Class 21 Technical Report Sections and Content EPD 397 Technical Communication Fall 2014 Section 10.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Critical Reading Strategies: Overview of Research Process
Advertisements

Critical Reading Strategies: Overview of Research Process
The Robert Gordon University
Chapter Fifteen Developing Empirical Research Reports.
Chapter 13 Proposals and Formal Reports
Theses and Dissertations Structure : How to jam in all that information.
WRITING RESEARCH PAPERS Puvaneswary Murugaiah. INTRODUCTION TO WRITING PAPERS Conducting research is academic activity Research must be original work.
Writing an original research paper Part one: Important considerations
Copyright © 2003 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. Business and Administrative Communication SIXTH EDITION.
Research Methods in Social Sciences
Essays IACT 918 July 2004 Gene Awyzio SITACS University of Wollongong.
Friday, November 14 and Monday, November 17 Evaluating Scientific Argument: Peer Review IPHY 3700 Writing Process Map.
ALEC 604: Writing for Professional Publication
Topics - Reading a Research Article Brief Overview: Purpose and Process of Empirical Research Standard Format of Research Articles Evaluating/Critiquing.
Formal Lab Reports –Some personal comments –Structure First and foremost Know what it is to plagiarize Don’t do it !!! Disclaimer: This is not a substitute.
Technical Writing Function. The purpose of having guidelines is to make the document more readable. Standard guidelines govern – Format – page layout,
Planning and Strategic Management
Primary research report/ Omission Course: Technical Communication Done by: Benquadi Irchad El Basri Myriam El Fethouni Yasmina Oulad Benchiba Soraya Supervised.
Learning Outcomes from Report-Writing Unit
Advanced Research Methodology
How to Organize Your Thesis
Dr. Alireza Isfandyari-Moghaddam Department of Library and Information Studies, Islamic Azad University, Hamedan Branch
Satie Airam é Bren School, Assistant Dean for Academic Programs Winter 2012 Group Project Defense Guidelines.
Writing the First Draft ENGL 3100 Dr. Shelley Thomas Based on Dr. Brenda Orbell’s original presentation.
Fall 2006 town meeting  To further explore communication ethics we will hold a town meeting in class. At this meeting, engineers will present to the.
EMPRICAL RESEARCH REPORTS
Literature Review and Parts of Proposal
1 Our Expertise and Commitment – Driving your Success An Introduction to Transformation Offering November 18, 2013 Offices in Boston, New York and Northern.
The IMRaD Structure Dr. Lam TECM Why is this important? Your project, duh Consumers of research You form opinions based on research (whether you.
Professional Certificate – Managing Public Accounts Committees Ian “Ren” Rennie.
Proposal Development Sample Proposal Format Mahmoud K. El -Jafari College of Business and Economics Al-Quds University – Jerusalem April 11,2007.
The Conclusion and The Defense CSCI 6620 Spring 2014 Thesis Projects: Chapters 11 and 12 CSCI 6620 Spring 2014 Thesis Projects: Chapters 11 and 12.
Report Format and Scientific Writing. What is Scientific Writing? Clear, simple, well ordered No embellishments, not an English paper Written for appropriate.
Communication 2 Report Writing.
Sample Report Formats. Research Article Front matter Title Abstract.
Wednesday’s agenda: September 6  Discuss your summary/critique of the Michaelson chapter on the Incremental Method.  Discuss structure of theses and.
Insert: Title of Improvement Read Out Date:. 2 Objectives for Today’s Session Share results of improvement effort Demonstrate fact-base, analytical approach.
Effective Communication for Colleges, 10 th ed., by Brantley & Miller, 2005© Chapter 11 Chapter 11 – Slide 1 Reports, Proposals, and Instructions for the.
1 Business Communication Process and Product Brief Canadian Edition, Mary Ellen Guffey Kathleen Rhodes Patricia Rogin (c) 2003 Nelson, a division of Thomson.
FEASIBILITY REPORTS WHAT IS A FEASIBILITY REPORT? A feasibility report assesses if an idea or plan is practical based on specific criteria. Variety of.
Literature Review Taken From: University of Washington Psychology Writing Center.
Community Resources Assessment Training 4-1. Community Resources Assessment Training 4-2.
Reports & Presentations Go to page 111 of the text.
Reports & Proposals. Reports can either be Informational or Analytical Informational Reports Writers collect and organize data to provide readers information.
Design Report – Fall Semester. Title Page List name of project and team number List date List team members, advisor, sponsor Team logos.
Communicating Marketing Research Findings
Introductions and Conclusions CSCI102 - Systems ITCS905 - Systems MCS Systems.
WRITING UP FYP REPORT Prabakaran Poopalan Maizatul Zolkapli March 2009.
Fall CS-EE 480 Lillevik 480f06-l6 University of Portland School of Engineering Senior Design Lecture 6 Other development processes Technical documents.
Cedric D. Murry APT Instructor of Applied Technology in research and development.
Chapter 10 Understanding and Planning Reports and Proposals 10-1.
UEF // University of Eastern Finland How to publish scientific journal articles? 10 STEPS TO SUCCESS lllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll lllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll.
Report Writing Lecturer: Mrs Shadha Abbas جامعة كربلاء كلية العلوم الطبية التطبيقية قسم الصحة البيئية University of Kerbala College of Applied Medical.
Writing your Master Thesis Management of People, Management of Innovation Processes, and Strategy and Organization Bo H. Eriksen, 12 October 2016.
Writing Scientific Research Paper
HUM 102 Report Writing Skills
Outline What is Literature Review? Purpose of Literature Review
Creating Reports Understanding various types of reports and writing persuasive Analytical Reports.
Chapter 18 Formal Reports
STATUS REPORT.
Technical Report Writing
Identifying Inquiry and Stating the Problem
Introduction SCEA Organization Scoping Analysis Conclusions Mitigation.
A POCKET GUIDE TO PUBLIC SPEAKING 4TH EDITION Chapter 31
Writing reports Wrea Mohammed
How to Read a Paper (Practice: CCS’14)
Class Project Guidelines
Chapter 13 Proposals and Formal Reports
Writing Lab Reports.
Research Proposal and Report
Presentation transcript:

Class 21 Technical Report Sections and Content EPD 397 Technical Communication Fall 2014 Section 10

Typical scientific report structure (“IMRAD”) starts general, then becomes specific about the work, and then generalizes 2 Source: Glasman-Deal, Hilary, 2010 Science Research Writing for Non-Native Speakers of English. Imperial College Press. Why did I do the work? Summarizes relevant prior work (literature review) Starts general, then focus Describes why this work is needed Why did I do the work? Summarizes relevant prior work (literature review) Starts general, then focus Describes why this work is needed What is most important about my work? How may I improve on my work? Build on discussion. Generalize and relate to Introduction What is most important about my work? How may I improve on my work? Build on discussion. Generalize and relate to Introduction How did I do the work? a.k.a. Materials and Methods, Experimental Procedures How did I do the work? a.k.a. Materials and Methods, Experimental Procedures What did I observe or find out? Overview (avoid discussing results in detail if report has Analysis section) What did I observe or find out? Overview (avoid discussing results in detail if report has Analysis section) Why are my findings significant and useful? What are the limitations of my work? Explain and interpret results Start focused, then generalize Why are my findings significant and useful? What are the limitations of my work? Explain and interpret results Start focused, then generalize Results Methodology Abstract Summary and Conclusions Introduction Analysis and Discussion

What do we already know? What don’t we know? Synthesize relevant prior work from credible sources, with citations to Reference list Describe gap in understanding or capabilities in detail, and effects on stakeholders Define terminology and acronyms What do we already know? What don’t we know? Synthesize relevant prior work from credible sources, with citations to Reference list Describe gap in understanding or capabilities in detail, and effects on stakeholders Define terminology and acronyms EPD-397 report content follows logical progression; descriptive section titles depend on audience and purpose 3 Source: Glasman-Deal, Hilary, 2010 Science Research Writing for Non-Native Speakers of English. Imperial College Press. Why is this project important? Why did I do this work? Summarize problem or opportunity; current state, ideal state, gap Identify stakeholders; summarize effect on stakeholders; introduce ethical considerations Summarize objectives and scope of your work Why is this project important? Why did I do this work? Summarize problem or opportunity; current state, ideal state, gap Identify stakeholders; summarize effect on stakeholders; introduce ethical considerations Summarize objectives and scope of your work What is most important about my work? How may I improve on my work? Build on Analysis and Discussion. Generalize and relate back to Introduction: problem, gap, ethical improvements, objectives and scope Conclusions must be supported by content in other sections Recommendations may explain how work is applicable to other situations What is most important about my work? How may I improve on my work? Build on Analysis and Discussion. Generalize and relate back to Introduction: problem, gap, ethical improvements, objectives and scope Conclusions must be supported by content in other sections Recommendations may explain how work is applicable to other situations How did I do this work? Describe how you gathered your data, information Describe how you analyzed data, information: assumptions, equations, calculations, criteria, weighting factors The Analytical Methodology may be in Background or at beginning of Results How did I do this work? Describe how you gathered your data, information Describe how you analyzed data, information: assumptions, equations, calculations, criteria, weighting factors The Analytical Methodology may be in Background or at beginning of Results What did I observe or find out in my research? Describe what you observe in the results of your research and analysis Include tables and graphics to summarize results, show trends, depict results Results may be included in Analysis and Discussion of Results What did I observe or find out in my research? Describe what you observe in the results of your research and analysis Include tables and graphics to summarize results, show trends, depict results Results may be included in Analysis and Discussion of Results Why are my findings significant and useful? What are the limitations of my work? (not the same as limitations in Project Significance) Explain and interpret your results; relate back to objectives of work Explain the ethical implications of your findings: effects on stake holders, Code of Ethics, relevant ethical tests Why are my findings significant and useful? What are the limitations of my work? (not the same as limitations in Project Significance) Explain and interpret your results; relate back to objectives of work Explain the ethical implications of your findings: effects on stake holders, Code of Ethics, relevant ethical tests EPD 397 report section titles are more descriptive than generic content titles Results Analytical Methodology Executive Summary Conclusions and Recommendations Analysis and Discussion of Results Background(s) Introduction Analytical and evaluative sections Analytical and evaluative sections

EPD 397 reports can be “mapped” into report structure: Example: Comparative Analysis of New Technologies to Solve Problem 4 Sources: Glasman-Deal, Hilary, 2010 Science Research Writing for Non-Native Speakers of English. Imperial College Press. Grossenbacher, L. and McGlamery, T., Organizing and Outlining your Formal Report, EPD 397 Technical Communications, Section 10 Course Page, Why is this project important? Why did I do this work? Summarize problem or opportunity; current state, ideal state, gap Identify stakeholders; summarize effect on stakeholders; introduce ethical considerations Summarize objectives and scope of your work Why is this project important? Why did I do this work? Summarize problem or opportunity; current state, ideal state, gap Identify stakeholders; summarize effect on stakeholders; introduce ethical considerations Summarize objectives and scope of your work What is most important about my work? How may I improve on my work? Build on Analysis and Discussion. Generalize and relate back to Introduction: problem, gap, objectives and scope, ethical improvements, Conclusions must be supported by content in other sections Recommendations may explain how work is applicable to other situations What is most important about my work? How may I improve on my work? Build on Analysis and Discussion. Generalize and relate back to Introduction: problem, gap, objectives and scope, ethical improvements, Conclusions must be supported by content in other sections Recommendations may explain how work is applicable to other situations Why are my findings significant and useful? Explain and interpret your findings; relate back to main objective of your work Explain the ethical implications of your findings: effects on stake holders; refer to Code of Ethics, relevant ethical tests Why are my findings significant and useful? Explain and interpret your findings; relate back to main objective of your work Explain the ethical implications of your findings: effects on stake holders; refer to Code of Ethics, relevant ethical tests What do we already know? What don’t we know? How did we evaluate? Describe current technology or solution(s) and why flawed or lacking in capabilities Explain criteria used to evaluate the current solution(s) and new technologies (e.g., efficiency, ease of manufacturing, cost, environmental effects, time to implement) Describe how you analyzed data, information: assumptions, equations, calculations, criteria, weighting factors Define terminology and acronyms Synthesize relevant prior work from credible sources, with citations to Reference list What do we already know? What don’t we know? How did we evaluate? Describe current technology or solution(s) and why flawed or lacking in capabilities Explain criteria used to evaluate the current solution(s) and new technologies (e.g., efficiency, ease of manufacturing, cost, environmental effects, time to implement) Describe how you analyzed data, information: assumptions, equations, calculations, criteria, weighting factors Define terminology and acronyms Synthesize relevant prior work from credible sources, with citations to Reference list What did I learn? For each technology: Provide technical description, necessary definitions, useful analogies, figures Assess strengths and weaknesses relative to evaluation criteria Clarify where this technology is an improvement over current solutions. Include tables and graphics to summarize results, show trends, depict results What did I learn? For each technology: Provide technical description, necessary definitions, useful analogies, figures Assess strengths and weaknesses relative to evaluation criteria Clarify where this technology is an improvement over current solutions. Include tables and graphics to summarize results, show trends, depict results Description of New Technologies Executive Summary Conclusions and Recommendations Analysis and Discussion of … Technical and/or Historical Background of … Introduction Analytical and evaluative sections Analytical and evaluative sections

Write conclusions to reflect technical insight and relate to problem or need: 5 Scenario: In urban areas with hard surfaces, storm water run-off can flood and damage streets and undermine landscaping, sidewalks and building foundations. WUWF, accessed 19-Nov-2014http://wuwf.org/post/manna-food-pantry-hopes-come-back-after-storm City of Excelsior Springs, Mo, accessed 19-Nov-2014http:// These effects can be costly; therefore, many municipalities require new construction to employ technologies to reduce erosion and damage. Examples of these technologies are permeable paving, and bio-retention areas.

Write conclusions to reflect technical insight and relate to problem or need: 6 Storm water mitigation systems incorporating permeable paving and bio- retention, such vegetated basins and swales, have the potential to reduce storm water runoff by up to 90% in most urban installations. This reduction is often sufficient to eliminate erosion and flood damage in urban landscapes, streets and building foundations caused by storm water runoff. Permeable paving, bio-retention basins, and bio-swales may reduce storm water runoff. Statement is true, but is so obvious to be superficial Conclusion summarizes the types of systems considered in the report Potential reduction in run-off is quantified: up to 90% Solution is tied back to problem of damage caused by runoff – “solves the problem” Conclusion summarizes the types of systems considered in the report Potential reduction in run-off is quantified: up to 90% Solution is tied back to problem of damage caused by runoff – “solves the problem”