School Data Dashboard & RAISEonline Presentation for Governors Thursday 7 th May 2015 Yvonne Broadbent - Headteacher.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Briefing for Governors: Performance in Leeds and the role of governors in improving outcomes Children’s Performance Service March 2014.
Advertisements

Aldwych Primary School – case study Information for presenters; Script is contained on the notes page Handouts required: Context Context extract Internet.
Sue Rogers Director of Education KGA Presentation GCSE and Post 16 plus Closing the Gap.
Understanding School Performance Data (Secondary) to improve effectiveness John Mc Cann Assistant Director of Schools Diocese of Shrewsbury Department.
Joining the dots Supporting & challenging your school Governor Dashboard 1 Paul Charman Director of Strategy & Operations, FFT Chair of Governors, Dyson.
Exploring the impact of involvement in NCSL activity on school improvement Pam Sammons and Qing Gu University of Nottingham School of Education University.
The Performance of Vulnerable Learners Somerset Schools Forum 20 May 2014 Agenda Item 5b Nicola Turner.
Data – a focus on vulnerable groups and how governors can use data to positively challenge Directorate Support Team (Data & Statistics) Cornwall Council.
RAISEonline. Our school NB Please remember this data is historic for last year. We are a growing and larger then average primary school (current NOR 325)
Achievement of pupils in Salford. L4+ English and maths.
FFT Data Analysis Project – Supporting Self Evaluation  Fischer Family Trust / Fischer Education Project Extracts may be reproduced for non commercial.
Pupil Premium is paid to children from deprived backgrounds, defined as any child who has been entitled to FSM at any point in the past 6 years (ie.
DEVELOPING SECONDARY STRATEGY. 2 Staffordshire Context: County Council Mission Statement To make Staffordshire “A great place to live, work, visit and.
Reepham Primary School School Improvement and Development Flexible, real purpose, independent thinking Fun, engaging, exciting and relevant Supports.
Feyisa Demie Adviser for school self-evaluation and
Summary and analysis of school data on pupil achievement 2012 ‘How are we doing?’
Achievement Self-Evaluation - Achievement ACHIEVEMENT SATs 2014 Level READING 99% 94% 92%81% WRITING 98% 94% 89%79% ENGLISH O/A -
Another New Framework Major Changes: No more satisfactory 2 strikes and you are out All criteria changed Very short notice No pre-inspection brief.
Salford: How well are we doing?. Early Years Foundation Stage.
OFSTED: Parents’ meeting WHAT THE INSPECTORS DIDN’T TELL YOU… OFSTED Inspection 21st-22nd February 2013.
Educational Standards Cabinet January Early Years Performance  The percentage of pupils achieving the target expectations in the Early Years Foundation.
Provisional End of Key Stage Outcomes v4 This includes provisional indications of performance by vulnerable groups at Early Years and at Key Stage 2 As.
© Crown copyright PPT-EN-05 Workshop 3S (Secondary) Analysing progress data.
FFT Aspire for Governors 1 Stephen Turp. 2 FFT education Not for profit organisation – backed by the Fischer Family Trust charity Aims to raise aspirations.
Manor School Progress Tracking Contents Introduction3 Summary of Findings Free School Meal Progression5 Gender Progression6 Special.
Joining the dots FFT aspire: an overview Anne Pepper FFT Associate 1 Essex LA – Schools Hands On June 2015.
Using Performance Data to Improve Governor Effectiveness Julie Johnson Assistant Director of Schools (Primary) Diocese of Shrewsbury Department of Education.
Using RAISEonline to improve our schools An executive agency of the Department for Education.
Using Performance Data to Improve Governor Effectiveness
Reepham Primary School School Improvement and Development At Reepham Primary School we aspire to be confident and ambitious learners who care for.
RAISEonline Data Analysis for Governors and Staff Beaver Road Primary School Clive Davies OBE Beaver Road (c)
Reforms to Primary Assessment and Accountability Catherine Wreyford, Department for Education October 2015.
Raising standards, improving lives
Lostock Gralam CE Primary School Parent Information Meeting January 2016.
Nikki Tilson – Assessment and Achievement Adviser (Nursery and Primary) Assessment Update September 2015.
RAISEonline Data Analysis St Bernadette's Catholic Primary School St Bernadette's Catholic Primary School (c)
An introduction to SEN Data analysis The Research and Evaluation Unit.
Empowering Informed Decisions Using RAISEonline data to improve governor effectiveness Dave Thomson Head of Data Analysis, RM Education.
A Guide to Raiseonline KEY PERFORMANCE MEASURES. Prior Attainment Informs the Journey KS1 Teacher Assessments KS4 ExamsKS2 TestsPost 16 Expectation to.
RAISEonline David Robinson & Martin Kaliszewski.
Understanding & Using School Governance ….data. Me 8.30ish finish 15 minute break Fire alarms/Loos Introduction to RAISEonline Working in groups Packs.
Data informing the Herefordshire Closing the Gap pilot January 2013 Key Stage Pilot Cohort – Current Year 4.
Governor Data Training. Secondary National Standards National Floor Standards 5 A*-C including English and maths above 40% rising to 50% in Progress.
Standards report Standards Report CT Board 18 th March 2016.
Hertfordshire County Council The Role of the Secondary Assessment Co-ordinator Day One 5 th July 2005.
‘A Flying Start’ Achievement Update November 2014 Chris Snudden Head of Education Achievement Service Head of Virtual School for Children in Care John.
Pupil Premium Chris Snudden. Pupil Premium 2014 – 2015 Indicative Allocations Total Pupil Premium for Norfolk £29,752,000 Primary = £18,032,000 Secondary.
FFT Data Analysis Project Who wants to be in the top 1 percent?
1. 2 Devon Joint School Improvement Partner CPD 9 th October 2008 Tiverton Hotel Target Setting 2010 Hilary Jones.
Joining the dots Governor Dashboard 1 Chris Wood.
2016 Primary Assessment Update 27th September 2016
EYFS and KS1 Parent Meeting November 2015
Attainment, progress and context by disadvantage / pupil premium
Analysing the Primary RAISE
Objectives To explore the data analyses that are available in RAISEonline and how they can be used to identify differences in progression rates To consider.
Who wants to be in the top 1 percent?
Full Governors Meeting
Perins School Governors Committee 15th January Staffroom
Governors’ Update RaiseOnline & Fischer Family Trust
Raise Online 2013 Grange Park Primary School
Sheffield Performance Overview
Supporting School Improvement Partners (SIPs) working with Schools Causing Concern, including Hard to Shift 1.
Workshop 2S (Secondary)
RAISEonline Data Analysis for Governors and Staff
Resource Slides.
Life beyond levels Analysing school performance using scaled scores
St Johns School Buckhurst Hill
Understanding ASP and FFT Data
St. Paul’s 2018 Results At St. Paul’s we are ambitious for all of our pupils and want to ensure the best possible provision in order to ensure the best.
Data Summary for Pupil Premium
Presentation transcript:

School Data Dashboard & RAISEonline Presentation for Governors Thursday 7 th May 2015 Yvonne Broadbent - Headteacher

Aims: To provide an overview and insight into the function of Data Dashboard and RAISEonline. To increase governor awareness of data in relation to the attainment and progress of pupils in school, and how this compares with the national picture. To ensure governors are well equipped to support and challenge senior leaders.

 5:00pm - Data Dashboard – 15 minutes  5:15pm - Questions arising – 5 minutes  5:20pm - RAISEonline – 20 minutes  5:40pm - Questions arising – 5 minutes  5:45 - Break for refreshments Presentation Content

 Is published by Ofsted for individual schools, to provide a ‘snapshot’ of the school’s performance.  Can be accessed by anyone but is particularly useful for Governors to generate key questions in order to support and challenge the school’s leadership team. Schools Data Dashboar d

Dashboard%20guidance-2014.pdf Data Dashboard

Yvonne Broadbent BA Hons QTS, NPQH

 This table from P27 of RAISEonline demonstrates the importance of a deeper level of understanding in relation to the school’s data. For example in reading, consistent with the information on Data Dashboard, school is attaining in line with the national figure. Boys are also in line with the national figure and girls are outperforming their peers nationally. However, when comparing the gap between boys and girls at a national level there is a difference of 1.1APS, in school we have a gap of 1.7APS. Therefore, we need to ensure we are targeting boys in reading to enable them to catch up with the girls.

Yvonne Broadbent BA Hons QTS, NPQH

 Thank you.  Any Questions?

RAISE ? RAISEonline

Reporting and Analysis for Improvement through school Self-Evaluation RAISEonline

Advantages  RAISE provides a rich and detailed summary of school data in relation to the national picture over time (trends), for all pupils in reading, writing, mathematics, grammar, punctuation and spelling.  An invaluable tool for school self-evaluation, particularly with respect to the attainment and progress of disadvantaged pupils and other groups.  Includes key data specific to EYFS, Y1 phonics screening, KS1 attainment and KS2 attainment and progress. RAISEonline

Disadvantages  Unvalidated data published late in October.  Validated data released late in February.  Can become ‘data saturated’ and therefore miss key messages. RAISEonline

 The whole document comprises of 61 pages, 34 of which are signposted with a ‘G’ in the top right hand corner. This is to indicate that these pages should be shared with governors and subsequently used to support and challenge senior leaders in school. RAISEonline

Context

P17 The percentage of pupils achieving a good level of development is significantly below the national figure (44% school, 61% national). The gap between school FSM and national is -5%. For non FSM pupils, the gap between school and the national picture is -19% School is outperformed by national statistics in every area of learning, with one exception in technology. Girls outperform boys in every area. This is mirrored by the national picture but the gap is far less significant than in school. For example, in the moving and handling strand of physical development, the gap between girls and boys is -10% nationally in contrast to the -29% gap in school.

47/61 pupils achieved the expected standard in the phonic screening test, which is slightly above national (77% school compared to 74% national). No significant variance between school and national for any group with the exception of SEN (9 pupils). 22% of SEN pupils (2 children) in school achieved the phonics standard compared to 40% nationally. P18

P24 In reading and mathematics, pupils in school are attaining in line with national at all levels. In writing, pupils in school are in line with national at L1, 2C+ and 2B+. Attainment in writing at the higher levels is significantly above national 2A+ - 48% in school compared to 39% national and L3 - 26% in school compared to 16% national.

In 2014, school APS in KS1 was marginally above national in reading, writing and mathematics. In 2014, first time school has not achieved significant + in mathematics following a three year run of green boxes. In writing, second successive year that school has not achieved significant + following a three year run of green boxes. In reading, closest to national (compared to other subjects) but school trend is generally declining in contrast to improving national picture. P26

The percentage of pupils attaining L4B+ in mathematics is 8% below national (68% school compared with 76% national). We are in line with national at higher level 5. In reading, the percentage of pupils attaining L4+, L4B+ and L5 is below national by 3%, 5% and 8% respectively. In writing, spelling, punctuation and grammar, pupils are attaining higher than the national average. P29

Both boys and girls below national in reading (boys below by 1.0 and girls by 0.3). In all areas of Literacy (reading, writing and G.P. & S.) FSM/disadvantaged pupils are attaining below their peers nationally. SEND – The attainment of SA pupils is below national in mathematics, similarly, SA and SA+ in reading and SA+ in writing. P38

In 2014, school’s value added for KS2 in all subjects was significantly below national. Percentile rank 88 in mathematics, 95 in reading and 82 in writing. P40

P45 11 pupils made less than expected progress in reading, 5 of whom were a level 2A (1pupil) or level 3 (4 pupils) at KS1. For 3 pupils, their prior attainment was level 1, 2 pupils 2C and 1 pupil 2B. 9 pupils made more than expected progress, 5 of whom were a 2A at KS1. 3 pupils prior attainment was a level 1 and these children went on to achieve a level 4. 1 pupil was a 2B at KS1 and went on to achieve a level 5 at the end of KS2.

P59

 Thank you.  Any Questions?