2016-17 Gifted & Talented Students Education Program Grant Webinar April 12, 2016.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
New Eligibility and Individualized Educational Program (IEP) Forms 2007 Illinois State Board of Education June 2007.
Advertisements

Copyright © 2010 School Nutrition Association. All Rights Reserved. The Art of Grant Writing Melinda S. Turner, Superintendent.
Dr. Tracy Tucker Thomas Coy Arkansas Department of Education
Completing the Classroom Teacher and Non-Classroom Teacher Evaluations for Presented by: The Office of Talent Development Employee Evaluations.
Del Mar College Planning and Assessment Process Office of Institutional Research and Effectiveness January 10, 2005.
CULTURAL COMPETENCY Technical Assistance Pre-Application Workshop.
Enter System Name AdvancED TM External Review Exit Report Calhoun County School System Jacksonville, Alabama April 27-30, 2014.
Writing an Effective Proposal for Innovations in Teaching Grant
Beyond the Core Curriculum: Gifted Education in an RtI Framework
COLLEGE SPARK WASHINGTON 2012 Community Grants Program LOI Webinar 9/27/2011 9:30 AM 9/28/2011 2:00 PM.
Environmental Justice (EJ) & Community-Based Transportation Planning (CBTP) Grant Programs California Department of Transportation District 3 January 25,
Anamosa Community Schools Linda Mazunik Katy Kash February, 2012.
1 Common IEP Errors and Legal Requirements. 2 Today’s Agenda Parent Survey Results Procedural Compliance Self Assessment Results.
Overview of Gifted Implementation and Advanced Learning Program (ALP)
Designing and Implementing An Effective Schoolwide Program
What should be the basis of
performance INDICATORs performance APPRAISAL RUBRIC
Problem Solving Model Problem Solving Model NC DPI Summer Preparation Preparation & Implementation Implementation North Carolina.
Tennessee Promise Forward Mini- Grant Competition Tennessee Higher Education Commission Informational Webinar.
WELCOME! We will begin our webinar at the top of the hour As you log on, do not be surprised if you don’t hear anyone else; participants are placed on.
Institutional Effectiveness & B-CU Dr. Helena Mariella-Walrond VP of Institutional Effectiveness Cory A. Potter Director of Assessment Academic.
Reviewing the 2015 AmeriCorps Applications & Conducting the Review AmeriCorps External Review.
1 Executive Limitation 12: Curriculum and Instruction Darlene Westbrook Chief Academic Officer Denise Collier Executive Director for Curriculum Monitoring.
Strategies for a well thought out and researched proposal GRANT-WRITING 101.
Keystones to Opportunity Pennsylvania’s Vision for Sustainable Growth in Reading Achievement Curriculum Directors’ Meeting February 23, 2012.
Gifted and Talented Education Neil Cummins School Larkspur School District
NEW START-UP APPLICATION  Deadline to submit application is October 1 year prior to implementation  If proposal is ed, submit cover page.
South Western School District Differentiated Supervision Plan DRAFT 2010.
CFDA E 2012 Application Technical Assistance Webinar.
Define the project identify potential funding sources gather information write and package the proposal submit the proposal to a funder Piece of cake?
Gifted and Talented Education Grants Webinar March 10, 2014.
Building and Recognizing Quality School Systems DISTRICT ACCREDITATION © 2010 AdvancED.
Equitable Services, Part 2 Planning for Equitable Services Virginia Department of Education Office of Program Administration and Accountability Title I.
Staying on Message in Changing Times Oklahoma Statewide System of Support (SSOS) January 7, 2011 Dr. Cindy Koss, Assistant State Superintendent Oklahoma.
Using Formative Evidence to Identify High Ability/High Potential ELLs Annual Meeting of Bilingual-Bicultural Program Administrators/Educators April 10,
Gifted and Talented Education Grants Webinar April 11, 2013.
On Site Review Process Office of Field Services Last Revised 8/15/2011.
Chesapeake College Program Planning & Grant Proposal Writing Workshop Presented by: Pat Bates and Elizabeth Mahler October – November 2009.
1. 2 Department of Education Public Charter School Program  PURPOSE: To expand the number of high- quality charter schools by providing financial assistance.
Systems Accreditation Berkeley County School District School Facilitator Training October 7, 2014 Dr. Rodney Thompson Superintendent.
Welcome to today’s Webinar: Tier III Schools in Improvement We will begin at 9:00 AM.
Grant Proposal Writing
Gordon State College Office of Institutional Effectiveness Faculty Meeting August 5, 2015.
WELCOME!  The Physical Education Teacher Hire/ Professional Development Grant Application Webinar will begin in a few minutes!
Arkansas Science and Technology Authority Science Mini-Grant Program.
ESEA on Teacher Quality Pros Requires licensure, BA/BS, subject area knowledge Provides funding to states for PD Requires annual, measurable objectives.
NH Department of Education Developing the School Improvement Plan Required by NH RSA 193-H and Federal Public Law for Schools in Need of Improvement.
INFORMATION SESSION: GIFTED EDUCATION IN GVSD Great Valley School April 5,
TITLE X, PART C MCKINNEY-VENTO ACT The McKinney-Vento Homeless Assistance Act Grant Application FY Office of Federal Programs March 9 th, 2016.
JACKSON STATE UNIVERSITY ACADEMIC ASSESSMENT COMMITTEE WORKSHOP By: Dr. Shemeka McClung Director Ms. Arnitra Hunter Research Associate Institutional Research.
Crafting a Quality Grant Proposal March, 2016 ACCELERATED COLLEGE CREDIT GRANT.
Colorado Accommodation Manual Part I Section I Guidance Section II Five-Step Process Welcome! Colorado Department of Education Exceptional Student Services.
Teacher Innovation Grants Teresa Pierrie Program Director
Selection Criteria and Invitational Priorities School Leadership Program U.S. Department of Education 2005.
Teacher Licensure PI-34 Wisconsin’s New Process. New License Stages  Initial Educator 5 year, non-renewable  Professional Educator 5 year renewable.
DPI Javits Grant: Expanding Excellence Initiative State Leadership Cadre March 2016.
An overview presented by: Cheryl Dyer, Assistant Superintendent
Investing in Innovation (i3) Fund
Webinar: ESSA Improvement Planning Requirements
Washington Reading Corps Site Applicants
Annual Title I Meeting School Name Date.
Student Learning Outcome Assessment Plan
Gary Carlin, CFN 603 September, 2012
New Jersey Department of Education
Applicants’ Orientation Meeting
Parent Informational Meeting
Curriculum Committee Report
Title I Annual Meeting Pinewood Elementary, August 30, 2018.
APR Informational Webinar
S-STEM (NSF ) NSF Scholarships for Science, Technology, Engineering, & Mathematics Information Materials 6 Welcome! This is the seventh in a series.
Presentation transcript:

Gifted & Talented Students Education Program Grant Webinar April 12, 2016

Topics Webinar Housekeeping Overview of the Gifted and Talented Students Education Grant Components of the Application Narrative Application Review Process Tentative Timeline Application Package and Reviewer Benchmarks

Overview of the Gifted and Talented Education Grant To support systematic and continuous learning opportunities not ordinarily provided in the classroom to meet the educational needs of students with gifts and talents, grades K-12, in the areas of general intellectual, specific academic, creativity, leadership, and the visual and performing arts. Purpose $ 237,200** **Funding is contingent upon allocations in the State of Wisconsin Biennial Budget Allocation

Overview of the Gifted and Talented Education Grant Eligible Applicants Maximum Award: $30,000 per applicant All CESAs 501(c)(3) Nonprofit Organizations Institutions within the University of Wisconsin System Milwaukee Public Schools

Overview of the Gifted and Talented Education Grant Eligible Activities Systematic and continuous services not ordinarily provided in the classroom for students with gifts and talents Training necessary to provide these services

Overview of the Gifted and Talented Education Grant Ineligible Activities Administrative costs that exceed 15%Capital purchasesComputer hardware upgrades or maintenanceWeekend or summer programsFunding for co-curricular clubs, competitions, or activities

Narrative Components Abstract Provide a summary of the proposal which describes: –Local student needs to be addressed –Student outcomes –Student learning opportunities –Project evaluation

Narrative Components Needs Statement Identify the student needs the proposed project will address: * Use multiple measures * Attach a summary analysis of the evidence Describe the current local conditions* Describe the desired conditions* State the student needs

Narrative Components Needs Statement Two examples: –MAP data and information from district common assessments indicate the majority of high ability 3 rd grade students in the region are not meeting grade level expectations to provide reasons to support opinions in written opinion pieces. –Student-self assessment on the Leadership Inventory, observation notes from school counselors, and peer feedback reveal middle school students identified for services in leadership do not regularly use rules for collegial discussions.

Narrative Components Student Outcomes and Evidence of Success There are two components to this section: List specific student outcomes. State the expected student growth based on the gaps identified in the Needs Statement. Clearly identify the evidence that will be used to measure to what degree the student outcomes are met.

Narrative Components Student Outcomes and Evidence of Success Two examples: –Eighty-five percent of 3 rd grade students participating in the project will improve their ability to support claims with clear reasons and relevant evidence in written opinion pieces by one level on the Project Writing Rubric. –Ninety percent of participating middle school students will improve their ability to effectively participate in group discussions, measured by comparing a pre-administration and post-administration of the Leadership Inventory.

Narrative Components School and Student Participants Name the schools that will participate in the proposed project. Provide the number of students that will participate in each learning opportunity of the proposed project. Describe the process and procedures used to identify these schools and students: - List the identification measures/tools used to identify participating schools and students. - Identify the specific criteria used to select participants. Describe how the process, procedures, tools/measures, and criteria are culturally and linguistically responsive to identify a diverse range of students (i.e., economic conditions, race, gender, culture, native language, developmental differences, and disabilities). Be specific.

Narrative Components Program Description Describe in detail the student learning opportunities in which students will engage to achieve the students outcomes: –What are the learning opportunities? How do they result in the student outcomes? –When will the learning opportunities take place? Where will they take place? –How are they systematic and continuous (rather than a single event)? –How do they connect to the core curriculum in schools? –How do they represent opportunities not available in the regular classroom?

Narrative Components Project Implementation Plan Use the form in Section VIII of the application package. Supply details for each of the identified student outcomes and the associated learning opportunities. Include: –Estimated costs –Detailed timeline –Person/position responsible for leadership and implementation

Narrative Components Sustainability Explain how the project will build school capacity to sustain services for students with gifts and talents.

Narrative Components Evaluation Use Form IX to provide a detailed plan for assessing the degree to which each student outcome was met. Supply the following information for each student outcome: Evidence that will be used to measure to what degree the student outcome was met Methods to analyze evidence Person/position responsible for analyzing evidence

Narrative Components Budget There are two steps to this section: First… Provide a detailed budget narrative. Clearly indicate how project costs were calculated. Use State Guidelines for expenditures. Then… Complete the Budget Summary Form (Section X of the application package).

Narrative Components Nonprofit Status Attach a copy of the organization’s IRS federal tax exemption determination letter. Please note this applies only to 501(c)(3) organizations. CESAs, Milwaukee Public Schools, and institutions within the University of Wisconsin system do not need to submit this documentation

Grant Review Process External Peer Review Internal Review Office of the State Superintendent

Tentative Application Timeline EventDate Grant Writing WebinarApril 12, 2016 Application DeadlineMay 20, 2016 Peer ReviewJune 6, 2016 Acceptance NotificationJuly 1, 2016 Funds Available for Use*July 1,2016 Deadline for Project Completion June 30, 2017 Deadline for Annual ReportSeptember 15, 2017 Deadline for Final ClaimSeptember 30, 2017 * NOTE: Funding is contingent upon allocations in the State of Wisconsin Biennial Budget

Application and Reviewer Benchmarks The Gifted and Talented Students Education Grant application and the reviewer benchmarks are available on the DPI Gifted & Talented website at

Chrys Mursky Consultant, Gifted and Talented, Advanced Placement, and International Baccalaureate Wisconsin Department of Public Instruction