Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. PowerPoint ® Lecture Slide Presentation prepared by Mary J. Sariscsany, California State University Northridge DYNAMIC PHYSICAL EDUCATION FOR ELEMENTARY SCHOOL CHILDREN R O B E R T P A N G R A Z I S I X T E E N T H E D I T I O N Chapter 7 Children with Disabilities
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Quality Physical Education for ALL Students Public Law All Handicapped Children Act (1975) Introduced new requirements, vocabulary, concepts IEP’s Mainstreaming Least restrictive environment Zero reject Progressive inclusion
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Quality Physical Education for ALL Students PL (continued) All youth, 3–21, receive a free and appropriate education in the least restrictive environment Physical education only specific area mentioned IDEA (1997) Individuals with Disabilities Act “Physical Education services, specifically designed … providing handicapped individuals with the least restrictive environment …”
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Quality Physical Education for ALL Students Schools must locate, identify and evaluate all students who might have a disability Screening followed by formal assessment IEP developed
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Least Restrictive Environment Determines the best placement arrangement of students with disabilities Entitles everyone of school age to some aspect of the school program Must have access to physical education Place students into setting that offer the best opportunity for educational advancement Varies depending on the unit of instruction
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Least Restrictive Environment
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Mainstreaming/Inclusion Students with disabilities must have opportunities to integrate with other students in public school Categories of placement for physical education Full mainstreaming Mainstreaming for PE only Partial mainstreaming Special developmental classes Reverse mainstreaming
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Screening and Assessment Involves all students in a school setting and is part of the “child find” process Conducted by the PE teacher Used to identify students who may need special services Assessment is conducted after screening process Team of experts
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Due Process Guidelines Written permission Interpretation of assessment External evaluation Negotiation and hearings Confidentiality
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Screening and Assessment Selection of test instruments Valid examinations Formal and informal assessment techniques Administration procedures Team evaluation
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Developing an IEP Developed by a committee Identifies the child’s unique qualities Determines educationally relevant strengths and weaknesses
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Components of an IEP Individualized Education Program Current level of educational performance Long-term goals Short-term instructional objectives A statement of special education and related services provided to the youngster Initiation and duration dates Criteria for determining if the short-term objectives are being reached
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Systematic Approach to Successful Mainstreaming
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Systematic Approach to Successful Mainstreaming Determine how to teach Analyze and diagnose motor behavior of students with disabilities Provide appropriate experiences for remediation Register data Understand specific impairments Know how to assess motor and fitness needs Find activities where students can excel
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Systematic Approach to Successful Mainstreaming Determine what to teach Determine how the existing curriculum affects students with differing needs Individualize activities as much as possible Find ways to modify instruction and activities Avoid degrading methods for choosing teams Analyze participants roles
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Systematic Approach to Successful Mainstreaming Reflection Check Ask the following: Do the changes allow students with differing needs to participate successfully? Does the modification make the setting unsafe? Does the change negatively affect the quality of the educational experience? Does the change cause an undo burden on the teacher?
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Modifying Activities All students have differing needs Teacher’s responsibility to make the environment better Use the STEPS (space, task, equipment, people, safety)
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Modifying Activities
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Modifying Activities Lack of strength and endurance Lower or enlarge goal size Modify game tempo Reduce projectile weight and/or size Reduce throwing distance Reduce points necessary to win game
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Modifying Activities Lack of strength and endurance (continued) Modify striking implements Slow down ball by decreasing air pressure Play games/activities at different positions Provide matching or substitution Youngsters can substitute skills
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Modifying Activities Lack of coordination Increase target or goal size Offer protection from injury Throwing—allow student to throw at maximum velocity Striking—begin striking a stationary object Catching—use soft, lightweight, and slow moving objects Place student in an environment where they will not have to chase equipment
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Modifying Activities Lack of balance and agility Increase width of rails, lines, beams Increase width of base of support Increase number of balancing body parts Increase surface area contacting floor
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Modifying Activities Lack of balance and agility (continued) Lower center of gravity Ensure surfaces offer good friction Some children require balance assistance Teach students to fall correctly
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Modifying Activities
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Teach Tolerance to all Students Recognize the similarities among all people Understand human differences Teach the acceptance of all students as worthwhile to all individuals
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Teach Tolerance to all Students
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Integrate Students with Differing Needs Meet goals specified in the IEP Build ego strength; stress abilities Foster peer acceptance Concentrate on student’s PE needs, not disability Provide continual monitoring and assess periodically Be constantly aware of students’ feelings and anxiety