The Evolution of the Presidency
Parliament or President? Parliamentary systems with a Prime Minister as chief executive are more common than directly elected president Prime Minister chosen by legislature, then he/she chooses cabinet from the parliament Prime Minister remains in power as long as his/her party maintains a majority
Presidents and Prime Ministers Differences Presidents could be outsiders, prime ministers always insiders Sitting members of Congress cannot simultaneously serve in the cabinet, members of parliament can Presidents have no guaranteed majority in the legislature, prime ministers always do Presidents and Congress often work at cross-purposes Even when one party controls both Consequence of separation of powers
Divided Government Presidents and Congress often working against each other Divided government happens when one party controls the White House and the other controls Congress Happens all the time (split ticket voting, everybody wants to block a policy at some point); unified government something of a myth Causes gridlock: But… Does it matter? Divided govt does about as well as a unified one in passing laws, conducting investigations, ratifying treaties, etc Parties themselves are ideologically diverse Unified governments really require same ideological wing of the party to control both branches
Evolution of the Presidency Concerns of the founders: both anarchy and monarchy Fear military power of the president (overpower states) Fear of presidential corruption by Senate (b/c they shared treaty-making power Fear of presidential bribery to ensure reelection Principal concern: balance power of legislative and executive branches
The Electoral College (yay, compromise!) Each state to choose its own method of selecting electors Electors would meet in their own capital to vote for president and vice-president House would decide the election if no candidate won a majority Electoral votes determined by adding the number of a state’s Senators to their Representatives
The President’s Term in Office George Washington set the precedent/tradition of 2 terms 22 nd amendment (1951) legally limited pres to 2 terms (thanks FDR) Founders also provided for the orderly transfer of power
The First Presidents Office was made legitimate by men active in independence and founding politics (founders worried over this) Minimal activism of early govt also lessen fears of the presidency Appointed people of stature in the community (rule of “fitness”) Relations with Congress were reversed: few vetoes, no advice from Congress to the pres.
Requirements 35 years old Natural born citizen 14 years of residency in the United States Term = four years, says Constitution Washington and his Amazing Precedent Codified by Twenty-second Amendment in 1951 (sorry, FDR)
The Jacksonians Jackson believed in a strong independent president Helped increase the power of the president through great veto use (none overridden) Demonstrated what a popular president could accomplish
Reemergence of Congress With brief exceptions, the next 100 years were a period of congressional dominance Intensely divided public opinion- partisanship, slavery sectionalism Only Lincoln expanded pres power Asserted “implied powers” and the express authorization of the president Justified by emergency conditions created by Civil War Congress again dominant until New Deal (T. Roosevelt and Wilson also strong) Even today: popular perception is that the president is center of govt. Contradicts reality of Congress being the public leader
Compensation $400,000 (plus perks)
“The Mansion”
“The West Wing”