Examining the Trend of Change in regards to Ohio’s Common Core Standards and Teacher Accountability and Evaluation Jamie S. Rawson EDU 723/Lesson 8 November.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Understanding Student Learning Objectives (S.L.O.s)
Advertisements

PARTICIPATION AND ADOPTION OF THE COMMON CORE STANDARDS INITIATIVE 1 Transforming Education in Kentucky Felicia Cumings Smith Associate Commissioner Michael.
Welcome to College and Career Ready Standards Quarterly Meeting # 1.
TEACHER EVALUATION What it is going to look like….
Common Core State Standards Initiative An Initiative of the Council of Chief State School Officers and the National Governors Association Center for Best.
On The Road to College and Career Readiness Hamilton County ESC Instructional Services Center Christina Sherman, Consultant.
August 15, 2012 Fontana Unified School District Superintendent, Cali Olsen-Binks Associate Superintendent, Oscar Dueñas Director, Human Resources, Mark.
Transitioning to the Common Core Common Core Academy - Summer 2011.
 Reading School Committee January 23,
AzMERIT Arizona’s Statewide Achievement Assessment for English Language Arts and Mathematics November 20, 2014.
A Key Piece of the Puzzle: The EQuIP NGSS Rubric & Delaware’s NGSS Implementation Plan Shelley Rouser and John Moyer Delaware Department of Education.
1 Program Improvement Update Foundations for writing the LEA Addendum.
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Tom Torlakson, State Superintendent of Public Instruction Common Core State Standards AB 250 and the Professional Learning.
Making preparations in Ohio: Common Core and Ohio’s Revised Academic Content Standards New System of Assessments.
Making preparations in Ohio: Common Core and Ohio’s Revised Academic Content Standards New System of Assessments.
Key questions around the Common Core and revised Standards.
Division of School Effectiveness1 Common Core State Standards: Transitioning from Awareness to Implementation December 1, 2011 Rutledge Conference Center.
HSTW Southern Regional Education Board Orientation to HSTW Goals and Key Practices.
Ipswich High School. Mission Statement The mission of Ipswich High School is to provide a student-centered, collaborative learning environment which motivates.
Principal Evaluation in Massachusetts: Where we are now National Summit on Educator Effectiveness Principal Evaluation Breakout Session #2 Claudia Bach,
Moving to the Common Core Janet Rummel Assessment Specialist Indiana Department of Education.
Meeting SB 290 District Evaluation Requirements
Horizon Middle School June 2013 Balanced Scorecard In a safe, collaborative environment we provide educational opportunities that empower all students.
The Common Core: Moving Ohio Forward Stan W. Heffner Superintendent of Public Instruction February 15, 2012.
Iowa’s Teacher Quality Program. Intent of the General Assembly To create a student achievement and teacher quality program that acknowledges that outstanding.
Curriculum Update January What are the big projects? Fall 2013 – Math Common Core Implementation Fall 2014 – English/Language Arts Common Core Implementation.
SOCIAL SCIENCES STANDARDS REVIEW AND REVISION February 2009-June 2011 PRESENTATION TO THE STATE BOARD OF EDUCATION.
State Role in Supporting Educators C HRIS M INNICH M AY 2012 | SCEE M EETING.
Leading Change Through Differentiated PD Approaches and Structures University-District partnerships for Strengthening Instructional Leadership In Mathematics.
Evaluation Team Progress Collaboration Grant 252.
Next-Generation Standards and Accountability Terry Holliday, Ph.D. Kentucky Education Commissioner Quality New Mexico June 9, 2011.
Oregon’s New Diploma Requirements: Oregon’s New Diploma Requirements: What You’ll Need to Know 2008 Superintendent’s Summer Institute August 4-6, 2008.
ISLN Network Meeting KEDC SUPERINTENDENT UPDATE. Why we are here--Purpose of ISLN network New academic standards  Deconstruct and disseminate Content.
A significant and historic opportunity for states to collectively develop and adopt a core set of academic standards in Mathematics and English/Language.
Newly Revised Ohio Science Standards NWO Inquiry Series September 22, 2011 Michelle Shafer Adapted from presentations shared by ODE.
Teacher and Principal Evaluations and Discipline Under Chapter 103.
A state-wide effort to improve teaching and learning to ensure that all Iowa students engage in a rigorous & relevant curriculum. The Core Curriculum.
  “The Common Core State Standards are an example of states recognizing a problem, then working together, sharing what works and what doesn’t.” - Former.
Presented to: [District] Staff DATE RECOGNIZING EDUCATOR EXCELLENCE [insert district logo]
2012 – 2013 School Year. OTES West Branch Local Schools.
EVALUATIONS FOR PROFESSIONAL GROWTH Ohio TIF and OTES.
Standard 1: Teachers demonstrate leadership s. Element a: Teachers lead in their classrooms. What does Globally Competitive mean in your classroom? How.
Curriculum Development A commitment to continuous improvement… Students and Learning It’s a people business… and it centers on…
1. Administrators will gain a deeper understanding of the connection between arts, engagement, student success, and college and career readiness. 2. Administrators.
Ohio Department of Education March 2011 Ohio Educator Evaluation Systems.
Melrose High School 2014 MCAS Presentation October 6, 2014.
Update on English Language Learners State Board of Education Achievement Committee December 9, 2013.
Oregon Standards: An Update 2009 Superintendent’s Summer Institute Oregon Department of Education August 3, 2009.
High Schools That Work An evidence-based design for improving the nation’s schools and raising student achievement.
New Jersey Assessment Of Skills and Knowledge Science 2015 Carmela Triglia.
1 Using the Instruction and Learning Appraisal (ILA) to Strengthen the Secondary Instructional Program WVDE Composite Results November.
Rowland Unified School District District Local Education Agency (LEA)Plan Update Principals Meeting November 16, 2015.
ANNOOR ISLAMIC SCHOOL AdvancEd Survey PURPOSE AND DIRECTION.
Educator Evaluation and Support System Basics. Oregon Framework for Teacher and Administrator Evaluation and Support Systems Alignment of State and Federal.
SACS/CASI District Accreditation  January 2007  April 2007  May 2007  January – April 2008  Board Approval for Pursuit of District Accreditation.
Raising the Bar: Common Core State Standards Idaho State Department of Education
Presented at the OSPA Summit 2012 January 9, 2012.
Dr. Derrica Davis Prospective Principal Candidate: Fairington Elementary School.
“ Public education is open to all children - no matter their ability, heritage, or economic background. It is the promise of our future ” Denise Juneau,
Preparing All Students for College and Career Readiness CCSS and Smarter Balanced Assessments 101.
Raising the Bar for Oregon. Why Now?  New Mathematics Content Standards were adopted for grades K-8 in 2007 and high school in Oregon Statewide.
WHY? To transform teaching and learning.. Strategic Pillars Goal 1: Student Growth and High Academic Achievement – Develop and implement a comprehensive.
Presentation to the Nevada Council to Establish Academic Standards Proposed Math I and Math II End of Course Cut Scores December 22, 2015 Carson City,
Michele Winship, Ph.D.  Compliance with HB 153/SB 316 requirements?  Seek out and get rid of “bad” teachers? OR  Improve teaching.
West Haven Next-Generation Accountability Report
21st Century Learning Environments Phase 1 Professional Development
Common Core State Standards AB 250 and the Professional Learning Modules Phil Lafontaine, Director Professional Learning and Support Division.
COMMON CORE State Standards Initiative
Common Core State Standards May 2011
Presentation transcript:

Examining the Trend of Change in regards to Ohio’s Common Core Standards and Teacher Accountability and Evaluation Jamie S. Rawson EDU 723/Lesson 8 November 21, 2013

CHANGE Change in general simply means to make or become differentChange in general simply means to make or become different Mixture of emotionsMixture of emotions Excitement, apprehension, fear, resistance, elation, reliefExcitement, apprehension, fear, resistance, elation, relief

Changes in Education Some of these changes are:Some of these changes are: Ohio’s New Learning StandardsOhio’s New Learning Standards Ohio’s Next Generation AssessmentsOhio’s Next Generation Assessments School and District report cardsSchool and District report cards Educator EvaluationsEducator Evaluations

Common Core In June 2010, the State Board of Education adopted the Common Core State Standards in English language arts and mathematics, the results of a multi-state effort. The board also adopted more rigorous versions of Ohio's academic content standards in science and social studies. All four sets of standards will underpin teaching in Ohio classrooms by , but schools are encouraged to begin using the standards now to prepare students for corresponding assessments that begin in

Common Core Math and LA are called Common Core State Standards because Ohio and other states chose to develop them, not the federal governmentMath and LA are called Common Core State Standards because Ohio and other states chose to develop them, not the federal government Ohio education leaders and teachers developed the Science and Social Studies standards and together all four are called Ohio’s New Learning StandardsOhio education leaders and teachers developed the Science and Social Studies standards and together all four are called Ohio’s New Learning Standards Drill much deeper into each areaDrill much deeper into each area Learning to apply more knowledge and skills in subject content than ever beforeLearning to apply more knowledge and skills in subject content than ever before Have a better foundation in Science and TechnologyHave a better foundation in Science and Technology Standards do not tell teachers how to teach or what textbooks to use.Standards do not tell teachers how to teach or what textbooks to use.

ONLS Ways to prepareWays to prepare Crosswalk which allows educators to compare Ohio's New Learning Standards with the academic content standards being phased out by Crosswalk which allows educators to compare Ohio's New Learning Standards with the academic content standards being phased out by model curriculum of teaching strategies and resources aligned to the College and Career Ready Standards.model curriculum of teaching strategies and resources aligned to the College and Career Ready Standards.

Potential threats Teacher frustration due to the changesTeacher frustration due to the changes Retainment/recruitment issuesRetainment/recruitment issues Teachers out of the classroom more for professional development..$Teachers out of the classroom more for professional development..$ Poor test scores/student performance..not properly prepared for the assessmentsPoor test scores/student performance..not properly prepared for the assessments

Opportunities Increased student achievementIncreased student achievement college-career readinesscollege-career readiness Greater sense of collaboration with peers ( teacher/teacher)Greater sense of collaboration with peers ( teacher/teacher) Professional Development/growthProfessional Development/growth empowering, rejuvenatingempowering, rejuvenating Communication/collaborati on with Parents/communityCommunication/collaborati on with Parents/community Use of 21 st century skillsUse of 21 st century skills Personalized instructionPersonalized instruction Increased student interest/participationIncreased student interest/participation

Timeline Ohio’s New Learning Standards must be implemented in the academic school year.Ohio’s New Learning Standards must be implemented in the academic school year. ODE encourages districts to start implementing the Ohio's New Learning Standards this yearODE encourages districts to start implementing the Ohio's New Learning Standards this year To alleviate fear, anxiety and frustration among all staff, it is recommend to get started now by preparing for these changesTo alleviate fear, anxiety and frustration among all staff, it is recommend to get started now by preparing for these changes

State Transition June July School Year School Year School Year School Year Phase 1- Communication and Awareness  Statewide awareness and understanding of the new academic standards and model curriculum  Participating member in both national assessment consortia  OAA and OGT assessments aligned to the Ohio’s 2001 and 2002 academic standards  Accountability based on the OAA and OGT Phase 2 - Alignment and Refinement  Curriculum alignment to the new standards  National assessment consortia and state assessment development work  OAA and OGT assessments aligned to the Ohio’s 2001 and 2002 academic standards  Accountability based on the OAA and OGT Phase 3 - Alignment and Initial Transition  Continued alignment and initial implementation of aligned curriculum and instruction  National assessment consortia and state assessment development work  OAA and OGT assessments aligned to the Ohio’s 2001 and 2002 academic standards  Accountability based on the OAA and OGT Phase 4 - Complete Transition and Full Implementation  Implementation of local curriculum & instruction aligned to the CC and state revised standards.  National and state assessments fully operational  Accountability based on the new national- and state- level assessments Development and implementation of necessary resources and professional development for a successful transition to Ohio’s Integrated Educational System

Recommenations Review, collaborate and implementReview, collaborate and implement Develop professionallyDevelop professionally Analyze dataAnalyze data Assess and refineAssess and refine Use technologyUse technology Engage on EvaluationEngage on Evaluation

administrators Review Curriculum CrosswalksReview Curriculum Crosswalks Study the simulationsStudy the simulations Evaluate/Adopt a board policy by July 1, 2013Evaluate/Adopt a board policy by July 1, 2013 Professional DevelopmentProfessional Development Dive deep into dataDive deep into data Study the questionsStudy the questions Embrace technologyEmbrace technology

Respond to the Assessment SurveyRespond to the Assessment Survey EngageEngage

Educator evaluations House Bill 1 in 2009 directed the Educator Standards Board to recommend model evaluation systems for teachers and principals to the State Board of Education for their review and adoption.House Bill 1 in 2009 directed the Educator Standards Board to recommend model evaluation systems for teachers and principals to the State Board of Education for their review and adoption. The Ohio Teacher Evaluation System (OTES) was created in response to this mandate and designed to ass the performance of Ohio Teachers.The Ohio Teacher Evaluation System (OTES) was created in response to this mandate and designed to ass the performance of Ohio Teachers. will provide educators with a richer and more detailed view of their performance, with a focus on specific strengths and opportunities for improvement.will provide educators with a richer and more detailed view of their performance, with a focus on specific strengths and opportunities for improvement.

otes Evaluations have two components, each weighted at 50 percent: Evaluations have two components, each weighted at 50 percent: 1.) Teacher performance rating, determined from: a professional growth plan, two 30 minute observations and walkthroughs1.) Teacher performance rating, determined from: a professional growth plan, two 30 minute observations and walkthroughs 2.) Student academic growth rating2.) Student academic growth rating

The OTES was collaboratively developed by Ohio teachers, school administrators, higher education faculty, and representatives from Ohio’s professional associations, in collaboration with national experts in the area of teacher evaluation. The OTES is designed to be research-based, transparent, fair and adaptable to the specific contexts of Ohio’s districts (rural, urban, suburban, large, and small). The evaluation system builds on what we know about the importance of ongoing assessment and feedback as a powerful vehicle to support improved practice.The OTES was collaboratively developed by Ohio teachers, school administrators, higher education faculty, and representatives from Ohio’s professional associations, in collaboration with national experts in the area of teacher evaluation. The OTES is designed to be research-based, transparent, fair and adaptable to the specific contexts of Ohio’s districts (rural, urban, suburban, large, and small). The evaluation system builds on what we know about the importance of ongoing assessment and feedback as a powerful vehicle to support improved practice.

The challenge for measuring student growth is that there is not a single student assessment that can be used for all teachers. Local education agencies (LEAs) must use Value-Added data from the state Ohio Achievement Assessments when available. If those are not applicable for a given subject or grade, LEAs can choose to use other assessments provided by national testing vendors and approved for use in Ohio. For subjects without state assessments or approved Vendor assessments – such as art or music – LEAs should establish a process to create Student Learning Objectives (SLOs) to measure student progress.The challenge for measuring student growth is that there is not a single student assessment that can be used for all teachers. Local education agencies (LEAs) must use Value-Added data from the state Ohio Achievement Assessments when available. If those are not applicable for a given subject or grade, LEAs can choose to use other assessments provided by national testing vendors and approved for use in Ohio. For subjects without state assessments or approved Vendor assessments – such as art or music – LEAs should establish a process to create Student Learning Objectives (SLOs) to measure student progress.

opes Ohio's new system for evaluating principals (Ohio's Principal Evaluation System - OPES) will provide educators with a richer and more detailed view of their performance, with a focus on specific strengths and opportunities for improvement.Ohio's new system for evaluating principals (Ohio's Principal Evaluation System - OPES) will provide educators with a richer and more detailed view of their performance, with a focus on specific strengths and opportunities for improvement. The Ohio Principal Evaluation System (OPES), adopted December 2008 by the State Board of Education, is designed to be used to assess the performance of Ohio principals.The Ohio Principal Evaluation System (OPES), adopted December 2008 by the State Board of Education, is designed to be used to assess the performance of Ohio principals.

opes Evaluations have two components, each weighted at 50 percent:Evaluations have two components, each weighted at 50 percent: 1.) Principal performance rating, determined from:1.) Principal performance rating, determined from: A professional growth planA professional growth plan Two 30 minute observationsTwo 30 minute observations WalkthroughsWalkthroughs 2.) Student academic growth rating2.) Student academic growth rating The electronic Teacher and Principal Evaluation System (eTPES) is the required accountability system for conducting and documenting educator evaluations and calculating ratings.The electronic Teacher and Principal Evaluation System (eTPES) is the required accountability system for conducting and documenting educator evaluations and calculating ratings.

Evaluation Threats Legal issues/lawsuitsLegal issues/lawsuits How the public and media will talk about these teacher evaluations/reportsHow the public and media will talk about these teacher evaluations/reports The end of one sized fits all professional developmentThe end of one sized fits all professional development Time for administrators to complete all of these evaluations and be instructional leadersTime for administrators to complete all of these evaluations and be instructional leaders Teachers exiting the profession or not wanting to teach in these “Value Added” content areasTeachers exiting the profession or not wanting to teach in these “Value Added” content areas

Opportunities Local boards of education must adopt policies about how they’ll use evaluation results for promotion and termination decisions. Seniority can not be the basis for teacher retention decisions, except when deciding between teachers who have comparable evaluations.Local boards of education must adopt policies about how they’ll use evaluation results for promotion and termination decisions. Seniority can not be the basis for teacher retention decisions, except when deciding between teachers who have comparable evaluations. StipendsStipends Weeds out ineffective teachers or places them elsewhereWeeds out ineffective teachers or places them elsewhere Improved performance teacher and studentImproved performance teacher and student

recommendations Take self initiative for your own responsibilities byTake self initiative for your own responsibilities by Educating yourself regarding the expectations and changesEducating yourself regarding the expectations and changes Seek professional developmentSeek professional development Talk to your administrators and other staff membersTalk to your administrators and other staff members Stay informed and aware of changesStay informed and aware of changes

timeline ching/Educator-Evaluation-System/District-Educator- Evaluation-Systems/Final-Educator-Evaluation- Timeline-resources.pdf.aspxhttp://education.ohio.gov/getattachment/Topics/Tea ching/Educator-Evaluation-System/District-Educator- Evaluation-Systems/Final-Educator-Evaluation- Timeline-resources.pdf.aspxhttp://education.ohio.gov/getattachment/Topics/Tea ching/Educator-Evaluation-System/District-Educator- Evaluation-Systems/Final-Educator-Evaluation- Timeline-resources.pdf.aspxhttp://education.ohio.gov/getattachment/Topics/Tea ching/Educator-Evaluation-System/District-Educator- Evaluation-Systems/Final-Educator-Evaluation- Timeline-resources.pdf.aspx