Lect. 10 Administrative Burdens and RIA. Overview Methodology currently used by many Member States and the European Commission to deal with the problem.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
European Semester and modernisation of public administration
Advertisements

Conference on the simplification of the Common Agricultural Policy A simple CAP for Europe-a challenge for all Brussels, 3-4 October 2006 DG AGRIs assessment.
1 The European Parliament (EP) AL. 2 The European Parliament (EP) The European Parliament (EP) is elected by the citizens of the European Union.
1 SG C Commission Communication on EU Regulatory Fitness COM (2012) 746 Working Group on Better Regulation Meeting of 4 th March, 2013 Michael Gremminger.
Standing for trust and integrity OROC Congress Ethics and Accountability Lisbon, 22 October 2010 Hilde Blomme FEE Director of Practice Regulation.
1 DG Enterprise & Industry European Commission E.U. conference of Administrative Burden Reduction Malta, 1 February 2008 Burden Reduction in Support of.
Women on Boards in Europe – From a Snail’s Pace to a Giant Leap? EWL report on progress and gaps Seminar ‘Equal Rights, Equal Voices? Women in Decision-Making.
Dr. André Nijsen Adviser Regulatory Reform 1 Standard Cost Model 2.0 Workshop Sonnenfels Center Wien April
Quaker Council for European Affairs – A Quaker Voice in Europe The European Union Budget Overview and Income.
INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE “THE SUCCESSFUL WORK SAFELY AND HEALTHILY” Conference Hall Grandis Congress Centre Brdo pri Kranju 7 November 2008.
Macroeconomics Basics.
Erasmus Thematic Network Sanne Hirs, Project coordinator Faculty of Law, Utrecht University.
Decision-making process in the Nikolay Kaveshnikov, Moscow State Institute of International Relations (University)
EP/Council Division of Power Commission proposes law, EP response based on one of three models: Co-decision (most issues, currently) – policy goes to EP,
The Italian Institutional Design for Administrative Simplification HIGH LEVEL REGIONAL SEMINAR ON “STRATEGIES, TOOLS AND CAPACITIES FOR ADMINISTRATIVE.
Patricia de Suzzoni, Chair of ERGEG Customer Working Group Citizens’ Energy Forum, London, September 2009 Regulatory aspects of smart metering in.
Integration of Regulatory Impact Assessment into the decision making process in the Czech Republic Aleš Pecka Department of Regulatory Reform and Public.
How is the budget raised The own resource system – The overall amount of own resources needed to finance the budget is determined by total expenditure.
THE EUROPEAN UNION Lesson 5
THE EUROPEAN UNION Lesson 5
Smart Regulation Responding to the needs of SMEs Commission Communication COM(2013) final of
Taking forward the BRTF Report: Admin Burdens and the Standard Cost Model in HMRC Presentation to the BRCC Craig Richardson, HMRC Analysis Steve Webster,
1 DG Enterprise & Industry European Commission Administrative Burden Reduction and Impact Assessment Presentation by Cavan O’Connor Close European Commission.
The SCM – main issues, advantages and challenges of quantification of administrative costs Daniel Trnka Regulatory Policy Division, Directorate for Public.
REGIONAL POLICY EUROPEAN COMMISSION The EU Recovery Plan and the proposal amending the European Regional Development Fund Regulation.
© OECD A joint initiative of the OECD and the European Union, principally financed by the EU Administrative Simplification: An overarching policy to maintain.
Europe: A mid term PSI review Chris Corbin ePSIplus Analyst Den Haag, The Netherlands, funded by eContentPlus.
Animal Welfare EU Strategy Introduction Community Action Plan The Commission's commitment to EU citizens, stakeholders, the EP and.
7 November 2006VI Eurosai Training Event - Prague1 Auditing EU funds – National SAI experiences Jan van den Bos – Netherlands Court of Audit.
Emerging methodologies for the census in the UNECE region Paolo Valente United Nations Economic Commission for Europe Statistical Division International.
Measuring Respondent Burden at the UK Office for National Statistics Denise Williams, Sarah Green & Jacqui Jones.
Implementation of the animal slaughter regulation Andrea Gavinelli, Head of Unit Animal Welfare Directorate General for Health and Food Safety European.
Sub-regional Workshop on the Implementation of the Convention on the Transboundary Effects of Industrial Accidents Erevan, Armenia, March 2003 The.
Communication Paper on Smart Regulation COM(2010) 543, 8 October 2010 Presentation by Savia Orphanidou 3 rd November 2010.
1 DG Enterprise & Industry European Commission Conference on Better Regulation: Practical Steps Forward Reykjavík 6 June 2006 OVERVIEW OF THE BETTER REGULATION.
Introducing Regulatory Impact Analysis into the Turkish Legal Framework “Training the Trainers” November 2008 Session 8 Standard Cost Model and RIAs.
Israel Accession Seminar PIAAC: Programme for International assessment of Adult Competencies Skills strategy in OECD Programme for the International Assessment.
© OECD A joint initiative of the OECD and the European Union, principally financed by the EU Strategy for Better Regulation in Romania Expert - Florin.
07/10/2009 Session 3: Business Register as a source for further development of business demography statistics Business Demography: the way to measure where.
Role-play on EU decision-making. The European Union: 500 million people – 28 countries Member states of the European Union Candidate and potential candidate.
Sofia, March 25, 2003 BULGARIA, BRITAIN AND THE LISBON AGENDA: STRATEGIES FOR RAISING EMPLOYMENT AND PRODUCTIVITY.
Fitness Check of environmental monitoring and reporting Stakeholder Workshop 19/20 Nov 2015 Joachim D'Eugenio Steve White DG Environment European Commission.
1 SG C Regulatory Fitness and Performance Programme (REFIT) Meeting of Business Statistics Directors Group Presentation by Jonathon Stoodley, Secretariat-General,
Ms. Podpeskar International Politics THE EUROPEAN UNION.
EN Regional Policy EUROPEAN COMMISSION Third progress report on cohesion 17 May 2005 Towards a new partnership for growth, jobs and cohesion.
Three key players The European Parliament - voice of the people Jerzy Buzek, President of of the European Parliament The council of Ministers - voice of.
Impact analysis during the harmonisation process with the EU and effects on Lithuanian economy Giedrius Kadziauskas, Senior Policy analyst 23 rd Fabruary.
Third Administrative Cost Measurement Study Serbia Branko Radulović.
F ACTORS FOR G ROWTH P RIORITIES FOR COMPETITIVENESS, CONVERGENCE & COHESION IN THE EU 27 April 2016 A Study commissioned by the European Economic and.
Action Programme for Reducing Administrative Burdens in the European Union DG Enterprise & Industry European Commission International Conference on SCM.
C.H. Montin, Tbilisi 11 Tbilisi, 12 November 2014 Developing Regulatory Impact Assessment In Georgia Overview of the RIA process & methodology Charles-Henri.
Administrative burdens in EU agriculture: an evidence base CAP Simplification Expert Group 24 April 2007 Jenny McInnes Department for Environment Food.
Better Regulation – practices
The European Union (EU)
Conference on the simplification of the Common Agricultural Policy
Presidency Priorities of the Czech Republic in Better Regulation
Developing Regulatory Impact Assessment In Azerbaijan
Third progress report on cohesion 17 May 2005
The Group of Directors and Experts of Better Regulation (DBR)
EPAN – Lisbon ad hoc group Welcome - Agenda Introduction
Protection of the EU budget
IPSG Meeting, Paris, 25th November 2008 Reduction of Administrative Burdens: Presentation of the EU Project & French Position Denis Besnainou, Michael.
the European Qualifications Framework (EQF)
European Union Membership
REPORTING ON DELIVERY OF EU BIODIVERSITY ACTION PLAN
Conference on the simplification of the Common Agricultural Policy
Cost of Mobile Communications Study
The Joint Action on Health Information InfAct
Prodcom Statistics in Focus
Presentation transcript:

Lect. 10 Administrative Burdens and RIA

Overview Methodology currently used by many Member States and the European Commission to deal with the problem of measuring administrative burdens

Compliance Costs to Business Direct financial costs Substantive compliance costs Administrative costs Compliance costs Monetary transfers to public administration (taxes, duties, etc.) Modification of productive process or output - Arising from administrative activities businesses would conduct even in the absence of a regulation - Arising from activities businesses realize simply because there is a regulatory requirement. Administrative burdens

A methodology developed by the Dutch Government in Objective: reduce administrative burdens (AB) arising from regulation by 25% within measured In brief, the SCM is a way of breaking down regulation into a range of manageable components that can be measured. pragmatic approach It has been developed to provide a simplified, consistent method for estimating the administrative costs imposed on business by public authorities. It is focused on a pragmatic approach to measurement and provides estimates that are consistent across policy areas. Results obtained in the Netherlands: total red tape costs in 2002 = € 16.4 billion, (i.e. 3.6% GDP). Only in the financial sector = € 698 mil. Thanks to the SCM this amount has been reduced by 30%.  Growing interest of other EU countries The Standard Cost Model (SCM)

The SCM Network In 2003, a network of European countries was formed to consistently apply the Standard Cost Model. The SCM network currently consists of Austria, Belgium, Flanders (Belgium), Czech Republic, Denmark, Estonia, Finland, France, Germany, Hungary, Italy, Ireland, Latvia, Luxembourg, the Netherlands, Norway, Poland, Sweden and the United Kingdom. Methodological guidelines International comparisons and best practices Website (  In 2005 OECD starts its own project on administrative burdens (Red Tape Scoreboard)

The EC and the SCM After ECOFIN pressures, the EC defines its own version of the SCM (EU Net Administrative Cost). In March 2005 pilot project (Communication on Better Regulation for Growth and Jobs in the European Union) November 2006: the Commission proposed launching an Action Programme to reduce the AB of existing regulation in the EU and proposed a reduction target of 25%. The EU-SCM has been introduced amending impact assessment methodology and guidelines January 2007: Action Programme for Reducing Administrative Burdens [COM(2007)23 final]. target of 25 %, to be achieved jointly by the EU and Member States by 2012 The 2007 Spring European Council endorsed the Action programme and fixed a reduction target of 25 %, to be achieved jointly by the EU and Member States by Coverage: EC regulations and directives and the associated national transposition and implementing measures.

The EC and the SCM Identification of 13 priority areas:  1. Company law  2. Pharmaceutical legislation  3. Working environment/employment relations  4. Tax law (VAT)  5. Statistics  6. Agriculture and agricultural subsidises  7. Food safety  8. Transport  9. Fisheries  10. Financial services  11. Environment  12. Cohesion policy  13. Public procurement 38 legislative acts A set of specific rules has been identified for each area. Total: 38 legislative acts

Preliminary Clarifications on the SCM The model has nothing to say about effectiveness and social welfare variations associated with public policies The SCM examines only costs arising from information obligations imposed by regulation (especially on businesses) It does not produce statistically representative estimates, but it’s a pragmatic method to obtain approximate estimates on Administrative Burdens (AB). Main advantage: high degree of specification in the measurement of AB It can be used ex-ante or ex-post (e.g. to estimate the baseline) Goals: 1) To increase the awareness about AB (especially hidden) imposed by the regulation; 2) to produce information useful to design simplification strategies

Costs arising from an obligation to produce and communicate information to public authorities or third parties (e.g. consumers). Definition of AB Information Information includes, in a broad sense, costs of labeling, reporting, monitoring, and registration

Different Levels of Government Problem arising with multilevel governance Why could the inclusion of different levels of government regulation be useful?  The solution adopted in the SCM: A, B, C categories  A-regulation: Data requirements that are exclusively and completely a consequence of EU rules and other international obligations. It is described in the international rules what information businesses have to produce.  B-regulation: Data requirements that are a consequence of EU rules and other international obligations. The formulation of the specific data requirements will be left to the MS. The international rules do not describe what information businesses have to produce.  C-regulation:Data requirements that are exclusively a consequence of rules formulated at the national level.

Basic Assumptions 1. Compliance. Full or actual? 2. “Business as usual” costs should not be included

The steps of the SCM 1.Identification and classification of information obligations 2.Identification of required actions 3.Classification by regulatory origin 4.Identification of target group(s) 5.Identification of the frequency of required actions 6.Identification of relevant cost parameters 7.Choice of data sources and/or development of data capture tool(s) 8.Assessment of the performance of a “normally efficient entity” 9.Estimate of the total Administrative Burden

Regulation Information obligation A Activity 1 Administrative burdens Information obligation B Data requirement 1 Activity 2 Data requirement 2 Breaking Down Regulations

IO A Possible List of Information Obligations (IO)...  Returns and reports  Applications for permission for or exemption from…  Notification of activities  Entry in a register  Keeping commercial emergency plans and programs updated, etc…  Cooperating with audits/inspections…  Providing information to third parties (e.g. labeling, financial prospectus, etc.) Adapted from “International SCM Manual”

...and Administrative Activities  Familiarization with the information obligation  Information retrieval  Modification of existing information  Production of information  Monetary costs specifically associated with IO  Internal meetings  Inspection by public authorities  Corrections resulting from inspection by public authorities  Training, updating of statutory requirements  Copying, distribution, filing, etc.  Reporting/submitting information Adapted from “International SCM Manual”

Target Groups: heterogeneity Business classification is crucial because regulatory burden can vary according to:  Dimension  if possible, producing at least estimates for SMEs and big firms  Sector  some regulations impose higher burdens on certain economic sectors

The relevant cost parameters of businesses for the work involved in complying with individual data requirements must be identified before the interviews are conducted. Price: a) Hourly wage for various occupation groups that perform administrative activities; b) Hourly rate for various external service providers that perform administrative activities. Time: Number of hours / minutes spent on administrative activity. This is the object of the estimate. Quantity: population (total no. of businesses) and frequency (no. of times an activity is realized yearly).  Expenditure on necessary acquisitions to comply with specific information obligations and/or data requirements must be included Cost Parameters

Collecting and Standardizing Data Choice of the data capture strategy (existing data, experts, interviews) Business interviews: 3 alternatives (by mail, by , by face-to-face interview) Data collection Data processing. For each administrative activity selection of a “normally efficient business”

Example International SCM Manual

The average cost per action is estimated by multiplying a tariff (based on average labor cost per hour including pro-rated overheads) and the time required per action: Σ (P*Q) (P: Price = internal/external hourly rate * no. hours; Q: Quantity = No. businesses* Frequency) …it’s possible to estimate total AB per activity, IO and regulatory origin SCM Formula

SCM Critical Points disproportionate What is really disproportionate and an irritant to business? The underhanded plot to introduce an “intrinsic CBA.” administrations citizensIntroducing some other “points of view”: costs internal to administrations and citizens