Keeping our Commitments to Collaborative Children’s Services.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
To Eliminate Poverty and Family Violence in El Paso County.
Advertisements

On The Right Track Multiple Response System (MRS) and System of Care (SOC) North Carolina’s Child Welfare Reform Model 1, 2008.
Maryland Choices “One Team – One Mission”. Regional CME Maryland Choices is …  The Northwest Regional Care Management Entity.
Reclaiming Futures as part of the OJJDP required Three-Year State Plan A Presentation to State SAGs Tom Begich.
Statewide Children’s Wraparound Initiative COSA Conference Presenters: Erinn Kelley-Siel Mary Lou Johnson Larry Sullivan.
Comprehensive Organizational Health AssessmentMay 2012Butler Institute for Families Comprehensive Organizational Health Assessment Presented by: Robin.
California Department of Social Services Program Improvement Plan
Katie A. Agreement Child Welfare and Mental Health working together will provide:  Intensive home and community based mental health services to children.
Understanding Katie A and the Core Practice Model
CW/MH Learning Collaborative First Statewide Leadership Convening Lessons Learned from the Readiness Assessment Tools Lisa Conradi, PsyD Project Co-Investigator.
California Child Welfare Co-Investment Partnership Children’s Conference Monterey, California May 29, 2008.
Building a System of Care in Child Welfare: North Carolina
Katie A. Implementation Progress & Hurdles: Child & Family Team Component Donna Ewing-Marto, Executive Family Partner, Family & Youth Roundtable Sarah.
Multiple Response System (MRS) and System of Care (SOC) North Carolina’s Child Welfare Reform Model The North Carolina Foster and Adoptive Parent Association.
1 Strategic Planning. 2 Elements of the Strategic Planning Process Strategic planning is a continual process for improving organizational performance.
Addressing Disproportionality in Texas A Committed Community Collaboration Presented by: Carolyne Rodriguez, Director of Texas State Strategy, Casey Family.
Using An Organizational Assessment : A framework to Help Agencies Build on Strengths, Recognize Challenges, and Develop a Comprehensive Work Plan, CWDA.
Commonwealth of Massachusetts Executive Office of Health and Human Services Improving the Commonwealth’s Services for Children and Families A Framework.
A Charge to Collaborate: IT’S NOT JUST ABOUT WHAT WE DO… IT’S ABOUT HOW WE DO IT…
"The Changing Expectations of Juvenile Justice in Texas"
Common Core 3.0 Content Overview Stakeholder Feedback Seeking Your Input to Improve Child Welfare Training! For audio: call enter access.
1 OAC Principles MHSA Prevention and Early Intervention.
IMPROVING ACCESS TO MENTAL HEALTH SERVICES FOR FOSTER CHILDREN PLACED OUT OF COUNTY JURISDICTION CHILD WELFARE COUNCIL MARCH 4, 2015.
1 Adopting and Implementing a Shared Core Practice Framework A Briefing/Discussion Objectives: Provide a brief overview and context for: Practice Models.
Adapted from materials developed by Anita P. Barbee, MSSW, Ph.D.
VERMONT AGENCY OF HUMAN SERVICES
ACO Mapping Group Recommendations 1. Are the subclass members being identified? 2. Are the subclass members being assessed? 3. Are the subclass members.
KENTUCKY YOUTH FIRST Grant Period August July
Lisa Pion-Berlin, PhD President and Chief Executive Officer Parents Anonymous ® Inc. Leah Davis, California State Parent Team Achieving Shared Leadership®
© Institute for Child Success COORDINATING COMPREHENSIVE HEALTH CARE WITH HOME VISITS FOR NEW FAMILIES: A Case Study of Home Visitation Integration with.
1 Strategic Planning Midwest Child Welfare Implementation Center Tribal Convening August 27-28, 2009 Steven Preister National Child Welfare Resource Center.
Measuring and Improving Practice and Results Practice and Results 2006 CSR Baseline Results Measuring and Improving Practice and Results Practice and Results.
Understanding TASC Marc Harrington, LPC, LCASI Case Developer Region 4 TASC Robin Cuellar, CCJP, CSAC Buncombe County.
Strategic Planning and the Importance of Collaboration: A conversation... Barrett Johnson, L.C.S.W. | CalSWEC Lisa Molinar, M.A. | Shared Vision Consultants.
Katie A. Learning Collaborative For Audio, please call: Participant code: Please mute your phone Building Child Welfare and Mental.
Children’s Mental Health Reform Overview: North Sound Mental Health Administration Prepared by Julie de Losada, M.S./CMHS
© 2010 NATIONAL TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE CENTER FOR CHILDREN’S MENTAL HEALTH, GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY Expanded School Mental Health Services (ESMH) in Baltimore.
Academy for Professional Excellence is a project of San Diego State University School of Social Work Statewide Leadership Convening August 6, 2015 Youth.
Practice Model Elements Theoretical framework Values and principles Casework components Practice elements Practice behaviors.
Your Presenters Melissa Connelly, Director, Regional Training Academy Coordination Project, CalSWEC Sylvia Deporto, Deputy Director, Family & Children’s.
THE KATIE A SETTLEMENT: IMPLICATIONS FOR CalSWEC Child Welfare Committee Mental Health Committee Oakland February, 2012.
Strong Minds, Strong Futures A trauma-informed system of care initiative for adolescents with behavioral health issues and their families.
Common Core 3.0 Online Learning Classroom Skill Building Field Activities.
Developed by: July 15,  Mission: To connect family strengthening networks across California to promote quality practice, peer learning and mutual.
 Legislative mandate*: ◦ Reform Group Homes & FFAs with robust & diverse stakeholder input ◦ Legislative report with recommendations  Continuum of Care.
1 A Multi Level Approach to Implementation of the National CLAS Standards: Theme 1 Governance, Leadership & Workforce P. Qasimah Boston, Dr.Ph Florida.
Comprehensive Youth Services Assessment and Plan February 21, 2014.
Strategic Planning  Hire staff  Build a collaborative decision- making body  Discuss vision, mission, goals, objectives, actions and outcomes  Create.
Your Presenters What we’re asking of you Statewide stakeholder review process taking place in all regions We want your feedback on all aspects of the.
California’s Child Welfare Continuum of Care Reform (CCR) Overview California Department of Social Services January 2016.
Improving the Lives of Mariposa County’s Children and Families System Improvement Plan October 2008 Update.
1 Child and Family Teaming (CFT) Module 1 Developing an Effective Child and Family Team.
California Child Welfare Core Practice Model: Development of Theoretical Framework and Alignment with Values and Principles Anita P. Barbee, MSSW, Ph.D.
California’s Child Welfare Continuum of Care Reform (CCR) Overview California Department of Social Services 1.
LOS ANGELES COUNTY. To learn about the Katie A. Settlement Agreement and its impact on the Child Welfare and Mental Health systems To appreciate the Shared.
California’s Child Welfare Continuum of Care Reform (CCR) Overview California Department of Social Services January 2016.
San Francisco Continuum of Care Reform Discussion
Policy & Advocacy Platform April 24, 2017
Continuum of Care Reform Ventura County Update
Continuum of Care Reform
Panhandle Partnership for Health and Human Services
Overview of the California Child Welfare Core Practice Model (CPM)
California’s Child Welfare Continuum of Care Reform (CCR) Butte County Overview December 2016 ~ Cathi Grams, Director Department of Employment and Social.
AspireMN Member Meeting
CPM as the Framework for Practice & System Change
Creating the Conditions for CPM to THRIVE
New York State Systems of Care
Child Welfare: Mark Lapiz (Santa Clara County)
Presentation transcript:

Keeping our Commitments to Collaborative Children’s Services

Brief History And Context  At least 5 Little Hoover Reports since 1977 have pleaded with state agencies to close gaps for kids and families.  Katie A. Settlement required a Core Practice Model be developed and implemented in CA.  State lead effort in to create and produce a “Pathways to Mental Health” CPM  Within one year, CWS partners began thoughtful planning and development of a “Child Welfare” CPM, and has finalized the various components..  Historic development of two models both mirrors and reinforces segregated approaches to care. Pathways Model has already been vetted and was published with approval of both state child serving agencies.  CWS Model in Development has nearly identical Values, Principles and Framework, and adds additional benefits.

Practice Model Background  California counties have tried many promising practices to improve outcomes for children and families  Many of these practices have common elements  Some recent efforts have even tried to combine different initiatives into more comprehensive practice models

Towards a Statewide Practice Model  Since 2012 the County Welfare Directors Association (CWDA) Children’s Committee has been working to develop a statewide practice model  Monthly meetings  3 Statewide Convenings  Multiple Presentations IV-E Summer Institute Continuum of Care Reform Meetings Local and Regional planning meetings

Practice Model Elements Theoretical framework Values and principles Casework components Practice elements Practice behaviors

Theoretical Framework  Our theoretical framework is an organized set of explanatory principles that help us understand: What leads to the problem of child maltreatment? How can we work to prevent child maltreatment from starting or stop it once it has started?

Theoretical Framework

Casework Components— What We Do

Practice Elements: This is How We Do It Engagement Inquiry / Exploration Advocacy Teaming Accountability Workforce Development and Support

Practice Behaviors Define practice elements so agency and community partners know what to expect and can build coordinated services and supports. Support evaluation of model fidelity and outcomes. Provide a framework for practice.

Practice Behaviors Provide direction to practitioners about how they will practice social work using the practice model. Finalized set of Practice Behaviors completed in 2015

Pathways Core Practice Model Background

Settlement Agreement “The purpose of the Core Practice Model (CPM) Guide is to provide practical guidance and direction for county child welfare and mental health agencies, other service providers, and community/tribal partners who will be implementing the CPM when working with children and families involved with child welfare who have or may have mental health needs.”

Why pursue an Integrated Approach to Practice? 1. Katie A. Settlement (JMT 2014) requires a “revision” of existing CPM and ‘unified Multi agency approach” to care. 2. Cost Savings to state and counties—Training Contracts may be consolidated and universalized. 3. Compliance, Information Tracking, Reporting and Data sharing will mirror practice, which should be similarly Integrated. Counties will not be confused as to which model should be trained to, is being implemented, and which model the state is assessing during their Integrated Compliance and Quality Reviews. 4. Children and families will be served with the same values and principles, and with the additional value of practice behaviors, when receiving any cross system services. 5. Other reform efforts (CCR, TFC, RFA) will be enhanced via a single document. Overlaps in service design already being identified. 6. California would have created and implemented a first in the nation Integrated, Cross System Practice Model. 7. Evidenced Based Programs implementation will be enhanced.

SMS/Community Team Implementation Plan (4 Pillars) Pillar 4- Core Practice Model Pillar 3-Oversight and Accountability Pillar 2- Information and Data Management Pillar 1-Training and Technical Assistance Engagement Satisfaction Engagement Satisfaction Access Linkages Access Linkages Cost Effectiveness Appropriateness Service Effectiveness Appropriateness Service Effectiveness

Crosswalk Shared Architecture/Outline Pathways CPM: CWS Draft CPM: 1. Engagement 2. Assessment 3. Service Planning and Implementation 4. Monitoring and Adapting 5. Transition 1. Prevention 2. Engagement 3. Assessment 4. Planning and Service Delivery 5. Monitoring and Adapting 6. Transition

Crosswalk Examples Pathways CPM: CWS Draft CPM: 1. Children are first and foremost protected form abuse and neglect, and maintained safely in their own homes. 2. Services are culturally competent and respectful of the culture of children and their families. 3. Recognize and acknowledge the effects of trauma in the lives of these children and families 4. The team works continuously to identify, locate, develop, identify funding for, advocate for, link the family to and support the use of agreed upon practices, services and supports. 1. We believe in using prevention and early intervention to help keep children and youth safe from abuse and neglect. 2. We believe in listening to families to learn about their culture and community. 3. Use a trauma-informed approach to acknowledge and validate venting, expressions of anger, and feelings of grief and loss. 4. Advocate for, link the family to, and help the family members access the services, supports and visitation activities identified in the plan.

Key Stakeholders  Youth  Parents  Resource Families  CWDA Children’s Committee.  CBHDA Children’s System of Care Com  Statewide Training and Education C.  Tribal Representatives  CDSS  DHCS  Provider Associations/Members

A Shared Approach to California’s Children, Youth and Families/ Integrated Practice Guide Unique Probation Theories, Values, Principles and Practices Unique Behavioral Health Theories, Values, Principles and Practices Shared Theoretical Underpinning Shared Principles and Values Unique Welfare Theories, Values, Principles and Practices Shared Practice Behaviors (CFT) Integrated Statewide Training Plan

Next Steps  Identify 3-4 Reps from CWS, Probation and MH to form Integrated CPM Design Team  Identfy MH Practice Behaviors and Theory to include in the ultimate document  Draft an Integrated document for stakeholder review.  Develop Implementation Readiness Scale and Organizational Assessment processes  Develop Regional Learning Collaborative approach to statewide implementation of the Practice Model, via Integrated Training Plan