Title I Faculty Presentation Faculty Title I and AYP Combined Presentation.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Title I & Title III Annual Parent Meeting
Advertisements

Newport News Public Schools Information on Title I Funding
Newport News Public Schools Information on Title I Funding E.S.E.A. (Elementary And Secondary Education Act)
1 Overview: What is “No Child Left Behind”?. 2 Reauthorization of Elementary and Secondary Education Act (“ESEA”) of ’65 Money to states for specific.
No Child Left Behind The New Age: No Child Left Behind.
Elementary/Secondary Education Act (1965) “No Child Left Behind” (2002) Adequacy Committee February 6,2008.
Before IDEA One in five children with disabilities was educated. One in five children with disabilities was educated. More than 1 million children with.
1 Title I Faculty Presentation Department of Federal and State Programs or PX
1 The Federal No Child Left Behind Act and the Financial Impact on Manchester Public Schools Fiscal Year
Title I, Part A Improving Basic Programs Program Requirements and Guidelines Sheldon ISD.
EDU 221.  Group Presentation Reflections due for 7 & 8  Quiz #2 (Tuesday, Nov. 16 th ) – Problem- based ◦ What makes an outstanding response? Referring.
Understanding the Requirements of Title I, Part A November 15, 2012 Caribe Royale LaTrell Edwards, Florida Department of Education Anna Moore, Florida.
Annual Parent Meeting Klein Road Elementary. © Not for use of distribution without permission. Why are we here?  NCLB law requires that Title I Schools.
Hickory Ridge Elementary School Annual Title One Parent Meeting
Educational Services and Choices: Information for Parents Florida PIRC at USF (Parental Information and Resource Center)
1 Prepared by: Research Services and Student Assessment & School Performance School Accountability in Florida: Grading Schools and Measuring Adequate Yearly.
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) Board Presentation March 25, 2008.
No Child Left Behind (NCLB) Public School Choice The School District Of Palm Beach County May 2011.
Title I Annual Parent Meeting
STAR (Support through Assistance & Reforms) Report.
Our Children Are Our Future: No Child Left Behind No Child Left Behind Accountability and AYP A Archived Information.
Title I Annual Meeting Presented by: SCHOOL NAME HERE.
NCLB Title I, Part A Parent Notification Idaho SDE Title I Director’s Meeting September 15, 2008 Cathryn Gardner, Senior Program Advisor Northwest Regional.
A Guide to No Child Left Behind (NCLB) and Public School Choice The School District Of Palm Beach County April 2010.
1 Title I Faculty Presentation Department of Federal and State Programs or PX
The New Age: No Child Left Behind (NCLB) By Don Bertucci, Chaffey Unified School District ROP.
Provided by Education Service Center Region XI 1 Title I, Part A Overview Provided by Education Service Center Region XI
The Basics of Title I Florida Public School Choice Consortium's Annual Conference (FPSCC) Anke Toth November 18, 2009.
Springfield Public Schools Adequate Yearly Progress 2010 Overview.
1 Differentiated Accountability. 2 Florida’s Differentiated Accountability Model On July 28, 2008, Florida was named one of six states to pilot a differentiated.
Title I Annual Meeting A Collaborative Presentation Department of Federal and State Programs and Title I Schools.
May 25,  MSP scores are compared against a uniform bar.  The MSP scores compared against the uniform bar are not representative of individual.
Title I Annual Meeting What Every Family Needs to Know!
Seaford School District Annual Parent Meeting 1. Title I Funding and Programs Parent Meeting Agenda Title I Program Presentation Document Review Parent.
SAISD Principal’s Meeting September 17, 2003 Office of Research and Evaluation.
Purpose of No Child Left Behind “…to ensure that all children have a fair, equal, and significant opportunity to obtain a high-quality education and reach,
Title I Faculty Presentation (Faculty Title I and AYP Combined Presentation) 1 Department of Federal and State Programs or PX
Ohio’s New Accountability System Ohio’s Response to No Child Left Behind (NCLB) a.k.a. Elementary & Secondary Education Act a.k.a. ESEA January 8, 2002.
Title I and Families. Purpose of Meeting According to the No Child Left Behind Act of 2001, schools are required to host an Annual Meeting to explain.
Title I and Families. Purpose of Meeting According to the No Child Left Behind Act of 2001, schools are required to host an Annual Meeting to explain.
1 Annual Title 1 Parent Meeting Title I School Principals’ Meeting September 20, 2010 Prepared by Mi Lee.
1 Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) U.S. Department of Education Adapted by TEA Modified by Dr. Teresa Cortez September 10, 2007.
Title I, Part A Improving Basic Programs Program Requirements and Guidelines.
No Child Left Behind Tecumseh Local Schools. No Child Left Behind OR... 4 No Educator Left Unconfused 4 No Lawyer Left Unemployed 4 No Child Left Untested.
Title I and Families. Purpose of Meeting According to the No Child Left Behind Act of 2001, schools are required to host an Annual Meeting to explain.
1 Title I Faculty Presentation Department of Federal and State Programs or PX
School Accountability in Delaware for the School Year August 3, 2005.
1 Title I Faculty Presentation Department of Federal and State Programs or PX
No Child Left Behind Education Week
No Child Left Behind. HISTORY President Lyndon B. Johnson signs Elementary and Secondary Education Act, 1965 Title I and ESEA coordinated through Improving.
1 Title I Faculty Presentation Department of Federal and State Programs or PX
Title I Faculty Presentation Faculty Title I and AYP Combined Presentation.
Capacity Development and School Reform Accountability The School District Of Palm Beach County Adequate Yearly Progress, Differentiated Accountability.
Differentiated Accountability Title I Conference Daytona, Florida April 29, 2009.
Why are we here? All Title I schools are required to hold an annual meeting for Title I parents* for the purpose of informing you of: our school’s participation.
Title I and Families. Purpose of Meeting According to the No Child Left Behind Act of 2001, schools are required to host an Annual Meeting to explain.
1 Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) U.S. Department of Education Adapted by TEA Modified by Dr. Teresa Cortez January 2010.
1 Welcome to the Title I Annual Meeting for Parents Highland Renaissance Academy.
Presented by: Frank Ciloski, Sherry Hutchins, Barb Light, Val Masuga, Amy Metz, Michelle Ribant, Kevin Richard, Kristina Rider, and Helena Shepard.
No Child Left Behind Title I Newport News Public Schools.
Preliminary AYP Preliminary Adequate Yearly Progress Data.
1 Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) U.S. Department of Education Adapted by TEA Modified by Dr. Teresa Cortez September 1, 2008.
1 Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) U.S. Department of Education Adapted by TEA May 2003 Modified by Dr. Teresa Cortez for Riverside Feeder Data Days February.
Cora Howe Annual Title I Meeting and Open House Understanding Title 1 Support for Schools September 12, 2013.
Title I Annual Meeting What Every Family Needs to Know!
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP). What is Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP)? As a condition of receiving federal funds under No Child Left Behind (NCLB), all.
PHILLIPS PREPARATORY SCHOOL
Title I Annual Meeting Pinewood Elementary, August 30, 2018.
Chapter 8 (key issues for Special Education)
Presentation transcript:

Title I Faculty Presentation Faculty Title I and AYP Combined Presentation

No Child Left Behind Act  NCLB is the reauthorization of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act originally passed under President Johnson’s Administration  Title I is part of the NCLB Act  All requirements regarding Title I are specified in the NCLB Act of

Title I  130 Title I schools in Palm Beach County for FY10  99 Public Schools  25 Charter Schools  6 Alternative Schools  Charter and Alternative Schools must follow same requirements as other public schools 3

Purpose of Title I To ensure ALL children have a fair, equitable, and significant opportunity for a high quality education 4

Qualifying for Funding  Each year schools are identified as Title I based on the percentage of students in the school eligible for free and reduced (f/r) price meals on Date Certain.  Date Certain for the FY10 school year was December 19,  Schools meeting the minimum percentage qualify for Title I funding. The FY10 percentage is 40% all schools. 5

Qualifying for Funding  The number of eligible students is multiplied by the per pupil allocation. Example On Date Certain, 312 students were eligible for f/r priced meals at Sunshine Elementary. This group represents 69% of the total student population. Per pupil allocation = $355 (set by District) School allocation = 312 x $355 or $110,760 6

Highly Qualified Staff  ALL core subject area teachers must be highly qualified:  Bachelor’s degree  State certification  For elementary teachers, a rigorous test  For new middle/secondary teachers, a rigorous test or major coursework  ALL non-instructional staff providing academic support to students must be highly qualified:  Two years of college or  60 college credits or  Pass a rigorous test  Being out-of-field is considered as NOT highly qualified 7

Professional Development  Must be evidenced-based and on-going  Must be reflected in the School Improvement Plan/Schoolwide Plan (SIP/SWP)  Must address the needs of students in all subgroups with an emphasis on those not meeting AYP  All out-of-county travel must be documented in the SIP/SWP and related to subgroups not meeting AYP 8

9 Required for Audit Documentation

Parents’ Right to Know  The professional qualifications of their child’s classroom teacher and paraprofessional.  If their child is taught by a teacher who is not highly qualified for four or more consecutive weeks, the parents must receive timely notice.  FCAT results must be provided to parents regarding the achievement level of their child. 10

Family Involvement Karen Mapp, parent involvement researcher at Harvard Graduate School of Education, says students in schools with solid family involvement programs:  Are more likely to enroll in higher-level programs and earn more credits  Have better social skills, behavior, and adapt more easily to school  Attend more regularly and are more likely to graduate 11

Family Involvement School-Parent Compact A compact is an agreement between the home and the school, which outlines how families, staff and students will share the responsibility for improving student achievement. A compact is an agreement between the home and the school, which outlines how families, staff and students will share the responsibility for improving student achievement.  Written with input from parents and staff  Required to document distribution of Compact  Compact reviewed with parents at a parent/teacher conference  Addresses the importance of communication between teachers and parents on an ongoing basis 12

Family Involvement Family Involvement Policy/Plan  Jointly developed with input from parents and staff  Required to document distribution of Family Involvement Policy  Provide parent trainings and meetings at flexible times  Involve parents in an organized, ongoing and timely way in planning, reviewing, and improving Title I programs  Provide parents with an opportunity to submit dissenting views if the SIP is not acceptable to them  Educate teachers and other staff on the value and contributions of parents, how to reach out to, communicate with, and work with parents 13

Family Involvement Positive Impact Activities:  Frequent face-to-face, written or phone contact between teachers and parents  School-based parent activities, which help train parents to work with their children at home  Interactive homework assignments that require parents to participate in learning 

The Federal Consequences of Not Making Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP)

16 Federal Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) Measures proficiency of all students in reading, math, and writing Measures graduation rates School must receive grade of “C” or better If a Title I school does not make AYP in all areas and all subgroups, consequences are applied

17 Proficiency Targets for AYP Each year proficiency targets increase YearReadingMath

18 Federal Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) NCLB requires all schools to measure Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) ALL public schools receive AYP Scores  Non-Title I Schools  Title I Schools  Charter Schools AYP measures progress of nine subgroups

19 Nine Subgroups Total Students White Black Hispanic Asian American Indian Economically Disadvantaged Students Limited English Proficient Students (ELL) Students with Disabilities (SWD)

20 No Adequate Yearly Progress (NAYP) ALL schools receive an AYP score Under No Child Left Behind, only Title I schools receive consequences if AYP not met “School in Need of Improvement” (SINI) after 2 years of NAYP

21 Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) AYP determines which Title I schools and students are eligible for NCLB Choice Options.

22 Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) Report Insert your school’s AYP Report

23 Federal Consequences for Not Making AYP (NAYP). 1 Year NAYPReview School Improvement Plan – Address subgroups not meeting AYP 2 Years NAYP - SINI 1*Supplemental Educational Services 3 Years NAYP - SINI 2*NCLB Choice Transfer with Transportation 4 Years NAYP - SINI 3*Corrective Action Plan 5 Years NAYP - SINI 4*Planning for Restructuring 6 Years NAYP - SINI 5*Implement Restructuring Plan * Consequences are cumulative. Each year same consequences apply, plus new consequences added

24 NCLB Choice Options for all SINI Schools All parents of students attending a Title I school that does not make AYP for two or more years are offered choices for their child’s education. School did not make AYP NCLB Choice 2 or more Years Remain at Assigned School OR Receive Supplemental Educational Services (SES) (if eligible) 3 or More Years Remain at Assigned School OR Receive Supplemental Educational Services (SES) (if eligible) OR Transfer to Another School

25 Corrective Action - SINI 3 Replace school staff relevant to failure to make AYP Implement new curriculum Decrease management authority at school Extend school year or school day Restructure internal organization of the school No Child Left Behind dictates one or more of the following options:

26 Reopening as public charter school Replacing school staff, including principal Entering into contract with a private entity State takeover Other major restructuring reform No Child Left Behind dictates one or more of the following options for restructuring: Planning for Restructuring - SINI 4

27 Restructuring - SINI 5 Reopening as public charter school Replacing school staff, including principal Entering into contract with a private entity State takeover Other major restructuring reform No Child Left Behind dictates one or more of the following options for restructuring: Implement the Plan prepared while a SINI 4

28 Restructuring - SINI 6 and 7 Continue implementing Restructuring Plan

29 Two Accountability Systems Federal No Child Left Behind - AYP State Differentiated Accountability – School Grades + AYP

30 Two Accountability Systems Uses AYP Schools in Need of Improvement Corrective Action Planning for Restructuring Restructuring Federal No Child Left Behind State Differentiated Accountability Uses AYP and School Grades Prevent IPrevent II Correct ICorrect II Not in DAIntervene

31 Florida’s Differentiated Accountability (DA) Plan DA Categories Prevent I A, B, C, or ungraded schools that have missed AYP for two years in a row or a third year and have met at least 80% of AYP criteria Prevent II D schools that have missed AYP less than two years in a row D schools that have missed AYP for 2 years in a row or a third year A, B, C or ungraded schools that have missed AYP for two years in a row or a third year and have met less than 80% of AYP criteria Correct I A, B, C, or ungraded schools that have missed AYP for four or more years and have met at least 80% of AYP criteria Correct II All F schools regardless of AYP status D Schools that have missed AYP for four or more years A, B, C, or ungraded schools that have missed AYP for four or more years and have met less than 80% of AYP criteria

32 Florida’s Differentiated Accountability (DA) Plan More DA Categories Not in DA  A, B, C, or ungraded schools that have met 100% of AYP criteria for two or more consecutive years  A, B, C or ungraded schools that have not missed AYP for two consecutive years Intervene Current F schools that have earned at least four F grades in the last six years D or F schools that meet three of the following four conditions: 1) Percentage of non-proficient students in reading has increased over last 5 years 2) Percentage of non-proficient students in math has increased over last 5 years 3) 65% or more of students not proficient in reading 4) 65% or more of students not proficient in math

33 Discuss your school’s DA Category and District Interventions Florida’s Differentiated Accountability (DA) Plan