Selecting Instructional Materials and Supporting Effective Implementation EVERGREEN, WASHOUGAL, BATTLEGROUND, CAMAS, VANCOUVER AND WOODLAND PUBLIC SCHOOLS.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
RIDE – Office of Special Populations
Advertisements

Teachers, administrators and staff continuously seek and share learning and then act on what they learn. The goal of their actions is to enhance their.
Common Core at CPS Scope and Sequence Implementation Plan
Implementation of the PA Core Standards. Effective Communication Guiding Principle 1 Design and establish systems of effective communication among stakeholders.
Teacher Evaluation New Teacher Orientation August 15, 2013.
On The Road to College and Career Readiness Hamilton County ESC Instructional Services Center Christina Sherman, Consultant.
Getting Organized for the Transition to the Common Core What You Need to Know.
Academic Alignment CROSBY TURNAROUND COMMITTEE
Leadership for the Common Core in Mathematics, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Linking Assessment Targets to Instructional Tasks and DOK This.
Targeted Efforts to Improve Learning for ALL Students.
DISTRICT IMPROVEMENT PLAN Student Achievement Annual Progress Report Lakewood School District # 306.
Open Educational Resources Sample Communications Slides for Educators and Administrators CC BYCC BY Achieve 2015.
© 2012 Common Core, Inc. All rights reserved. commoncore.org NYS COMMON CORE MATHEMATICS CURRICULUM A Story of Units Module Focus Grade 2- Module 4.
© 2012 Common Core, Inc. All rights reserved. commoncore.org NYS COMMON CORE MATHEMATICS CURRICULUM A Story of Units Module Focus Kindergarten- Module.
Kyrene Professional Growth Plan
Lesson Design: An Overview of Key Tools for Flexible Math Instruction Think about Ms. Christiansen—the teacher in the video. What helps a teacher plan.
Up-Date on Science and SS February 2015 Faculty Meeting.
Welcome What’s a pilot?. What’s the purpose of the pilot? Support teachers and administrators with the new evaluation system as we learn together about.
Moving to the Common Core Janet Rummel Assessment Specialist Indiana Department of Education.
Meeting of the Staff and Curriculum Development Network December 2, 2010 Implementing Race to the Top Delivering the Regents Reform Agenda with Measured.
DMUSD TRANSITION TO COMMON CORE STATE STANDARDS. COMMON CORE STATE STANDARDS  Common Core State Standards Initiative is a state-led effort coordinated.
Consortia of States Assessment Systems Instructional Leaders Roundtable November 18, 2010.
Leveraging Educator Evaluation to Support Improvement Planning Reading Public Schools Craig Martin
NEXT GENERATION BALANCED ASSESSMENT SYSTEMS ALIGNED TO THE CCSS Stanley Rabinowitz, Ph.D. WestEd CORE Summer Design Institute June 19,
EngageNY.org Overview of the 3-8 ELA Curriculum Modules Session 1A, November 2013 NTI.
Math Fellows Heather Dorsey. Purpose of the Fellows To be a part of and support a system that focuses on math making sense for all students. --Leadership.
Connecting the Dots BISD’S LEARNING PLATFORM AND ESTABLISHING EXPECTATIONS FOR LEARNING RUBRIC.
Leadership: Connecting Vision With Action Presented by: Jan Stanley Spring 2010 Title I Directors’ Meeting.
Common Core State Standards Background and ELA Overview Created By: Penny Plavala, Literacy Specialist.
Strategic Planning Update Kentucky Board of Education January 31, 2012.
FewSomeAll. Multi-Tiered System of Supports A Comprehensive Framework for Implementing the California Common Core State Standards Professional Learning.
 Participants will teach Mathematics II or are responsible for the delivery of Mathematics II instruction  Participants attended Days 1, 2, and 3 of.
Elementary & Middle School 2014 Mathematics MCAS Evaluation & Strategy.
Created by NWRESD Data Quality Project CCSS Stewardship Committee 2013 Created by NWRESD Data Quality Project EQuIP Network Common Core Stewardship Committee.
The Principles of Learning and Teaching P-12 Training Program
Planning and Integrating Curriculum: Unit 4, Key Topic 1http://facultyinitiative.wested.org/1.
Destination--- Common Core Staff Meeting/SSC February 2013.
Twilight Training October 1, 2013 OUSD CCSS Transition Teams.
1. Housekeeping Items June 8 th and 9 th put on calendar for 2 nd round of Iowa Core ***Shenandoah participants*** Module 6 training on March 24 th will.
Designing Local Curriculum Module 5. Objective To assist district leadership facilitate the development of local curricula.
Expeditionary Learning Queens Middle School Meeting May 29,2013 Presenters: Maryanne Campagna & Antoinette DiPietro 1.
Common Core State Standards: Supporting Implementation and Moving to Sustainability Based on ASCD’s Fulfilling the Promise of the Common Core State Standards:
BACK TO SCHOOL Welcome Back! Evaluation Task Force Findings.
1.  Assuring that all students with disabilities have access to and participation in the general education curriculum  Recognizing that special education.
1. Administrators will gain a deeper understanding of the connection between arts, engagement, student success, and college and career readiness. 2. Administrators.
Ohio Department of Education March 2011 Ohio Educator Evaluation Systems.
Readiness for AdvancED District Accreditation Tuscaloosa County School System.
EngageNY.org Overview of the 3-8 ELA Curriculum Modules Session 1A, February 2014 NTI.
Bridge Year (Interim Adoption) Instructional Materials Criteria Facilitator:
OER and the Changing Face of Instructional Materials NOT YOUR PARENTS’ TEXTBOOKS Barbara Soots Open Educational Resources Program Manager Office of Superintendent.
MATHEMATICS & THE COMMON CORE STATE STANDARDS Today’s Agenda: 1. Propose three possible solutions to address the non-alignment of our K – 5 math instructional.
Planning for School Implementation. Choice Programs Requires both district and school level coordination roles The district office establishes guidelines,
Smarter Balanced Interim and Formative Assessment PTE Summer Conference June 17, 2014 Nancy Thomas Price, Comprehensive Assessment Coordinator.
RtI Response to Instruction and Intervention Understanding RtI in Thomspon School District Understanding RtI in Thomspon School District.
Vision Statement We Value - An organization culture based upon both individual strengths and relationships in which learners flourish in an environment.
Overview of the 3-8 ELA Curriculum Modules
CCRS Quarterly Meeting CCRS Quarterly Meeting English Language Arts
Bridgewater-Raritan Regional School District Program Evaluations A summary of recommendations from the completed program evaluations March 6, 2009.
Defining & Aligning Local Curriculum. What is Curriculum? Individually consider your personal definition of the term curriculum What words do you think.
CSDCDecember 8, “More questions than answers.” CSDC December 8, 2010.
OER Project Office of Superintendent of Public Instruction Office of Superintendent of Public Instruction Digital Learning Department Digital Learning.
1 Update on Teacher Effectiveness July 25, 2011 Dr. Rebecca Garland Chief Academic Officer.
What about the Assessment System?
An Overview of the EQuIP Rubric for Lessons & Units
Barbara Soots Open Educational Resources Program Manager
An Overview of the EQuIP Rubric for Lessons & Units
Implementing the Specialized Service Professional State Model Evaluation System for Measures of Student Outcomes.
Common Core State Standards
K–8 Session 1: Exploring the Critical Areas
Presentation transcript:

Selecting Instructional Materials and Supporting Effective Implementation EVERGREEN, WASHOUGAL, BATTLEGROUND, CAMAS, VANCOUVER AND WOODLAND PUBLIC SCHOOLS APRIL 27, 2016

Agenda Welcome/Introductions Ladder of Inference Course Design and Instructional Material Guidance/Toolkit  Reflect and discuss cycle  Policy deep dive Quality Assessment Rubrics (IMET and EQuIP) Next steps

What is your story as a _______ student? With a partner/trio, share your story of being a student in the content area. What is common to your stories? What were barriers to your learning? What worked for you as a student? How does this look the same/different for your students today?

Taking a learning stance and the ladder of inference

THE LADDER OF INFERENCE Taking a learning stance and the ladder of inference Read the short selection Turn and talk (15 min) ◦When have you found your thought process moving up the ladder of inference? Could be in your personal life or your professional life ◦How do you notice when others are moving up the ladder of inference? What does that sound like? ◦What are the potential effects of teams moving up the ladder of inference? ◦How can first focusing on identifying and discussing low- inference observations and data (Rungs 1 and 2) support your team? 6

Preliminary Discussion What does your current selection and adoption process look like? a.Who are the stakeholders involved in the process? b.What are the existing policies? Who sets them? c.How does your district determine alignment to learning standards and learning progression throughout courses? d.What is the timeline for the process? e.Do materials vary from school to school? f.How often does this process occur?

Textbook photo by Cassidy Curtis – CC BY NC SATextbook photo by Cassidy Curtis – CC BY NC SA Multimedia by hugoespinozas – CC BY NC SAMultimedia by hugoespinozas – CC BY NC SA Instructional Materials Revisited Not Your Parents’ Textbook

Under the Instructional Materials Umbrella Individual units, lessons, and plans Supplemental resources Assessments K-12 core curricula District-created materials/resources Online courses Teacher-created materials Maple by kanegen – CC BY May be printed or digital. May carry different licensing types from open to all rights reserved.

Instructional Material Considerations New learning standards, frameworks, and assessments Increased development of open educational resources 10

Why OER… 11 It Looks Insoluble It Looks Insoluble by David Goehring– CC BYCC BY

Course Design and Instructional Materials Selection Cycle Identify Parameters and Goals Review Existing Course Design Select Instructional Materials Implement Course and Assess Effectiveness Where do we want to go? Where are we now? How do we get there?Was it worth the trip?

Questions/Required Resources State learning standards District learning goals Applicable state laws Content area frameworks Metrics to gauge effectiveness of resources School board policy Where do we want to go? Identify Parameters and Goals OSPI Teaching and Learning IdentifyReview SelectAssess

Where do we want to go? Identify Parameters and Goals IdentifyReview SelectAssess Discussion: Take a moment to read through the questions in this section. Do you have other parameters that you need to consider? Other factors, beyond alignment important for your community? Who needs to be involved in these discussions and what supports need to be in place (release time, face to face or virtual convening, etc.) What metrics will you use to gauge the effectiveness of your instructional materials? Review your existing policy with regard to instructional materials adoption. Do any areas require additional clarification? 2020 Policy2020 Procedure

District Policy Links Battle Ground Public Schools Camus School District – PolicyCamus School District Camas School District - ProcedureCamas School District Washougal School District Vancouver Public Schools Woodland School District WSSDA Model Policy Evergreen Public Schools – on slide below

Where are we now? Review Existing Course Design IdentifyReview SelectAssess Questions  Are your instructional materials aligned to state learning standards?  Are your existing materials effective teaching and learning tools?  Is your professional learning strategy effective?

Reviewed OER Library Instructional Materials Guidance OSPI OER Review Results

Louisiana Department of Education led an online review of instructional materials to determine the degree of alignment with state content standards TIER 1 - EXEMPLIFIES QUALITY TIER2 - APPROACHING QUALITY TIER 3 - NOT REPRESENTING QUALITY Curricular Resources and Annotated Reviews Instructional Materials Guidance Louisiana Department of Education

Instructional Materials Guidance edreports.org edreports

Comparison View Helps to Sort Information The “compare” function shows how different programs align in different areas, so you can focus on what districts might consider based on local student and teacher needs.

Where are we now? Review Existing Course Design IdentifyReview SelectAssess Team Activity  Use one or more of the referenced sites to examine reviews of your current instructional materials.  What team (roles) will be responsible for assessing existing course design and materials.  What are the nuts and bolts of convening and facilitating this group?

How do we get there? Select Instructional Materials IdentifyReview SelectAssess What is the gap between where your district is currently and where you would like to be. Understand the current landscape of instructional materials Determine the level of instructional materials improvement and other supports and strategies needed. Minor Refresh Fill Gaps Complete Overhaul

Levels of Improvement Minor Refresh Instructional materials are in good shape, aligned to standards, student performance is good, teachers are prepared. District would like to include supplemental resources to increase engagement or to focus on specific ideas. 1.Establish district guidelines for identification and usage of temporary supplemental materials. 2.Have the principal designate an individual to approve the selection of supplemental resources and establish selection criteria for these resources. 3.Train teachers and district staff in the effective location of instructional materials and provide them with a firm understanding of resource licenses which will determine their levels of permitted uses for the resources.

Levels of Improvement Fill Gaps Current instructional materials do not quite meet standards but with some additions they could. This may include adding resources like lessons, units, or formative and summative assessment tasks. 1.Establish district guidelines for identification and usage of temporary supplemental materials. 2.Have the principal designate an individual to approve the selection of supplemental resources and establish selection criteria for these resources. 3.Leverage any existing reviews of material 4.Train teachers and district staff in the effective location of instructional materials and provide them with a firm understanding of resource licenses which will determine their levels of permitted uses for the resources. 5.Review the content for alignment to state learning standards using established rubrics

Levels of Improvement Complete Overhaul Existing instructional materials are out-of-date, not aligned with standards, and ineffective tools for students and teachers. A new option is required. 1.Examine current school board policies regarding the selection and adoption of instructional material. 2.Determine district capacity 3.Establish timelines and a project team communications strategy. 4.Determine if a “textbook” is necessary? Are digital options available? Does your district feel comfortable pulling together resources to create their own course curriculum? Is there appropriate material available?

Levels of Improvement Complete Overhaul 5.Determine strategy for identifying options and designate appropriate personnel 6.Determine if piloting or field testing is advisable. Examine any existing materials reviews from trusted sources. 7.Recruit and convene an Instructional Materials Review Committee 8.Report results and select material 9.Create an implementation strategy that includes initial resource training, sustained professional learning, and resources and strategies to help families support students with their learning

Review Lenses – Building Your Team Teachers/content specialists Quality and alignment to state learning standards Technology Specialists Delivery platforms, access, and security considerations Curriculum Specialist/Administration Assess the needs for successful implementation of the instructional material at scale Goed Zoekveld by Bart van de Blezen – CC BY NC SA

Aligned - blog from Student Achievement Partners Instructional materials taskforce Common Core-aligned sample lessons with explanations and supporting resources. Instructional Materials Alignment Toolkit Parent and community resources Professional development resources Instructional Materials Guidance Student Achievement Partners Achieve the Core – Aligned Blog

National and state reports, policy briefs, surveys, and white papers that focus on preparing all students for college and careers EQuIP Exemplar lessons and units Videos eLearning modules Peer review panel Instructional Materials Guidance Achieve Achieve EQuIP Rubrics

How do we get there? Select Instructional Materials IdentifyReview SelectAssess Team Discussion Where along the instructional materials improvement spectrum does your district fall? How will you select, train, and calibrate a team to look critically at instructional materials options? Describe the collaboration between IT and content experts in support of the selection and review process?

Was it Worth the Trip? Implement and Assess Effectiveness Questions  Define your strategy for professional learning around implementation of materials.  Were the changes you made impactful to teaching and learning in a positive way?  Did students achieve success based on the decided upon metrics? IdentifyReview SelectAssess

Was it Worth the Trip? Implement and Assess Effectiveness Team Discussion  What educator supports are in place or will be provided to promote successful implementation and continuing professional learning?  What are some opportunities to engage with parent or community groups?  Who and how will you monitor progress based on your decided upon metrics? IdentifyReview SelectAssess

EdReports Rubric IMET Rubric EQuIP Rubrics Achieve OER Rubrics IMET Rubric Instructional Materials Guidance Review Rubrics

IMET Non-Negotiable Criteria pp 4-16 Focus and Coherence 1. Materials must reflect the content architecture of the Standards by not assessing the specific topics named in Metric 1A before the grade level where they first appear in the Standards. 2. Materials must focus coherently on the Major Work of the grade in a way that is consistent with the progressions in the Standards.

IMET Alignment Criteria pp Materials must reflect the balances in the Standards and help students meet the Standards’ rigorous expectations. 2.Materials must authentically connect content standards and practice standards. 3.Materials must provide supports for English Language Learners and other special populations.

 Measures overall quality when compared to the CCSS  Unit-focused  Four Criteria I. Alignment to the Depth of the CCSS II. Key Shifts in the CCSS III. Instructional Supports IV. Assessment EQuIP

When evaluating lessons/units: Based on criteria ◦Need a common lens of understanding criteria- ◦Use CCSS, Progression Docs, Cluster Docs, etc. Evidence Based ◦Provide specific examples (reasons) in the unit where the criteria is weak. ◦Provides guidance on what you will need to look for to supplement the curriculum— entire unit, short activity? Improvements Suggested ◦Look for a unit that , activities that , add formative process for these 2 lessons, etc. Identifying Supplemental Support (adapt, supplement, create, etc.) OSPI MATH WEBINAR_PART 3_

Technology Rubric Examples:  Does each of the technology components within the resource work with your district’s devices?  Can part or all of the resources be accessed off-line, or does it require a “live” internet connection?  What plug ins, apps, software, etc. would a device need to have to run all the different components of this resource and enable students and teachers to seamlessly view and interact with the materials?

Review & Reflect Each group member selects a rubric or section of rubric to review. Discuss: ◦What knowledge and skills will a review team need to look critically at mathematics instructional materials options? ◦Cite evidence from the rubrics to support your thinking

Except where otherwise noted, this work is licensed Keep in Touch with OSPI

Additional Informational Slides

WSSDA Featured Policies District Sample Policies & Procedures – Updated April 2015 Instructional Materials Selection & Adoption: Policy 2020; 2020P New Instructional Materials Model Policy

Core Instructional Materials are the primary instructional resources for a given course. They are district- approved and provided to all students to help meet learning standards and provide instruction towards course requirements. Alternative Core Materials are the primary instructional materials for a given course that are used with a subset of students. These materials are intended to replace approved core materials and may be used for specialized course offerings or flexible learning environments. Photo by BioDivLibrary - Creative Commons Attribution License Core Instructional Materials are the primary instructional resources for a given course. They are district-approved and provided to all students to help meet learning standards and provide instruction towards course requirements. Alternative Core Materials are the primary instructional materials for a given course that are used with a subset of students. These materials are intended to replace approved core materials and may be used for specialized course offerings or flexible learning environments. Instructional Materials Categories

Core Instructional Materials are the primary instructional resources for a given course. They are district- approved and provided to all students to help meet learning standards and provide instruction towards course requirements. Alternative Core Materials are the primary instructional materials for a given course that are used with a subset of students. These materials are intended to replace approved core materials and may be used for specialized course offerings or flexible learning environments. Photo by BioDivLibrary - Creative Commons Attribution License Intervention Materials are designed to support strategic or intensive intervention for students who are at risk of not meeting established learning standards. Supplemental Materials are used in conjunction with the core instructional materials of a course. These items extend and support instruction. Temporary Supplemental Materials are those items used in conjunction with the core instructional materials of a course that are of interest or value for a short period of time and are chosen within district-established guidelines. Instructional Materials Categories

Roles and Responsibilities Instructional Material Type Role Certificated Teaching Staff PrincipalSuperintendent Instructional Materials Committee School Board Core materialidentify establish adoption procedure recommendadopt Alternative coreidentify designate selector InterventionIdentify designate selector Supplementalidentify designate selector Temporary Supplemental select – within district guidelines Model Policy 2020