How to establish a successful IP Policy for Universities and Research Institutes Anton Habjanič, D.Sc. director of TechnoCenter at the UM ERF-FEMISE Expert.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
SOME KEY ISSUES FOR CONSIDERATION IN A NATIONAL IP STRATEGY PART SIX – IP Policy for R&D Institutions and Universities OGADA TOM Innovation and Technology.
Advertisements

Research Administration Capacity Building in an Established Institution Presenter: M.M.Aboud, MD Director of Research and Publications, MUHAS.
Final Report Presentation By Mohammad Saber Sakhizada March,26 – 2009.
1 RIT: Support Infrastructure, Policies and Procedures – Perceptions, Myths and Reality Varda Main Director Technology Licensing Office.
1 UMass Dartmouth Conflicts of Interest Policies UMass Dartmouth Liz Rodriguez February 17, 2011.
Development of Intellectual Property Policies at Universities and Research Centers Mr. Ryszard Frelek, Division for Certain Countries in Europe and Asia,
Technology and Economic Development Intellectual Property Issues in Research Jim Baker Director Office of Technology and Economic Development
Intellectual Property Rights Regulations in Russia: Case of Government-Supported R&D Irina Dezhina Leading Researcher, Ph.D. Institute for the Economy.
IP Issues in Research Jim Baker, Executive Director Innovation, and Industry Engagement.
Intellectual Property Rights Margaret Lawlor Business Development Manager Faculty of Medical Sciences 2015 copyright©NewcastleUniversity 2015.
Creation of IP Culture in Universities & Advantages of Universities having an IP Culture Dr Duncan Matthews Queen Mary University of London.
INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY AS A STRATEGIC TOOL Alison Campbell OBE PhD RTTP Belgrade 30 October 2012.
EXPRESS LICENSE AGREEMENTS Ted Hagelin Crandall Melvin Professor of Law Kauffman Professor of Entrepreneurship and Innovation Director, NY Science & Technology.
Universities and Patents From Open Science to Open Innovation Gilles Capart Chairman of ProTon Europe.
3rd session: Corporate Governance
Commercialization of University Technology Innovation, Technology Transfer and Licensing Jack Turner, Associate Director M.I.T. Technology Licensing Office.
Vilnius Lithuania BSc.: Biochemistry Neuropsychology J.D.: University of Oregon LL.M.:University College London Pacific Northwest National Laboratory.
Intellectual Property: Kenneth Kirkland, Ph.D. Executive Director, Iowa State University Research Foundation (ISURF) Director, Office of Intellectual Property.
RESEARCH PRODUCTS AND INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS OGADA T. and MBAYAKI A. CAMPUS BASED RESEARCH WORKSHOPS TOWN CAMPUS 3 May 2006.
Cern.ch/knowledgetransfer. Knowledge Transfer | Accelerating Innovation Charlyne Rabe CONTRACTS FOR TECHNOLOGY TRANSFER Charlyne RABE KT Legal Advisor.
Ch. 3: Recognizing Opportunity. Understanding Entrepreneurial Trends  Current Trends  Internet – Most Businesses have an Online Component  Service.
Technology Transfer at Rice
Tech Launch Arizona Tech Transfer Arizona Rakhi Gibbons, Asst. Director for Biomedical and Life Sciences Licensing.
Constructing the “Price” of the Technology in IP Licensing Negotiations Sub Regional Training Program on IP Valuation Maribor November 5 to 7, 2012.
Presented by Vladimir Yossifov Consultant, IP Services “IP Universities” Istanbul, May 16 to 18, 2012 Albert Long Hall, BOGAZICI UNIVERSITY.
Overview OTL Mission Inventor Responsibility Stanford Royalty Sharing Disclosure Form Patent View Inventor Agreements Patent.
Judie Kay & Peter Shadbolt Industry Liaison Beyond the Silos: Developing a Corporate Approach to Industry Engagement.
Model Intellectual Property Policy for Universities and Research Institutions in Countries in Transition Mr. Michal Svantner, Director, Division for Certain.
Review of Technology Transfer at The University of Texas System Margaret Sampson Partner, Vinson & Elkins LLP U. T. System Board of Regents’ Meeting Technology.
A Dual Role Principal (Rector) of Heriot-Watt University Chair of the regional economic development company.
Polimi Case study: Procedures, tools, facts & Figures
National Knowledge Commission Government of India Entrepreneurship National Knowledge Commission 19 th January, 2009 New Delhi.
Best Practices: Financial Resource Management February 2011.
Rick Watson Managing Director and Head of the European Securitisation Forum +44 (0) Prospects for Securitisation.
European Corporate Governance: What are the current issues? European Union Corporate Governance Standards - Working Group Meeting December 17, 2013 Brussels.
IP Institutional Policy “Ten Questions Method” Santiago, October 21 – 24, 2013.
WIPO Pilot Project - Assisting Member States to Create an Adequate Innovation Infrastructure to Support University – Industry Collaboration.
A possible Intellectual Assets acquisition initiative for 4TU Proposal.
WIPO Tools for Countries in Transition Mr. Ilya Gribkov, Program Officer, Division for Certain Countries in Europe and Asia (DCEA), WIPO.
Technology Transfer and IP framework initiatives May 2011.
Management of Intellectual Property Rights in Countries in Transition and Relevant WIPO Studies for Countries in Transition Budapest, April 15 and 16,
Policies Promoting IP Development in Universities and Higher Institutions of Learning In Africa OGADA Tom WIPO National Workshop on Intellectual Property.
A possible Intellectual Assets acquisition initiative for 4TU Proposal.
Elements of a Workable Intellectual Property Policy OPIC IP Roundtable Noel Courage Bereskin & Parr November 21, 2007.
“IP Universities” Istanbul, May 16 to 18, 2012 Albert Long Hall, BOGAZICI UNIVERSITY IP Policy for Universities Tamas Bene, IP manager University.
WP1: IP charter Geneva – 23rd June 2009 Contribution from CERN.
The structure of an IP Institutional Policy “Ten Questions Method” Sofia, Bulgaria November 25 and 26, 2015.
Moscow, Russia, 10 September 2012 HSE Intellectual Property Policy Aliya Ermakova, Head of IP Department, Innovation and Enterprise Office, HSE
Intellectual Property Right Bernard Denis, DG-KTT.
NATIONAL CONFERENCE Intellectual Property Policies for Universities and Innovation dr. sc. Vlatka Petrović Head, Technology Transfer Office Acting Head,
Policy on the Management of Intellectual Property in Technology Transfer Activities at CERN CERN/FC/5434/RA Technology Transfer Network Meeting – 10 th.
Why an Intellectual Property Policy? Sofia, November 24 and 25, 2015 Mr. Evgeniy Sesitsky, Department for Transition and Developed Countries, World Intellectual.
Industry’s Perspective on Industry-University Intellectual Property External Research Directors Network Industrial Research Institute, Inc. April 17, 2001.
© 2004 The IPR-Helpdesk is a project of the European Commission DG Enterprise, co-financed within the fifth framework programme of the European Community.
AECM and the Different European Guarantee Models Berlin, 5 May 2006M. Sousa Branca.
Open-ended Forum on Proposed Development Agenda Projects October 13-14, 2009 Intellectual Property and Technology Transfer : “Common Challenges – Building.
Technology transfer – The Hungarian experience Legal background Innovation Act: - Public R&D institutions are required to establish IP policy - IP created.
Privatizing the intellectual commons: Universities and the commercialization of biotechnology Nicholas S. Argyres and Julia Porter Liebeskind Journal of.
Review of Research-Related Agreements Between Academic Institutions and Other Entities. Manoja Ratnayake Lecamwasam, PhD Intellectual Property and Innovation.
WIPO Guidance – Intellectual Property Policy for Universities and Research Institutions for Countries in Transitions Prague, April 21 and 22, 2016 Mr.
Startup India. What if your idea is not just an idea? What if it sees light? What if it’s really born? What if you can get someone to believe in it?
OTC FELLOWS PROGRAM INFORMATION SESSION Fall 2016.
Technology Transfer Office
Nicholas S. Argyres and Julia Porter Liebeskind
Director Department for Transition and Developed Countries
National Contact Points (NCP) Training
Entrepreneurship National Knowledge Commission 19th January, 2009 New Delhi Government of India.
Development of Intellectual Property Policies at Universities and Research Centers Maribor, November 5 to 7, 2012 Mr. Ryszard Frelek, Division for Certain.
Presentation transcript:

How to establish a successful IP Policy for Universities and Research Institutes Anton Habjanič, D.Sc. director of TechnoCenter at the UM ERF-FEMISE Expert Group Meeting (January 18, 2016, Cairo, Egypt)

What is Technology Transfer for  Making Money ?  Academic Service ?  Economic Development ? To help achieve the University mission, which is... To create and disseminate knowledge! None of the above!!!... it’s not (only) about the money ! €, Academic Service and Economic Development are measures of our activity, not our objectives!!! Source: ”What is the impact of a good TTO?’’, Karl Klingsheim, ASTP Annual Conference, Berlin 2012 Knowledge Triangle

Technology Transfer & Knowledge Exchange (Drivers of Innovations) Source: ”A Composite Indicator for Knowledge Transfer”, European Commission, October 2011

Ingredients of good Technology Transfer  High quality research (generator of good ideas)  Markets with companies able to commercialize inventions  Investors willing to invest in new products, government willing to support where investors do not invest (death valley)  Scientists and managers with entrepreneurial spirit  Well connected and qualified Technology Transfer Professionals

Technology Transfer Cycles

IP Strategy & Policy  IP Strategy: A plan designed to achieve IP management supporting the core missions of technology transfer.  IP Policy: Principles of actions (set of provisions), often with direct legal implication regarding duties and rights of faculty and indirect implications for partners. Background! Commission Recommendation on the management of IP in knowledge transfer activities and Code of Practice for universities and other public research organisations Intellectual Asset Management for Universities (UK IP Office) Model Intellectual Property Policy for Universities and Research Institutions (WIPO)

IP policy is a must-have tool: provides clear and transparent rules on IP management while involving the personal, institutional, national and international aspects of IP management in one regulatory document. Advantages of a good IP Policy:  Creates guidance & consistency for IP and technology management procedures  Involves transparency in decision making process  Safeguards the interests of all parties by stipulating deadlines  Facilitates professional IP management  Creates legal certainty for companies and other third parties  Supports commercialization activities  Stimulates more industrial support for research  Guarantees the fair distribution of the income among stakeholders  Encourages bringing research results to the public benefit  Enhances the promotion & reputation of the university and the researchers Importance of IP Policy

10 key Questions for Establishing a successful IP Policy

Source: WIPO Question 1: Who owns IP generated by publicly funded research? Who is the first owner of IP (the employed inventor or the employer)? Does the “Professor‘s privilege” exist? Who can apply for ownership of IP? Who has the Pre-emption rights? Can university claim ownership of IP created in the course of students’ research activity?

Question 2: Benefit sharing? How are revenues from research commercialization shared among inventors, institute or department, university and government or funding agency? 10 key Questions for Establishing a successful IP Policy

Question 3: What rights does the government have on IP generated at universities and R&D institutions? For example, manufacture in the country, preference for national companies, regulatory compliance, royalty sharing, royalty-free license to the government, title back to the government if the institution doesn’t take title etc key Questions for Establishing a successful IP Policy

Question 4: Is private funding for defined research projects permitted? If so, under what conditions and approval process? Who owns the IP in such cases? If the university or R&D institution owns the IP, what kind of licenses (royalty free, royalty bearing, exclusive, non-exclusive etc.) would it be willing to grant? 10 key Questions for Establishing a successful IP Policy

Question 5: Options for commercialization? What choices do universities and R&D institutions have for commercializing their research results? Does the university or R&D institution want to encourage entrepreneurial activity or not? 10 key Questions for Establishing a successful IP Policy

Question 6: Who manages the IP & technology transfer? Is there a TTO, outsourced company, government entity, IP Hub or a national IP Office? Who negotiates licenses with outside parties, reviews employee contracts, manages invention disclosure procedures, reviews sponsored research proposals, manages royalty sharing, establishes and manages spin-off companies …? 10 key Questions for Establishing a successful IP Policy

Question 7: What IP Management procedures will be followed? What are the bottlenecks in technology transfer and commercialization of R&D results? How should IP Assets be managed? What are the IP management procedures? How is the IP policy etc. communicated to stakeholders? 10 key Questions for Establishing a successful IP Policy

Question 8: How to afford the cost of protection and maintenance of IP? Does the university or R&D institution pay the expenses of protection and maintenance of IP? In the case of government or private sponsored research, who pays for these costs (e.g. registration, attorney’s fees, maintenance etc.)? Is there a limit to how much the university or R&D institution will spend and what kinds of inventions it will fund protection for? 10 key Questions for Establishing a successful IP Policy

Question 9: How are conflicts-of- interest and commitment handled or prevented? May a professor or researcher accept additional private income for projects that may require time away from the organisation? Does the organisation permit professors to consult on their own or take a leave of absence? Can the professor or student use facilities of the university or R&D institution for private research activities? 10 key Questions for Establishing a successful IP Policy

Question 10: How should scientists be encouraged and motivated? What kind of incentive schemes could foster not only research but also innovation activities? For example, staff training on IP knowledge, financial incentives or personal career development etc. 10 key Questions for Establishing a successful IP Policy

Recommendations on how Universities & Research Institutes can Enhance Innovation Enhancing entrepreneurship and boosting innovativeness at universities & research institutes requires a corresponding ecosystem (e.g. organized in accordance with the  one stop shop  principle) with TTO as its key component (  entry point  ), and IP Policy that encourage and provide incentives to researchers. The IP Policy has to be adapted in a manner that the institution is able to identify emerging inventions efficiently, asses and manage disclosed inventions in a systematic way, and addresses grand challenges (IP Policy has to be flexible and adaptive, i.e. able to evolve in response to changing circumstances.) Main challenges for enhancing innovation: –Harmonization of IP Policy with institutional and (inter-) national agreements, regulations and policy frameworks; –Providing funding aimed at bridging the gap between  embryonic  research results and demonstrations of PoC that would stimulate market exploitation (e.g. special funds can be established by leveraging proper (inter)national grants); –Available human resources & their ingrained mentality.

Contact data Anton Habjanič, D.Sc TechnoCenter at the University of Maribor Krekova ulica Maribor Slovenia Direct link to the Rules: Thank you for your attention!