Long-Term Bridge Performance Program Federal Highway Administration Long-Term Bridge Performance Program Hamid Ghasemi, Ph.D. Program Manager Long-Term.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
PACE EH Redefining Local Environmental Health PACE EH National Summit Louisville, Kentucky March 28-29, 2006 The PACE EH Methodology.
Advertisements

Facilities Capital Planning and Management A program management overview prepared for Ferndale School Districts Facilities Planning Committee.
Major Incident Process
NCHRP 07-21: Asset Management Guidance for Traffic Control Devices, Barriers, and Lighting 2014 ATSIP Annual Meeting Presented by Nancy Lefler Vanasse.
California’s Infrastructure Crisis. Statewide Transportation System Needs Assessment “California’s transportation system is in jeopardy. Underfunding.
A U.S. Department of Transportation University Transportation Center Welcome International Bridge Study Workshop June 14–15, 2011.
New technologies and disaster information resources Part 2. The right information, at the right time, the right way.
TURNER-FAIRBANK HIGHWAY RESEARCH CENTER FHWA Long-Term Bridge Performance Program Hamid Ghasemi, Ph.D. Program Manager Long-Term Bridge Performance Program.
TURNER-FAIRBANK HIGHWAY RESEARCH CENTER NDE Research Ongoing Projects and Response Based Load Rating The Office of Research, Development, and Technology.
National Bridge Inspection Standards (NBIS)
Impacts of “MAP-21”on the National Bridge Inspection Program Tribal Government Coordination Meeting Date August 7, 2014 Presented by: Gary Moss, P.E. Acting.
CHRIS GUTIERREZ President KC SmartPort, Inc. December 8, 2009.
Current Trends in Mining Finance: Strategic and Financial Challenges Roy Hinkamper, KPMG LLP April 2013.
CONDITION APPRAISAL AND REMEDIAL TREATMENT CIRIA Research Project RP692 MASONRY AND BRICK ARCH BRIDGES:
PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS OVERVIEW Lecture 2. n Provide a historical perspective of the evolution of PMS over the last 20 years n Describe the basic.
UGDIE PROJECT MEETING Bled September WP6 – Assessment and Evaluation Evaluation Planning  Draft Evaluation plan.
Office of Safety Research and Development Federal Highway Administration U.S. Department of Transportation TRANSPORTATION SAFETY PRIORITIES GOVERNMENT.
Managing Risk to Reduce Construction Claims (And Improve Project Success) Presented by Laurie Dennis, PE, CVS-Life, FSAVE.
Transportation Management Plan Overview. TMP Overview2 Is that the impression people have?
Prof. J.J Lew, P.E. Principal Investigator – Purdue Univ. James H. Anspach, P.G. Technical Advisor – So-Deep, Inc. C. Paul Scott, P.E. FHWA Advisor Kevin.
FHWA Update 2011 VOBug Meeting Helena, MT Thomas Saad, P. E. FHWA Resource Center Phone:
Green Jobs in New Jersey ’ s Energy Economy Jennifer M. Cleary The John J. Heldrich Center for Workforce Development, Edward J. Bloustein School for Planning.
Pre-Project Planning Lessons from the Construction Industry Institute Construction Industry Institute Michael Davis, P. Eng, PMP Ontario Power Generation.
Certification/Qualification Program. Certification Program What is it? Who is involved? What should be considered? Where can a Certification Program work.
National Public Health Performance Standards Local Assessment Instrument Essential Service:10 Research for New Insights and Innovative Solutions to Health.
Patrick DeCorla-Souza, P3 Program Manager, FHWA
Using Value for Money Analysis to Evaluate Highway Public-Private Partnership Projects ARTBA P3 Conference Washington, DC, July 15-17, 2015 Patrick DeCorla-Souza,
AASHTO Subcommittee on Rail Transportation Sept. 18, 2012 Kevin Chesnik.
CNJohnson & Associates, Inc An Overview of Chargeback Best Practices.
Problem Statement and Motivation Key Achievements and Future Goals Technical Approach Kouros Mohammadian, PhD and Yongping Zhang (PhD Candidate), CME,
TAM ETG Webinar #3 Network Life Cycle Analysis Part 1: Introduction and Overview Wednesday, July 8,
FHWA Next Generation Simulation (NGSIM) Program 2007 TRB Planning Applications Conference Daytona, FL May 7, 2007 James Colyar, P.E. Highway Research Engineer.
Federal Highway Administration,, US DOT Freight Modeling Research, Funding, and Collaboration Tianjia Tang, Ph.D., PE Office of Freight Management and.
1 Ministry of Transport, Public Works and Water Management.
Using Technology to Strengthen Human Subject Protections Patricia Scannell Director, IRB Washington University School of Medicine.
RESEARCH IMPLEMENTATION Selecting the Right Projects RESEARCH DIVISION WASHTO-X VIDEOCONFERENCE October 11, 2005 Blaine D. Leonard, P.E. Sr. Research Project.
Federal Highway Administration Long-Term Bridge Performance Program LTBP Program Update for Virginia Concrete Conference, Richmond, VA March 4, 2011 Michael.
Overview of the SPDG Competition Jennifer Doolittle, Ph.D. 1.
Strategies for Ensuring Optimal Guidance in Decision Support Systems for Winter Maintenance Operations Kevin Petty, Daniel Johns, Paul Bridge, Mikko Siitonen,
FHWA Reorganization Update Program Performance Management Standing Committee on Performance Management Meeting Detroit, MI October 14, 2011 Peter Stephanos.
Terri Lewis Darlene Groomes Lou Adams Tom Jones Managing the Transition from WIA: Framing the “O” in WIOA 8 th Summit Conference San Diego, California.
1 Road Weather Management Performance Metrics Development: An Update Chris Cluett, Leon Osborne, Arthur Handman, Jeff Jenq ITS America 2007 Annual Meeting.
KEY PROVISIONS OF THE DRIVE* ACT H.R. 22, as passed by the Senate on July 30, 2015 *Developing a Reliable and Innovative Vision for the Economy Thomas.
Transportation Management Plan Overview. TMP Overview2 Is that the impression people have?
Challenges of M&E Dr. Fred Mugambi Mwirigi JKUAT.
Implementation Overview SHRP 2 Oversight Committee June 18, 2012.
Funding your Dreams Cathy Manduca Director, Science Education Resource Center Iowa State University, 2005.
Assessment: Demonstrating Your Success. What Retention Efforts Have Been Successful? A Sample Of Our Group’s Responses Mentoring programs have been successful.
Chris Pangilinan, USDOT Research and Innovative Technology Administration Applications for the Environment: Real- Time Information Synthesis (AERIS) State-of-the-Practice.
Ohio Department of Transportation Steering Committee Meeting #3 Steering Committee Meeting #1May 30, 2012 Steering Committee Meeting #1 WELCOME Steering.
Data Palooza Workshop May 9, 2013 Rabinder Bains, FHWA – Office of Policy and Government Affairs.
1 Conservation and Development Network A Smithsonian Institution and the World Bank collaborative effort within the Global Tiger Initiative Smithsonian.
Working Smart for the Customer’s Benefit Pam Hutton AASHTO SHRP2 Implementation Manager June 11, 2013.
1 FTA Research Programs Ronald Hynes Acting Associate Administrator for Research, Demonstration, and Innovation April 17, 2007.
New Mexico Department of Transportation Research Bureau Expanding the Use of Weigh-In-Motion Data.
USACE Asset Management Risk and Reliability Workshop Condition Index Definitions Primer Allen C. Estes United States Military Academy.
H t t p : / / o p s. f h w a. d o t. g o v / w z / w o r k z o n e. h t m Slide 1 QuickZone — A Work Zone Delay Estimation and Analysis Tool Matthew H.
FHWA’s Research and Development Programs John McCracken, Chief Science Officer and Research Program Manager, Infrastructure R&D U.S. Federal Highway Administration.
Freight-21: A National Strategic Freight Mobility Program & Trust Fund Coalition for America’s Gateways and Trade Corridors.
Presentation of Capabilities contact information Kevin Monte de Ramos (888)
Utah Research Benefits Value of Research Taskforce July 29, 2015 Cameron Kergaye Utah Department of Transportation.
A Strategic Plan for Pavement Engineering NCHRP 20-7(223) AASHTO Joint Technical Committee on Pavements Dan Dawood, P.E. Pennsylvania Department of Transportation.
Safe, Accountable, Flexible, Efficient Transportation Equity Act: A Legacy for Users Advancing Safety through SAFETEA-LU Michael Halladay FHWA Office of.
TRB Annual Meeting Tuesday, January 24, 2006 Session 505 FHWA Commitment and Corporate Objectives for Advanced Research.
March 10, 2011 RITA’s Research, Development & Technology Knowledge Management System Alasdair Cain, Transportation Specialist, RITA Research, Development,
1 USDOT Congestion Initiative Baltimore – Washington Regional Traffic Signal Forum Maritime Institute Linthicum, MD March 14, 2007 Regina McElroy Director,
How safe are our highway structures? Optimised assessment of bridges Aleš Žnidarič Slovenian National Building and Civil Engineering Institute.
Insert the title of your presentation here Presented by Name Here Job Title - Date How can we make London’s transport network resilient to climate change?
Center for Risk Management of Engineering Systems University of Virginia Update for VTrans2025 Technical Committee June 14, 2006 Dr. James H. Lambert Alexander.
Quality Assurance for Emulsified Asphalt Surface Treatments
Presentation transcript:

Long-Term Bridge Performance Program Federal Highway Administration Long-Term Bridge Performance Program Hamid Ghasemi, Ph.D. Program Manager Long-Term Bridge Performance Program Federal Highway Administration Turner-Fairbank Highway Research Center McLean, Virginia

Long-Term Bridge Performance Program Designated in the “SAFETEA-LU” surface transportation authorization legislation as a 20-year research effort to improve our knowledge of bridge performance Funding is currently only authorized through FY FHWA Long-Term Bridge Performance Program

Long-Term Bridge Performance Program Challenges!

Long-Term Bridge Performance Program 1)Aging bridge population – performance poorly understood 2)Currently available data will not support desired performance assessments 3)LTBP Program is essential to understanding, improving bridge performance LTBP program should, a.Focus on most common bridges b.Serve FHWA and stakeholder needs c.Not burden bridge owners with new requirements d.Encourage international cooperation FHWA’s Perspective 4

Long-Term Bridge Performance Program 1)Available road and bridge funds have leveled off or decreasing 2)Key material prices escalating beyond inflation rate 3)Traffic Volume and load demands growing rapidly 4)Demand and expectations from users of the system will continue to grow 5)Eliminating deficient bridges LTBP program should, a.Help States meet challenges b.Set data protocols c.Focus on practical, useful data d.Take advantage of sensing technology 5 State DOTs’ Perspective

Long-Term Bridge Performance Program 1)Availability and quality of data will affect the degree of uncertainty in assessing bridge performance, developing deterioration models and performing LCC analysis 2)Uncertainty in data is a.Aleatory– that is the inherent randomness or variability in the data b.Epistemic– that is the lack of sufficient knowledge or the inability to predict or estimate the desired data correctly Research Community’s Perspective 6

Long-Term Bridge Performance Program Define Measure National consensus –Number of bridges needing work –Structural deficiencies, posting or sufficiency rating (uncertainties) –Deficiencies and load carrying capacity –Customer satisfaction Bridge Performance ?

Long-Term Bridge Performance Program Challenges in Measuring Bridge Performance It is not well defined and understood or documented Relies too heavily on expert opinion and not on objective data Based on significant assumption or generalization based on a very simplistic understanding of bridge behavior Uncertainties –Subjectivity of current condition ratings –Lack of proper documentation (i.e., records of actions and costs) –Incomplete data (i.e., cost, maintenance) –Many hidden deterioration and damage escape visual inspection

Long-Term Bridge Performance Program Uncertain Action Effectiveness 1.different actions at a given application time (t 1 ) 2.same action at different application time (t 1 vs. t 2 ) Time Action A 2 at time t 1 Action A 1 at time t 1 Action A 2 at time t 2 Uncertain Time of Applying/Delaying Actions Uncertain Costs associated with applied actions Uncertain Deterioration Rates associated with different actions Condition Bridge Condition vs. Age t1t1 t2t2

Long-Term Bridge Performance Program Measuring Performance Moving Target !

Long-Term Bridge Performance Program Goals and Performance Categories

Long-Term Bridge Performance Program ~ 600,000 Mean Age: 40 yrs NBI PONTIS

Long-Term Bridge Performance Program Stewardship and Management Quantitative Database Better information Sensor Technology (i.e., NDE, SHM) Training and education Deployment Improved Bridge management

Long-Term Bridge Performance Program LTBP Program Objective

Long-Term Bridge Performance Program Anticipated Impacts of the LTBP Program Improved knowledge of bridge performance Advances in deterioration and predictive models Effective use of Life-Cycle Cost Analysis Improved inspection/condition information thru NDE and SHM Help foster the next generation of bridge and asset management systems

Long-Term Bridge Performance Program Vision Detailed inspection, periodic objective evaluation and monitoring (Representative sample of bridges, excluding long-span bridges) Instrument and continuously monitor Forensic autopsies of decommissioned bridges

Long-Term Bridge Performance Program Project Lead and Administrator - Center for Advanced Infrastructure and - Transportation (CAIT) - Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey - Ali Maher, Ph.D., Principal Investigator Principal Industry Partner -Parsons Brinckerhoff (PB) Thomas A. Fisher, P.E., Program Manager Andrew J. Foden, P.E., Ph.D., Deputy Program Manager Academic Partners - Utah Transportation Center, Utah State University - Virginia Transportation Research Council - University of Virginia, Virginia Tech - Institute of Transportation Studies - University of California, Berkeley Industry Partners - Siemens Corporate Research - Bridge Diagnostics, Inc. (BDI) - Advitam Special Consultant - John Hooks - Emin Aktan LTBP Team

Long-Term Bridge Performance Program LTBP Team

Long-Term Bridge Performance Program LTBP Overview Map

Long-Term Bridge Performance Program Development and Pilot Tasks and Responsibilities

Long-Term Bridge Performance Program LTBP Pilot Program

Long-Term Bridge Performance Program Concluding Remarks Current bridge performance assessments are based on subjective data and generalization There is a broad consensus in the bridge community that the state-of-the-knowledge about bridge performance can and should be greatly improved There is need for a quantitative bridge database

Long-Term Bridge Performance Program Concluding Remarks Continued ….. Quantitative data and knowledge learned from the LTBP program could lead to –Better understanding of bridge performance –Improved knowledge of bridge deficiencies –Design and construction of bridge of the future –Improvements in the effectiveness of the NBI and PONTIS –Efficient management of highway systems

Long-Term Bridge Performance Program LTBP Program Information LTBP Program Web site Hamid Ghasemi, Ph.D., Program Manager LTBP Program Ali Maher, Ph.D., Principal Investigator

Long-Term Bridge Performance Program Thank You!