ECLAT Cluster Footprint Mapping. ECLAT meeting March 2012 WP330 Cluster footprint mapping 1.Cluster footprint mapping using statistical magnetospheric.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
ATMOP Partners Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS), France 7 th framework project selected.
Advertisements

Anti-Parallel Merging and Component Reconnection: Role in Magnetospheric Dynamics M.M Kuznetsova, M. Hesse, L. Rastaetter NASA/GSFC T. I. Gombosi University.
The role of solar wind energy flux for transpolar arc luminosity A.Kullen 1, J. A. Cumnock 2,3, and T. Karlsson 2 1 Swedish Institute of Space Physics,
IMF Bx influence on the magnetotail neutral sheet geometry and dynamics E. Gordeev, M. Amosova, V. Sergeev Saint-Petersburg State University, St.Petersburg,
Magnetopause flow vortices revealed during high speed solar wind streams Mona Kessel (NASA GSFC), Yaireska Collado-Vega (University of Puerto Rico), Xi.
Anti-parallel versus Component Reconnection at the Magnetopause K.J. Trattner Lockheed Martin Advanced Technology Center Palo Alto, CA, USA and the Polar/TIMAS,
The Significance of Dipole Tilt for Substorm Onsets James Wanliss.
SuperDARN Workshop May 30 – June Magnetopause reconnection rate and cold plasma density: a study using SuperDARN Mark Lester 1, Adrian Grocott 1,2,
Figure 4: Overview of the geometry of the Rankin Inlet and Inuvik radar in MLT coordinates on Aug 08 th Merged vectors are shown in black. AMPERE.
Ionospheric Convection and Field-Aligned Currents During Strong Magnetospheric Driving: A SuperDARN/AMPERE Case Study L. B. N. Clausen (1), J. B. H. Baker.
GEM Workshop June 24, 2003 Data Assimilation Workshop Notes Why and What is Data Assimilation? What Data Assimilation is not Key Challenges in Data Assimilation.
Phase Coherence on Open Field Lines Associated with FLRs Abiyu Nedie, Frances Fenrich & Robert Rankin University of Alberta Edmonton, Alberta, Canada 2011.
Tucson MURI SEP Workshop March 2003 Janet Luhmann and the Solar CISM Modeling Team Solar and Interplanetary Modeling.
Observations of Open and Closed Magnetic Field Lines at Mars: Implications for the Upper Atmosphere D.A. Brain, D.L. Mitchell, R. Lillis, R. Lin UC Berkeley.
Free Magnetic Energy in Solar Active Regions above the Minimum-Energy Relaxed State (Regnier, S., Priest, E.R ApJ) Use magnetic field extrapolations.
1 Geomagnetic/Ionospheric Models NASA/GSFC, Code 692 During the early part of April 6, 2000 a large coronal “ejecta” event compressed and interacted with.
University of Toronto Department of Computer Science © 2001, Steve Easterbrook CSC444 Lec22 1 Lecture 22: Software Measurement Basics of software measurement.
Samantha Sanders Code 674 Dr. David G. Sibeck NASA Goddard Space Flight Center.
Tuija I. Pulkkinen Finnish Meteorological Institute Helsinki, Finland
June 19, 2009 R. J. Strangeway – 1RBSP SWG, Redondo Beach, CA Importance of Ground Magnetometers to NASA Heliophysics Missions Several U.S. projects have.
Time Table exchange QSAS / CL / CAA / AMDA CESR, 25/26 feb
Radiation conditions during the GAMMA-400 observations:
Ionospheric Services The Australian Bureau of Meteorology, Space Weather Services setion (formerly the Ionospheric Prediction Service, IPS) provides a.
What role do energetic particles present in the dayside cusp play in magnetospheric processes? THEODORE A. FRITZ Center for Space Physics at Boston University.
Frontiers in Modeling Magnetic Flux Emergence and the Development of Solar Eruptive Activities Organizers: Mark Linton and Yuhong Fan SHINE Liaison: KD.
Solar Shield - Forecasting and Mitigating Solar Effects on Power Transmissions Systems Pulkkinen, A., M. Hesse, S. Habib, F. Policelli, B. Damsky, L. Van.
Estimating currents and electric fields in the high-latitude ionosphere using ground- and space-based observations Ellen Cousins 1, Tomoko Matsuo 2,3,
Kp Forecast Models S. Wing 1, Y. Zhang 1, and J. R. Johnson 2 1 Applied Physics Laboratory, The Johns Hopkins University 2 Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory,
Statistical properties of southward IMF and its geomagnetic effectiveness X. Zhang, M. B. Moldwin Department of Atmospheric, Oceanic, and Space Sciences,
Computer Animation Rick Parent Computer Animation Algorithms and Techniques Optimization & Constraints Add mention of global techiques Add mention of calculus.
The Community Coordinated Modeling Center: A Brief Overview NASA Goddard Space Flight Center Lika Guhathakurta
MAGNETOSPHERIC RESPONSE TO COMPLEX INTERPLANETARY DRIVING DURING SOLAR MINIMUM: MULTI-POINT INVESTIGATION R. Koleva, A. Bochev Space and Solar Terrestrial.
Update on NASA’s Sensor Web Experiments Using Simulated Doppler Wind Lidar Data S. Wood, D. Emmitt, S. Greco Simpson Weather Associates, Inc. Working Group.
Solar Shield project - lessons learned and advances made (ccmc.gsfc.nasa.gov/Solar_Shield) Pulkkinen, A., M. Hesse, S. Habib, F. Policelli, B. Damsky,
Solar Shield project - lessons learned and advances made Pulkkinen, A., M. Hesse, S. Habib, F. Policelli, B. Damsky, L. Van der Zel, D. Fugate, W. Jacobs,
LHCb Software Week November 2003 Gennady Kuznetsov Production Manager Tools (New Architecture)
SIMO SIMulation and Optimization ”New generation forest planning system” Antti Mäkinen & Jussi Rasinmäki Dept. of Forest Resource Management.
Response of the Magnetosphere and Ionosphere to Solar Wind Dynamic Pressure Pulse KYUNG SUN PARK 1, TATSUKI OGINO 2, and DAE-YOUNG LEE 3 1 School of Space.
Season-dependent magnetotail B y and associated field-aligned currents A.Petrukovich 1 and R. Lukianova 2,1 1 Space Research Institute, Moscow,
Conjugate response of the dayside magnetopause and dawn/dusk flanks using Cluster-THEMIS conjunctions and Ground based observations M W Dunlop, Q-H. Zhang.
ESS 7 Lecture 13 October 29, 2008 Substorms. Time Series of Images of the Auroral Substorm This set of images in the ultra-violet from the Polar satellite.
E.E. Antonova1,2, I.P. Kirpichev2,1, Yu.I. Yermolaev2
June 30, 2011 Plasma Pressure Constraints on Magnetic Field Structure in the Substorm Growth Phase Sorin G. Zaharia 1 and Chih-Ping Wang.
Guan Le NASA Goddard Space Flight Center Challenges in Measuring External Current Systems Driven by Solar Wind-Magnetosphere Interaction.
Review of Parnas’ Criteria for Decomposing Systems into Modules Zheng Wang, Yuan Zhang Michigan State University 04/19/2002.
Quantitative Assessment of Tsyganenko Models at Geosynchronous Orbit Chia-Lin Huang* and Harlan Spence Boston University Howard Singer NOAA Nicolai Tsyganenko.
Ghislain Fouodji Tasse Supervisor: Dr. Karen Bradshaw Computer Science Department Rhodes University 24 March 2009.
Adjustable magnetospheric event- oriented magnetic field models N. Yu. Ganushkina (1), M. V. Kubyshkina (2), T. I. Pulkkinen (1) (1) Finnish Meteorological.
Global MHD Simulation with BATSRUS from CCMC ESS 265 UCLA1 (Yasong Ge, Megan Cartwright, Jared Leisner, and Xianzhe Jia)
NASA NAG Structure and Dynamics of the Near Earth Large-Scale Electric Field During Major Geomagnetic Storms P-I John R. Wygant Assoc. Professor.
Magnetic reconnection in the magnetotail: Geotail observations T. Nagai Tokyo Institute of Technology World Space Environment Forum 2005 May 4, 2005 Wednesday.
New Science Opportunities with a Mid-Latitude SuperDARN Radar Raymond A. Greenwald Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory.
Study on the Impact of Combined Magnetic and Electric Field Analysis and of Ocean Circulation Effects on Swarm Mission Performance by S. Vennerstrom, E.
Multi-Spacecraft Observation of Compressional Mode ULF Waves Excitation and Relativistic Electron Acceleration X. Shao 1, L. C. Tan 1, A. S. Sharma 1,
Continuous Global Birkeland Currents from the Active Magnetosphere and Planetary Electrodynamics Response Experiment Brian J Anderson, The Johns Hopkins.
1 CAA 2009 Peer Review, Jesus College, Cambridge, UK, March CAA Peer Review: Selected Recommendations.
>> European Cluster Assimilation Technology.
Thermospheric density variations due to space weather Tiera Laitinen, Juho Iipponen, Ilja Honkonen, Max van de Kamp, Ari Viljanen, Pekka Janhunen Finnish.
1 OEAW Contribution to ECLAT R. Nakamura, W. Baumjohann, M. Volwerk Institut fu ̈ r Weltraumforschung der Österreichischen Akademie der Wissenschaften.
R. Maggiolo 1, M. Echim 1,2, D. Fontaine 3, A. Teste 4, C. Jacquey 5 1 Belgian Institute for Space Aeronomy (IASB-BIRA); 2 Institute.
SECAS Dec 01 MISSIONS: POLAR, WIND, GEOTAIL, CLUSTER Jim Sharber MISSION STATUS.
>> European Cluster Assimilation Technology.
Dynamics of the auroral bifurcations at Saturn and their role in magnetopause reconnection LPAP - Université de Liège A. Radioti, J.-C. Gérard, D. Grodent,
Utilizing Scientific Advances in Operational Systems
ARTEMIS – solar wind/ shocks
Global MHD Simulations of Dayside Magnetopause Dynamics.
Effects of Dipole Tilt Angle on Geomagnetic Activities
Pulkkinen, A. , M. Hesse, S. Habib, F. Policelli, B. Damsky, L
Upcoming Candidate MMS-Cluster-THEMIS Conjunctions Within the Magnetosheath, at the Magnetopause and the LLBL C.P. Escoubet1, S.M. Petrinec2, R. Nakamura3,
Magnetosphere: Structure and Properties
Presentation transcript:

ECLAT Cluster Footprint Mapping

ECLAT meeting March 2012 WP330 Cluster footprint mapping 1.Cluster footprint mapping using statistical magnetospheric models for years (10) 2.Time-varying configuration and Cluster footpoint mapping for selected events using adaptive magnetospheric models. 3.Development and testing a new-generation statistical magnetospheric model (T12), adaptation for wide usage 4.Provide input of footprint information to the development of visualization tools (WPs 0440 and 0320); 5.Preparation of final footprint data for ingestion to CAA Main work tasks (m0-m20):

ECLAT meeting March 2012 WP330 Cluster footprint mapping 1.Cluster footprint mapping using statistical magnetospheric models Investigate/select statistical magnetospheric field models most suitable for massive runs ; T96 and TS05 selected Software for mapping, computations of Cluster-3 ionospheric footpoints for (5min time resolution). Provide input of footprint information to the development of visualization tools (WPs 0440 and 0320),

ECLAT meeting March Time-varying configuration and Cluster footprint mapping using adaptive magnetospheric models. Investigate the requirements (spacecraft number /coverage, region,etc) to ensure good quality of adaptive model ( using Themis-time constellations of multi-spacecraft, run the adaptive models for dayside and flank regions (has no value, discarded, see *); Select time intervals with appropriate coverage in the magnetotail ( , Cluster large-scale +GOES + Geotail) Adjust algorithms/codes for using with Cluster and running the adaptive model for identified time intervals; (*) investigation showed: this suggestion was unjustified because, compared to magnetotail case, (1) the number of free model parameters is hard to reduce to a reasonably small number (compared to a number of measurements), and (2) no independent way exists to control the quality of the model constructed (like IsoBoundaries in magnetotail) WP330 Cluster footprint mapping

ECLAT meeting March 2012 WP330 Cluster footprint mapping New-generation empirical magnetospheric model (T12) - new model features : A novel flexible set of separately shielded (at MP) modules describing variable systems of equatorial currents New modules representing global 3d current system (FACs), cusp etc. Model field is confined within a boundary whose size and shape is controlled by the solar wind pressure, geodipole tilt, and IMF Bz. Examples P dyn =6nPa, IMF Bz=+7nT P dyn =6nPa, IMF Bz=-7nT  Variable flaring has a dramatic effect on the global field line configuration, and will have important implications in the modeling of the IMF penetration into the magnetosphere.

ECLAT meeting March 2012 WP330 Cluster footprint mapping New-generation empirical magnetospheric model (T12) - new model features (2): A novel flexible set of separately shielded (at MP) modules describing variable systems of equatorial currents New modules representing global 3d current system (FACs), cusp etc. Model field is confined within a boundary whose size and shape is controlled by the solar wind pressure, geodipole tilt, and IMF Bz. Model is based on vastly extended set of space magnetometer data, largest amount of observations ever used in modeling studies (including new data from Geotail, Polar, Cluster, GOES, Themis … ) Model will be driven by a set of parameters, derived solely from observations in the upstream solar wind, taking into account finite buildup and different relaxation times of magnetospheric current systems, as well as nonlinear saturation effects. That will make it possible to use the model as a short-term forecasting tool.

ECLAT meeting March 2012 WP330 Cluster footprint mapping 3. Develop and test a new-generation statistical magnetospheric model (T12). Develop/test new approaches/modules for different components of 3d current system (last part, R2 -FAC modules to be completed in 04/12) Add new data (collect/compile/verify) to be used for modeling (THEMIS, GOES, Cluster, Polar, etc) ; altogether about 60*satellite*years of new data (records at 5min resolution supplemented by solar wind/IMF tags) Establish optimal combination of IMF/SW parameters, best suited as driving variables for each of the main magnetospheric field source. Assemble the new model, fit the spacecraft database, do initial tests /this model will be comprehensively tested/validated, particularly in application with Cluster, as a part of science /validation efforts at the concluding stage of ECLAT project /