Team formulation Developments in Cwm Taf Julian Pitt/Lucy Johnstone Consultant clinical psychologists
What is a formulation? A formulation is the essential link between theory/evidence on the one hand, and intervention on the other ‘ Formulations can best be understood as hypotheses to be tested’ (Butler, 1998) It is a core skill in the training of both psychologists and psychiatrists. ‘…….at some level it all makes sense’ (Butler, 1998)
DCP Good practice guidelines on psychological formulation 2011
All formulations: Summarise the client’s core problems Are constructed jointly with the client, who describes their life experience and the sense they have made of it Suggest, on the basis of psychological theory, research and evidence, why the client has developed these difficulties, at this time and in these situations Are used to inform an individual intervention plan Are open to revision and re-formulation.
‘Jane’ Her parents had substance abuse problems She performed poorly at school She could not cope with her children There is marital conflict She was diagnosed with depression
Formulation drawn up with Jane “Your parents had significant problems with drink and drugs, and as a result you grew up feeling unloved and worthless. You were not encouraged to fulfil your potential at school, and took the only option that seemed to be available to you – marriage to the first person who seemed to show an interest in you. Although you love your children very much, your background means that you find it hard to cope with the emotional demands of parenting. Your husband offers little support, and you once again feel unloved and unwanted in your close relationships. It is hard for you to assert yourself or get what you need. With so many past feelings still unresolved, you feel overwhelmed and despairing and full of self-blame. Sometimes you feel as if there is no way out. At the same time, you have considerable strengths and determination, and want to make a better life for yourself and your children. “
Team formulation – a recent development Adopted in a couple of Trusts in England (Tees, Esk and Wear OA, Sussex AMH/OA) and attracting an increasing amount of attention as an innovative practice Regular weekly meetings facilitated by a psychologist, attended by as many team members as possible Clients can be ‘booked in’ for discussion and staff from other teams/agencies invited as appropriate Key worker prepares brief summary of personal and psychiatric history in advance
Simple format: What is the current question or ‘stuck point’? Team members develop a shared formulation, guided by the facilitator The formulation is used as a basis for an intervention Facilitator writes it up and circulates for agreement Added to the records Review as necessary in future meetings Inform and include service user as much as possible (meet them beforehand, feed back afterwards, develop parallel formulation to feed into staff version)
Benefits of team formulation (Guidelines 2011) Consistency of approach to intervention Helping team, service user and carers to work together Gathering key information in one place Generating new ways of thinking Dealing with core issues (not just crisis management) Supporting each other with complex clients Drawing on and valuing the expertise of all team members Reducing negative perceptions about service users Helping staff to manage risk Minimising disagreement and blame within teams Increasing team understanding, empathy and reflectiveness Raising staff morale Conveying messages to staff about hope for change
Training in team formulation Lucy Johnstone’s half day training package has been delivered to all CMHT staff (Taf Ely, Rhondda, Cynon and Merthyr); both AO teams: the Pinewood and rehab service Lucy has also done 3 training sessions to social care teams Lucy Johnstone has delivered a day’s training on facilitating team formulation meetings to local psychologists
Feedback from before and after training
Regular team formulation meetings now running in: All 4 CMHTS Both Assertive Outreach teams 2 locked rehabilitation units RGH inpatient wards There has been support and good participation from all disciplines.
Evaluation of staff views 100% of the participants felt that the meetings had helped to develop a shared team understanding of a client’s problems, strengths and difficulties; draw on the knowledge and skills from different professional backgrounds; generate new ideas about working with the client; develop an intervention plan; and improve risk management. Hollingworth and Johnstone 2014
‘ The meetings give me a sense of not being on my own… they have increased my confidence in working with other professions involved’ ‘Useful in planning a way forward which has given the client and professionals a sense of hope for future recovery’ ‘It felt as if the formulation helped to focus and make more rigorous many of the ideas that were already there amongst the care team’ ‘..enabling team members to deal with emotional difficulties entailed in dealing with challenging patients’ ‘Although I was not in complete agreement…. I was able to express my view and an agreement was reached by the team’
Taking the model further? Develop a fully validated staff questionnaire based on the initial evaluation Measure of changes in team climate Look at other outcome measures (admissions, use of medication, recovery indicators etc) Look at service user involvement in/experience of the process
References Butler, G (1998) Clinical formulation. In AS Bellack and M Hersen (eds) Comprehensive clinical psychology. Oxford: Pergamon Hollingworth, P and Johnstone, L (2014) Team formulation: what are the staff views? Clinical Psychology Forum, 257,
Dexter Smith, S. (2010). Integrating psychological formulations into older people’s services – three years on. PSIGE Newsletter, No. 112, October 2010, Davenport S (2002) Acute wards: problems and solutions. Psychiatric Bulletin 26, Eells TD (1997) (ed) Handbook of psychotherapy case formulation. New York: Guilford Press Clarkson, P. (2003) The Therapeutic Relationship (2 nd edn.), London, Philadephia: Whurr. Evans G and Parry J (1996) The impact of reformulation in CAT with difficult- to-help clients’. Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, 3 (2), Gardner, D (2005) Getting it together: integrative approaches to formulation. Clinical Psychology Forum 151, 10 –15 Harper D and Spellman D (1994) Consultation to a professional network Journal of Family Therapy, 16, Harper, D and Moss D (2003) A different kind of chemistry? Reformulating ‘formulation.’ Clinical Psychology, 25, 6-10.
Herman, J (2001) Trauma and recovery. London: Pandora Kahn, M. (1996) Between Therapist and Client: The New Relationship. (2 nd edn.) New York: W.H.Freeman/ Owl Books. Kennedy F, Smalley M and Harris T (2003) Clinical psychology for inpatient settings: principles for development and practice. Clinical Psychology Forum 30, Kinderman, P (2001) The future of clinical psychology training. Clinical Psychology Forum 8, Lake, N (2008) Developing skills in consultation 2: a team formulation approach. Clinical Psychology Forum 186, Lapworth, P., and Sills, C. (2010) Integration in Counselling and Psychotherapy (2 nd edn). London: Sage Larkin W and Morrison AP (2006) Trauma and psychosis. London: Routledge Martindale, B (2007) Psychodynamic contributions to early intervention in psychosis. Advances in Psychiatric Treatment, 13, Morberg Pain C, Chadwick P and Abba N (2008) Clients’ experience of case formulation in CBT for psychosis. BJ Clinical Psychology 47, 2, Okiishi, J., Lambert, M.J., Neilson, S.L. and Ogles, B.M. (2003) Waiting for supershrink: an empirical analysis of therapist effects. Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, 10, 6,
Pilgrim, D (2000) Psychiatric diagnosis: more questions than answers. The Psychologist, 13 (6), Read, J van Os J, Morrison AP, Ross CA 2005) Childhood trauma, psychosis and schizophrenia. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica 112, Romme M and Escher S (2000) Making sense of voices. Summers, A (2006) Psychological formulations in psychiatric care: staff views on their impact. Psychiatric Bulletin 30, Tarrier, N ((2005) Case formulation in cognitive behaviour therapy: the treatment of challenging and complex cases. Hove: Brunner-Routledge Weerasekeera, P (1996) Multiperspective case formulation: a step towards treatment integration. Malabar, Fl: Krieger Williams CJ, Ashworth P and Blackburn IM What becomes of cognitive therapy trainees? Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapy, 27,