“ Safer, More Effective ISCO Remedial Actions Using Non-Extreme Persulfate Activation to Yield Sustained Secondary Treatment ” Wade Meese, Vice President.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
In-Situ Remediation at Silver Lake Region 4 Hazardous Materials Geo/Bridge/Environmental Unit.
Advertisements

Basic Water Treatment Water Chemistry In order to understand how to best serve a customers needs, a system integrator needs to understand water chemistry.
Iron and Manganese Cycling
BIOREMEDIATION Jiří Mikeš.
Air Force Plant 4 Superfund Site Evaluation of SVE Combined with ERH for the Remediation of TCE Source Material Jeffrey Ragucci SWS 6262 – Soil Contamination.
Microbially Induced Soil Cementation via Denitrification Nasser Hamdan 1, Edward Kavazanjian, Jr. 2, Bruce E. Rittmann 3 1 Graduate Research Associate,
Nitrification and Denitrification
Environmental Geosciences Human Interactions with the Environment Andrea Koschinsky Organics.
SPENT CAUSTIC TREATMENT OPTIONS Hadi M. Al-Daghman, 2014
Chemical Oxidation Treatment Technologies Susan J. Masten, Ph.D., P.E. Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering Michigan State University East Lansing,
Environmental Geotechnology Presentation Naval Air Station, Pensacola, Florida.
Green Chemistry Section 18.5
Biodegradation of btex
Recent Developments for the Remediation of Contaminants. Cesar M. Lozano, Ph. D. Chair Department of Chemistry – Physics, Universidad del Turabo, PR Presentation.
Bioremediation of BTEX Compounds CE 679 Adv. Water and Wastewater Treatment By: Zach Maruska December 10, 2007.
1 Kent S. Sorenson, Jr. Ryan A. Wymore Enhanced Bioremediation for Treatment of Chlorinated Solvent Residual Source Areas – Case Study and Implications.
Acid Mine Drainage: From Formation to Remediation CE Aquatic Chemistry Julie Giardina Dominike Merle.
Water quality issues – ‘natural’ controls Acidity – low pH due to infiltration of acidified precipitation; acids from mine drainage; pyrite oxidation.
An Introduction to Acid Mine Drainage by George Mitchell and Tim Craddock.
Introduction to Chlorine Dioxide Technology. Chlorine Dioxide is … Oxidizer and Disinfecting Biocide Molecular Formula – ClO 2 2/3 the oxidation potential.
Pulping and Bleaching PSE 476/Chem E 471
Solution Provider bij bodemsanering Leading in soil and groundwater remediation Solution Provider for soil & groundwater remediation Leading in soil and.
Chemical Weathering Definition: transformation/decomposition of one mineral into another Mineral breakdown carbonate dissolves primary minerals --> secondary.
Oxidative coupling of Methane & other reactions for treating Sulfur CHBE 446 – Gp5 Stephan Donfack Benjamin Harbor Nguyen Huynh Cyndi Mbaguim.
Remediation of Mixed Chromium and TCE Releases
Acid Lakes from Lignite Mines Dan Henderson. Lignite  Brown/soft coal.  Used for steam electric power generation.  Mined in open pits.  Production.
4A10 Construction Research & Innovation BioGeoChemistry Professor Mark Dyer TrinityHaus.
IRON & MANGANESE ENVE 201 Dr. Aslıhan Kerç
Iron and Manganese Removal
Chemical Weathering. I. Introduction Chemical Weathering I. Introduction II. Process of Decomposition A. Overview: Decomposition alters minerals into.
Landfill Processes. Objectives  Describe the physical, chemical, and biological processes occurring in a landfill  Describe leachate quality (Table.
Aquatic Ecosystem Chemistry Dissolved Oxygen (DO) Temperature Redox Potential (ORP) Major ions (Hardness; Conductivity; Salinity/TDS) Carbonate Buffer.
1 In-Situ Treatment of Groundwater with Non-aqueous Phase Liquids December 10-12, 2002, Chicago, IL Scott G. Huling, Ph.D., P.E. USEPA Robert S. Kerr Environmental.
SCH 3U- Detox for Contaminated Land
Applications of Fenton and Fenton-like Reactions for De-rusting Wastewater Treatment Mr. Piseth Som ( ) Degree Program in Chemical and Environmental.
Formation and Treatment
What is Bioremediation?
1 Section 5: Limitations. 2 ISCO Limitations  Saturated Zone vs Unsaturated Zone  Chemistry  CoSolvents  Geology /Geochemistry/Hydrogeology  NAPL.
1 Section II: ISCO Technology  Importance of ISCO chemistry  Terminology  Reaction sequences/products/byproducts  Oxidant selection/contaminants 
Environmental Technology ChimH409 (2-0-1) Michel Verbanck 2012 Universite Libre de Bruxelles Bruface Dept Water Pollution.
June 25-26, 2002D&D Lessons Learned Workshop1 Tritium Decontamination Techniques and Technology C. A. Gentile, J. J. Parker D&D Lessons Learned Workshop.
Treatment Technologies
ABSTACT La Réduction Chimique In Situ Offre la Réclamation sans Séquestrer les Contaminants ou Accumuler les Catabolites In Situ Chemical Reduction (ISCR)
1 Groundwater Pollution Using the characteristics of living things as tools for environmental improvement - exercises & case studies.
E NVIRONMENTAL G EOCHEMISTRY AT T EXAS A&M U NIVERSITY Oxidation-Reduction Reactions Bruce Herbert Geology.
Precipitation Titrations Dr. Riham Ali Hazzaa Analytical chemistry Petrochemical Engineering.
Mike Huffington Dan Montonye North Dakota State University.
Groundwater Pollution
Two Union Square Union Street, Suite 601 Seattle, WA (206) Field testing and modeling of in situ groundwater.
1, 12/2/ Key factors for a successful ISCO application with Permanganate Prepared by: Richard W Lewis CPG Program Manager ERM.
DeNovo Constructors, Inc.
“ Safer, More Effective ISCO Remedial Actions Using Non-Extreme Persulfate Activation to Yield Sustained Secondary Treatment ” Michael Scalzi, President.
“ Safer, More Effective ISCO Remedial Actions Using Non-Extreme Persulfate Activation to Yield Sustained Secondary Treatment ” Michael Scalzi, President.
Can a Pilot Demonstration be too Small? William Lundy, Sr. Sr. Vice President DeepEarth Technologies, Inc IPEC 2015 Denver, CO.
Objectives III. Reactions A. Reaction types 1. Acid-base reactions 2. Precipitation reactions 3. Oxidation-reduction reactions a. Oxidation number b. The.
Groundwater Pollution
Professor: 莊順興 Presenter: 李謙詳 2016/01/04. * Unlike physical separation processes that merely concentrate or change the phase of hazardous wastes. * chemical.
Benefits of Laboratory Treatability Studies in Support of Full-Scale Design for In Situ Remedies Michaye McMaster Geosyntec Consultants Sandra Dworatzek.
What is Degassing? Degassing is removing dissolved gases from liquids. Applications includes: Removing biogenic hydrogen sulfide from groundwater, used.
Limits to Petroleum Degradation
Background Professional Geologist - 36 years
Chemical oxidation Reactants Products Reduced Oxidized Oxidants
Chemical oxidation E°b> E°a Reductant a Oxidant a Oxidant b
Chemical oxidation Reactants Products Reduced Oxidized Oxidants
Jesse Taylor: Remington Technologies
ENHANCED BIOREMEDIATION PILOT USING iSOC® TECHNOLOGY AT A FORMER MANUFACTURED GAS PLANT CASE STUDY PREPARED BY: MR. DAVID WORK, PE RETEC GROUP.
Chemical Weathering SAPROLITE.
System Monitoring/Regulatory Evaluation
Sequence of chemical compounds being reduced in soil after submergence
Presented by: Kerry Martin, P.G., DCRP Technical Specialist
Presentation transcript:

“ Safer, More Effective ISCO Remedial Actions Using Non-Extreme Persulfate Activation to Yield Sustained Secondary Treatment ” Wade Meese, Vice President Innovative Environmental Technologies, Inc. Sunbury, OH

Overview of ISCO Technologies  Oxidizing agents  Recognized effectiveness  General chemistries of reactions Use of Persulfate for ISCO Treatment  Mode of Action  Limitations of convectional activation technologies Provect-OX™ Self-Activating ISCO/Enhanced Bioremediation  ISCO Mode of Action  Biological Mode of Action  Potential advantages  Case Studies Conclusions Presentation Outline

ISCO involves:  Injection of an oxidizing agent into the subsurface to destroy organic compounds.  The by-products for complete mineralization include carbon dioxide (CO 2 ), water (H 2 O) and oxygen (O 2 ). Goal is to mineralize or transform contaminants of concern (COCs) In Situ Chemical Oxidation (ISCO)

Common Oxidizing Agents OxidantPotential (V)Form Fenton’s Reagent (OH )2.80Liquid Activated Persulfate (SO 4 - )2.60Salt/Liquid Ferrate (Fe 6+ )2.20 Ozone (O 3 )2.08Gas Persulfate (S 2 O 8 2- )2.01Salt/Liquid Hydrogen Peroxide (H 2 O 2 )1.78Liquid Permanganate (MnO 4 - )1.68 Salt (KMnO 4 ) Liquid (NaMnO 4 )

Reactivity of Oxidizing Agents

Basic Oxidizing Agent Reactions Ozone (No Activator) – O 3 + 2H + + 2e -  O 2 + H 2 OE o =2.08 V – Hydroxyl Radical O 3 + H 2 O  O 2 + 2OH. 2O 3 + 3H 2 O 2  4O 2 + 2OH. + 2H 2 O 2OH. + 2H + + 2e -  2H 2 O E o =2.80 V Persulfate (Requires Activation) – S 2 O e -  2SO 4 2- E o =2.01 V – S 2 O 8 2-  2(SO 4 - ). E o =2.60 V Hydrogen Peroxide (Requires Activation) – H 2 O 2 + 2H + + 2e -  2H 2 OE o =1.77 V – H 2 O 2  2OH. ; 2OH. + 2H + + 2e -  2H 2 O E o =2.80 V Permanganate (No Activator) – MnO H + + 3e -  MnO 2 + 2H 2 O E o =1.68 V K +, Na +

Accepted Oxidizing Techniques for Specific COCs

Divalent Metal Activation  Oxidant consumption during conversion of ferrous iron to ferric iron  Inhibition of biological utilization of the generated ferric species (EDTA)  High oxidant consumption due to overdosing of the ferrous chelated iron Caustic Activation  Significant health and safety issues  Unsuitably high (extreme) pH environment for biological attenuation  Self-limiting biological attenuation process due to hydrogen sulfide generation Heat Activation  Difficult Implementation  High Cost  Elevated hydrogen sulfide production Hydrogen Peroxide Activation  Limited efficacy on many targeted compounds  Elevated hydrogen sulfide production  Produces heat and (excessive) gassing which can lead to surfacing issues Limitations of Traditional Persulfate Activation Techniques

The ISCO reactions are short lived  Ozone (minutes to hours) Fenton’s (hours to days) Persulfate (days to weeks) Permanganate (months).  The ISCO process can enhance COC desorption  Lack of secondary treatment mechanism mandates subsequent treatments General Limitation of Persulfate / ISCO = Rebound

Provect-OX™ = Sodium Persulfate + Ferric Oxide (Fe 2 O 3 )  Chemical Oxidation via Sulfate (SO 4 ) Radical  Chemical Oxidation via Ferrate (Fe 6+ ) Radical Self-Activating ISCO / Enhanced Bioremediation Reagent 2 Fe OCl‾ + 4 OH‾ → 2 FeO Cl‾ + 2 H 2 O S 2 O ACTIVATOR [Fe 3+ ] → SO 4 - ● + e‾ → SO 4 2- ● S 2 O Fe > Fe (4+ to 6+) + SO SO 4 2-

 Persulfate is activated by Fe(III) requiring lower activation energy than alternative mechanisms  No consumption of persulfate oxidant  Elevation of iron oxidation state to a supercharged iron ion (ferrate species) which can itself acts as an oxidant  The supercharged iron cation consumption results into ferric species that act as a terminal electron acceptor for biological attenuation  The generated sulfate ion from the decomposition of the persulfate acts as a terminal electron acceptor for sulfate reducers Provect-OX™ ISCO Processes

Sulfate Reduction  After dissolved oxygen depletion sulfate is used as an electron acceptor for anaerobic biodegradation by indigenous microbes (sulfidogenesis)  Stoichiometrically, 1.0 mg/L of sulfate consumed by microbes results in the destruction of approximately 0.21 mg/L of BTEX compounds  Sulfate acts as an electron acceptor in co-metabolic processes during bioremediation of petroleum products  Basic reactions for the mineralization of benzene and toluene under sulfate reducing conditions: C 6 H SO H 2 O --> 0.37 H HCO HS H 2 S - C 7 H SO H 2 O --> 0.25 H HCO HS H 2 S - Provect-OX™ Biological Attenuation Processes

Ferric Iron Reactions  Ferric iron used as electron acceptor during anaerobic biodegradation of contaminants  Stoichiometrically, the degradation of 1.0 mg/L of BTEX results in the average consumption of approximately 22 mg/L of ferric iron C 6 H H 2 O + 30 Fe > 6 HCO Fe H + C 7 H H 2 O + 36 Fe > 7 HCO Fe H + C 8 H H 2 O + 42 Fe > 8 HCO Fe H +  Ferric iron is reduced to Ferrous iron, which is soluble in water  Ferrous iron is oxidized to Ferric iron and the iron cycling provides sustained secondary bioremediation via one electron transfer reactions (Weber et al, 2006) Provect-OX™ Biological Attenuation Processes

Pyrite Formation  Sulfate residual is utilized as terminal electron acceptor by facultative organisms thereby generating sulfide  The ferrous iron and the sulfide promote the formation of pyrite as a remedial byproduct  This reaction combats the toxic effects of sulfide and hydrogen sulfide accumulation on the facultative bacteria  Provides a means of removing targeted organic and inorganic COIs via precipitation reactions  Pyrite possesses a high number of reactive sites that are directly proportional to both its reductive capacity and the rate of decay for the target organics Fe S > FeS 2 + 2e Provect-OX™ Biological Attenuation Processes

Safely catalyzed process without the Hazards of Extreme Activators Caustics Can be provided pre-mixed in one bag Safely distributed in the field No Heat Generated – minimizes gassing and surfacing issues Uses Fe 3+ as activator (no persulfate “Master Supplier”) Conserves Oxidant – Unlike other Persulfate Activators Multiple ISCO processes via formation of reactive ferrate species = better ISCO Enhances bio attenuation utilizing both iron and sulfate reduction Encourages the formation of pyrite / Prevents H 2 S formation Long-lived reactions – sustained treatment manages rebound Cost-effective – reduces need for multiple injection events Provect-OX™ Potential Advantages

Single injection event at a wood treating facility in Midwestern United States in July 2013 to remediate soils and groundwater impacted by the historical release of heavy ended petroleum compounds. Total treatment area of approximately 82,000 square feet, treating between 13 and 22 feet below ground surface. Provect-Ox™ Case Study 1  91 injection points  Spaced 34 ft apart  22,022 lbs of Provect-OX MW-16 MW-17 MW-7A MW-6

Injection Equipment

Case Study 1 - Groundwater SVOC Analytical Data

Single injection event implemented at a former gas station in Northern New Jersey in August 2013 to remediate soils and groundwater impacted by the historical release of BTEX compounds. Total treatment area of approximately 3,100 square feet, treating between 4 and 14 feet below ground surface. Provect-OX™ Case Study 2  26 injection points  Spaced 8-10 ft apart  4,392 lbs of Provect OX

Case Study 2 – Field Parameters & VOC Analytical Data MW-2 Sampling Date06/20/201310/02/201311/26/201302/28/201405/28/2014 Benzene (ppb)ND ND Toluene (ppb)ND ND Ethylbenzene (ppb)ND4.08ND Total Xylenes (ppb)ND ND MW-2 Sampling Date06/20/201310/02/201311/26/201302/28/201405/28/2014 pH ORP (mV) D.O. (mg/L) Conductivity (mS/cm) Temperature ( o C) Groundwater Elevation (ft) Sulfate (mg/L)56.61, Total Iron (mg/L) Dissolved Iron (mg/L) ND

Case Study 2 – Field Parameters & VOC Analytical Data MW-5 Sampling Date06/201310/201311/201302/201405/201409/201412/2014 pH ORP (mV) D.O. (mg/L) Conductivity (mS/cm) Temperature ( o C) Groundwater Elevation (ft) Sulfate (mg/L) Total Iron (mg/L) Dissolved Iron (mg/L) MW-5 Sampling Date06/201310/201311/201302/201405/201409/201412/2014 Benzene (ppb) ND1.27ND Toluene (ppb) J0.16ND0.57ND Ethylbenzene (ppb) JND 14.2ND Total Xylenes (ppb) J0.37ND7.85ND

Single injection event at a former gas station upstate New York to address soil and groundwater contamination due to the historical release of BTEX compounds. Total treatment area of 9,225 square foot area, treating between 9 and 15 feet below ground surface. Provect-OX™ Case Study 2  39 injection points  Spaced ft apart  8,006 lbs of Provect OX

Case Study 3 – Geochemical and VOC Data Sulfate and Iron Utilized as Terminal Electron Acceptors to Sustain Bioremediation and Minimize Rebound

Provect-OX™ combines multiple ISCO and enhanced biological processes Safely catalyzed process without the Hazards of Extreme Activation No Heat Generated – minimizes gassing and surfacing issues Uses Fe 3+ as activator-minimized oxidant consumption Long-lived reactions – sustained treatment manages rebound Demonstrated effectiveness under field conditions Cost-effective – reduces need for multiple injection events CONCLUSIONS

“Safer, More Effective ISCO Remedial Actions Using Non-Extreme Persulfate Activation to Yield Sustained Secondary Treatment” Questions