Navigating Sign Regulations Michael P. Otworth, CPCU, ARM, ASLI VP & Senior Unit Manager Benjamin C. Eggert, Esq.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Research Methods in Crime and Justice Chapter 3 The Ethical Principles that Guide Researchers.
Advertisements

PAMDA SPLIT and the New Property Occupations Bill Redmond + Redmond Russell Sparke – Special Counsel Disclaimer: The content of this presentation is a.
The Judiciary. Is the Judiciary a political branch of the government? Should it be? What are the dangers of an unelected, activist judiciary? What are.
© The McCoy Law Firm 2012 James McCoy The McCoy Law Firm Coit Rd., Ste. 560 Dallas, Texas (214)
The Corporate Laws Amendment Bill, B6/2006. © 2006 Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu Corporate Laws Amendment Bill, B6/2006 – 29 May 2006 Introduction Presenting.
EVEN THOUGH THE CHARTER IS THE HIGHEST LAW, CAN IT STILL BE CHALLENGED AND CHANGED?
Constitutional Law Part 8: First Amendment: Freedom of Expression
Unlawful Internet Gambling Enforcement Act Final Rule Joseph Baressi June 3, 2009.
1 Protecting Your Sign Code Against Attack (S634) APA 2007 National Planning Conference Professor Daniel Mandelker, FAICP Washington University, St. Louis.
Enforcement in the Pharmaceutical Industry Michael K. Loucks First Assistant U.S. Attorney United States Attorney’s Office District of Massachusetts October.
Protests, Parades and Public Assemblies - Key Constitutional Principles and Recent Developments Robert E. Hagemann Charlotte Senior Assistant City Attorney.
Copyright © 2004 by Prentice-Hall. All rights reserved. PowerPoint Slides to Accompany BUSINESS LAW E-Commerce and Digital Law International Law and Ethics.
© 2007 Prentice Hall, Business Law, sixth edition, Henry R. Cheeseman Chapter 4 Constitutional Law for Business and Online Commerce Chapter 4 Constitutional.
Constitutional Law Part 4: The Federal Judicial Power Lecture 1: Interpretive Limits.
 The 5 th Amendment limits the national government, but the 14 th guarantees that states cannot deprive rights without “Due Process.”  Due process is.
The Judicial Branch Study Guide for Unit 5. 5 th Amendment Deals with the rights of the accused: Double jeopardy is prohibited Right to be heard by a.
SECTION 1 Freedom of Assembly and Petition Standard Discuss the meaning and importance of each of the rights guaranteed under the Bill of Rights.
Objective: Evaluate the role of the First Amendment
The Freedom of Information Act What the Government Doesn’t Want You to Know, and How You Can Find Out Presentation for: Conservative Political Action Conference.
Four tips to mitigate Mobile fraud in the future.
Public Communications Law Lecture 1 Slide 1 The First Amendment This course is fundamentally a study of the First Amendment freedoms and how they apply.
Does the First Amendment protect free speech if humanitarian groups want to provide support to designated terrorist organizations? Must a humanitarian.
Use Policies Deputy Attorney General Robert Morgester
Incorporation & Annexation Incorporation: establishment of city as legal entity –Reasons: provide town services (streets, law enforcement, water/sewer,
1 Sign Codes that Stand Up in Court APA 2011 National Planning Conference April 12, 2011 Boston, MA Professor Daniel Mandelker, FAICP Washington University,
Constitutional Law Part 8: First Amendment: Freedom of Expression Lecture 3: Places Available for Speech.
Supreme Court Project Example Church of the Lukumi Babalu Aye v. Hialeah, Florida
Waremart concluded that the Moscone Act violates the First Amendment as it extends greater protection to speech regarding a labor dispute than to speech.
Chapter 2 Legal Aspects of Investigation © 2009 McGraw-Hill Higher Education. All rights reserved. LEARNING OBJECTIVES Explain the historical evolution.
Legal Issues. Overview Standard Contract Terms of Social Networking Sites Government Content on a Third-Party Site Competitive Procurement Issues First.
+ Perry’s Three Fora Traditional Public Forum Streets, Parks & Sidewalks CB/CN rules apply Designated/Public Forum State need not open property for expressive.
© 2015 OnCourse Learning Texas Real Estate Brokerage and Law of Agency, 6 th Edition.
Basics of Religious Rights. 1 st Amendment Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof;
Twelve Guiding Principles for the Regulation of Surveillance Camera Systems Presented by: Alastair Thomas Date: 23 rd October 2013.
The Paralegal Professional PA101.  the power to govern is shared by one central or federal government and the 50 state governments.
Signs Gary Taylor, AICP, Iowa State University
The Judiciary Vocabulary Review. activist approach.
WASHINGTON STATE LEGISLATURE BILL DRAFTING AND BILL REPORT WRITING October 29, 2004.
Homework: Read/OL 13.2 for Tuesday FrontPage: See next slide.
In re Tam on Appeal to Group 2 Seattle IP Inn of Court.
Morse v. Frederick A U. S. Supreme Court Case.
Regulatory approval times between submission and marketing authorization approval APRIL 2007 SOURCE: CMR INTERNATIONAL PERFORMANCE METRICS PROGRAM.
Judicial and First Amendment Supreme CourtJudicial BranchMore Supreme Court Freedom of Religion Freedom of Speech
Presented by: Richard A. Spiers, CPCU, ARM, ARe and Thomas J. Lyons, Esq. The Changing World of Marijuana: Did You Inhale? March 7, 2016.
The Decision of the Supreme Court on the Constitutionality of the PPACA Wilson Huhn ©
Southwest Region Planning Commission April 27, 2016 Benjamin Frost, Esq., AICP.
What is argued in the dissenting opinion?.  Which message is Constitutional?
ORDINANCE Noun: A piece of legislation enacted by a municipal authority. Origin: Latin Ordinare: Put in order.
Argued: March 19, 2007 Decided: June 25, =2&i= &w=580&fh=&fw=&ll=&pl=&r=
 What is a Case Brief?  A case brief is a condensed, concise outline-form summary of a court opinion. Hence, the term “brief.” It is generally used.
THE JUDICIAL SYSTEM Part 1: The Federal Court System Part 2: Civil Liberties and the 1 st Amendment Part 3: Civil Rights, Equal Protection Under the Law.
Sign Ordinances – Reed v. Town of Gilbert Permit required to get a sign unless fell into 1 of 19 exemptions:  Political - temporary sign which supports.
Lesson 18: How Has the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment Changed the Constitution?
Chapter 4 Constitutional Law for Business and Online Commerce
EU Sanctions on Individuals
Why do we study American citizenship…
Sign Amendment First of two amendments proposed to sign ordinance
Lesson 25: What Is the Role of the Supreme Court in the American Constitutional System?
Lesson 18: How Has the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment Changed the Constitution?
Brian Gaviglio Litigation Management Attorney
Court.
The First Amendment On Campus
The Judicial Branch And the Federal Courts.
Lecture 36 Unit IV Introduction
Market linked debentures
Theories Behind Freedom of Expression
Public Forum Doctrine Religion and the Constitution.
McDonald v City of Chicago
Law and Public Education
Public Forum Doctrine Law and Education.
Presentation transcript:

Navigating Sign Regulations Michael P. Otworth, CPCU, ARM, ASLI VP & Senior Unit Manager Benjamin C. Eggert, Esq.

Goals Reed v. Town of Gilbert Changes Everything 2 Sign Regulations Generally Practical Solutions

Overview of Sign Regulations Purpose Statement Permit Procedures Prohibitions/Limits Specifications Exemptions Other provisions Basic Elements of Most Sign Regulations 3

Overview of Sign Regulations These are the powers of local government Historical Approach - Issue was whether sign regulation concern public safety/property value Modern Approach – Little impediment to regulation of sign Police Power 4

Overview of Sign Regulations Complex Issue No Single Test Governments “shall make no law” “abridging the freedom of speech” Rule: Prohibitions on speech cannot be based on content “Content Neutral” requirement First Amendment 5

Overview of Sign Regulations Literal Test: if you need to read the sign order to tell whether it complies with the regulation, the regulation is content based. Pragmatic Test: if you can justify the sign regulation without reference the sign’s content, the it is content neutral. First Amendment 6

Overview of Sign Regulations General Rule: Generally, courts have considered the intent of a sign regulation and strike it down as a “content based” regulation only when it was determined the regulation was adopted to suppress speech with which the government disagreed. First Amendment 7

Reed v. Town of Gilbert Background Plaintiff Church: Needed signs to guide people to services. Defendant Town: Wanted to regulate and limit signs Regulation of Physical Size: Non-political, non- ideological signs cannot exceed 6 sq. feet in area Regulation of Time: Maximum time allowed is 12 hours before the event, and 1 hour after the event 8

Reed v. Town of Gilbert 9 Examples of “illegal” sign at issue in Reed v. Town of Gilbert

Reed v. Town of Gilbert 10 Another example of “illegal” sign at issue in Reed v. Town of Gilbert

Reed v. Town of Gilbert 11 Example of “legal” signs at issue in Reed v. Town of Gilbert

Reed v. Town of Gilbert 12 Comparison of spacial limitations of different kinds of signs in Reed v. Town of Gilbert

Reed v. Town of Gilbert 13 Comparison of temporal limitations of different kinds of signs in Reed v. Town of Gilbert

Reed v. Town of Gilbert Result - Generally Town of Gilbert Lost 9-0 Regulation was unconstitutional No clear guidance 14

Reed v. Town of Gilbert Result - Generally Four separate opinions; little clear direction going forward Six justices joined a limited opinion and comprise the “majority.” Three of the six concurred in a separate opinion The remaining three concurred in the result, but had an entirely different rationale. 3 – 3 – 3 Split 15

Reed v. Town of Gilbert Result – Majority Opinion Any regulation of a sign that is based on the content of the speech is subject to strict scrutiny. Strong, rigid “content neutrality” rule Practical result is that the regulation is presumptively unconstitutional. Very high standard: most regulations are not going to pass this test 16

Reed v. Town of Gilbert Result – Concurring Opinion Three Justices generally agreed with majority opinion but felt that some rules are not content based Content-neutrality “lite” Would allow more regulation of more types of signs. Some examples: Size & Location Lighting/Electric Commercial/Residential Density 17

Reed v. Town of Gilbert Result – Concurrence in the Judgement Three other Justices (Breyer, Ginsberg, Kagan) agreed the Town’s regulation was unconstitutional, but for entirely different reasons Very critical of the rule of absolute content-neutrality based First Amendment should yield to some regulation and there’s no reason to strike down reasonable regulations in pursuit of some absolute constitutional principle 18

Reed v. Town of Gilbert Result – Bottom Line Regulation is suspect if it targets: Content of the sign Purpose of the sign Identity of person/entity putting up on the sign In other words, if you are differentiating a sign based on: (1) reading the sign’s content, (2) knowing the author of the content, or (3) why the sign was put up, then may be unconstitutional. 19

Practical Effects of Reed v. Town of Gilbert Permissible Regulations Regulate non-commercial signs in a content-neutral time/place/manner approach Location Size/Height Structure Materials Lighting Fixed/Moving Parts Portability 20

Practical Effects of Reed v. Town of Gilbert Permissible Regulations??? But there are numerous open questions about what you can regulate: Category/Function? Most regulations approach signs by type For example, real estate signs are governed by X, Y & Z regulations What to do now? Signs on Public Property? Public Safety Signs? 21

Practical Effects of Reed v. Town of Gilbert Permissible Regulations??? But there are numerous open questions about what you can regulate: Signs on Public Property? Public Safety Signs? Non-Commercial Speech? Commercial Speech? Political Signs? Temporary Signs? 22

Practical Effects of Reed v. Town of Gilbert Solutions – Carefully Consider Enforcement Actions If you see a violation, consider enforceability in light of lessons of Reed v. Gilbert Look for solutions short of enforcement If regulation is enforced, it may invite a lawsuit 23

Practical Effects of Reed v. Town of Gilbert Solutions – Review Existing Regulations Hire a professional Lawyer/Risk Management Professional Looking for content-based standards 24

Practical Effects of Reed v. Town of Gilbert Solutions – Review Existing Regulations Looking for content-based standards Amend regulations that are based on content 25

Practical Effects of Reed v. Town of Gilbert Solutions – Review Existing Regulations Develop strong purposes statement Cite specific factual studies relevant to regulatory purpose and intent 26

Practical Effects of Reed v. Town of Gilbert Solutions – Review Existing Regulations Severability Clause Substitution Clause No Exemptions Clause 27

Practical Effects of Reed v. Town of Gilbert Bottom Line Creates more issues than it resolves Contents-based regulations may be challenged & unconstitutional Review/Update regulations 28

Contact Information Benjamin C. Eggert, Esq.Michael P. Otworth, CPCU, ARM, ASLI Wiley Rein, LLP Genesis Mgmt and Insurance Services 1776 K Street NWP.O. Box 1255 Washington, DC 20006Stamford, CT Direct: (202) Direct: (203)

30 Proprietary Notice The material contained in this presentation has been prepared solely for informational purposes by Genesis Management and Insurance Services Corporation and Wiley Rein LLP. The material is based on sources believed to be reliable and/or from proprietary data developed by Genesis and Wiley Rein LLP, but neither Genesis nor Wiley Rein represent as to its accuracy or its completeness. The content of this presentation is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances. Disclosure Genesis Insurance Company is licensed in the District of Columbia, Puerto Rico and all states. Genesis Insurance Company has its principal place of business in Stamford, CT and operates under NAIC Number