County-Wide Act 167 Plan “County-wide Act 167 Stormwater Management Plan for Chester County, PA” was prepared by: Chester County Water Resources Authority.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Siskiyou County Land Development Manual 2006 Update Planning Commission Hearing Land Development Manual Update.
Advertisements

Stormwater Rulemaking Briefing US Environmental Protection Agency.
4/7/2015 Workshop: Development Sustainability & Stormwater Planning/Design Stormwater Infrastructure Financing: Getting Decision Makers on Board Mike Hall,
Los Angeles County MS4 Permit Reissuance: New Directions & Strategy Presented by LA Regional Water Quality Control Board Southern California Water Dialogue.
Utah Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (UPDES) Utah Sewer Management Program (USMP)
Upper Providence Township Stormwater Management MS4 Program.
Environmental Harm Urban stormwater frequently contains litter, oil, chemicals, toxic metals, bacteria, and excess nutrients, like nitrogen and phosphorous.
Proposed Stormwater Regulations Public Forum Richland County Government September 2009.
NPDES Phase II Storm Water Regulations: WHAT MUNICIPAL GOVERNMENTS NEED TO KNOW.
Chapter 102 Changes and Highlights Municipal Update Coordinating Permits.
{Your District Name Here} District Small MS4/Municipal Storm Water Update {Date Here}
Department of Conservation and Recreation 1 Proposed Stormwater Management Requirements for Virginia Rappahannock River Basin Commission June 24, 2009.
SLIDE 1 Sustainable Stormwater Management May 6, 2015 Blue Highways: Transportation and Stormwater Management in Virginia Ginny Snead, PE Richmond Office.
Wake County Stormwater Workshop Guidance on the New Stormwater Ordinance and Design Manual August 29, 2006.
Board of County Commissioners Meeting September 22, 2009 PROPOSED FERTILIZER ORDINANCE.
Ohio Balanced Growth Program New Resources for Watershed Planning and Best Local Land Use Practices Kirby Date, AICP, Cleveland State University.
Balancedgrowth.ohio.gov Best Local Land Use Practices Kirby Date, AICP Cleveland State University.
Introduction to PA Act 167 Stormwater Management Planning Little Juniata River Watershed April 21, 2005.
Ohio Balanced Growth Program Best Local Land Use Practices Development Incentives Kirby Date, AICP, Cleveland State University.
Putting the “LID” on Water Pollution New Water Quality Requirements for Land Use County of Orange Mary Anne Skorpanich Richard Boon.
Water Supply Planning Initiative State Water Commission November 22, 2004.
New Stormwater Regulations “C.3” Provisions in effect Feb. 15, 2005.
Watershed Protection & CodeNEXT Austin Neighborhoods Council March 25, 2015 Watershed Protection & CodeNEXT Austin Neighborhoods Council March 25, 2015.
2005 RWQPP Initiative Related Travis County Implementation.
EVALUATION AND APPRAISAL REPORT MAJOR COMMUNITY ISSUES RELATED TO COMPREHENSIVE PLAN Board of County Commissioners/ Local Planning Agency Joint Meeting.
DC Draft Phase II Watershed Implementation Plan Stakeholder Meeting March 1, 2012 Metropolitan Washington Council Of Governments Hamid Karimi Deputy Director.
1 Stormwater Phase II Municipal Separate Storm Sewer Systems and Act 167 Doug Brennan PA DEP September, 2002.
Department of Public Works NPDES Low Impact Development and Green Streets Resolutions City Council August 17, 2015.
Introduction to Storm Water Phase II Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection.
Board of County Commissioners PUBLIC HEARING December 2, 2008.
Local Government Assistance Phase II Storm Water Rule Erie County Department of Environment & Planning.
Bassett Creek Water Management Commission Joint Advisory Group Meeting January 23, 2001.
Why are we here today? To discuss the challenges we face in meeting NPDES Phase II minimum requirements for stormwater control. The NPDES program requires.
Board of County Commissioners PUBLIC HEARING June 8, 2010.
Stormwater Treatment and Flow Control Dan Cloak Presentation to the Citizens Advisory Committee November 13, 2006 Options for implementing new Phase II.
VI. Developing a VSMP Program General Stormwater Training Workshop.
Stormwater Treatment and Flow-Control Requirements in Phase I and Phase II Municipal NPDES Permits Dan Cloak, Principal Dan Cloak Environmental Consulting.
MS4 Permit Updates May 9, 2014 Jay Hoskins, P.E. Metropolitan St. Louis Sewer District.
Connecticut Department of Energy and Environmental Protection.
Stormwater and C.3 Overview Tom Dalziel, Assistant Manager Contra Costa Clean Water Program.
Stormwater Overview Board of County Commissioners Planning Conference March 1, 2007.
10/03/021 Stormwater Video-conference Department of Environmental Protection Stormwater Videoconference October 3, 2002.
NC Phase I Perspective Steps undertaken by Charlotte for Post-Construction Controls SC Stormwater Forum May 8, 2007.
Phase II National Storm Water Regulations What’s in it for you?
From the Beginning Design Standards and Other Post-Construction Program Elements.
MS4 APPLICATION PROCESS Mark Fife Water Bureau Water Bureau Permits Section Permits Section.
An Overview of our Community’s Stormwater Management Program
New Development and Significant Development 12/21/20151 New Development & Significant Redevelopment.
Bureau of Watershed Management Regulatory Proposal Chapter 102 [Erosion and Sediment Control] Erosion, Sediment and Stormwater Management February 21,
SW101 Large and Small Construction Denise Hamilton, EPA Region 6 8 th Annual Region 6 MS4 Operators Conference June 26, 2006.
Getting Started: Summary of Bylaw and Regulatory Options for Stormwater and Low Impact Development Lexington & Wakefield 1 st Workshop - February 7, 2007.
HAMPTON ROADS REGIONAL WATER RESOURCES MANAGEMENT PROGRAM Presentation John M. Carlock, AICP Deputy Executive Director, Physical Planning Hampton Roads.
Public Workshop May 14, 2013 Alachua County Board of County Commissioners.
JULIE MAWHORTER MID-ATLANTIC URBAN & COMMUNITY FORESTRY COORDINATOR CHESAPEAKE TREE CANOPY STRATEGY & WORKPLAN UPDATE CITIZEN’S ADVISORY.
Program Overview Town of Wrightsville Beach Public Works Department Stormwater Services.
What is Stormwater? Direct result of rainfall Recharges groundwater by infiltration Produces “runoff” (excess rainfall after infiltration) May be concentrated.
1. Wolfeboro’s Tool Kit Implemented tools for water quality protection Municipal Watershed District Ground Water Protection Overlay District Steep Slope.
Williamsburg’s Local Strategies to meet the ChesBay TMDL March 2012 Chesapeake Bay Watershed Virginia Maryland Pennsylvania New York Delaware West Virginia.
Why the Need for Increased Stormwater Funding? Citizens expect a higher level of protection from flooding Increased development.
John Huisman – NC DWQ NC Water Quality Commission – January 11, 2012 NC Environmental Management Commission – January 12,
Urban Runoff Pollution Ordinance 2017 Proposed Update
Supervisor, RIDEM RIPDES Permitting Program
Planning Commission Public Hearing September 9, 2016
PENNSYLVANIA STORMWATER BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES MANUAL
Sacramento County Stormwater Quality Program
Stormwater Management Program
Comprehensive Land Use Planning and Zoning
MS4 OVERVIEW 2015.
Sacramento County Stormwater Quality Program
Rule 5/6/13 Conversion to General Permits
Presentation transcript:

County-Wide Act 167 Plan “County-wide Act 167 Stormwater Management Plan for Chester County, PA” was prepared by: Chester County Water Resources Authority Chester County Planning Commission Chester County Conservation District

PA Act 167 – Stormwater Management Planning Act 1978 Reduce flooding and stormwater impacts of future development and redevelopment Mandates that counties prepare stormwater management plans and minimum stormwater standards Mandates that municipalities adopt the stormwater management standards Applies to all municipalities and all land area within Chester County

County-Wide Act 167 Plan Watersheds Plan Addendum to Watersheds Model Ordinance Matrix of Minimum Standards Christina Stormwater TMDL Plan Template Documentation of municipal and public involvement and input Requirements for State Projects (PennDOT, Pa Tpk Comm, etc.) Othe r updates – County flood mitigation programs, etc. Incorporates components of previously approved 167 Plans

Plan Prepared In Conjunction With: Watershed Plan Advisory Committee (WPAC) 73 municipalities Home Builders Association Land Preservation Organizations Watershed Conservation Organizations Professional Engineers/Planner Committee Chester County Engineers Association Professional Environmental Planner Municipal Solicitor

Municipal/Public Input - Process to Date Final Plan Preparation – began October 2011 Five public/municipal review/comment cycles 4,100 comments received and addressed Discussed at 25 meetings of public, municipal representatives, stakeholders All comments were incorporated to the maximum extent possible while complying with PADEP minimum requirements

Adoption of Final Plan County-Wide Act 167 Plan was formally recommended to the Chester County Board of Commissioners for adoption by the following Boards: Chester County Planning Commission Chester County Conservation District Chester County Water Resources Authority Chester County Board of Commissioners adopted the final Plan March 27, 2013

Minimum Required Standards Downgradient Properties - hydrologic change requires written permission Natural Hydrology Site Design - required Water Quality and Volume Control - no net increase in runoff of 2- year storm Infiltration - minimum 1” runoff from impervious surfaces must be infiltrated Stream Channel Protection - 2-year post peak rate reduced to 1-year pre peak rate; attenuate 1-yr 24 hr runoff Peak Rate Runoff Controls - 10-yr post to 2-yr pre; 5-yr post to 2-yr pre; 100-yr post to 100-yr pre; 100% meadow for new development Permanent Protection, O&M Plans and O&M Agreements - required for EVERY BMP; must be recorded with Recorder of Deeds Long-term Operation, Maintenance and Inspections - required

Minimum Applicability Regulated activity = any earth disturbance that alters runoff >1,000 sq. ft. “proposed impervious” – full ordinance applies (engineered plan and municipal review required) option to increase to >2,000 sq. ft. <1,000 sq. ft. – prohibited from causing pollution or altering runoff from property (no plan or municipal review required) “Proposed Impervious” = new and replacement

Flexibility for Relaxed Controls Exempt Activities – agriculture, residential in-footprint replacement; municipal road shoulder improvements; etc. Redevelopment – improvement of runoff control required; less restrictive than new development Small Projects – option to require “Simplified Method” for projects up to 2,000 sq. ft. of proposed impervious Agricultural Structures – option for up to 10,000 sq. ft. building plus 5,000 sq. ft. vehicle movement area can be designed through Conservation Plan process and exempt from municipal review/approval Peak Rate Controls – 5-year and 10-year control standard can be based on either erosion control or flood control

Requirements for State Projects State financed projects must be consistent with the Act 167 Plan Pa Turnpike Commission – must comply with municipal ordinances PennDOT – Not required to comply with municipal ordinances Agreed to inclusion of list of “priorities” for increased coordination with municipalities and Improvements to existing local roadway drainage problems

Key Concerns Raised Some required standards are more restrictive than current municipal standards. The minimum project size (threshold) for which engineered plans/reviews are required is small. Increased municipal burden and costs for engineering reviews, inspections and enforcement. Increased burden and costs to residential home owner or other land owner. All stormwater control features must have O&M agreements and easements for inspections/repairs recorded with Office of Recorder of Deeds. These concerns result from PADEP requirements; Plan minimizes these impacts to maximum extent possible, while meeting PADEP requirements.

County-Wide 167 Plan Benefits Provides minimum stormwater standards that are more practical, flexible and less restrictive than are otherwise required by PADEP. less restrictive and more flexible than the standards adopted by other counties. Provides one set of streamlined stormwater standards that meet multiple state regulatory requirements. Increases opportunities for municipal involvement in stormwater plan reviews for state transportation projects. Provides consistent stormwater standards across all municipalities and watersheds of Chester County.

Need for County-Wide Plan >250 locations of known flooding problems 86% of County drains to: A stormwater-impaired (polluted) stream An Exceptional Value or High Quality water body A stream with stormwater quality regulations (TMDLs) established for mandatory implementation 84% of County within watersheds that are source waters for public water supply 58 of 73 municipalities regulated under MS4 program Assist municipalities in streamlining MS4, TMDL and Act 167 stormwater mandates

County-wide Act 167 Plan – Next Steps – Municipal Implementation Approved by PADEP – July 2, Municipal Implementation Workshops Were Held (August, September 2013) Municipal Ordinances must be Adopted by January 2, 2014 Notification of Adoption to be Submitted to PADEP

For more information: Chester County Water Resources Authority County-wide Act 167 Plan, Model Ordinance, and Supporting Materials are Available Online at: Chesco.org/ water