CPA Code Implications Related to SEC Bounty Rules Kevin O’Brien portfolio.du.edu/kobrien Daniels College of Business University of Denver.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Best Practices for In House Counsel
Advertisements

Building on Our Core Values Building on Our Core Values © 2003 by the AICPA The Sarbanes-Oxley Act.
Conflict of Interest, Conflict of Commitment, and Outside Activities UTSA HOP 1.33 Non-covered UTSA staff 1.
ETHICS. Business Conduct  The Agent agrees to conform to all applicable federal, state and local laws in conducting business under this agreement.
Ethics in Mediation Sandy Garrett, Chief Disciplinary Council, TBPR Richard Murrell, Moderator.
MONEY LAUNDERING, THE GATEKEEPER INITIATIVE, AND THE ATTORNEY-CLIENT RELATIONSHIP Edward J. Krauland STEPTOE & JOHNSON LLP February 2003.
COMPLYING WITH HIPAA PRIVACY RULES Presented by: Larry Grudzien, Attorney at Law.
Whistle-Blowing Ronald F. White, Ph.D. Professor of Philosophy College of Mount St. Joseph.
© The McCoy Law Firm 2012 James McCoy The McCoy Law Firm Coit Rd., Ste. 560 Dallas, Texas (214)
McGraw-Hill/Irwin © 2003 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., All Rights Reserved Chapter 19 CHAPTER 19 INDEPENDENCE, PROFESSIONAL CONTDUCT, AND QUALITY.
Professional Ethics Chapter 4.
© Copyright 2003 Latham & Watkins. All Rights Reserved. USC Institute for Corporate Counsel The SEC’s New Part 205 Regulations Brian G. Cartwright March.
Confidentiality A Defining Duty. What are sources of confidentiality obligations? Constitutional law Disciplinary rules Fiduciary responsibility Court.
Week Duty to keep quiet, not talk about cases By product of Fiduciary Duty 2. Right not to be forced to testify about communications --Statutory.
BELMONT UNIVERSITY AMERICAN INN OF COURT SEPTEMBER 9, 2014 PRESENTED BY KRISANN HODGES DEPUTY CHIEF DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL - LITIGATION BOARD OF PROFESSIONAL.
Sarbanes-Oxley and the OkRPC Drew L. Kershen Earl Sneed Centennial Professor Univ. of Oklahoma College of Law Copyright 2003, Drew L. Kershen, all rights.
Copyright © 2011 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. McGraw-Hill/Irwin Chapter Six Legal and Regulatory Obligations in an Ethical Framework.
Chapter 03 Professional Ethics McGraw-Hill/IrwinCopyright © 2014 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.
Copyright © 2010 South-Western/Cengage Learning
Copyright © 2010 South-Western/Cengage Learning
Fraud and SOX Compliance McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2012 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.
Two Hats, One Lawyer: Demystifying Privilege & Confidentiality Stuart I. Teicher, Esq.
BA 427 – Assurance and Attestation Services Lecture 13 Professional Ethics and the Code of Conduct.
Professional Ethics. McGraw-Hill/Irwin © 2004 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., All Rights Reserved. 3-2 Steps in Resolving an Ethical Dilemma Identify.
© 2003 Rule 1.9. Duties to Former Clients (a) A lawyer who has formerly represented a client in a matter shall not thereafter represent another person.
D E N V E R L A S V E G A S O R A N G E C O U N T Y P H O E N I X S A L T L A K E C I T Y T U C S O N SOX, the ABA Model Rules, & the Nevada Rules of Professional.
 Corporate governance is based on three interrelated components: corporate governance principles, functions and mechanisms.
Internal Auditing and Outsourcing
Privacy, Confidentiality and Duty to Warn in School Guidance Services March 2006 Disclaimer - While the information in these slides are designed to reflect.
HIPAA PRIVACY AND SECURITY AWARENESS.
1 Lecture 2: Whistle-Blowing Please refer to “Ethics and the Conduct of Business” by John R. Boatright BBA 361 BBA 361 Business Ethics & Corporate Governance.
Summary of the Investor Protection, Auditor Reform, and Transparency Act of 2002 (Sarbanes-Oxley Act)
Issues in Corporate Governance: Board Structures and Functions Based on a Student Presentation by Joshua Shullaw and Matthew Domeyer.
Corporate Responsibility and Compliance After Enron and Sarbanes-Oxley 6th National Congress on Health Care Compliance February 2003 John Bentivoglio
Avoiding Traps in Internal Investigations H. Lee Barfield II Bass, Berry and Sims PLC November 5, 2010.
Sarbanes Oxley Act. The Sarbanes Oxley Act consists of 11 Sections I – Public Company Accounting Oversight Board II – Auditor independence III – Corporate.
Chapter 19: Ethical Responsibilities Chapter 19 Ethical Responsibilities.
FleetBoston Financial HIPAA Privacy Compliance Agnes Bundy Scanlan Managing Director and Chief Privacy Officer FleetBoston Financial.
Do You Have One?. “I represent the city as an organization and I do not represent you and I cannot guarantee the confidentiality of what you tell me.”
1 Sarbanes-Oxley Overview. 2 Sarbanes-Oxley Act Summary The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 §201Prohibited Non-Audit Services §202Audit Committee Pre-Approval.
A.S. FlemingFall 2009 Acct 431 – Cost Management "Ethics in its broader sense, deals with human conduct in relation to what is morally good and bad, right.
Chapter 7 Blowing the Whistle Copyright © 2014 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent.
WHITE COLLAR CRIME Lecture 13: Policing & Regulating White Collar Crime.
John Steele, Attorney at Law. 2 Confidentiality 3 Topics 1. Definitions 2. Comparison 3. ABA Approach 1. Rule; Exceptions; Other rules 4. California.
ABA CRIMINAL JUSTICE SECTION INTERNAL INVESTIGATIONS: NAVIGATING THE ETHICAL MINEFIELD.
1 CHAPTER 3 Professional Responsibilities: Maintaining Quality of Assurances.
©2003 Prentice Hall Business Publishing, Auditing and Assurance Services 9/e, Arens/Elder/Beasley Professional Ethics Chapter 4.
Ethics of Representing Governmental Entities Helen M. Hierschbiel OSB General Counsel.
ETHICS: CONFIDENTIALITY OF IFTA DATA IFTA ATTORNEYS’ SECTION MEETING October 7, :30-10:00 a.m. Jim Clark Motor Carrier Services Attorney Indiana.
Welcome….!!! CORPORATE COMPLIANCE PROGRAM Presented by The Office of Corporate Integrity 1.
HARRIS PROPRIETARY 1 assuredcommunications™ NCMA Each of Medco Health’s False Claims Was “Knowingly Submitted” Because Medco Health Had No Effective Corporate.
TOPIC B: CONFIDENTIALITY 2016 P.R. Prof. Janicke.
Federal Preemption under Dodd-Frank’s Whistleblower Award Program Kathleen Clark Washington University in St Louis 6 th International Legal Ethics Conference.
© 2003 by the AICPA SAS 99: Consideration of Fraud in a Financial Statement Audit.
“Teaching Accounting Ethics” Kevin O’Brien CPA, JD, LLM in Taxation Business Ethics & Legal Studies portfolio.du.edu/kobrien.
Building on Our Core Values Building on Our Core Values © 2003 by the AICPA The Sarbanes-Oxley Act.
1 Ethical Lawyering Spring 2006 Class 8. 2 Rest. 68 Except as otherwise provided in this Restatement, the attorney-client privilege may be invoked as.
Copyright © 2012 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. Chapter 6 The Role of Government McGraw-Hill.
WHISTLE-BLOWING Responsibilities to Third Parties.
Recognizing the Client
Chapter 03 Professional Ethics McGraw-Hill/Irwin
Chapter 7 Blowing the Whistle.
HIPAA CONFIDENTIALITY
Privileged Information: Confidentiality and Disclosure
Whistleblower Program
The Sarbanes-Oxley Act
WHISTLEBLOWING Whistle blowing in its most general form involves calling(public)attention to wrong doing, typically in order to avert harm. Whistle blowing.
Missouri Association of Rural Education
Topic 12 : Confidentiality And Whistle-Blowing
WHISTLEBLOWING Whistle blowing in its most general form involves calling(public)attention to wrong doing, typically in order to avert harm. Whistle blowing.
Presentation transcript:

CPA Code Implications Related to SEC Bounty Rules Kevin O’Brien portfolio.du.edu/kobrien Daniels College of Business University of Denver

5 th : Asadi/GE Energy or 2 nd Circuit Liu/Siemens Sean McKessy, Chief of the SEC’s Office of the Whistleblower, added, “This award of more than $30 million shows the international breadth of our whistleblower program as we effectively utilize valuable tips from anyone, anywhere to bring wrongdoers to justice. Whistleblowers from all over the world should feel similarly incentivized to come forward with credible information about potential violations of the U.S. securities laws.”

FINREG WB Provisions Bounty (10 to 30% under False Claims Act) Right to a jury trial within 3 years – 90 day SARBOX rule does not apply – Exempting from SARBOX WB protection employees of subsidiaries does not apply Must be material – Greater than $1,000,000 in monetary sanctions arising from the WB information WB must have a “reasonable belief” that an SEC violation has occurred.

List of Exclusions Those who have a contractual or legal duty to report already Those who obtain the information by means or in a manner determined to violate federal or state criminal law Those in compliance, internal whistle blowing, internal audit personnel Those covered under the attorney client privilege unless disclosure the SEC is permitted under state rules.

SEC Bounty Rules & Preemption The SEC Says It’s OK to Reward People For Breaking State Laws The SEC stated in explanation of final regs:“we are not excluding information that is received in breach of state-law confidentiality requirements, such as those imposed on auditors, because to do so could inhibit important federal-law enforcement interests.”

Whistle Blower Improvement Act No contingent fee legal representation 0 to 30% (lowering minimum to 0) Can’t collect if culpable Must WB internally unless clear company is acting in bad faith.

Sec. 307: Outside Attorneys: “Up the Ladder Rule” Required to whistle blow inside the client company if a SEC violation To corporate counsel or CEO Then, to audit committee or Board of Directors ABA Rule: then may consider disclosing to SEC – Known as the “Noisy Withdrawal” rule.

Exceptions (b) A lawyer may reveal information relating to the representation of a client to the extent the lawyer reasonably believes necessary: – (1) to prevent reasonably certain death or substantial bodily harm; – (2) to prevent the client from committing a crime or fraud that is reasonably certain to result in substantial injury to the financial interests or property of another and in furtherance of which the client has used or is using the lawyer's services; – (3) to prevent, mitigate or rectify substantial injury to the financial interests or property of another that is reasonably certain to result or has resulted from the client's commission of a crime or fraud in furtherance of which the client has used the lawyer's services.

Rest of States Permit Disclosure to SEC— Example Colorado Rule 1.13 Internal Lawyer: – If a lawyer for an organization knows that his employer’s officer or another employee is engaged in an illegal act that reasonably is likely to cause substantial injury to the company, then need to W/B internally to the highest sources within the company, unless – The attorney reasonably believes it is not in the best interest to the company to go internal, but rather external immediately whether or not Rule 1.6 allows for WB externally for fraud causing substantial financial harm to others.

Entity has Protection in Five States Five states don’t permit the lawyer to whistle blow to the SEC—only if the lawyer reasonably believes the client actions “will likely end in death or substantial bodily harm” – California – Alabama – Rhode Island – Kentucky – Missouri – Montana

Attorneys and WB Lawyers mostly cannot sue under the tort of wrongful discharge at the state level due to the attorney client privilege. However, the 9 th Circuit said the privilege does not apply federally. SOX said “any person” can sue for retaliation for Whistle Blowing Need only have a reasonable belief that shareholder fraud occurred.

Cynthia CooperColeen RawleySherron Watkins

CPA Duty of Confidentiality in Colorado cannot disclose or use for their own benefit any confidential information pertaining to a client or the employer of the CPA, which information is obtained in the course of employment or performing professional services.

7.7B (exceptions to 7.7A) 1. Employer or client consents 2. Legally enforceable subpoena or summons or to comply with government regulations 3. Part of a civil suit between CPA and client or employer 4. Peer Review 5. Investigation by the board based upon a complaint

Old Rule—(1990’s) If employee CPA disagreed with management over GAAP treatment-- – Duty to quit – Duty to keep mouth shut

Sherron Watkins Guidance Texas Board Rule like all 50 states-- Don’t subordinate your judgment No whistle blowing provision similar to the ethical interpretation by the AICPA or Colorado Only 13 states have adopted the AICPA, PCAOB, Colorado WB rule

The Public Interest Principle In discharging their professional responsibilities, certificate holders may encounter conflicting pressures from among each of those groups. In resolving those conflicts, certificate holders should act with integrity, guided by the precept that when certificate holders fulfill their responsibility to the public, clients’ and employers’ interests are best served. (Emphasis added.)

Does new 7.3B or AICA Ethical Interpretation satisfy DeGeorge requirements? – Permissible Severity of Harm Notification of Supervisor Exhaust Internal Channels – External WB Obligatory Documentation/ Evidence Chance of Success A material misrepresentation of the financial statement(s)? Supervisor Notification Exhaust Internal channels “Document facts/rules” Consider quitting Assess responsibility to WB externally

Last Step Most Controversial? 5. “The employee must have good reason to believe that by going public the necessary changes will be brought about. The chance of being successful must be worth the risk one takes and the danger to which one is exposed.”

Colorado/AICPA/PCAOB WB Rule CPAs “also must assess any responsibility that may exist to communicate to third parties, such as regulatory authorities or external auditor”

Rest of States Permit Disclosure to SEC— Example Colorado Rule 1.13 Internal Lawyer: – If a lawyer for an organization knows that his employer’s officer or another employee is engaged in an illegal act that reasonably is likely to cause substantial injury to the company, then need to W/B internally to the highest sources within the company, unless – The attorney reasonably believes it is not in the best interest to the company to go internal, but rather external immediately whether or not Rule 1.6 allows for WB externally for fraud causing substantial financial harm to others.

Public Policy Recommendations All states consider adopting the AICPA rules on DeGeorge like whistle blowing rules in the public interest. AICPA rules amended to allow whistle blowing directly to the SEC if: – the CPA reasonably believes it is not in the best interest to the company to go internal, or – the CPA reasonable believes the company is acting in bad faith.