U.S. General Services Administration Could Suspension and Debarment Happen to You?

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
A GIA is a contract between a surety company and a contractor (or subcontractor)/principal. A GIA is a standard, typical document in the construction.
Advertisements

Personnel Background Investigations. Introduction The interests of the national security require that all persons privileged to be employed in the departments.
The Deficit Reduction Act, Deficit Reduction Act of 2005 In the Deficit Reduction Act of 2005 (DRA) Congress, for the first time, has mandated healthcare.
Tim A. Di Guiseppe
Small Business Impacts and Implications The FAR Ethics and Compliance Rules 10M-0009.
Federal Audit Executive Council Annual Conference, September 26, 2013
Presentation before the Missouri Bar’s Health and Hospital Law Committee November 18, 2011 Markus P. Cicka, J.D., L.L.M. (Health Law) Director – Missouri.
Corporate Compliance Instructor Notes:
RECOVERY OVERSIGHT OFFICE OFFICE OF INSPECTOR GENERAL U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR.
Reporting Requirements and Procedures. Trafficking in Persons Reporting Requirements FAR Combating Trafficking in Persons* –Contractors shall.
New FAR Rules on Mandatory Disclosure and Contractor Business Ethics Richard P. Rector Chair, Government Contracts Practice DLA Piper LLP (US) © 2009 DLA.
Contractor Code of Business Ethics and Conduct Laura K. Kennedy Senior Vice President, Ethics and Compliance SAIC.
Procurement Integrity Act (PIA) Overview
U.S. General Services Administration Suspension and Debarment and the Acquisition Workforce: What You Need to Know Maria Swaby Director of Suspension and.
Suspension & Debarment PRESENTED BY Jon DevoreChristine V. Williams Birch Horton Bittner & CherotDavis Wright Tremaine Washington, D.C. Anchorage, AK
Revenue Audits Returns processed in a “non-judgemental” manner Revenue Audit of selected returns. Objective is to promote voluntary tax compliance. Audit.
2011 FRAUD & ABUSE UPDATE John Hellow Hooper, Lundy & Bookman, PC All views expressed in the seminar materials and.
H.R. Policies Termination, Resignation, & Disciplinary Procedures Jessica M. Johnson, Director of Advocacy Programs Trish Krajniak, Legal Fellow Colorado.
Congress and Contractor Personal Conflicts of Interest May 21, 2008 Jon Etherton Etherton and Associates, Inc.
Overview of New Government Protections Against Trafficking in the Federal Supply Chain Mathew Blum, Associate Administrator, Office of Federal Procurement.
Learn. Perform. Succeed. Protest, Claims, Disputes and Appeals Chapter 7.
The Use of Counseling and Discipline to Improve Employee Productivity.
Suspension and Debarment How does it work? Randy Sawyer, ICE SDO.
Procurement Lobbying Legislation New York State Bar Association December 9, 2005 (revised January 4, 2006)
Supplier Ethics: Program Checklist
Corporate Ethics Compliance *
Importance of Documentation Demonstratin g Due Diligence concept application defense.
Internal Auditing and Outsourcing
Dwt.com National 8(a) Association Conference June 2015 Different Viewpoints When a Government Contract Goes Wrong: Department of Justice, Private Practice.
CORPORATE COMPLIANCE Tim Timmons Vice President Compliance and Regulatory Services Health Future, LLC.
0 Overview of the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act and Related Corporate Procedures (A312, A312A and A301)
Debarment and Enjoinment Procedures for Construction Steve Owens Senior Assistant Attorney General and Chief Real Estate and Land Use Section Bert Jones.
Compliance and Ethics Training Overview
New FAR Ethics Requirements Richard W. Oehler Perkins Coie LLP 1201 Third Avenue Suite 4800 Seattle, WA (206)
Why the Office of Compliance and Ethics was Created
UNEMPLOYMENT COMPENSATION WHAT EMPLOYERS NEED TO KNOW.
Child & Adult Care Food Program Serious Deficiency Process & Provider Appeals.
ETHICS, CONTROLS AND DISCLOSURE: EXPLORING THE NEW FINAL RULE Robert J. Sherry K&L Gates Dallas, TX / San Francisco, CA December 3, 2008.
Lecture 4. OUTCOMES What must the equity plan include?. What must affirmative action measures include? Which factors are taken into account in determining.
Department of Energy June 16, 2015 Executive Order (EO) 13673: Fair Pay and Safe Workplaces Jean Seibert Stucky Assistant General Counsel for Labor and.
Chapter 19: Ethical Responsibilities Chapter 19 Ethical Responsibilities.
Defining and applying mitigating and aggravating circumstances. Relevant changes to the amount of fine. Defining and applying mitigating and aggravating.
U.S. General Services Administration Richard P. Levi Counsel to the Inspector General General Services Administration May 6, 2010 Federal Acquisition Regulation.
Why do I Have Miners’ Rights? 4 The Act gives miners and their representatives many rights because Congress wanted to encourage them to take an active,
SECAF: Government Contracts Opportunities & Obstacles Grant H. Willis February 11, 2014.
Chapter 3 COMMON LAW ISSUES. There are various areas of common law liability in employment law Misrepresentation by Candidates: dismissal is only acceptable.
FDIC Perspective on Environmental Risk Presented by: Gordon Stoner Legal Division Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation May 6, 2008.
Jeff Newman May 21, GSA Schedule Contracting – The Opportunity – The Acquisition – Contract Administration and Revenue Generation 2.
U.S. General Services Administration Thinking Through the Suspension & Debarment Implications of FCPA Violations.
Suspension & Debarment Timothy Noelker Scott Lane May 15,
Wisconsin Department of Health Services Purchase of Services Contract Guide Julie Anstett and Lucinda Champion Friday, May 6, 2016 Wisconsin Department.
Early Career Researcher Public Procurement Conference -
Responding to a Federal Investigation
Is Your Ethics Program in Order?
Whistleblower Program
Compliance Program 2018.
What You Need to Know When Meeting with the GSA SDO
Bid exclusion risks in Public Procurement Procedures With focus on Competition and new Data Protection rules related breaches 11 APRIL 2017.
COMPLIANCE PROGRAM.
State Purchasing & Trade Show May 17 & 18, 2006
Contests, Hearings, SDO Decisions & Appeals
“Mitigation” in Suspension and Debarment
EEO MODULE 3: DISCRIMINATION COMPLAINT PROCESSING
What You Need to Know About Suspension & Debarment
Suspension & Debarment at GSA: What You Need to Know
Compliance in the Federal Acquisition Regulation in the European context University of Florida, January Professor Michal Kania University of Silesia.
Chairman Christi Craddick
Nebraska Supreme Court rules on interpreters Additions & Amendments
Roger Bickerstaff 8 July 2019
Could Suspension and Debarment Happen to You?
Presentation transcript:

U.S. General Services Administration Could Suspension and Debarment Happen to You?

Learning Objectives  Why companies and individuals are suspended and debarred  Present Responsibility: what it is and why it is important  The nuts and bolts of the suspension and debarment process  The impact of suspension and debarment on small businesses  How small businesses can mitigate the risk of suspension and debarment 2

Suspension and Debarment- Generally  Federal Government only does business with contactors that have business honesty, integrity, and appropriate internal controls  Suspension and debarment is the way to protect the Federal government from contractors that are not good business partners  Contractors that are excluded from doing Federal business are listed as ineligible on the System for Award Management ( 3

WHY IS A COMPANY OR INDIVIDUAL SUSPENDED OR DEBARRED? 4

Causes for Suspension and Debarment  A conviction or civil judgment for committing fraud or a criminal offense in connection with obtaining, attempting to obtain, or performing a public contract or subcontract  Violating antitrust statutes related to offer submission  Commission of embezzlement, theft, forgery, bribery, falsification or destruction of records, making false statements, tax evasion, violating Federal criminal tax laws, or receiving stolen property 5

Causes for Suspension and Debarment Continued  Intentionally using “Made in America” or similar inscription on item sold or shipped to US/outlying areas when not made in either  Committing other offenses indicating a lack of business integrity or business honesty (that affects the present responsibility of the contractor)  Violation of Drug-Free Workplace Act 6

Causes for Suspension and Debarment Continued  Violation of terms of Government contract/subcontract “so serious to justify debarment.” For example:  Willful failure to perform one or more contracts  History of failure to perform, or unsatisfactory performance, of one or more contracts  Committing Unfair Trade Practice  Delinquent Federal taxes (in excess of $3,000) 7

Causes for Suspension and Debarment- Continued  Knowing failure of a principal of a contractor, until 3 years after final payment on any Government contract awarded to contractor, to timely disclose to the Government, in connection with the award, performance, or closeout of the contract or a subcontract there under:  Credible evidence of violations of certain criminal laws  The Civil False Claims Act  Significant overpayment(s) on contract 8

Causes for Suspension and Debarment- Continued  Failure to comply with the Immigration and Nationality Act  Any other cause of so serious or compelling a nature that it affects the present responsibility of the contractor or subcontractor 9

Causes for Suspension and Debarment Continued  The cause for suspension and debarment can be judicially based or “fact-based”  Fact-based grounds often come from: – Issues brought to the SDO’s attention through OIG contract audits – OIG investigations – Disclosures from contractors – Acquisition workforce reports of violations The cause for suspension and debarment does not need to relate to work on a Federal contract 10

WHAT IS PRESENT RESPONSIBILITY? 11

Present Responsibility  Inquiry focuses on the perceived ability of a contractor to contract with the Government in a responsible manner on a going forward basis  SDO asks:  Despite the contractor’s prior misconduct, is the contractor presently responsible?  Can the contractor be trusted to perform in accordance with contract requirements, governing law, and overall, to conduct themselves ethically? 12

Present Responsibility Continued  SDO’s inquiry into a contractor’s present responsibility focuses on the contractor’s:  Honesty  Integrity  Competence  Other case-specific features 13

WHAT IS SUSPENSION AND DEBARMENT? (FAR 9.4) 14

Suspension (FAR 9.407)  What is it?  A temporary exclusion used only when the Government needs immediate protection  Used when facts about possible wrongdoing are still being developed through an investigation or legal proceedings  Basis Required: The SDO needs information sufficient to support the reasonable belief that a particular act or omission occurred (Adequate Evidence) 15

Debarment (FAR 9.406)  What is it?  An exclusion from Federal procurement and non- procurement programs for a specified period of time  Used when an investigation or legal proceedings have concluded  Basis Required: – A civil judgment or conviction – In absence of a court decision, evidence that leads to the conclusion that the fact is more probably true than not (Preponderance of the Evidence) 16

Duration of Suspension and Debarment  Duration:  Suspension: – Generally, suspensions may last up to 12 months before legal proceedings are initiated – Once legal proceedings are initiated, the suspension may stay in effect until proceedings are concluded  Debarment: – Typically three years – May be longer or shorter depending on the facts of the case 17

Notification and Effect of Suspension and Debarment  Contractor Is Notified of Suspension or Debarment Through:  Suspension Notice  Notice of Proposed Debarment; Debarment Notice  Effects of suspension and debarment on a contractor: immediate government-wide exclusion from Federal procurement and non-procurement programs 18

WHO CAN BE SUSPENDED OR DEBARRED? 19

Who Can Be Suspended or Debarred?  Those companies or individuals directly involved in the wrongdoing that:  Have submitted offers for, have been awarded, or reasonably may submit offers for a Government contract  Reasonably may be expected to do business with the Government as agent/ representative of another contractor  Companies or individuals not directly involved in the wrongdoing  Affiliation  Imputation 20

WHAT TO DO IF YOU RECEIVE A SUSPENSION OR PROPOSAL FOR DEBARMENT NOTICE 21

What To Do If You Receive a Notice of Suspension or Proposed Debarment  Respond!  Contractor afforded thirty days to respond and to submit arguments and supporting documents against the action  If you need an additional time to respond, request this from the agency as soon as possible  To aid in preparing response, ask for the administrative record, which contains information supporting the action  You can respond on your own or through legal counsel 22

What To Do If You Receive a Notice of Suspension or Proposed Debarment Continued  Meet your burden in responding  You must demonstrate that the contractor is presently responsible and that excluding the contractor is not necessary to protect the Government’s interests  While you should acknowledge and address past misconduct, focus the response on the contractor’s present responsibility 23

What To Do If You Receive a Notice of Suspension or Proposed Debarment Continued  Written Matters in Opposition and/or  Meeting with Suspension and Debarment  Bring relevant individuals  Even if represented by counsel, the contractor should do the majority of the talking – SDO wants to hear from those who work for the contractor – SDO will ask questions of contractor 24

FAR Mitigating Factors  1) Standards of Conduct (a)(1):  Whether the contractor had effective standards of conduct and internal control systems in place at the time of the activity which constitutes cause for debarment or had adopted such procedures prior to any Government investigation of the activity cited as a cause for debarment. 25

FAR Mitigating Factors Continued  2) Voluntary Disclosure- FAR (a)(2):  Whether the contractor brought the activity cited as a cause for debarment to the attention of the appropriate Government agency in a timely manner.  3) Internal Investigation- FAR (a)(3):  Whether the contractor has fully investigated the circumstances surrounding the cause for debarment and, if so, made the result of the investigation available to the debarring official. 26

FAR Mitigating Factors Continued  4) Full Cooperation- FAR (a)(4):  Whether the contractor cooperated fully with Government agencies during the investigation and any court or administrative action.  5) Paid Costs/ Restitution- FAR (a)(5):  Whether the contractor has paid or has agreed to pay all criminal, civil, and administrative liability for the improper activity, including any investigative or administrative costs incurred by the Government, and has made or agreed to make full restitution. 27

FAR Mitigating Factors Continued  6) Disciplined Employee- FAR (a)(6):  Whether the contractor has taken appropriate disciplinary action against the individuals responsible for the activity which constitutes cause for debarment.  7) Agreed to Implement Remedial Actions- FAR (a)(7):  Whether the contractor has implemented or agreed to implement remedial measures, including any identified by the Government. 28

FAR Mitigating Factors Continued  8) Ethics Training- FAR (a)(8):  Whether the contractor has instituted or agreed to institute new or revised review and control procedures and ethics training programs.  9) Adequate Amount of time Passed- FAR (a)(9): Whether the contractor has had adequate time to eliminate the circumstances within the contractor’s organization that led to the cause for debarment. 29

FAR Mitigating Factors Continued 10) Management Recognition of the problem- FAR (a)(10): Whether the contractor’s management recognizes and understands the seriousness of the misconduct giving rise to the cause for debarment and has implemented programs to prevent recurrence. 30

SDO’S TOOLS IN ADDITION TO SUSPENSION AND DEBARMENT 31

Other Tools in the SDO’s Toolbox  Request for Information  Do not result in ineligibility (not listed on SAM)  An information gathering tool  Show Cause Letter  Do not result in ineligibility (Not listed on SAM)  A tool used to ascertain the contractor’s position  Used where responsibility concerns, but exclusion not deemed appropriate at that time 32

What To Do If You Receive a Request for Information or a Show Cause Letter  Respond to the letter providing:  For a Request for Information: The requested information (with supporting documentation)  For a Show Cause Letter: Information and argument supporting why your company is presently responsible and should not be excluded from procurement/ non- procurement (with supporting documentation)  A failure to respond may lead to suspension or debarment action against the contractor 33

Other Tools Continued  Administrative Agreement  Used when a contractor has been found substantially on the way to being responsible, but additional monitoring and/or internal development by contractor is needed. Terms often include: – Improvement of ethics and compliance programs, internal controls – Scheduled reports to Suspension and Debarment Official (SDO) – That a violation of the Administrative Agreement is a separate and independent basis for debarment  Are public documents (Posted on FAPIIS) 34

Other Tools Continued  Termination of Review  SDO has determined after review that no action against the contractor is necessary to protect the Federal government’s interests 35

WHAT ARE THE EFFECTS OF SUSPENSION AND DEBARMENT ON SMALL BUSINESSES? 36

Direct Effects of Suspension and Debarment on Small Businesses  Listed as ineligible on SAM  Ineligible for new contracts (including task orders), but may continue performing current contracts  Agencies may not exercise options under existing contracts or issue modifications that add work or extend the duration of the contract  May not perform subcontracts equal or greater to $30K  May not act as a representative or agent of other contractors 37

Collateral Effects of Suspension and Debarment on Small Businesses  Potential ruin of small business  Potential termination of ongoing contracts  Reputational damage  Loss of goodwill  Revenue loss  Contraction of credit and/or denial of loans 38

HOW CAN SMALL BUSINESSES MITIGATE THE RISK OF SUSPENSION AND DEBARMENT? 39

How to Mitigate the Risk of Suspension and Debarment  Be proactive in establishing sound business practices (scaled to your business size), which may include:  Strong internal controls  Sound hiring practices  A practice of verifying the accuracy of representations and certifications to the Federal Government – New:  Felony conviction certification  Small business size status penalties 40

How to Mitigate the Risk of Suspension and Debarment Continued  A sound, living ethics program. Such a program may include: – Encouraging employees to adopt new ways of approaching their work, issues they encounter – Encouraging employees to think before they act, to always “do the right thing” – Establishing core values that are championed from the top – Holistically training employees to do more than just comply with the rules 41

How to Mitigate the Risk of Suspension and Debarment Continued  Making voluntary or mandatory disclosures to the relevant agency Suspension and Debarment Official or Office of Inspector General  Addressing misconduct or suspected misconduct by employees– Do not turn a blind eye!  Choosing Teaming Partners or Subcontractors carefully  Responding to Requests for Information and Show Cause Letters 42

Important Links  System for Award Management:  FAR 9.4: 4.html 4.html  Federal Sentencing Guidelines: Ethics and Compliance: HTML/8b2_1.htm HTML/8b2_1.htm  Interagency Suspension and Debarment Committee: