C. Darve / Technical Board – December 13 th, 2012Preliminary pressure vessel code requirements Preliminary pressure vessel code requirements Technical.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Final Competence Assessment Assessment Documents Assessment strategy (SummitSkills) Assessment methodology (SQA) Assessment guidelines (SQA)
Advertisements

Comparison between American and European Pressure Vessel Rules
PLANT DESIGN (I) Prof. Dr. Hasan farag.
CE Regulation Service PROLAB Tech Rev 1 Machinery Directive Flow Chart A brief guide.
Pressure Systems 10CFR851 - The Way to Go but, Some Tough Issues W. Oren Manager of Engineering and Technical Services Division Pressure Systems 10CFR851.
Gas Transmission Pipelines
SRF Cryomodules November 2013 Meeting
U D T Workshop on the Pressure Equipment Directive, Warsaw June 2004 INTERFACES BETWEEN NATIONAL LEGISLATION AND DIRECTIVE 97/23/EC SYSTEM OF ENSURING.
Prof R T KennedyEMC & COMPLIANCE ENGINEERING 1 EET 422 EMC & COMPLIANCE ENGINEERING.
GRPE GRPE CGH 2 Experts (A sub-group of the GRPE Informal Group “Hydrogen/Fuel Cell”) JASIC Presentation At The GRPE CGH 2 Experts Meeting.
Fermilab requirements and recent FEA Analyses PH-DT Engineering Office, CERN 06/05/2015 Page 1 CERN, May 6th 2015.
The ESS Cryomodules 2012 December, 5th Christine Darve
Hydrogen system R&D. R&D programme – general points Hydrogen absorber system incorporates 2 novel aspects Hydrogen storage using a hydride bed Hydrogen.
July LEReC Review July 2014 Low Energy RHIC electron Cooling Edward T. Lessard ESHQ.
Safety Requirements and Regulations 10/3/20121Safety Requirements & Regulations James Sears.
Application – Identifying, Listing Equipment, and Documentation
Marc Tavlet - GLIMOS1 Paperwork needed to come and work at CERN 1. Access Rights – Registration 2. Tests with Beams 3. Safety Procedures to work at Point-2.
Thermosiphon quality management and documentation EN/CV/DC Presentation done by Elena Perez Rodriguez For further information contact
Parliamentary Portfolio Committee Presentation Annual Report 2012.
IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency IAEA Safety Standards for Research Reactors W. Kennedy Research Reactor Safety Section Division of Nuclear Installation.
Preliminary Functional Analysis of ESS Superconducting Radio-Frequency Linac C. Darve, N. Elias, J. Fydrych, D. Piso European Spallation Source ESS AB,
Project X RD&D Plan Cryogenics Arkadiy Klebaner AAC Meeting February 3, 2009.
Pressure Systems: Users Guide Introduction This guidance note summarises the key features of the Pressure Systems Safety Regulations (PSSR). Theses Regulations.
HL-LHC Standards and Best Practices Workshop (11-13 June 2014)
High power RF tests places at CERN O. Brunner, CERN 4th SPL Collaboration Meeting jointly with ESS.
Mike Scharfenstein LUSI DOE Review August 19, 2008 ES&H Overview p. 1 LCLS Ultrafast Science Instruments (LUSI) M. Scharfenstein.
ICEC26-ICMC2016 New Delhi, India. Rossi Mendez Sales Engineer – HHS Author: Stefan Schaap Project Engineer – HHS.
JLAB Pressure Systems Considerations Ed Daly. Outline Introduction Federal Law - 10CFR851 Compliance JLAB Pressure Systems Program –Complies with 10CFR851,
ESS Cryomodule Status Meeting – Elements of Safety | | Christine Darve Elements of Safety Applicable to the ESS 2013 January, 9 th Christine.
LCLS-II Prototype Cryomodule Vacuum Vessel and HGRP Tom Peterson 4 December 2014 Design Review.
Logo area 11 T Review: Safety and Codes Thomas Otto HL-LHC Project Safety Officer With contributions by -Frédéric Savary, Hervé Prin, TE-MSC -Carlos Arregui,
Prof R T KennedyEMC & COMPLIANCE ENGINEERING 1 EET 422 EMC & COMPLIANCE ENGINEERING.
Safety - Lessons learnt from the design, commissioning and operation of the HIE-ISOLDE cryomodules Safety overview ESS 8 June 2016 AP.Bernardes/EN on behalf.
Process Safety Management Soft Skills Programme Nexus Alliance Ltd.
Wish list from ESS Christine Darve H-ECCTD Kick-off meeting 16 March
Overview of the ESS Linac Cryogenic Distribution System
Logo area MQXF Review: Safety Thomas Otto HL-LHC Project Safety Officer With contributions by -Paolo Ferrcin and Ezio Todesco, TE-MSC -Francesca Viggiano,
Spoke section of the ESS linac: - the Spoke cryomodules - the cryogenic distribution system P. DUTHIL (CNRS-IN2P3 IPN Orsay / Division Accélérateurs) on.
1 Interfaces, Engineering and Standards. 2 Interfaces LoKI Interface document description for deliverables Elements: PBS number, Deliverable description,
Development of Cryo-Module Test Stand (CMTS) for Fermi Lab (R.L.Suthar, Head,CDM, BARC) Cryo-Module Test stand (CMTS) is a very sophisticated equipment.
Logo area Compliance with CERN Safety Rules – Role of CERN Health, Safety & Environment protection (HSE) Unit C. Arregui, S. Marsh (HSE-SEE) International.
Cryomodule Safety Approvals Jay Theilacker LCLS-II Production Cryomodule Final Design Review May 12-14, 2015.
Chapter Editor: John Weisend TDR Chapter 6 Cryogenic System, Vacuum System & Test Stands.
ESS Cryomodule Status Meeting – Introduction | | Christine Darve Introduction to Cryomodules for the ESS 2013 January, 9 th Christine Darve.
LS2 Safety Preparation Thomas Otto, LS2 Safety Support Officer for LHC
Cryogenic safety organisation at CERN
Crab Cavity Technical Coordination meeting:
The application of the PED on the design codes for cryogenic equipment and future developments foreseen in this field Paris, 06/09/2016 l Hervé BARTHELEMY.
Preparation of functional/engineering specifications for HL-LHC
Spoke section of the ESS linac: - Status of prototypes and CDS-SL
Strategy for conformity of non-standard cryogenic equipment
ISO and EIGA standards for cryogenic vessels and accessories
Safety in Construction and Upgrade Phases
EET 422 EMC & COMPLIANCE ENGINEERING
Cryogenic C&C Scope of work
Thomas Otto, TE Department, CERN
Harmonized Standards / Materials Josef L
Optimum cryomodule length at the ESS
Changes in EN
ESS approach and support for Declaration of Conformity (CE-marking) Fredrik Håkansson 9th SRF ESS
Installation Binder / IRR – an example
Mattias Skafar Head of Quality Division
Target Helium Cooling System Design Code 10th Target Technical Board Meeting Ulf Odén WP2 Manager 19 April, 2019.
ESS approach and support for Declaration of Conformity (CE-marking) Fredrik Håkansson 9th SRF ESS
Licensing requirements for Cryomodules
INTERFACES BETWEEN NATIONAL LEGISLATION AND DIRECTIVE 97/23/EC
WP11: CDS-SL CDR Overview
ESS approach and support for Declaration of Conformity (CE-marking) Fredrik Håkansson ESS Accelerator Collaboration Board Meeting Trieste
DFX safety aspects in the LHC tunnel
Design and integration of safety equipment and safety aspects in the LHC tunnel (cryogenic safety only) Vittorio Parma Th.Otto.
Presentation transcript:

C. Darve / Technical Board – December 13 th, 2012Preliminary pressure vessel code requirements Preliminary pressure vessel code requirements Technical Board – December 2012 Christine Darve European Spallation Source - Accelerator Division Lund, Date

C. Darve / Technical Board – December 13 th, 2012Preliminary pressure vessel code requirements European Directive 97/23/EC (PED) Preliminary ESS pressure vessel code requirements based on study modeled existing experience Example: Paulo Azevedo (CERN-TE/MSC) work 2

C. Darve / Technical Board – December 13 th, 2012Preliminary pressure vessel code requirements Relationship between this European Standard and the Essential Requirements of EC Directive 97/23/EC (PED) This European Standard has been prepared under a mandate given to CEN by the European Commission and the European Free Trade Association to provide a means of conforming to Essential Requirements of the EC Directive 97/23/EC (PED). ESS engineering standards (see “Safety & Standards” talk) SIS standards, Swedish standards institute CEN standards, European Committee for standardization (incl. PED) ISO standards, International Organization for standardization 3

C. Darve / Technical Board – December 13 th, 2012Preliminary pressure vessel code requirements – Goal: to comply with European directives and regulations using a series of codes describing necessary procedures to follow. – ESS has established the use of “Norms and Standards” to be used in the design of the ESS components (accelerator, target, instrument). – ESS is developing a web-based manual (E-Share) to provide guidance to the engineering design, fabrication, installation and operation of the accelerator components.  pertain to the design and operation of cryogenic systems 4

C. Darve / Technical Board – December 13 th, 2012Preliminary pressure vessel code requirements Conformity Assessment procedure PED - harmonized standards EN (old CODAP) EN (cryogenic vessels) Construction  Engineering design report (Risk Analysis)  Manufacturing  Inspection/controls (Project Engineer) 5 Prevention:  training  Operational procedure Protection  Emergency procedures  Safety relief, CE marking Installation

C. Darve / Technical Board – December 13 th, 2012Preliminary pressure vessel code requirements Reference based on Paulo Azevedo ‘s SPL study: EN ISO 4126: Safety devices for protection against excessive pressure (parts 1,6, and 7) EN 13648: Cryogenic vessels – Safety devices for protection against excessive pressure (part 3) EN 13458: Cryogenic vessels – Static vacuum-insulated vessels (part 2) Lehmann and Zahn; “Safety aspects for LHe cryostats and LHe transport containers” (1978) Cavallari et al; “Pressure protection against vacuum failures on the cryostats for LEP SC cavities” (1989) Boeckmann et al; “Experimental tests of fault conditions during the cryogenic operation of a XFEL prototype cryomodule” CERN Safety Commission; “Safety instruction IS 47: The use of cryogenics fluids”; CERN EDMS doc

C. Darve / Technical Board – December 13 th, 2012Preliminary pressure vessel code requirements 7 Example

C. Darve / Technical Board – December 13 th, 2012Preliminary pressure vessel code requirements 8 Example

C. Darve / Technical Board – December 13 th, 2012Preliminary pressure vessel code requirements 9 Example

C. Darve / Technical Board – December 13 th, 2012Preliminary pressure vessel code requirements 10 Example

C. Darve / Technical Board – December 13 th, 2012Preliminary pressure vessel code requirements 11 Example of safety report: “Cryogenic Safety Analysis ILCTA - MDB Vacuum System“ Table of Contents Category:Page Number: 1.0 – System Design Documents 1.1 – System Description – Flow Schematic (Reduced Size for Reference)5 1.3 – Component – Valve – Instrumentation List (App.1)6 1.4 – Operating Control Loops and Interlock Systems (App.3)6 2.0 – System Operating Documents 2.1 – Operating Procedures – Commissioning phase7 2.3 – Qualification and Training Requirements7 3.0 – Safety Analysis Documents 3.1 – FMEA (App.4)8 3.2 – What If Analysis (App.5) – Hazard Analysis8 3.4 – Other ES&H Sections Compliance (App.6)8 4.0 – Engineering Documents 4.1 – Relief System Calculations – Material Stress Calculations Appendices Example

C. Darve / Technical Board – December 13 th, 2012Preliminary pressure vessel code requirements Pressure vessel code to apply to the ESS cold linac cryomodules 12

C. Darve / Technical Board – December 13 th, 2012Preliminary pressure vessel code requirements 13 Example of application of Pressure Equipment Directive Example

C. Darve / Technical Board – December 13 th, 2012Preliminary pressure vessel code requirements 14 Example

C. Darve / Technical Board – December 13 th, 2012Preliminary pressure vessel code requirements 15 Example

C. Darve / Technical Board – December 13 th, 2012Preliminary pressure vessel code requirements 16 Example

C. Darve / Technical Board – December 13 th, 2012Preliminary pressure vessel code requirements 17 Example

C. Darve / Technical Board – December 13 th, 2012Preliminary pressure vessel code requirements 18 Example

C. Darve / Technical Board – December 13 th, 2012Preliminary pressure vessel code requirements Principles: Comply with the formality of safety procedure Similar to SPL approach (example) On-going: CEA/IPNO Safety analysis for a staged venting of the cryomodules MCI if cavities to be replaced - Risk analysis in progress Open questions: Define the heat load deposited for un-insulated vacuum vessel Proper selection of the temperature for the relieving scenario 19