Pre-decisional – for Planning and Discussion Purposes Only 1 Technology Planning for Future Mars Missions Samad Hayati Manager, Mars Technology Program.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
TECHNOLOGICAL INSTITUTE Center for Robot Technology.
Advertisements

Lunar Landing GN&C and Trajectory Design Go For Lunar Landing: From Terminal Descent to Touchdown Conference Panel 4: GN&C Ron Sostaric / NASA JSC March.
VI. Descent and Terminal Guidance for Pinpoint Landing and Hazard Avoidance Session Chair: Dr. Sam W. Thurman.
Terrain Relative Navigation for Pinpoint Landing using Cubesats
PRE-DECISIONAL DRAFT; For planning and discussion purposes only 1 1 March 4-5, 2008 Evolution of Lunar to Planetary Landing A.Miguel San Martin Mars Science.
CURIOSITY: Big Mars Rover for Big Mars Science! Artist’s Concept. NASA/JPL-Caltech.
Inner Guides=Text Boundary Outer Guides=Inner Boundary Asteroid Redirect Mission and Human Exploration Michele Gates Human Exploration and Operations Mission.
Mars EDL CubeSat Mission Jekan Thanga 1, Jim Bell 1 Space and Terrestrial Robotic Exploration Laboratory School of Earth and Space Exploration (SESE) Arizona.
Lunar Advanced Science and Exploration Research: Partnership in Science and Exploration Michael J. Wargo, Sc.D. Chief Lunar Scientist for Exploration Systems.
Technology Enabling the Exploration of Mars Brooke Tuttle ITMG – PowerPoint Presentation 11/18/2008.
Autonomous Landing Hazard Avoidance Technology (ALHAT) Page 1 March 2008 Go for Lunar Landing Real-Time Imaging Technology for the Return to the Moon Dr.
Navigation Systems for Lunar Landing Ian J. Gravseth Ball Aerospace and Technologies Corp. March 5 th, 2007 Ian J. Gravseth Ball Aerospace and Technologies.
Ares Aloft: Martian Atmospheric Entry and In-Situ Resource Use via CubeSat Jeffrey Stuart Jet Propulsion Laboratory California Institute of Technology.
Ken Farley, Project Scientist Ken Williford, Deputy Project Scientist
Flying, Hopping and Perching Microbots for Extreme Environment Exploration Deployed Using CubeSats Jekan Thanga 1, Jim Bell 1 Space and Terrestrial Robotic.
Hypersonic Reentry Dynamics Faculty Advisors Professor Mease (UC Irvine) Dr. Helen Boussalis (CSULA) Student Assistants Katie Demko Shing Chi Chan 7/12/2015NASA.
Lunar Lander Phase B1 p. 0 9 th International Planetary Probe Workshop, Toulouse, June 21 th, 2012 Innovative Visual Navigation Solutions for ESA’s Lunar.
Algorithm Implementation: Safe Landing Zone Identification Presented by Noah Kuntz.
Controlled Autonomous Proximity Technology with flUx pinning & Reconfiguration Experiments CAPTURE: David Bayard, Laura Jones, and Swati Mohan Jet Propulsion.
Jet Propulsion Laboratory California Institute of Technology National Aeronautics and Space Administration National Aeronautics and Space Administration.
Zereik E., Biggio A., Merlo A. and Casalino G. EUCASS 2011 – 4-8 July, St. Petersburg, Russia.
Imaging and Localisation Package for a Martian Balloon Based Aerobot Dave Barnes, Andy Shaw, Phil Summers Roger Ward, Mark Woods, Malcolm Evans Gerhard.
Challenging Environment
Mars Exploration Directorate National Aeronautics and Space Administration Jet Propulsion Laboratory California Institute of Technology Pasadena, California.
Distributed Network Scheduling Bradley J. Clement, Steven R. Schaffer Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology Contact:
Filling Mars Human Exploration Strategic Knowledge Gaps with Next Generation Meteorological Instrumentation. S. Rafkin, Southwest Research Institute
Sample Fetching Rover All rights reserved, 2013, Thales Alenia Space Template reference : K-EN SAMPLE FETCHING ROVER (SFR) FOR MSR Andrea.
What does it take to LAND on Mars? Whitney Eggers Emmett, Idaho Aaron McKinnon, Boise, Idaho Mentors: Behzad Raiszadeh, Eric Queen Whitney Eggers Emmett,
Mars 2020 Project Matt Wallace Deputy Project Manager August 3, 2015.
National Aeronautics and Space Administration Jet Propulsion Laboratory California Institute of Technology Pasadena, California Mars Exploration Directorate.
The Mission to Colonize Mars A home away from home… (Yes, I know there aren’t oceans on Mars, but come on…the background looks cool)
Mars Exploration Rovers (MER) Entry, Descent, Landing, and Deployment.
Jet Propulsion Laboratory California Institute of Technology August 4, 2015 Austin Nicholas Landing Site Considerations Related to the Potential Sample.
IMARS History and Phase II Overview Presented to MEPAG 13 May 2014 L. May, NASA HQ NOTE ADDED BY JPL WEBMASTER: This content has not been approved or adopted.
Planetary Protection 1 Planetary Protection Considerations for Mars Sample Return C. Conley, NASA PPO G. Kminek, ESA PPO 4 August, 2010.
Mars in the Planetary Decadal Survey Steve Squyres Cornell University Chairman, Planetary Science Decadal Survey Steve Squyres Cornell University Chairman,
STRATEGIES FOR MARS NETWORK MISSIONS VIA AN ALTERNATIVE ENTRY, DESCENT, AND LANDING ARCHITECTURE 10 TH INTERNATIONAL PLANETARY PROBE WORKSHOP June,
MIT : NED : Mission to Mars Presentation of proposed mission plan
Mars Exploration Program Response to: Vision and Voyages for Planetary Science in the Decade Michael Meyer MEPAG June 2011 Lead Scientist, Mars.
Evaluating New Candidate Landing Sites on Mars: Current orbital assets have set the new standard for data required for identifying and qualifying new Mars.
Mars Exploration Rovers Entry, Descent, Landing and Deployment.
PREDECISIONAL FOR PLANNING AND DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY 1 Humans to the Martian System Preliminary Summary of Strategic Knowledge Gaps P-SAG (jointly sponsored.
Accelerated Long Range Traverse (ALERT) Paul Springer Michael Mossey.
PROPOSED 2018 Joint Rover Mission Plans for Proposed 2018 NASA & ESA Joint Rover Mission Landing Site Selection Matt Golombek Mars Exploration Program.
Seeker kick-off workshop “State of the art” Simon Lacroix Laboratoire d’Analyse et d’Architecture des Systèmes CNRS, Toulouse.
Kelley Case Concept Design Methods Chief JPL Innovation Foundry Caltech Space Challenge March 24, 2013.
Human Exploration of Mars Design Reference Architecture 5
Goals for this Meeting: Day 1 Day 2 Update the community on progress in the exploration of Mars, including NASA and the European Space Agency (missions.
And scattered about... were the Martians–dead! –slain by the putrefactive and disease bacteria against which their systems were unpre- pared; slain as.
1 st Mars 2020 Landing Site Workshop - Introduction John Grant and Matt Golombek NASA/JPL-Caltech/Malin Space Science Systems NOTE ADDED BY JPL WEBMASTER:
MARS EXPLORATION PROGRAM NSTA Robotics E-Class MARS EXPLORATION PROGRAM NSTA Robotics E-Class Sheri Klug Mars Space Flight Facility Arizona State University.
Mars Sample Return Discussions As presented on February 23, 2010
Abstract Each July, the Association for Unmanned Vehicle Systems International holds an annual International Aerial Robotics Competition (IARC), with major.
National Aeronautics and Space Administration February 27, 2013 Defining Potential HEOMD Instruments for Mars 2020 A Work in Progress... NOTE ADDED BY.
Rover and Instrument Capabilities Life in the Atacama 2004 Science & Technology Workshop Michael Wagner, James Teza, Stuart Heys Robotics Institute, Carnegie.
Mars Exploration Rover Mission Thread-like features on Mars: Mystery Solved Opportunity - March 2004.
MEPAG: Action Items, Forward Planning Jack Mustard, MEPAG Chair MRO HiRISE / U. Arizona / JPL / NASA NOTE ADDED BY JPL WEBMASTER: This document was prepared.
Science Methods & Approach Life in the Atacama 2004 Science & Technology Workshop Nathalie A. Cabrol NASA Ames.
A Programmatic View of CLARAty Richard Volpe JPL Space Exploration Technology Program Office NASA Mars Technology Program 2009 Mars Science Laboratory.
[Date] Dr. Yang Gao Robotics & Autonomy Test Facilities: In Support Micro Space Vehicle Research.
Astrobiology Science and Technology for Exploring Planets (ASTEP) Mid-Year Review August 4, 2004 Robust Autonomous Instrument Placement for Rovers (JPL:
上海天文台 Shanghai Astronomical Observatory CVN in Chang’e-3 lunar exploration mission ZHENG Weimin Shanghai Astronomical Observatory, Chinese.
Scarab Autonomous Traverse Carnegie Mellon December 2007 David Wettergreen.
Workshop on Science Associated with the Lunar Exploration Architecture - Earth Science Subcommittee Theme: A Lunar-Based Earth Observatory Science Observations.
Session Chair: Dr. Sam W. Thurman
Mars 2020 Rover Mission The Mars 2020 mission addresses high-priority science goals for Mars exploration, including key questions about the potential for.
Mars Rover By Benn Davis.
Planetary Protection Category V Restricted Earth Return
Autonomous Operations in Space
REQUIREMENTS FOR MISSIONS towards europa
Presentation transcript:

Pre-decisional – for Planning and Discussion Purposes Only 1 Technology Planning for Future Mars Missions Samad Hayati Manager, Mars Technology Program Mars Program Office, JPL California Institute of Technology MEPAG, Brown University Providence, RI July 29-30, 2009

2 Outline Candidate future missions Technologies for future missions Maturity and priority of identified technologies Schedule Pre-decisional – for Planning and Discussion Purposes Only

Future Missions Considered 3 Pre-decisional – for Planning and Discussion Purposes Only

2016 Trace Gas Orbiter Mission 2018 or 2020 Mid-Range Rover Mission 2018 or 2020 Net Lander Mission Mars Sample Return Mission 4 Candidate Future Mission Concepts Pre-decisional – for Planning and Discussion Purposes Only

Mid-Ranger Rover Mission Concept 5 Landing Target Landing Error 0.5 km 1.In-situ exploration 2.Cache samples for a future mission to return to earth Obtain 5 cores from each region Total of 20 samples Encapsulate samples Store samples in a canister Avoid contaminating samples from Earth based contaminants Pre-decisional – for Planning and Discussion Purposes Only

MRR Mission Concept Technologies: Precision Landing 6 Precision Landing: Many error sources contribute to the landing error Guided entry on MSL utilizes its onboard IMU and flies the S/C to zero out known deviations from the target Major contributors to the remaining error are –IMU initialization error –Drift due to winds during parachute phase of descent Current best estimate is that the landing error could be reduced to ~7km. Advantage of this technique is that additional fuel would not required to reduce errors Technology development would consist of accurate modeling and simulation taking into consideration realistic conditions to validate this concept If MRR carries an upward looking LIDAR to measure winds, MSR lander may be able to use that information to increase its landing precision Pre-decisional – for Planning and Discussion Purposes Only

MRR Mission Concept Technologies: Hazard Avoidance 7 Hazard Avoidance: If hazard avoidance is utilized, science targets might be selected within landing error ellipse Technology : –Terrain Relative Navigation (TRN) could be utilized to image the terrain and use onboard maps to determine the actual position of S/C –Optimal descent guidance could be used to divert S/C to a safe landing location Original trajectory Modified trajectory Pre-decisional – for Planning and Discussion Purposes Only Landing Target Landing Error Hazard Avoidance

MRR Mission Concept Technologies: Sample Acquisition, Encapsulation, and Handling 8 Coring: 1cmX 5, at least 20 cores Low-mass, low-power drill Dry drilling Coring initialization Core break-off Core retention Core encapsulation Core storage Contamination prevention Mini CorerCAT Designed for MSL Honeybee Robotics Pre-decisional – for Planning and Discussion Purposes Only MRR Sample Handling Concept

MRR Mission Concept Technologies: Rover Technologies 9 Landing Target 7 km 0.5 km Mid-Range Rover Concept: Total traverse: 7+5x = ~10 km Selection of regions for sampling 10sols/region Sampling = 5sols/sampleX20= 100 sols Sols available for traverse: ( )x0.7= 150 sols Required Traverse speed = 10000/140= 67 m/sol Fetch Rover Concept: Required Traverse speed =12000/150=80 m/sol MER Example: Maximum possible (mechanical and power)= 252 m/sol Maximum possible with VO and Auto nav= 29 m/sol Need roughly a three-fold improvement in rover speed Technology Approach: Increase rover drive distances and average speed, by eliminating the need for rovers to stop while performing autonomous navigation and visual odometry. Implement FPGA based stereo and visual odometry and improved Autonav Pre-decisional – for Planning and Discussion Purposes Only

MRR Mission Concept Technologies: Planetary Protection (Round Trip Contamination) Two approaches might be available: 1.Dry Heat Microbial Reduction (DHMR) terminal sterilization –Consists of heating the entire S/C to C for 30 hours –Technology challenges are: Hardware compatibility Chamber design large enough to accommodate S/C Full system bio-barrier to avoid recontamination 2.Component and Subsystem Sterilization –Component level sterilization of relevant subsystems by DHMR or other methods such as hydrogen peroxide or irradiation –Clean-assembly strategy to avoid recontamination –Bio-barriers –Analytical tools to accurately estimate contamination risks post landing to satisfy probabilistic requirements 10 Pre-decisional – for Planning and Discussion Purposes Only

11 Technologies for Mars Sample Return Mission Concept Sample Acquisition, Transfer, and Encapsulation: Would require coring from a small rover, automated tool change out, and encapsulation capabilities Mar s Earth Back Planetary Protection: Meet the goal of less than10 -6 probability of inadvertent release of a single Mars particle > 0.2 micron in the Earth’s biosphere Round-Trip PP: Full system microbial reduction methods to prevent Mars sample contamination Precision and Safe Landing: Reduce landing error to ~6-7 km and develop hazard avoidance capabilities for proposed MSR lander Mars Ascent Vehicle (MAV): Develop a <300kg ascent vehicle to lift a 5kg sample container (0.5 kg samples) to a 500 km Mars orbit Earth Entry Vehicle: Develop an Earth Return Vehicle to safely deliver Martian samples to Earth. Satisfy stringent back planetary requirements Rendezvous and Sample Capture: Develop capabilities to track, rendezvous, and capture a small (16cm diameter) Orbiting Sample in Mars orbit autonomously Mars Returned Ground Sample Handling: Develop capabilities to safely handle Martian samples; Avoid contaminating samples and assure containment Rover Technology: Increase rover speed for traversing long distance Rover avionics for low-mass low, low-power fetch rover

12 Technology Risks Component Technology Risk System Technology Risk Round Trip PP MRSH Precision or Pin-point Landing Sample Acquisition Handling Back PP MAV Rendezvous Sample Capture EEV Mid-Range Rover Mission Concept Pre-decisional – for Planning and Discussion Purposes Only

Example Schedule 13 Pre-decisional – for Planning and Discussion Purposes Only