An Employee-Owned Company © 2013 Edvance Research An Evaluation of Teach For America (TFA) in Texas Schools: Findings, Issues and Challenges Lauren Decker,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Teacher Training, Teacher Quality and Student Achievement Douglas Harris Tim R. Sass Dept. of Educational Dept. of Economics Policy Studies Florida State.
Advertisements

Texas State Accountability 2013 and Beyond Current T.E.A. Framework as of March 22, 2013 Austin Independent School District Bill Caritj, Chief Performance.
Presented to: Oklahoma State Board of Education August 20, 2013 Oklahoma Interruption Investigation Arthur Thacker.
Accountability Update Ty Duncan Coordinator of Accountability and Compliance, ESC
State Board of Education December 2013 Revision of Instructional Materials Adoption Process and Delay for Mathematics 1.
Third-Party Evaluation Studies as a Basis for Determining Program Effectiveness and Improvement Needs Center for Research and Reform in Education Johns.
2013 State Accountability System Allen ISD. State Accountability under TAKS program:  Four Ratings: Exemplary, Recognized, Academically Acceptable, Academically.
SCHOOL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM (SIP). AYP INDICATORS, COMPONENTS AND STANDARDS  Reading/ELA  Performance: 87% Proficiency Rate  Participation: 95% Participating.
Jeff Beard Lisa Helma David Parrish Start Presentation.
Index Accountability 2014 Created by Accountability and Compliance staff of Region 17 Education Service Center.
1 The New York State Education Department New York State’s Student Reporting and Accountability System.
Teacher-Designed Incentive Pay in Texas A Presentation to the IES Research Conference by Lori L. Taylor.
Data Analysis Concepts & Terms
Texas High School Project and the Texas Science, Technology, Engineering, and Math (T-STEM) Initiative Texas Regional Collaboration March 6, 2007.
COALITION PARTNERS San Antonio Independent School District North East Independent School District Catholic Schools of the Archdiocese The University of.
Dr. Bonnie J. Faddis & Dr. Margaret Beam RMC Research Fidelity of Implementation and Program Impact.
STATE ACCOUNTABILITY OVERVIEW Back To School| August 19-22, 2013 Dean Munn Education Specialist Region 15 ESC.
ITEA and NASA Partners in Space ITEA 2009 March 26, 2009 Louisville, KY.
Evaluating a Literacy Curriculum for Adolescents: Results from Three Sites of the First Year of Striving Readers Eastern Evaluation Research Society Conference.
AYP vs. AEIS Talking Carroll Elementary October 5, 2010.
Evaluating the Vermont Mathematics Initiative (VMI) in a Value Added Context H. ‘Bud’ Meyers, Ph.D. College of Education and Social Services University.
Establishing a Culture of Mathematics Learning in Urban Schools Syracuse City School District / Syracuse University Partnership Beyond Access to Math Achievement.
What Was Learned from a Second Year of Implementation IES Research Conference Washington, DC June 8, 2009 William Corrin, Senior Research Associate MDRC.
2015 Texas Accountability System Overview and Updates August 13, 2015.
Mathematics and Science Education U.S. Department of Education.
State Charter Schools Commission of Georgia SCSC Academic Accountability Update State Charter School Performance
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Tom Torlakson, State Superintendent of Public Instruction 2013 Assessment and Accountability Information Meeting State.
What are the STAAR Performance Standards? Copyright 2013 by Region 7 Education Service Center. All rights reserved.
SAISD Principal’s Meeting September 17, 2003 Office of Research and Evaluation.
The Center for the Future of Teaching and Learning Research conducted by SRI International California State University University of California, Office.
March 7, 2013 Texas Education Agency | Office of Assessment and Accountability Division of Performance Reporting Accountability Policy Advisory Committee.
2015 Texas Accountability System La Porte Independent School District August 5, 2015.
Mathematics and Science Partnerships: Summary of the Performance Period 2008 Annual Reports U.S. Department of Education.
Math and Science Partnership Program Approaches to State Longitudinal Evaluation March 21, 2011 San Francisco MSP Regional Meeting Patty O’Driscoll Public.
MSRP Year 1 (Preliminary) Impact Research for Better Schools RMC Corporation.
Evaluating Impacts of MSP Grants Hilary Rhodes, PhD Ellen Bobronnikov February 22, 2010 Common Issues and Recommendations.
Professional Development in Challenged Environments Project: Making Mathematics Matter (PM³) A Model for Effective PD Conversations Among Colleagues March.
Preliminary Data: Not a Final Accountability Document1 SAISD TAKS Performance Board Work Session June 2004 Office of Research, Evaluation,
Regional Assessment Network (RAN) Update Chun-Wu Li, Ph.D. Assessment and Accountability Services Riverside County Office of Education November 22, 2013.
Mathematics and Science Partnerships: Summary of the FY2006 Annual Reports U.S. Department of Education.
Turning Around Lowest-Achieving Schools (TALAS)
Evaluating Impacts of MSP Grants Ellen Bobronnikov Hilary Rhodes January 11, 2010 Common Issues and Recommendations.
Mathematics and Science Partnerships: Summary of the Performance Period 2008 Annual Reports U.S. Department of Education.
Urban Middle Grades Mathematics Curriculum Implementation Karen D. King Monica Mitchell Candace Barriteau Phaire Jessica Tybursky.
Release of Preliminary Value-Added Data Webinar August 13, 2012 Florida Department of Education.
Mathematics Performance Tasks Applying a Program Logic Model to a Professional Development Series California Educational Research Association December.
Effectiveness of Selected Supplemental Reading Comprehension Interventions: Impacts on a First Cohort of Fifth-Grade Students June 8, 2009 IES Annual Research.
Program Evaluation and Impact Assessment: Internet-delivered, On-Demand Professional Development Participating Schools versus Their Respective Districts.
Copyright © 2007 Pearson Education, inc. or its affiliates. All rights reserved. 1 Evaluation of Distributed Scoring with the Texas Assessment of Knowledge.
Revamping the Teaching Profession by Attracting Non-Teachers to It: Evidence from Enseña Chile Mariana Alfonso Education Division, Inter-American Development.
Impact of School Grants in Primary Schools In The Gambia Impact Evaluation Team The Gambian Team AFRICA IMPACT EVALUATION INITIATIVE, AFTRL Africa Program.
EngageNY.org Technology-Enhanced Learning DATAG March 2013.
June 25, Regional Educational Laboratory - Southwest Review of Evidence on the Effects of Teacher Professional Development on Student Achievement:
Enhancing Education Through Technology ( EETT/Title II D) Competitive Grant Application Technical Assistance Workshop New York State Education Department.
Adequate Yearly Progress [Our School District]
Classroom Network Technology as a Support for Systemic Mathematics Reform: Examining the Effects of Texas Instruments’ MathForward Program on Student Achievement.
Evaluation of Teachers Trained Through Different Routes to Certification Presentation at the IES Research Conference June 2009 Jill Constantine Mathematica.
Lauren Drelicharz & Brian McKevitt
Evaluation Requirements for MSP and Characteristics of Designs to Estimate Impacts with Confidence Ellen Bobronnikov March 23, 2011.
Fundamentals of Educational Research
Administrative Council September 10, 2012
VAM Primer.
Arizona State University
Data Review and Discussion David Holland
Pilot Panhandling Initiative
National Conference on Student Assessment June 2016
Texas Regional Collaboratives
Education Services October 3, 2017.
Release of Preliminary Value-Added Data Webinar
Chapter 3 Professional Development
Presentation transcript:

an Employee-Owned Company © 2013 Edvance Research An Evaluation of Teach For America (TFA) in Texas Schools: Findings, Issues and Challenges Lauren Decker, Herb Turner, David Goodman, Jessica Brite, & Eishi Adachi Presented to American Evaluation Association October 16, 2013

an Employee-Owned Company © 2013 Edvance Research Report released March 2013 Turner, H., Goodman, D., Adachi, E., Brite, J., and Decker, L. (2013). Evaluation of Teach For America in Texas schools. San Antonio, TX: Edvance Research, Inc. Available at

an Employee-Owned Company © 2013 Edvance Research TFA Overview Teach For America (TFA) – Alternative means to teaching profession – 2 year commitment with training and support (TFA corps member) – Program’s Primary Goal provide teachers to high-need schools otherwise not staffed with comparable quality teachers Four TFA regions in Texas – more than 1,600 corps members – working in 32 districts during the school year

an Employee-Owned Company © 2013 Edvance Research Evaluation Context

an Employee-Owned Company © 2013 Edvance Research Independent Evaluation TFA receives funding from Texas Legislature Short-time frame to complete study prior to next legislative session TFA commissions study to support TFA’s request for more funding

an Employee-Owned Company © 2013 Edvance Research Evaluation Process Teach For America Funded independent impact evaluation Edvance Research designed and conducted the impact evaluation Edvance Research conducted the evaluation in consultation with a Technical Working Group (TWG): – Eric Hanushek – Thomas Dee – Ildi Laczko-Kerr Final report reviewed and approved by TWG

an Employee-Owned Company © 2013 Edvance Research Primary Research Questions What is the effect of TFA corps members on 2010/11 TAKS mathematics and reading scores? What is the effect of TFA alumni on 2010/11 TAKS mathematics and reading scores? Target Population: Upper elementary (Grades 4 & 5) and middle school (Grades 6-8) across 4 TFA Texas regions

an Employee-Owned Company © 2013 Edvance Research Primary Contrasts & Outcomes TFA corps members Reading TFA alumni Experienced comparison teachers TFA corps members Novice comparison teachers vs. Math Reading Math Reading Math Grades Outcomes Contrasts Elementary (4 & 5) Elementary (4 & 5) Middle (6 – 8)

an Employee-Owned Company © 2013 Edvance Research Evaluation plan and data challenges

an Employee-Owned Company © 2013 Edvance Research School level Structure of Administrative Data Requested Student level Teacher level

an Employee-Owned Company © 2013 Edvance Research Structure of Administrative Data Received Two teacher characteristics at the student level

an Employee-Owned Company © 2013 Edvance Research Two-stage matching

an Employee-Owned Company © 2013 Edvance Research Grade level TFA schools Matched Comparison schools Corps member (0-1 yr experience) Alumni (> 1 yr experience) Novice (0-1 yr experience) Experienced (> 1 yr experience) Texas Schools TFA Schools Comparison Schools Stage 1 School Matching Stage 2 Student Matching

an Employee-Owned Company © 2013 Edvance Research Largest matched comparison study conducted on TFA in Texas (To Date) Reading (analytic sample) Mathematics (analytic sample) TFAComparisonTFAComparison Schools Students7,177 5,894

an Employee-Owned Company © 2013 Edvance Research Did the matching process work?

an Employee-Owned Company © 2013 Edvance Research Summary of school-level baseline equivalence testing Elementary TFA vs. comparison schools Middle grade TFA vs. comparison schools Gender == Race/ethnicity =covariate Economically disadvantaged =covariate LEP =covariate Reading == Mathematics == Note: Results of all baseline equivalence testing is evaluated based on the WWC standards

an Employee-Owned Company © 2013 Edvance Research Summary of student-level baseline equivalence testing (reading analytic sample) Elementary TFA corps member vs. Novice Middle grade TFA corps member vs. Novice Middle grade TFA alumni vs. Experienced Gender === Race/ethnicity ==covariate Economically disadvantaged === LEP ==covariate Reading ==covariate Mathematics covariate==

an Employee-Owned Company © 2013 Edvance Research Summary of student-level baseline equivalence testing (mathematics analytic sample) Elementary TFA corps member vs. Novice Middle grade TFA corps member vs. Novice Middle grade TFA alumni vs. Experienced Gender === Race/ethnicity === Economically disadvantaged === LEP ==covariate Reading covariate== Mathematics ==covariate

an Employee-Owned Company © 2013 Edvance Research Two-level Regression Model

an Employee-Owned Company © 2013 Edvance Research Findings

an Employee-Owned Company © 2013 Edvance Research Findings Note. Elementary grade sample sizes were insufficient to conduct the analysis.

an Employee-Owned Company © 2013 Edvance Research Main Limitations Only one teacher characteristic was controlled through matching Matching only equated groups on measured school and student characteristics The level of TFA fidelity of implementation associated with impact estimates is unknown The TFA teacher indicator were embedded in the student record so the exact number of TFA teachers in the study is unknown

an Employee-Owned Company © 2013 Edvance Research Thank you Lauren Decker Herb Turner