembly) –Representative voice of the region. –Covers nine areas: Berkshire,
Neighbourhood Planning. Frequently Asked Questions What is Neighbourhood Planning? What can a Neighbourhood Plan do – and what can it not do? What are.
Round up of other planning news Graham Withers, Development Management “If anyone comes to me with an idea for new planning legislation I am going to shoot.
Assessing viability in plan making and HCA support on viability Growth Point Best Practice Network Michael Rich 11 th May, 2012.
Redevelopment of the Georgia-Pacific Mill Site, Fort Bragg, CA. Options and Alternatives for Public Participation in the Planning Process Neil Peacock.
1 Poole Grammar School Accommodation of Yr 7 Children Partnership Agreement February 2007 Michael Thompson TEAM FOCUS – RTL Ltd.
Thames Tunnel PINS Meeting with London Boroughs Janet Wilson & Mark Wilson.
Open Public Meeting July 27, am – 12 pm State Transportation Building, Boston MassHealth Demonstration to Integrate Care for Dual Eligibles.
Neighbourhood Planning: Designed to Deliver? How neighbourhood planning can support economic growth The Cabe approach 27 th June 2014 David Waterhouse.
Cornwall Council Housing Adaptations & Advice Service Jane Barlow; Head of Housing Karen Sawyer; Assistant Head of Housing.
Empowerment: ‘passing more and more power to more and more people through every practical means’ Communities in Control, 2008  Representative democracy.
Inception meeting with Northumberland County Council Janet Wilson & Kathrine Haddrell.
1 Planning 4A7 Design & the Built Environment Dept. of Civil, Structural, & Environmental John O’Connor.
Our Pre-application offer at Croydon How we manage to provide a comprehensive, proportionate and good value service Nicola Townsend London Borough of Croydon.
Overview of the Planning Act and its implications for Local Authorities 17 th September 2015  Andrew Farrow – Chief Officer (Planning & Environment),
1 Scrutiny for Policies and Place Committee 19th April Planning System Reforms Alyn Jones, Interim Director of Economic & Community Infrastructure Operations.
Pre-Application Advice in Kirklees Simon Taylor – Head of Development Management.
INTRODUCING CIL AND DEALING WITH SCHEME SPECIFIC VIABILITY ISSUES – BRISTOL’S APPROACH Jim Cliffe Planning Obligations Manager Bristol City Council.
CIL vs S106 The Regulation 123 list. The levy cannot be expected to pay for all of the infrastructure required: – 10-30% – Consider CIL as just one part.
Planning Performance Agreements in Camden PAS Pre- Application Services Workshop - 10 June 2014 Frances Wheat Head of Development Management.
PAS Peer Day 10 th February 2015 Zoe Willcox Service Director Planning Place Directorate Positive Planning: Delivering Housing Unblocking stalled sites.
What is a Service Level Agreement? Service level agreements are part of a quality approach to help teams identify and agree what ‘good quality’ looks like.
Community Infrastructure Levy – Charging Schedule.
Implementing a CIL in Sheffield - Lessons Learned Richard Holmes Principal Planning Officer Forward and Area Planning Sheffield City Council.
S106 Agreements Development Control User Panel. s106 agreements What are s106 agreements? How are they managed? The future:Community Infrastructure Levy.
Planning Performance Agreements and Extensions of time Date: September 2013www.pas.gov.uk.
RCUK International Funding Name Job title Research Councils UK.
SECTION 106 UPDATE DARREN WILDING DCLG. S106 - LEGISLATION Section 106 of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990 restricts the development or use of the.
Community Infrastructure Levy The fundamentals. Response to questions.
Phillipa Silcock Using and discharging conditions.
Demystifying viability The local authority experience Dominick Mennie, Deputy Team Leader (Plan Making)
No.1 for Service and Value CIL – the experience Martin Howell, Group Planner – Policy & Information, Wandsworth Council
The Lead Agency Council Sports Trust (Sport Otago) Cluster of clubs Interested parties / other.
12 th April  What is it?  Why now?  Who’s doing it?  What are the benefits?  What will the plan look like?  How is it done?
Development Permit System. Development Permit System 2 Disclaimer  The information presented is provided as background information to facilitate understanding.
The National Planning Policy Framework: what it means for you.
Item 3 South East Plan and recent policy statements…
The partnership principle in the implementation of the CSF funds ___ Elements for a European Code of Conduct.
Tools, models and due diligence for collaboration
Poole Grammar School Accommodation of Yr 7 Children
Presentation transcript:

Planning Performance Agreements in Islington PAS Pre-Application Services Workshop 19 th June 2014 Victoria Geoghegan Head of Development Management & Building Control

Structure of Presentation Why Islington using PPAs When we encourage the use of PPAs Islington’s service offer Success so far Examples Survey How Islington benefits?

Why Islington encourages PPA? Lots of reasons…… -Timeframes -Resources

Why Islington encourages PPA? 1: Improves quality of planning process Shared vision and policy objectives identified Effective stakeholder involvement Collaborative working Fosters strong and productive partnerships An improved customer service Better value in long term Removal of 13/16-week time constraint

Why Islington encourages PPA? 2: Facilitates well informed, robust decision making Effective transparent community engagement Community empowerment and ownership Building trust Less objection, more support Certainty through Member involvement Avoidance of refusal and lengthy appeals More sustainable and higher quality developments

Why Islington encourages PPA? 3: Facilitates workload planning Core and ‘flexible workpool’ model Discretionary pre-application advice paid for by those who benefit Service can respond to development pressures Fixed term contracts for additional staff

What sort of PPAs do Islington offer? Pre-application Application stage Post decision – AOD, s73 Significant clients who submit a number of applications and enquiries each year One off PPA covering the end to end process

When do we encourage a PPA Planning proposals that: are strategic require Environmental Impact Assessment on larger sites that include a variety of land uses have impact on strategic areas of environmental sensitivity on sites with many constraints to be resolved involve significant non-standard planning obligations referable to GLA or Secretary of State; significant impact on existing communities which require wide consultation/ involvement with stakeholders unique to a local authority’s experience.

Islington’s PPA process

Islington’s charges Normal pre-application charging regimes For a flat fee of £6000 we offer 2 types of PPA: 1.Pre-app and Application 2.Application phase only Post decision fee of £1500 offer 1 type 1.AOD/s73 Also included as part of the PPA process: Design Review Panel Members’ Pre-application Forum

Success so far Steady increase in use of PPA – Pre-application Application Stage 2011: 00/ : 82/ : 1917/ /10 Some examples : Mount Pleasant City Forum City University Housing Service’s Major Applications London Metropolitan University Old street office development

Case Study: City Forum Mixed use scheme comprising 995 flats, 190 bed hotel, B1 office and affordable workspace, town centre uses, crèche and open space. EIA development and referable to the GLA. The application site has an extant permission Screening: PPA was necessary. Funded an officer. Scoping: Timetable of meetings agreed - including 2 x CABE DRP reviews, 2 x Pre-Application Members’ Forum. Vision and objectives, key stakeholders, policy position, procedural arrangements and committee date all agreed. Implementation: First of 50 agreed meetings April Extended Key benefits: Member involvement allowed more certainty and understanding of a very complex proposal and ensured the applicant knew what the main issues were. Allowed key viability and design issues to be resolved – CABE DRP twice. Timeframe extended to accommodate negotiations. Decision was to refuse under delegated Call in by GLA

Case Study: City University Redevelopment of part of the site for Graduate School. Screening: PPA was necessary Scoping: Timetable of meetings agreed - including 2 x DRP reviews, 1 x Pre-Application Members’ Forum. Vision and objectives, key stakeholders, policy position, procedural arrangements and committee date all agreed. Implementation: Nov 2012 onwards. Extended Key benefits: Sensitive heritage area/switched on community. Community /member involvement allowed more certainty and understanding of a very complex proposal and ensured the applicant knew what the main issues were. Timeframe extended to accommodate negotiations. Approved subject to a s106

PPA Survey 2012

Survey’s Positive Comments Benefits both parties Creates a positive working relationship Accountability and focus on timescales Provides results and dedicated offices makes a difference

Survey’s Neutral Comments Doesn’t make a difference Time consuming to put in place When paying a fee they expect a certain level of service Don’t always stick to targets LPA use to justify longer determination period

Survey’s Negative Comments Ignore timescales Just another cost Time consuming to negotiate

So for Islington a PPA is not just about removing the time constraints … a PPA will: limit bureaucratic approach promote shared objectives, visions, goals allows flexibility build trust and strong partnerships give genuine voice to local communities establish transparency and more certainty result in well informed and robust decision Ensures staff resource is available for discretionary service

Questions?