Using PLCs to Build Expertise Community of Practice October 9, 2013 Tammy Bresnahan & Tammy Ferguson.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Professional Learning Communities Connecting the Initiatives
Advertisements

Building Effective Leadership Teams: A Practitioner’s Look
Supporting the Art & Science of Teaching Supporting the Art & Science of Teaching Robert J. Marzano.
© 2010 Learning Sciences International Bering Strait School District Demographic Information  Covers 88,000 square miles.
1 Literacy PERKS Standard 1: Aligned Curriculum. 2 PERKS Essential Elements Academic Performance 1. Aligned Curriculum 2. Multiple Assessments 3. Instruction.
Academic Alignment CROSBY TURNAROUND COMMITTEE
Building & Using an Effective Leadership Team Kathi Cooper Aida Molina Bette Harrison Sandy Lam.
1 Why is the Core important? To set high expectations – for all students – for educators To attend to the learning needs of students To break through the.
Linda Nickel EPSB Project Specialist 1.
Leading the Learning The Role of the Instructional Leadership Team ESC, West Instructional Directors July 30, 2014.
Developing and Supporting Highly Effective Teachers in Every Classroom Leaders of Learning Implementation Norman Public Schools Date.
Best Practices. Overview of Best Practices Literacy Best Practice Documents: Were developed by curriculum staff and area specialists, with coaches’ and.
 Teacher and administrator evaluations are governed by Florida Statute and State Board Rule 6A  The Florida Department of Education and.
Matt Moxham EDUC 290. The Idaho Core Teacher Standards are ten standards set by the State of Idaho that teachers are expected to uphold. This is because.
Plan for Highly Effective Job-Embedded Professional Development Building Teacher Capacity for Instructional Reform EL 560 By: Jeremiah Stieve.
1 GENERAL OVERVIEW. “…if this work is approached systematically and strategically, it has the potential to dramatically change how teachers think about.
Sharon Walpole University of Delaware Michael C. McKenna University of Virginia Literacy Coaches in Action: Strategies for Crafting Building- Level Support.
Deliberate Practice Technical Assistance Day
Session Materials  Wiki
Welcome What’s a pilot?. What’s the purpose of the pilot? Support teachers and administrators with the new evaluation system as we learn together about.
SCPS is…  We are a high-performing district  We are focused on student achievement  We are committed to achieving excellence and equity through continuous.
1 Confidential to Shelby County Schools and Memphis City Schools Reflective Practice Theory of Action.
Administrative Evaluation Committee – Orientation Meeting Dr. Christine Carver, Associate Superintendent of Human Capital Development Mr. Stephen Foresi,
Building Teacher Effectiveness A Lab School Protocol.
Kentucky Integrated Strategy September 29, College & Career Readiness Agenda—Literacy/Mathematics Design Collaborative Tools Offer tools for the.
1. 2 Why is the Core important? To set high expectations –for all students –for educators To attend to the learning needs of students To break through.
Freehold Borough Teacher Evaluation Training KICKOFF PRESENTATION March 8, 2013 Presented by: Joy Forrest (FLC) Jennifer Donnelly (PAE) Rich Pepe (FIS)
Leveraging DI Through Curriculum Implementation Ron Ballentine Cindy Cosentino Halton District School Board
Teacher Keys Effectiveness System Forsyth County Schools Orientation May 2013 L.. Allison.
Principal Professional Development September 26, SUSD Common Core PD 2013.
Leadership: Connecting Vision With Action Presented by: Jan Stanley Spring 2010 Title I Directors’ Meeting.
PRESENTED BY THERESA RICHARDS OREGON DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION AUGUST 2012 Overview of the Oregon Framework for Teacher and Administrator Evaluation and.
Elementary & Middle School 2014 ELA MCAS Evaluation & Strategy.
Setting purposeful goals Douglas County Schools July 2011.
Improving Our Profession Through Deliberate Practice.
Educator Growth and Professional Development. Objectives for this session The SLT will…  Have a thorough understanding of High Quality Standard 5: Educator.
Implementing Formative Assessment Online Professional Development What Principals Need to know.
What is HQPD?. Ohio Standards for PD HQPD is a purposeful, structured and continuous process that occurs over time. HQPD is a purposeful, structured and.
ISLN Network Meeting KEDC SUPERINTENDENT UPDATE. Why we are here--Purpose of ISLN network New academic standards  Deconstruct and disseminate Content.
Professional Learning Communities “The most promising strategy for sustained, substantial school improvement is developing the ability of school personnel.
1. Housekeeping Items June 8 th and 9 th put on calendar for 2 nd round of Iowa Core ***Shenandoah participants*** Module 6 training on March 24 th will.
A state-wide effort to improve teaching and learning to ensure that all Iowa students engage in a rigorous & relevant curriculum. The Core Curriculum.
Lancaster County School District. Student Learning Objectives are the product of an interest in extending the available data for educators throughout.
Common Core State Standards: Supporting Implementation and Moving to Sustainability Based on ASCD’s Fulfilling the Promise of the Common Core State Standards:
WELCOME WASHINGTON STATE FELLOWS! September 22, 2015 Jessica Vavrus, Assistant Superintendent of Teaching and Learning, OSPI Cindy Duncan, Assistant Superintendent.
Professional Learning Teams Cascade High School September 18, 2015.
TPEP Teacher & Principal Evaluation System Prepared from resources from WEA & AWSP & ESD 112.
1. Administrators will gain a deeper understanding of the connection between arts, engagement, student success, and college and career readiness. 2. Administrators.
ANNOOR ISLAMIC SCHOOL AdvancEd Survey PURPOSE AND DIRECTION.
Student Learning Objectives 1 SCEE Summit Student Learning Objectives District Professional Development is the Key 2.
Mathematics Performance Tasks Applying a Program Logic Model to a Professional Development Series California Educational Research Association December.
Zimmerly Response NMIA Audit. Faculty Response Teacher input on Master Schedule. Instructional Coaches Collaborative work. Design and implement common.
ACS WASC/CDE Visiting Committee Final Presentation South East High School March 11, 2015.
The Literacy and Numeracy Secretariat Le Secrétariat de la littératie et de la numératie October – octobre 2007 The School Effectiveness Framework A Collegial.
Purpose of Teacher Evaluation and Observation Minnesota Teacher Evaluation Requirements Develop, improve and support qualified teachers and effective.
Supplemental Text Project Kenn Ward EDL 678 Dr. Pfennig June 2013.
1 OBSERVATION CYCLE: CONNECTING DOMAINS 1, 2, AND 3.
OEA Leadership Academy 2011 Michele Winship, Ph.D.
Instructional Leadership and Application of the Standards Aligned System Act 45 Program Requirements and ITQ Content Review October 14, 2010.
ACS WASC/CDE Visiting Committee Final Presentation Panorama High School March
Instructional Leadership Supporting Common Assessments.
Sample evidences for Teacher Evaluation Robyn White
Lakeland Middle School Professional Learning Communities (PLC)
Instructional Personnel Performance Appraisal System
Collaborative Inquiry and Professional Learning Communities
Instructional Personnel Performance Appraisal System
February 21-22, 2018.
Instructional Personnel Performance Appraisal System
Instructional Personnel Performance Appraisal System
Presentation transcript:

Using PLCs to Build Expertise Community of Practice October 9, 2013 Tammy Bresnahan & Tammy Ferguson

 Why Differentiate PD? Does this look like your faculty??? It doesn’t look like ours either!!

 1.Focus on academic content 2.Develop pedagogical knowledge and skills 3.Align with standards, curriculum, and assessments 4.Involve active learning by participants 5.Area applied in the context of teacher practice 6.Are participatory and collaborative 7.Occur over a sustained period of time 8.Require teacher to direct their personal professional development 8 Characteristics of High- Quality Professional Learning McRel (2012). An analysis of Florida’s professional development system. Denver, CO

  School Community Professional Development Act:  Increased opportunities for professional collaboration among and between teachers, guidance counselors, instructional leaders, postsecondary educators engaged in preservice training for new teachers, and the workforce community. Why PLCs?

  According to Rick DuFour  The most promising strategy for helping students to achieve at the highest levels is to develop the capacity for educators to function in a Professional Learning Community.  And PLCs  Require school-wide effort  Have a “pervasive and ongoing impact” on the school culture  Require the participants to act on their new learning PLCs DuFour, R., DuFour, R., Eaker, R., & Many, T. (2006). Learning by doing: A handbook for professional learning communities at work. Bloomington, IN: Solution Tree Press.

 How Can I Organize PLCs to Support Deliberate Practice and Build Expertise? The purpose of this session is to: Provide a context for successful PLCs Offer organizational tools to monitor implementation and evaluate for effectiveness Share positive outcomes from our experiences

  Teachers have to have an understanding of  The framework  The scale  The purpose  Teachers have to be empowered to organize and plan for their own learning by providing:  Time  Resources  Support Context

  Commitment to continuous improvement  Evidence of current learning  Develop ideas and strategies  Implement those strategies  Analyze impact  Apply new knowledge Building Internal Capacity DuFour, R., DuFour, R., Eaker, R., & Many, T. (2006). Learning by doing: A handbook for professional learning communities at work. Bloomington, IN: Solution Tree Press.

  A cohort of 12  Domain 1: 3-day Institute  iObservation technical training  Domain 1 Refresher  Inter-Rater Reliability: 3-day Institute  Professional Development Days,  Whole faculty Domain 1  Professional development days (PDDs) focused on DQ1 and DQ 5 The Art & Science of Teaching Framework: Our Professional Development

  Teachers wanted “Differentiated PD”  Overview of Deliberate Practice in September  Set-aside time for PLCs October – February Professional Development

  Keep a clear focus on deliberate practice elements  Domain 3: Reflecting on teaching  Using an action research model for implementation  Domain 4: Collegiality and Professionalism  Working together toward a common goal Connections to the Framework

  Plan – Identify the area for growth and develop a plan using:  Administrative observation data  Self- evaluation data  Student data  Act – Implement deliberate practice  Analyze – Work with PLC to plan, observe, and provide feedback  Reflect – What was the effect of the DP? What new changes can be made? Collaborative Action Research Approach within a PLC

Getting Ready  Completed a self- evaluation across Domain 1  Created a “Google Form”  Chose DP elements based on  Self-evaluation  Past observation/ evaluation  Discussion with principal  Completed prior to October PDD

Organizing  Selected groups by similar focus  Approved by the principal (some discussions occurred)  Met to begin planning  Wrote action steps Example

  Becoming a Reflective Educator  The Handbook for the Art and Science of Teaching  Observation protocol forms/learning map  iObservation resources  Teaching Channel Videos  Hunt Institute Videos  New this year:  Using Common Core Standards to Enhance Classroom Instruction & Assessment (Marzano, et al 2013)  PD360/CC360 Planning Resources

 Planning

  Met every Professional Development Day and during common planning (1.2.1)  Investigated strategies for implementation (1.2.1)  Focused on deliberate practice elements based on set goals (1.2.3)  Observed peers (1.2.4)  Watched videos (online and own) to identify ways to improve practice (1.2.5) Learning

Accountability

  Tried new strategies in classroom (1.3.1)  GATE mentors observed mentees to provide feedback (1.3.2)  Mentors use iObservation to provide peer to peer feedback Implementing

Group Examples DQ 2 Element 13: Reflecting on Learning DQ 2 Element 6: Identifying Critical Information

Grade 4 Implementation DQ1, Elements 1 & 2Revising Knowledge (#20)

 Student Evidence, Grade 5 Revising KnowledgeLearning Goals and Scales

  Used teacher observation data in iObservation (1.4.1)  Analyzed teachers’ self-reported feedback from their PLC experience (1.4.2)  Tracked student progress toward established learning goals (1.4.3)  Evaluated student outcomes using FCAT or other summative assessment (1.4.4) Evaluating

Evaluation  Self-reported evaluation of learning:  Content  Delivery  Learning  Support  Implementation  Outcomes

  Teachers’ feedback was positive about the benefits of managing their own professional development  97% of teachers want PD to continue in this format  86% of teachers believed that their learning is having a positive impact on student performance Reflecting

 Reflecting as a District  Mixed groups, common focus  Create own plan, implement & reflect  Relevant to own classroom/work  Providing time  Autonomy  Choice  More time to work together  Help identifying resources  More time to observe each other  More feedback from administration “ This is the most worthwhile professional development I've had.”

  Create a seamless connection: CCSS and the Marzano Framework  Develop CCSS unit plans that identify strategies addressing content (DQ 2-5)  Document learning through blogs or wikis and through video  Reflect on changes in practice using peer observations and video recordings Goals for PLCs