Unit Planning 2015-16: Integrating Learning Outcomes Assessment, Student Achievement Data and Institution-Set Standards with College Planning and Resource.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
What Did We Learn About Our Future? Getting Ready for Strategic Planning Spring 2012.
Advertisements

State Center Community College District Willow International Community College Center State of the Center Report Deborah J. Ikeda, Campus President January.
AQIP Status Report An Overview and Discussion. Timeline for SJC’s AQIP Journey November 2000 AQIP admission 2002 First action projects submitted September.
October Priority 8 Review Team 8: Planning Subcommittee M. DesVignes, D. Kinney, J. Moore, M. Siegel, R. Tillberg Collect and use data systematically.
Orientation to the Accreditation Internal Evaluation (Self-Study) Flex Activity March 1, 2012 Lassen Community College.
Graduate Program Review Where We Are, Where We Are Headed and Why Duane K. Larick, Associate Graduate Dean Presentation to Directors of Graduate Programs.
Strategic Planning Summit GAP/Committee Chairs/IE December 5,
GROWING LEADERS Opportunity. Engagement. Achievement. SSSP + SEP Steering Committee: August 26, 2014 Kathy Mendelsohn, Mark Sanchez, Brian.
TaskStream Training Presented by the Committee on Learning Assessment 2015.
Dr. Marybeth Buechner Dean of Planning, Research & Institutional Effectiveness Sacramento City College Los Rios Community College District.
Successfully Aligning Resources With Planning League of Innovation Conference March 10, 2013 Greg Nelson Vice President of Administrative Services Tammeil.
Accreditation follow-up report. The team recommends that the college further refine its program review, planning, and resource allocation processes so.
College Planning Council 8 June Accreditation Standard 1 Standard 1: The institution demonstrates strong commitment to a mission that emphasizes.
Convocation Opening Address College of Sequoias Welcome&Introductions.
A Multi-Campus Model for Program Review & Integrated Institutional Planning Raúl Rodriguez, Ph.D., Chancellor 1.
State Center Community College District 2008 Strategic Plan One-Year Status Report December 2008.
In the Spirit of Student Success College of the Sequoias Strategic Plan Spring 2011 Update.
August Priority 7 Review Team 7: Planning Subcommittee R. Hall-Allen, M. DesVignes, J. Moore, R. Romali, R. Tillberg Increase the resources available.
Accreditation 2015 Update: Harbor’s Assessment-based Planning System (HAPS) Integrating Learning Outcomes Assessment, Student Achievement Data and Institution-Set.
S LOs What is New and Due in the Assessment Process: A focus on continued improvement in academic year NOTE: For reference, hyperlinks to resources.
Assessment Committee 20 October Self Evaluation HAPS is the result of a process that began in 2012, the last Accreditation self- evaluation.
STRATEGIC PLANNING & WASC UPDATE Tom Bennett Presentation to Academic Senate February 1, 2006.
Alignment of Course Standards and Assessments Overview of CTE Task Group.
CERRITOS COLLEGE I.E.P.I. REPORT (DUE JUNE 2015) STRATEGIC PLANNING RETREAT, MAY 8, 2015.
SPC Advisory Committee Training - TAC Fall 2015 Institutional Research President’s Office 1 Abridged from the SPC Advisory Committee Training on October.
SPC Advisory Committee Training Fall 2015 Institutional Research President’s Office SPC 10/9/20151.
Program Review 2.0 Pilot 2 October Self Evaluation HAPS is the result of a process that began in 2012, the last Accreditation self- evaluation.
1 Learning Outcomes Assessment: An Overview of the Process at Texas State Beth Wuest Director, Academic Development and Assessment Lisa Garza Director,
Unit Planning : Integrating Learning Outcomes Assessment, Student Achievement Data and Institution-Set Standards with College Planning and Resource.
Program Review 2.0 Pilot 2 October Self Evaluation HAPS is the result of a process that began in 2012, the last Accreditation self- evaluation.
MAY 1, 2014 THE LOOK AND FEEL OF TASKSTREAM. PERCEPTION OF ASSESSMENT: COMPLIANCE Accreditation Write Outcomes Identify Assessments Gather Results PackageResults.
IS GCC MEETING ITS MISSION AND GOALS? MASTER PLANNING COMMITTEE (TEAM A) MAY 8, 2015.
Assessment Committee 20 October Self Evaluation HAPS is the result of a process that began in 2012, the last Accreditation self- evaluation.
Los Angeles Valley College April 21, QUESTION 3: NEW GOALS & OBJECTIVES REFLECTING COLLEGE BASIC SKILLS INITIATIVE “ACTION PLANS”
Surveys Quantitative data Qualitative data Etc. Service Unit Outcomes Administrative, Student Services, Instructional Support Services Program Outcomes.
Integrated Planning Initiatives Dr. Ryan Cornner Associate Vice President, Strategic Planning and Innovation November 17, 2014.
Laney College Institutional Effectiveness Goal Indicators: Proposal for Adoption Draft Proposal June 13, 2016.
Model of an Effective Program Review October 2008 Accrediting Commission for Community and Junior Colleges.
Middle States Re-Accreditation Town Hall September 29, :00-10:00 am Webpage
Lead-Off Batter: Applying New Accjc standards
Committee Orientation
Program Review and Integrated Planning: A Conversation About Data
D Adapted from: Kaplan & Norton The YCCD District Mission, Vision, Values & Goals are Foundational to College Planning. All College EMP work aligns.
President’s Strategic Plan Mid-Year Progress Report
Dean, Research, Planning & Institutional Effectiveness
27 February 2017 College Planning Council
Presented To: SLO Symposium
Assessment Committee Meeting Continuous Program Improvement
Presented To: College Planning Council
Budget Development Process
Academic Affairs Cluster 10 December 2015
Institutional Effectiveness Partnership Initiative: Indicators Workshop
Accreditation Standard 1: Mission, Academic Quality and Institutional Effectiveness, and Integrity: The College Mission & The 2015 Student Success Scorecard.
Dean, Research, Planning & Institutional Effectiveness
Chairs and Managers Retreat 1 February 2016, SSA 219
Dean, Research, Planning & Institutional Effectiveness
College Planning Council 8 June 2015
Dean, Research, Planning & Institutional Effectiveness
Presented To: College Planning Council
Foothill College Governance Redesign Update
Foothill College Governance Redesign Update
Academic Affairs Cluster 28 May 2015
Presented To: College Planning Council
Guided Pathways Work Plan
Unit Planning Retreat 1 February 2016, SSA 219
Craig Rutan, Accreditation and Assessment Committee Chair
Accreditation follow-up report
College Planning Council 8 June 2015
Presented To: College Planning Council
In the Spirit of Student Success
Presentation transcript:

Unit Planning : Integrating Learning Outcomes Assessment, Student Achievement Data and Institution-Set Standards with College Planning and Resource Allocation Processes Counseling 29 January 2016, TECH 110

Unit Planning Retreat February 1, 2016, Slide 2  Purpose of Revised Process:  Close planning cycle by updating existing plans  Expanding Current Annual Unit Planning Process to include “Program Review” elements  Focus planning on the college mission and SEMP measures  Implement Institution-set Standard and other legislative, regulatory or Ed Code requirements  Use results of data review to create improvement actions Overview

Unit Planning Retreat February 1, 2016, Slide 3 Data Element Institution Set Standard Stretch Goal SEMP Measure 2013/ / / 2012 Three- year Ave Course Completion Rate 65%72% %66.8% 66.5% Program Completion Rate June 2016* %45.1%41.3%42.2% CTE completion rate June 2016* %60.0%60.6%59.5% Degrees Awarded 672June 2016* Certificates Awarded 66.3June 2016* University Transfers 489June 2016* College-level Student Achievement Data, Analysis & Results * from 2016 SER Student Achievement Data Section * The CCCCO’s IEPI reporting requires the college to establish standards and goals for student achievement measures identified in the framework. Harbor will establish these goals in June 2016.

Unit Planning Retreat February 1, 2016, Slide 4 Data Element Program-level Analysis Results Standard SEMP Measure 2013/ / / 2012 Three-yr Average Associate of Arts Degrees 20% meet standard (2/10) Associate of Science Degrees 14% meet standard (3/22) Associate for Transfer Degrees 100% meet standard (1/1) Certificates 22% meet standard (4/18) Course Completion 59% meet standard (48/81) 65% %66.8% 66.5% Course Completion - Online 31% meet standard (9/29) 65% %59.3%61.1%58.9% Licensure Passage Rate - Nursing Meets standard85% %98.3%97.1%98.5% Licensure Passage Rate - EMT Does not meet standard60% %n/a Licensure Passage Rate - CNA Meet standard85% % 81%93.7% Job Placement Rate 67% meet standard (6/9) 72.5% %69.8%74.8%72.5% Program-level Student Achievement Data, Analysis & Results * from 2016 SER Student Achievement Data Section

Unit Planning Retreat February 1, 2016, Slide 5  Assessment Activities are the basis of Unit Planning  Student Achievement (SEMP Measures)  Student Learning (SLO/SAOs)  Both activities generate Improvement Actions  Improvement Activities collectively form the Unit’s Plan  All results recorded online increasing usability of results Harbor’s Assessment-based Planning System (HAPS) Overview

Unit Planning Retreat February 1, 2016, Slide 6 Integration of Assessment and Planning

Unit Planning Retreat February 1, 2016, Slide 7 Goal 1. Access and Preparation for Success Basic skills first-year enrollment * Completion-based class schedules Equitable Enrollment * Orientation, Assessment and Educational Plan completion rate * Fall to Spring Persistence * Goal 2. Teaching and Learning for Success Achievement gaps *Basic skills completion* Completion: Course, Certificate, Degree & Transfer ** Gainful Employment** Licensure Passage rates** On-time Completion * SLO, PLO, ILO achievement ** Year-to-year persistence * Goal 3. Organizational Effectiveness Accreditation status * Fiscal viability and compliance with state and federal guidelines (IEPI measures)* Institutional plan progress ** Program review, Planning and Assessment participation ** Process review and evaluation ** Resource allocation ** Goal 4. Resources and Collaboration Budget Goals Efficiency measures (class size average, fill rate, FTES/FTEF) Number and type of revenue sources and amount generated Funds raised (annual and cumulative) Foundation endowment Amount of scholarships awarded Number and type of community/business partnerships Integration of SEMP and Measures

Unit Planning Retreat February 1, 2016, Slide 8 Integration of SEMP and College Initiatives College Mission Goal 1. Access and Preparation for Success AtD (AA/S S) Com muni ty Servi ces (AS) Enroll Mgmt (AA/A S) Equit y (AA) SSSP (SS) Stud ent Succ ess Score card Goal 2. Teaching and Learning for Success Accre ditati on Stan dards AtD (AA/S S) Basic Skills (AA) Enroll Mgmt (AA/A S) Equit y (AA) IEPI SSSP (SS) Stud ent Succ ess Score card Goal 3. Organizational Effectiveness Accre ditati on Stan dards Distri ct Strate gic Plan Enroll Mgmt (AA/A S) Facili ties (AS) Hum an Reso urces (AS) IEPI Tech nolo gy (TAC) Goal 4. Resources and Collaboration Accre ditati on Stan dards Enroll Mgmt (AA/A S) Foun datio n (AA) Tech nolo gy (TAC)

Unit Planning Retreat February 1, 2016, Slide 9  Results are summarized for review and oversight by the college administrative and governance process  College level results are used by the College Planning Council to identify annual institutional priorities within the three year strategic planning cycle.  These priorities guide annual planning and resource allocation decisions. HAPS Manages Assessment Results

Unit Planning Retreat February 1, 2016, Slide 10 Course-level Student Learning Outcomes Data, Analysis & Results

Unit Planning Retreat February 1, 2016, Slide 11  Signing in to HAPS  Start a module  Filling in the form  Retrieving an existing module  Unit Planning requirements Creating the Unit Plan

Unit Planning Retreat February 1, 2016, Slide 12 Lunch

Unit Planning Retreat February 1, 2016, Slide 13  Review existing Planning and Policies Procedures  Task: Define:  Chair’s validation of faculty responses  Dean’s validation of unit’s work  Committee Oversight of SEMP  Approval of improvement actions for resource allocation process  Task: Establish Timeline Validation processes

Unit Planning Retreat February 1, 2016, Slide 14  Follow up on institution-set standard and other regulatory and institutional requirements  Track progress on required activities (updates due throughout the year)  “Just in time” planning – rather than planning for next year, planning is continuous and as needed  Unit Planning cycle aligns with SEMP cycle (3 years)  Addresses need to record current year actions in planning and resource allocation activities  Record and manage resource allocation process  Report on MISSION/SEMP fulfillment  Summary of Data Review (3 years) as starting point for CPR Using Unit Plans

Unit Planning Retreat February 1, 2016, Slide 15 Recap

Unit Planning Retreat February 1, 2016, Slide 16  Strategic Educational Master Plan Strategic Educational Master Plan  Student Success Scorecard 2015 Student Success Scorecard 2015  SEMP Fact Book SEMP Fact Book  Harbor's Assessment-based Planning System (HAPS) Harbor's Assessment-based Planning System  Program Review 2.0 Program Review 2.0  SLO Assessment Pilot SLO Assessment Pilot  SEMP Outcomes Summary (login) SEMP Outcomes Summary (login)  Program Review Module Summary (login) Program Review Module Summary (login)  ISLO Inventory (login) ISLO Inventory (login)  SLO Assessment Summary (login) SLO Assessment Summary (login) QUESTIONS/DISCUSSION